What I mean is, say the Iron-Age Spongebob cartoonists with permission from the higher-ups through some strange string of luck made a little account on twitter containing a good amount of the cartoonist's less-than-kid-friendly drawings of the characters and the voice actors saying things that would make the DBZ leaks blush.
Would that have gotten the show a stable fanbase, since releasing the animatics and fan-baiting haven't worked too well?
Should cartoonists exploit the "holy shit" quotient created by official raunch/smut?
Henry Robinson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
soundcloud.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
ign.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
twitter.com
Aiden Ortiz
Yes, and no.
Chase Hill
Care to go into detail?
Nathan Cook
Companies like to be protective of their property. They wouldn't go out of their way to damage the brand even for fun. Not saying that's always the case though, but generally you're hired to make sure ______ is always viewed in a favorable light.
Funimation is in a world of trouble because they just ruined the Dragon Ball brand in the West.
James Wood
Brandon Young
No, that would be disrespectful to Stephen Hillenburg's vision.
Noah Walker
>Funimation is in a world of trouble because they just ruined the Dragon Ball brand in the West.
I mean, that’s a but unfair. They didn’t make Super, they just dubbed it.
Ayden Fisher
any more disrespectful than the shit nick's already pulled?
or tom kenny and mr. lawrence swearing in the voices of spongebob and plankton (the latter actually in character)?
Ayden Sanchez
>Iron-Age
Gavin Cook
Camp Koral is already a disrespect.
Or maybe he wasn't a fag and was just astounded Spongebob became a cultural icon on the level of Mickey Mouse no matter how crappy the show got.