Oscar noms

No she absolutely did not, faggot. We didn't even have proof the two even met. And now she's on a publicity tour.

Attached: 1513126676880.png (866x900, 94K)

she got tons of money from this
maybe more from politican

Ford gave the best performance and still has the cliffhanger .00001% chance of being "based on a true story"
Phillips is a seasoned actor, but couldn't decide if he wanted to be the protagonist or antagonist of the story.
Jussie just mailed in his performance. Just sloppy work all around.

Ford or Smollett. Nathan Phillips was decent, but you could tell he has mental issues and was bullshitting for years, with no one listening. Ford's was more dramatic, probably more despicable as well. That being said, Jussie is going to have more "staying power" with his trial and conviction. Tough call.

Attached: 1538859418840.jpg (1013x1024, 85K)

>went through a real incident
She's a trained liar and actress, every single emotional mannerism she went through down to her teary-eyed "indelible in the hippocampus" monologue was fucking carefully rehearsed to push an agenda. She was partners with numerous other quacks who did fraudulent "studies" on recovering repressed memories of rapes that didn't happen. And she was primed to be used against Romney when he went up against Obama and then quickly shelved to be pulled out again at a later date when they needed her.

good bait

Attached: 1530250207909.jpg (851x666, 57K)

You're literally just the flip side of people that automatically side with Jussie or Nathan Phillips. "My team's guy has to be a good guy. He's on my team!"

Yeah no sorry my side actually has the carefully researched evidence and documented fact on it.
You really need to keep up, your le epic centrist shit doesn't cut it when you just embarrass yourself by not knowing any of the facts of the case.

>I was molested in high school to the point that it still bothers me today as a 55 year old hag
>I can't remember the place, when/where it happened, or the other people there
>but I remember Kavanaugh 100%!
>btw nobody can corroborate my story
She's a fucking liar.

Have some fucking nuance you drones. She was obviously a real victim of abuse who thought it was maybe Kavanaugh but once Democrats knew about it they bullied and pressured her into doubling-down and accusing Kavanaugh. Don't be mad at the victim, be mad at the fucking soulless evil politicians who abused a rape victim and tried to destroy an honest man's life because they were still salty Obama's pick got blocked.

Ford simply because she there isn't any objective evidence that she lied. There's objective evidence the others lied. Otherwise, I'd say Jussie.

>She was obviously a real victim of abuse
Oof

>I know she was a victim because my feelings
>p-please don't look at the evidence, that will just upset me

Actually I take it back about "isn't any objective evidence."
There was the contradictory statement she gave, but nothing like videos and pictures like the other 2.

her act was terrible though and the only reason people pretended to believe it was so they could look like a decent person
liar never got raped by anyone and tried to ruin an innocent mans life

>maybe Kavanaugh
She said she was 100% sure it was Kavanaugh when she was questioned. She is just as guilty as the democrats and she's done nothing but profit off this publicity since it occurred.

There's actually quite a bit of evidence that shows she lied about numerous things in her testimony. The best you can say is that you can't disprove the negative that she ever met Kavanaugh, which is irrelevant fluff in light of all the actual documented contradictions, errors, and outright lies she did tell of her own volition.

>Yeah no sorry my side actually has the carefully researched evidence
Nuh uh! *obvious lies* My friends say this bitch is wrong.

Compelling stuff.

>when you just embarrass yourself by not knowing any of the facts of the case.
Why would I bother watching something so boring and pointless closely? Either way, if you weren't so partisan and butthurt you would be able to see clearly how much of an obvious scumbag the guy is, whether he did the dirty or not.

>equating your feelings with documented evidence
It doesn't work that way user, sorry. But by all means avoid investigating the facts and instead keep getting increasingly emotional because your side HAS to be right because that's what you want to be true.

You can chalk some stuff up to trauma I guess, even though what she described doesn't sound all that traumatic. Anybody focusing on her is focused on the wrong area. The democrats who used her are the ones who deserve scorn.

Don't forget that first she said he raped her. Then it was molested. Then it was "he pushed me onto a bed and it might have been an accident".

she could have said no, she deserves all the scorn given

>your side
I don't have a side. That's what people don't get and how I can tell you're operating from a place of ideological motivated emotion. It's all team sport for you, not honest assessment.

Amy Schumer.

>indelible in the hippocampus.....

Who the fuck else could pull that off?

>I don't have a side
Enlightened centrist after "just the facts" everyone, watch out

read this

assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4952137/Rachel-Mitchell-s-analysis.pdf

Ford had so many inconsistencies and even admitted to knowingly foregoing fbi interviews in private in favor of a televised hearing in 5 minute blocks.

>but Ford went through a real incident
allegedly

She was the resident cumdumpster of the dorm, you retarded faggot. She fucked something like 64 people in high school alone. She ran an intelligence community recruitment program at Stanford. Her dad is a member of the intelligence community. She's related by family ties to Peter fucking Strzuk. The cunt who helped prep her for the whole thing was an ex-fed friend of hers named Monica McLean. Kill yourself, you NPC brainlet motherfucker.

Attached: omwneoztg9421.png (623x302, 12K)

Attached: Allegedy.gif (480x253, 1.03M)

>rape victim
She didn't even claim to have been raped.