What are some albums for when you're a privileged LA girl that has unprotected anal with strangers...

why do you care what some random woman does with her body? phoebe bridgers having an abortion is none of your concern or worthy of your time thinking about. i will never understand the mentality of these pro life evangelical nutjobs

your mom should have aborted

>does with her body
She didn't kill herself, she killed her child, which had its own separate body.
>phoebe bridgers having an abortion is none of your concern
She made it public. You announce things publicly to bring it to the public's attention.
>i will never understand the mentality of these pro life evangelical nutjobs
And I will never understand the mentality of someone who refuses to have safe sex and then murders their child, when contraception is so easily available.

Women are never held responsible for their actions

have sex

She will never fuck you

I do and because I use condoms, I've never had my unborn child murdered.

It's not kept private, and that faked guitar smash was just pathetic. Should be considered a criminal act, really.

you missed OP

based babykiller making christcucks seethe

there are no real christians here, all larpers

Stalin banned abortion, and it's heavily restricted in North Korea and China and plenty of religious non-Christian nations. Believe it or not, it's not just Christians opposed to the murder of the unborn.

>murder of the unborn.

Attached: 2321312312.gif (498x468, 93.79K)

That's (You) when Roe is overturned kek.

overturning row v wade isnt even about the issue of abortion. libtards dont seem to understand the issue

youtube.com/shorts/eqBfSPgsrKw

She's shitting her son rn

Yeah and those are all authoritarian shitholes. Really great company yall "small government" Republicans are keeping.

A fetus isn't a baby, cry harder.
Abortions were legal under Lenin's rule and China has a long, complicated history with abortion and birth rates, you're just seeing what you want.

Didn't your people literally just bomb and vandalise a pro life office?

>A fetus isn't a baby
sure it is, what kind of nonsense is this? "baby" is a colloquialism that describes the unborn the same as infants

all those sperms are also dying babies.

bet you feel guilty now...

not aware of "my people" doing shit, but i do recall decades of evangelical nutjobs doing that to planned parenthood clinics

That's not how biology works

literally no, not any more than babies are dying off during a woman's period. sperm and unfertilized eggs are nothing more than the DNA of those who produced them, while a fertilized egg and fetus are genetically unique

Imagine defending abortion by using moronic catholic logic about jizz

imagine if every time someone jerked off you had some evangelical republicans claiming you were murdering the unborn and they needed to ban ejaculation outside of marriage, using the NSA surveillance techniques to monitor when men jerk off or watch porn and saying theyre doing it to protect the sanctity of life and prevent degeneracy or whatever, all contraception gets banned outside marriage, all porn is banned, men are forced to get vasectomies if they want to have sex without getting a girl pregnant. the tune would change REAL quick, bet you

I don't believe in small conservative. I believe in a large government to punish people like you and Phoebe.
>Abortions were legal under Lenin's rule
Which is why I said Stalin and not Lenin. Stalin was just as much of a non-Christian as Lenin.
>China has a long, complicated history with abortion and birth rates
Sure, but as it stands now, abortion is restricted in the nation.
>you're just seeing what you want.
Not really. What state mandated non-religious countries allow super liberalized abortion?
>A fetus isn't a baby, cry harder.
This is literally semantics. A fetus is an unborn human child.
Please learn the basics of biology before you embarrass yourself like this.

Oh, so youre a fascist. Fair enough.

There's a difference between seminal emissions which can happen regardless of whether you masturbate or not and a woman's period and a fertilized egg which then develops into a baby. You're just retarded.

the difference is one involves a woman meaning the republicans will do everything they can to come up with an excuse to restrict their rights

Republicans aren't banning women from having periods, which is the equivalent of men jerking off, they're banning them from murdering their unborn children after fertilization. And even then, they're only throwing it to the states. I hope they eventually completely ban it though.

you are killing potential humans, there is not much knowledge required.

sperm left unattended will not turn into a baby.

This is an actual argument that npcs are using nowadays?

>She didn't kill herself, she killed her child, which had its own separate body.
u wut?
the fetus grows out of the mother's body. it's literally one of her cells that starts dividing

Fetuses are humans regardless of whether they're born or not. They aren't another species, retard.
It's actually very hard to defend abortion, which is why their arguments are so terrible.

a fetus aborted also will not turn into a baby

>It's actually very hard to defend abortion
no it isn't

>the fetus grows out of the mother's body.
Sure, that doesn't mean the fetus itself is her body, which is why you can kill a fetus without killing the mother. Or even vice versa in some circumstances.
it's literally one of her cells that starts dividing
Both the fetus and mother have their own unique cells.
Well certainly no one in this thread's done a good job of doing so.

>Which is why I said Stalin and not Lenin. Stalin was just as much of a non-Christian as Lenin.
My point is that you're making a wrong generalisation to prove your point. Lenin legalised abortions and they were legalised again after Stalin's death. He was the odd one out, the Reds sided with women on a lot of issues for an early 20th century political party.
>Sure, but as it stands now, abortion is restricted in the nation.
Again, taking a small segment of history and looking at it on a vacuum is not the most reasonable argument.
>This is literally semantics. A fetus is an unborn human child.
Fine, let me rephrase that.
A fetus is not a child, cry harder.

pro-abortion = master morality
anti-abortion = slave morality
simple as

You can semantically refer to it as an unborn child instead of a baby, which is what the definition of "fetus" is, but don't act as if it changes anything.

>thread is full of roasties coping with the fact that they are murderers.

okay
>a child killed will not turn into an adult
what point are you trying to make?

bitches need to be kept in line or they abandon the one responsibility they're actually needed for in any society

Libtards believe in "my body my choice" except when it comes to Vax mandates

>it's literally one of her cells that starts dividing
>Both the fetus and mother have their own unique cells.
are you denying that the fetus starts as the mother's egg cell

only white women should not be allowed abortions

Theyre not humans until they are born

a fetus starts a zygote a unique cell total different to the moms egg or dads sperm cell

>everyone I don't like is fascist
Retarded commie

>starts as the mother's egg cell
no, it's a fertilized egg, which is something and someone else entirely. a fetus is not part of the mother's body, it's genetically unique

what is there to argue? you do like killing sperm, but once it starts dividing it's a no go?

surely you would have to be extremely narrow minded to dismiss abortion completely.

The question would probably come to what stage of abortion is defendable, which i assume most would determine based on the level of sentience or awareness the fetus has

>My point is that you're making a wrong generalisation to prove your point
No I'm not. The argument was that only Christians opposed abortion, and I provided numerous historical examples of that not being the case. That's not a "generalization."
>Lenin legalised abortions and they were legalised again after Stalin's death
It wasn't legalized, it was less criminalized. Abortion was still technically illegal and again, all of these men were as irreligious as the other.
>the Reds sided with women on a lot of issues for an early 20th century political party.
Lenin did, this wasn't true of most communist states though. As we're talking about China as well, it was also illegal under Mao.
>Again, taking a small segment of history and looking at it on a vacuum is not the most reasonable argument.
It's not a small segment of history.
>A fetus is not a child, cry harder.
By very definition it is, and you're the only one crying now that abortion is being btfo'd.

So did Ceacescu in Romania. He banned abortion and Romania ended up having a problem with their orphanages being overcrowded and having a bunch of them be neglected or adopted by Westerners. The goal was to boost the birth rates of Romania, but it ended up just creating more orphans and forcing women into situations where they couldnt take care of the child

>you do like killing sperm, but once it starts dividing it's a no go?
are you pretending like there's no appreciable difference? is that what you're resorting to?

chuds literally do the same.

you're really going to say it's hard to defend abortion and descend to this ridiculous level of mental gymnastics when confronted with a fairly simple argument

>basic biology and objective observation used to contextualize it
>mental gymnastics
oh, you're retarded

You literally said you wanted an authoritarian right wing government that punishes people you dont like and were distinct from a "small conservative". Thats as fascist as it gets

I think we have a candidate for a late-term abortion