Is there a minimum requirement for screen time to be eligible for an Oscar?

Is there a minimum requirement for screen time to be eligible for an Oscar?

If you had blinked at the wrong time you would have missed Regina King's entire role in Beale Street, yet she won the Oscar for it.

Attached: GettyImages-1127207802.jpg (3410x2272, 2.13M)

rules dont apply to niggers

Why are Negress's so masculine,
look at those fucking shoulders, might as well just fuck a dude.

Yes, I forgot what the screen time rules were but they exist.

Never saw the movie, what was her screentime?

The actress that won for Network was only in one scene, maybe 3 minutes of screen time

they genuinely have higher test than other women

Anthony Hopkins got an award for LEADING actor in The Silence of the Lambs for fucks sake. I don't think there's a requirement.

Africans have the lowest factor of sexual dimorphism among any species of homo sapiens.

>BLACK PRIVILEGE
IT WAS BECAUSE SHE HAS BLACK SKIN

Reminds me of when Judi Dench won she was like "Why did I get this?"

>Patricia Neal in Hud (1963) – 21 minutes and 51 seconds
>Beatrice Straight in Network (1976) – 5 minutes and 2 seconds
>Hermione Baddeley was nominated for Room at the Top (1959) – 2 minutes and 19 seconds

I don't have an exact time stamp but in total over the whole she's only prominently in 2 scenes, in which her spotlight must be somewhere in the ballpark of 8 minutes maybe, other than that she's basically set dressing or a talking head.

The father characters of both Tish and Fonny are in an equal amount of the film (or maybe a bit more) and are just as valuable to the film as she is, and their performances are just as good. Yet neither of them were ever mentioned in any awards since the release.

If Beale Street Could Talk unironically looks really kino

fuck niggers

Attached: 1550995384293.jpg (879x656, 224K)

Regina King absolutely deserved it, she was great in Beale Street, really the best part of the movie, other than the score.

I don't think there are any rules about screentime, especially for supporting categories. I know actors and actresses have won in roles where they had as low as five minutes of screentime (Beatrice Straight in Network, for example.)

It's pretty good. Infinitely better than Moonlight, probably because this was based on a book.

Did you even see the movie? The scenes with her in Purto Rico were the best in the film. Not sure she deserved to win over Stone and Weisz, but it was a very good performance, and certainly more substantial than previous winners. I'd wager she had more screentime than Anthony Hopkins did in Silence of the Lambs, and he won Lead Actor.

OP here, it is a good movie, I liked it. I just felt like she was an odd choice for the Oscar, I feel like Weisz deserved it more so.

She looks like she beats men up

they even have higher test than white ""men""

Weisz and Stone both being nominated probably split the votes. Wiesz was really good, but I think King deserved it overall.

Is there a definitive determining factor for if a person is a lead or support?

Emma Stone was basically the anchor for that movie, much of it revolved around how the events effected her and she was by far the most focused on character. I would have never considered her anything but the lead of that movie. I don't understand how Colman was the lead, is it something to do with the story?

they are bred that way, like work dogs were, but now we keep them as pets

>Is there a definitive determining factor for if a person is a lead or support?
I don't think so. Much of the Academy's decisions are made arbitrarily; in the interest of getting a lot of celebrities to show up, and to ensure people will watch. Stone probably wouldn't have been nominated if she wasn't as big of a draw as she is right now, I don't think her performance was anything special.