Will it be good?

Attached: Addams family.jpg (1280x720, 155K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xFCrR3Uw6Mk
youtube.com/watch?v=ck_Yfm9VML8
youtube.com/watch?v=F3jnymeJof4
youtube.com/watch?v=jqQwzgixHAM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I've yet to see anything that leads me to believe so.

I remain fairly confident that it won't be the worst animated film released this year.

No

I don't know. Just give me the Morticia lewds.

this year is bad for animation

so nahhh

BASED

>Jersey Shore with the Addams Family

might be fun.

trailer?

Yeah, there is one. It's probably on Youtube.

link?

Probably not. I'll watch it anyway, though.

youtube.com/watch?v=xFCrR3Uw6Mk

Not if you can't type a complete sentence.

It's directed by the Sausage Party guys, so most likely not.

With jews you never win, so no

It was never good to begin with

What do jews have to do with this being good or not?

I think it'll turn out okay, nothing special. The disgusting side characters really sour it though.

It's weird because the addams family are better looking than "normal" people.

Why are all the classic songs being replaced by monkey sounds nowadays?

Monkey sounds?

Why do they talk so much ? All of them
They just talk and talk and talk

Probably (too) inoffensive.

these are the new sounds, racist grandpa

Why does this film look so damn cheap? Shit looks like those direct to dvd CG film we used to see in the late 2000s.

It's easier to animate. That's why a lot of cartoons have a lot talking.

>The disgusting side characters really sour it though.
That's going to kill the movie. The Addams family are a fish out of water joke. The movie dropped the ball on the out of water part
>Adams family walk around in a rich neighborhood. Pugsly starts drinking out of a dog bowl
That right there is "out of water" joke. You see the Addams family are different.
>Morticia tells him not to drink it all, and the random person might also by thirsty.
You have another Addams continuing the joke, but now they handed it over to an "outsider" to finish the joke
>Random guy turns and runs in fear
That's how you know this movie is going to be shit. The guy doesn't say anything. I mean you could have a rich guy walking his dog and then stop to give it water only to realize pugsly is already drinking then have him look down on the Addams family and when Morticia ask him if he wants some he can get mad and leave. But no they got fucking lazy and just did a scream and have the character run away. That action of him screaming is completely unwarranted from pugsly doing something bizzare.


That's why the movie is not going to be good. Addams do something bizzare, townsfolk reaction is worse than the original Addams family action.

All the non-Addams characters look like reject Lorax movie characters.

I think you're overthinking one joke

Once...just fucking once can I watch an animated trailer set in modern day where NOBODY says "Awesome!"

Attached: 1391556300601.jpg (429x410, 30K)

I just think the people who are not Adams family, are going to bring this movie down.

MGM still exists?

Some casino company is making a cartoon?

No, because Raúl Juliá is irreplaceable as Gomez Addams.

Uncle Fester too. He was never my favorite Adams, but after the trailer, damn do I miss the old Festers.

Attached: tumblr_mhgd06Mn1r1rt8mkvo2_500.gif (500x240, 897K)

Attached: tumblr_n8vqy1XnW31tx21j0o1_500.gif (500x250, 495K)

>No, because Raúl Juliá is irreplaceable as Gomez Addams.
He was not even the best Gomez. Astin was always better, because he created the Gomez everyone has aped since. Juliá's Gomez is a take on Astin's Gomez, and you don't do Astin's Gomez better than Astin.

Is that Anton LaVey at 1:34

Attached: THIS IS GONNA BE LIT.jpg (180x260, 8K)

why is gomez fat? he's always been a svelte suave dude

They're based of the OG designs

Attached: Addams_Family_sketch_Charles_Addams.jpg (460x414, 68K)

based and Juliapilled

So, are they supposed to be rich?

very

You ever think about how MGM just has NO franchises?

James Bond is licensed and the estate handles most of it.

And beyond that they just don't have any mainstream franchises at all.

Basically I'm saying this feels like a desperate attempt to get the megabux other studios do.

Attached: 1567875104407.png (186x186, 97K)

No

do they ever explain why

This Gomez sounds terrible, like nobody was sure what they wanted to do with his voice to make him Raulish or sound like Astin. He sounds like a hot mess and Mortica isn't any better.

Why didn't they just cast Tim Curry?

old old OLD money.

Various things is they have much always been warmongers and invest in the things that deal with death Coffin Makers Tombstone Carvers Toxic Waste Disposal that kinda thing.

He had a Stroke about a decade or so ago. Been in recovery for a while.

Okay Okay, Sounds like them moving to a rich neighborhood doesn't sound that much of a stretch

That's a funny way to spell "John Astin"

For TV and Film both are the Standard

Wasn't there another character that's just hair and speaks gibberish.

Yeah, cousin ITT. Snoop Dogg plays him in this.

he speaks in mumble talk, tho. is he gonna clear his throat and speak snoop?

It'd be weird if he didn't

In the trailer it looks like his voice is altered

Not really. More like an exaggerated observation, but it still has merit.
The summed up point is that they're never going to deliver good comedy, just fast comedy. The punch line is just 'instant reaction' not, natural observation.
And if that's the goal they're setting out for a comedic standard, then there are very VERY low hopes for this movie.

Wait, Seth Rogan's involved with this?

Figures...

No, Conrad Vernon and some dude named Greg are. They directed SP, Rogen was only involded in writing that movie.

Because they put all the money toward the voice cast.

oh jesus christ there's gonna be an itt rap during the credits isn't there

meh, as long as it stays during the credits it's fine. The original movies had MC Hammer during the credits.

Ever heard the term "Flanderization"?

youtube.com/watch?v=ck_Yfm9VML8

"Flanderization" isn't even possible because there was never any depth to begin with. Its a series of one panel one joke comics centered around morose gallows humor. Its like saying Marmaduke can get Flanderized, you can't because you can't take way from it to make it focus on a singular character trait because thats what it already is.

This is a very good post.

It's weird, having Wednesday next to the actual freak of natures that are the background characters in this movie makes her look alot cuter; but I liked her design already in the first place.
Also holy FUCK I don't think anyone could stomach having to see that Parker chick for an hour long film.

true

The live action tv show is the gold standard no adaptation can measure up to

youtube.com/watch?v=F3jnymeJof4

Attached: giphy.gif (640x480, 984K)

Why did they make wednesday addams ugly?

No its not lol that guy is jerking himself off over using a thesaurus and he sounds like an idiot.

Reminds me of that shitty MC hammer song.

youtube.com/watch?v=jqQwzgixHAM

>You don't want her to think your square do you?
>Squaare?
>Yeah! You want her to think you boss!
Booosss?
God damn Wednesday that's way too cute.

>this year is bad for animation

You can say that again

Attached: 6C5A0495-E87C-45EB-88A3-679735D84594.jpg (466x1141, 180K)

Holy shit America is not doing well this year.

>playmobil the movie

...What?? I guess they're trying hard to play off the lego movies but considering the sequel to lego movie wasn't well received it seemed like a lightning strike of success.

Attached: itshim.png (414x437, 105K)

How to train your dragon was good

I think it's more about box office.

Basically every animated film except TS4 unperformed this year.

You think we're heading towards the end of cartoony/stylized CGI like we did with 2D. Back in the 2000s 2D films were flopping left and right.

I half expected the frogs to start singing Hello My Baby.

Nah, that'd actually be funny.

We’re now in the era of live-action and hyperrealistic remakes of animated movies.

That's sad

Angry Birds 2 was alright. Not great, not shit.

this year is bad for animation

so nahhh

Adding to this user, I've yet to see anything bar the teaser, so I have no clue what they're even attempting.

Needs more Debbie.

Attached: ....jpg (384x400, 24K)

no, it will be trash just like everything else

I wanna vomit every time I see Wednesday’s friend.

Attached: 5749BCC1-8E84-4D41-9534-578F0E426090.png (945x640, 761K)

Jesus Christ

We need new DreamWorks. Studio that will shake the animation industry.

Who left Disney recently?

2 of them are already gay flagged?

For the record:

>Missing Link
$16.6 million
>UglyDolls
$27.5 million
>The Angry Birds Movie 2
$111.7 million
>Wonder Park
$119.6 million
>The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part
$191.3 million
>The Secret Life of Pets 2
$428 million
>How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
$519.9 million
>Toy Story 4
$1,058.1 million
>The Lion King
$1,617.8 million

Nostalgia sells so well.

Attached: disney.gif (501x585, 11K)

Wednesday Addams isn't fuckable.

3/10

That's not even "ugly in an appealing way" like Psychonauts was

Attached: bacon.jpg (1023x802, 276K)

Visuals aside (they are in no way irredeemable), this trailer is an audio assault on all that is decent.
It's like an audible attempt to appeal to every possible demographic at once, sped up.

Attached: 1478779725554.png (776x377, 192K)

What?

Satanist here, yes and no
Anton's aesthetic was taken from other sources, his shaved head and goatee were intentionally chosen to give him a devilish appearance
So yes, it's a look Anton made famous, but no it's not LaVey.

Attached: 1567335846698.jpg (400x533, 57K)

Why is every American animation horrible CGI now?

Because every other attempt at good 2D animation in the cinema bombs. Easier to produce a shitty looking CG film with half the effort, and still get more than your money back

Attached: 9F4124A6-27E9-42F7-8F6E-D99054E7AAAA-343-000000409F7016B8.jpg (900x474, 64K)

He's always fat in cartoon form and skinny in live action form.

Bunch of CG films have been bombing lately. Even Pets 2 severely underperformed (though it certainly won't lose any money).
Odds are this film will flop too. When was the last time an animated film by MGM was successful?

MGM makes animated movies??

name a single time anything to do with the addams family has been good

t. munster

US released was pushed to December, they want to compete with Fro2en of all things!

Meanwhile toys are already on the shelves. On clearance even.

Who is THIS semen demon?

Attached: b4291017-3431-470d-8961-0225cbf1737dlarge.png (960x696, 672K)

no

I honestly have nothing against this movie, but the reminder of Raul Julia's Gomez destroys any care I can give to this. He just took that character to the grave with him

I think that, like Ledger's Joker, Julia became the standard for the average viewer, not that I have anything against his portrayal.

No. It will not be good. I am expecting the somewhere between the quality of the Emoji movie, and Shrek 3.
>the reminder of Raul Julia's Gomez destroys any care I can give to this
This, if you're going to reboot the series, you need to move the quality forward.

>That retarded-looking Gomez
Thank God for the iterations we got on TV and Movies

Is anybody else really depressed by this movie? I love the Addams family so much, and yes they are supposed to be campy, but this... this is so cheap looking, and I don’t even get a hint of dark aesthetic in it. It’s like whoever made this was frustrated they had to make an Addams family movie, because they wanted to work on the next Ugly Dolls.

Attached: 8FFE3174-4F49-4407-9397-BACC3F13D6C6.png (639x474, 436K)

What the fuck is up with the chick on the right?

Seriously, I get the Addam's looking funky and weird but these other characters look freakier than Wednesday.

I was thinking the same when I saw this. The previous movies were pretty perfect.

Fat Gomez?

Absofuckinglutely not.

He was always a little squat in the original New Yorker comics.

Attached: Addams_Family_-_The_little_dears.jpg (500x657, 123K)

Sorry, that was a bad example

Attached: Addams Family report card.jpg (537x640, 92K)

Attached: Addams Family Christmas 4.jpg (600x468, 53K)

You said it, not me.

god no wonder people think Steven universe is good when this is type of shit is seen as the standard

>Satanist here

Attached: f2mba5spaj701.jpg (1536x2048, 290K)

Debbie Jellinsky Addams, wife and psycho.

I’ll watch it for Charlize, who is my South African Queen.

Why is this so good? Everyone just playing their asses off and looking like they have fun doing it.

>looking like they have fun doing it.
Because of this. The difference between great comedy and good comedy, is that in a great comedy the comedian himself is having fun and finds the jokes funny.

based

I doubt the target audience knows who any of these characters are, but it looks decent enough.

why do they slaughter the fucking music

>rap

Attached: 1456743.jpg (345x323, 14K)

i want morticia to squeeze my head with her thighs

Munsters > Addams Family

I love the character designs but holy shit the teaser trailer was a huge "oh no" for me. Perhaps the movie will be okay but that first teaser kills any hype i'd like to have. It's too current day and in no way timeless like the raul julia movie