Why do CG characters always have irises but 2D characters just have black dots?

Bullshit, but I will say that Pixar's more realistic iris style is overrated and unnecessary.

>One: Yes they do
You stupid retard.

>Two: Detailed irises are not easier to draw, you dingus.
You illiterate stupid retard.

Attached: file.png (808x418, 447K)

>Why do CG characters always have irises but 2D characters just have black dots?

Attached: file.png (480x360, 69K)

>Why do CG characters always have irises but 2D characters just have black dots?
>>One: Yes they do
>Two: Detailed irises are not easier to draw, you dingus.
Should i continue?

Attached: file.png (480x368, 142K)

The Captain Underpants movie would like a word with you.

Attached: AAAABQiLj97wmnKM0_m5UJrEg5CmzoM4VEApYOprRbGWs2hHm4doXm5xQc1Jhj0038An_yuMw37wbbLkewyjTnTB_IHafrrCjlbg (1280x720, 107K)

Attached: file.png (720x540, 488K)

Fun trivia. Box jellyfish are unique among jellyfish because they have fully developed compound eyes similar to humans. They can rotate any direction to see out of the jelly's transparent body. They still don't have or apparently need a brain.

Guys why do literally all 2D cartoons only use black dots for eyes and have no iris'??

Me no understand, me no unga bunga comprehend.

Attached: file.png (640x480, 273K)

Me no understand am why draw monkeys no ever do draw color in eyeball??

Attached: file.png (1256x739, 1.13M)

how do anyone explain reason for why no iris in 2D draw cartoon why am only 3D mobie boobie movie?

Unga bunga unga unga.

Attached: file.png (289x391, 162K)

>always
>>One: Yes they do
Hahahahahaha god damn imagine not only making such a retarded statement but doubling down on it as if you were even remotely close to being correct ahahahahahha you fucking moron.

Attached: file.png (640x480, 284K)

I legit can't remember the last time I saw OP get owned this hard. What a faggot.

Watch better shows.

Attached: entrapta waifu.jpg (1920x1080, 207K)

Is it a bunch of ESL faggots in here? Unless you're writing a science paper, people normally say "always" as a hyperbolic word to mean "often". Or, judging by the double posts and half IPs, is it just some samefag patting himself on the back? Because I'm gonna guess this guy is.

Post one.

The problem is that OP doubled down on his "always" here: so people started dogpiling on him because he made a point of specifying that his original wording was literal.

Get fucked, OP.

Attached: Capture.png (1681x614, 79K)

Get fucked, samefag.

Attached: 1567278483076.gif (652x349, 283K)

>14 posters
>I quoted 8 besides myself
>"samefag"
You're embarrassing yourself.

Neat. Not him, but I had no idea you could do that.

OP here.

That's not me.

This is my second post in the thread.

Attached: Test.png (786x898, 159K)

>cgi is soulless

>Proves you can hide other (You)'s
>"NUH-UH"

Imagine having no retort for that.

There are still more people than two user.

Are you retarded? How could I fake there being 14 IPs in the thread? Where are all these posters who aren't mocking the OP? And furthermore, if I used that trick to hide the (You)s WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T I HAVE ERASED MY OWN YOU ABSOLUTE SPERG

There being 14 posters in the thread does NOT mean 8 of those posts are 8 individual people.Especially when, at the time, there were about 27 or so posts in the thread.

You're a goddamn idiot.

>Merely pretending to be retarded
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAA

Attached: file.png (499x463, 272K)

Jesus, this is just sad. Cope with the fact that you have no response to my second point, faggot.
>if I used that trick to hide the (You)s WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T I HAVE ERASED MY OWN YOU ABSOLUTE SPERG
Just cope.

I posted this thing and I'm not OP.

>WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T I HAVE ERASED MY OWN YOU ABSOLUTE SPERG
Because that's the whole point of the gif, you fucking retard. You hide every (You) but one to make it seem like you're NOT a samefag.

That's why posting a screencap as "evidence" is fucking retarded and why I'm calling you out on it. Whether or not you are a samefag isn't the point, but the idea that, "LOOK SEE PROOOOOF" is autistic when it's so fucking easy to manipulate.

This. Get fucked by a cactus OP, you sentient blob.

You really are retarded. I hate to have to spell this out for you, but it doesn't help me look better to have quoted myself. You could have pounced on that and said I was patting myself on the back. But no, instead you go on this ludicrous tangent about being able erase (You)s when I would only benefit from making them all look like other people's posts.

Ok

Attached: Test2.png (697x176, 39K)

> but it doesn't help me look better to have quoted myself.
It makes it look like only one of them is you and you are not a samefag. That's the point of the gif. Are you an idiot? Do you not understand how that works?

>You're a samefag!
>No I'm not, see? Only ONE of these people are me!
>You can easily manipulate that, you know.
>SHUT THE FUCK UPPPPPPPPP REEEEEEEEEEEEE

I'm starting to think you need to lurk more if you don't understand this shit.

Also, you waste of sperm, about half of those pictures I quoted are named file.png, implying it's a mobile user. Now you have to postulate that I was phoneposting too, all because you can't cope with the fact that more than one person called you out on your idiocy.

>Exactly 1 minute apart
>Trying to pretend he's not a samefag.

Oh buddy, you just messed up. I didn't even see this post when I made the response just now.

see

>You can't change file names on a computer

Yikes, imagine being so DESPERATE to prove you're NOT a samefag, lol.

I didnt even accuse you of samefagging you fucking idiot ahahahhaahhahhahahahahahha wow what a fucking retard ahhahahahahahaha.

Attached: file.png (626x480, 382K)

Ok, then, I guess I give up? I didn't think my thread would get hijacked by the grammar police.

Attached: 23423523536.png (511x296, 225K)

You're still wrong tho

Holy FUCK are you dense. Why would I make it look like only one of them is me when I could make it look like NONE of them are me? What's a greater defeater of your claim, "proof" that I'm not a samefag patting myself on the back, or an admission that I patted myself once?

Why does it even matter if they're samefags or not you fucking retard. It wouldnt change how completely blown the fuck out you were.

... Because if you're not the poster of ANY of the posts, then the "samefag" comment is not directed to you. Are you fucking stupid?

>two likeminded people can't post 1 minute apart about how the OP is objectively retarded
yikes

>It wouldnt change how completely blown the fuck out you were.

Why are you saying (you) like I made the thread?
What the fuck is going on in this thread? Am I getting punked by some summerfags who forgot to go back to school?

>N-NOT A SAMEFAG I SWEAAAAAAAAAAAR
>JUST TWO INCREDIBLY LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO MAKE THE SAME POST EXACTLY ONE MINUTE APART WHICH JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE POST COOLDOWN TIMER!

S E E T H I N G

Okay enough of this stupid samefag debate shit, i posted half of those posts, OP you're a stupid faggot and i'm using the 4ChanX extension so i can just hit "copy image" and paste it directly, thats why they're all "file.png".

That doesnt change that you're still a stupid retard and your point was wrong, now shut the fuck up.

I wasnt even trying to hide that it was me you absolute fucking idiot,

>>Should i continue?

Do you think you're clever by realizing something that i was more or less openly stating? Jesus christ you're a fucking idiot.

Attached: file.png (537x204, 17K)

Except it actually was:
>Or, judging by the double posts and half IPs, is it just some samefag patting himself on the back? Because I'm gonna guess (You) this guy is.
That post you quoted there? Yeah, that's me. And I did quote myself. But if I'm going to erase all the other (You)s why the hell would I not make it look like I was just a bystander commenting on the OP getting BTFO? That's all that post ostensibly was until you claimed otherwise and I posted my screencap. This really couldn't be simpler and it's sad that you still don't get it.

ITT: Some retards try to think they "owned" a guy on Yea Forums because they got upset over a comment made about eyeballs or something.

Attached: 24234525.png (248x317, 110K)

>TWO INCREDIBLY LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO MAKE THE SAME POST
>i mean not really they were actually pretty different in style and substance but
>I'M GONNA SAY THEY WERE ANYWAY AND PRETEND I DON'T KNOW HOW IMAGEBOARDS WORK

>OP resorting to the same kind of samefagging he was just crying about.

Sneed.

what show is that again?

Spider-Man Unlimited

i know multiple people have already said this, but god damn youre stupid

Just admit you were being a retard, faggot.

Is it really that hard to believe that a second person would make a post in a thread? I don't get this weird insistence "It must be OP".

Attached: 1565388651697.jpg (407x286, 13K)

Because you were adamantly and blindly defending your own point you fucking idiot, stop trying to pretend and just own up to it.

Your original point was fucking stupid, and your defense was fucking stupid. You are stupid.

>Because you were adamantly and blindly defending your own point you fucking idiot
What? Except for my original post, every post I have made in this thread is me saying, "That's not me." I never defended anything. It's just weird and seems obsessive. It can't just be some other dumb guy you're arguing with, it has to be me otherwise you're even more mad and I legitimately don't understand why "it must be me".

Attached: 234535435.png (376x405, 36K)

Stop lying retard you're not fooling anyone.

Ok.

Attached: 23423452353.png (229x252, 26K)

Did your mom lack some vitamins while you were on the womb?

Attached: Star_Butterfly.png (416x750, 223K)

Attached: 1490222042825.png (620x640, 260K)

Memes aside, I was thinking on Illumination/Dixar/Sony when OP mentioned it, right after posted it I remembered Les grandes vacances (Dot eyes + CGI). How common is it? I mean, regarding CGI animation which type of eyes are more common, since I was thinking that overdetailed irises was the dominant, but then I started getting many counter examples, so I think is more like 2D cartoons, where there isn't a tendency or a dominant style.

Or maybe I wrong, idk.

Attached: 1566379985903.png (858x858, 826K)

To only have to draw it once unlike the many times you'd have to for a 2d cartoon.

I'd like to think that CG animation had a similar (But not exact) development history as 2D animation did sometime between the 80's - 90's.

2D animation starts focusing on being way too realistic (I know it was for toys, but still) and then the 90's completely shifts into being full blown cartoony because artists wanted something different. CGI feels similar. Everyone was so focused on being photorealistic because it was impressive thanks to Sully's hair tech, Finding Nemo's water tech, WALL-E's air tech, etc, we hit an apex and now we've flipped to being much more stylized in the last 5 or so years.

>Captain Underpants
>Spiderverse
>Sausage Party
>The LEGO Movie
>Paperman/Feast

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and Horton Hears a Who were about a decade ago and were seen as visual treats. But I think if they wanted to push it even further now, they could REALLY amp up the 2D-ness of those products.

And they’re still smarter than this OP

Nobody cares, move on, user. It's been hours.

I just got here and scrolled down the thread.

Nobody cares.

OP Positively seething.

It's time to move on, user.

SEETHES SNEED AND BREED

Attached: Dancing Pudding 1.gif (128x128, 38K)

because CG is devoted to being as ugly as it can possibly be.
I saw someone color over CG Lupin's gross eyes in all black and they look great
irides*

ITT: retards.

I like how the Spumco style often gave characters fully-colored irises and pupils. Also Invader Zim gave all of its characters distinct iris colors.

I always appreciated that in those shows, but I've never seen anyone else mention it.