Oh, now I get it. The writers obviously knew this was unfunny as hell...

bleeding-eye-Joe might have a chance against him but since the dems don't want an election between two white males they will probably pick AOC

>feetfag
IS DAN THE MAN ALL OVER AGAIN

You guys can't truly believe this

Daily reminder that Steven Miller writes his tweets

AOC ain't even running nigga

>bleeding-eye-Joe might have a chance against him but
Meanwhile in Bizarro World...

Isn't she too young to run for president this election cycle?

>AOC
Isn't running for president you absolute caricature. (She's not old enough yet.)

That's the guy who is always on coke during interviews, yea?

The Simpsons was never prophetic, it's just when you've been on the air for 30 years some of the things you predict are bound to come true. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Trump was a funny meme, but I genuinely can't see him in another term.
But I have literally no idea who the fuck the other republican candidates are, same with the democratic candidates besides Bernie and Biden.

That being said, it's not like anything will change. America is a country that is literally incapable of change because of the way it was set up and founded to prevent tyrants, so massive changes are literally impossible, and the other party will literally just repeal what the previous president did to spite them, with what happened with Obama care.
Like, why in gods name repeal something if you don't have a solution for it in the first place?

Our political system is super fucked and terrible, so caring about candidates really doesnt mean jack shit when at a minimum a president needs 8 years per term to get shit done effectively.

What fucking reality are you retards living in

The guy indeed

>But I have literally no idea who the fuck the other republican candidates are
The Republicans are trying to cancel their primaries to prevent any competition to Trump.

>if only we lived in a dictatorship like China, we could get things done
Come on now, Zhang.

The Dems have no chance of winning with anyone because they're party went off the deep end when Hillary Lost. You could've had a chance with a moderate canidate that was willing to reach across and deal with issues important to the American people like job security, illegal immigration, lower taxes, and cutting government spending on more than just the Military. But no you fuckers went bonkers to the point that your nominees are unironically calling for open borders and outlawing cow farts.

How fucking delusional are you?

Probably a cocktail of drug abuse, paranoia, stress, lack of sleep, early signs of dementia, insecurity and his dad having done everything for him.

Quote me a single time Joe Biden (who is more conservative than Obama), white middle class hero Sanders or "it's all about class" Warren ever called for open borders.

4channers also said that during the midterms and look what happened.

This post is giving off tiny-dick ancap energy.

A president can get things done quickly if their party holds a majority in the house and Senate and they have popular support.

>>Biden is the real conservative, vote for him
Nice try

This first thing Disney TV Animation did with The Simpsons and it's awful, it really shows that the only person at Disney TV Animation who knows what he's doing is Paul Rudish.

That's not what I said, though. Biden is a shit candidate, they need to go full populist socialist (not woke, socialist) like Bernie to win.

The mid terms where more Republicans won Governor and Senate seats? The only place the Dems won were house seats.

It was repealed for being actively damaging, and no solution would have been approved by both sides. This was when the establishment republicans were against him too (thankfully the midterms and voter backlashed whipped them into line) but any proposal was shot down again and again so may as well at least remove the thing making it worse.

The first debate Joe called for universal medical care for illegal aliens like every other canidate you blind retard.

Honestly, I believe he thought being president was fun, until he became the president. He's literally shooting himself in the foot so he can lose, but his yesmen and followers won't let him leave.

What happened in this scene exactly?

He also said "Elect me and I promise you I will outlaw coal entirely!" Yes, this was supposed to be the guy who is put forth as the Democrats' solution to the blue collar voter problem.

all feetfags should be put on 24/7 surveillance since this pattern has been proven right over and over again

Attached: footfag.png (960x960, 502K)

I live in the same delusional reality that somehow got him elected, while everyone here though hillary was going to win.
I live in the reality where we have a socialist lecturing people about wealth when he owns three houses. Where half of the nominees want free healthcare for illegal immigrants over their own. Tell me what world you live in

As for those House seats, two things.

1. The GOP didn't really contest most of the seats that got lost
2. Most Republican Congressmen who lost their seats were McCain-style RINOs

nothing new, just ignore it

Attached: smpsn.png (1814x962, 1.3M)

But that was amazing for trump and got never-trumpers replaced by loyalists

Attached: Fuck spammers.jpg (1080x1072, 678K)

Reminds me of the comic where Batman becomes president.

youtube.com/watch?v=ErhaWVG0o1I

The 9/11 thing is still pretty fucking weird desu.

Like any of the president's campaign promises between '16 and '18?

like any president really

>Who here supports giving health care to illegal immigrants?
>everyone raises hand

literal propaganda
>Muh strong felames
>Muh Russia
Never mind how rabidly anti-jew 2 of those women are nor how their positions are so shit the other dems distance from them.

You didn't answer the question.
>sucking israel's dick this hard

Attached: Bait 1.jpg (680x649, 82K)

>while everyone here though hillary was going to win

kek

Attached: hilllary already won.jpg (550x565, 74K)

It’s criminal what they did to Tulsi

You seem to have lost track of what user was saying, he wasn't feeding you the easy "wow all presidents break every single one of their promises" line that you thought was clever when you were 13, he was responding to a claim that presidents can fulfil their promises if they have a majority in the Congress - which Trump did between 2016 and 2018 and still managed to accomplish jackshit.

He dident really. Most the republicans were just as shit until alot got replaced and the rest forced to come in line.

>criticising israel isn't the same as being anti-semitic
>HURR BAITTTT
Who do you honestly think will fall for that.

>lucky there's a family guy....

Attached: feels bad guy.png (1916x1034, 2.49M)

>like any president really
And i thought i gave an accurate answer.

Nigga half the Republicans were never trumpers neo-cons that voted down Trump at every turn. He hardly had a majority ever.

He's assuming the republicans are actually on the same side. There were way too many of them voting against party to get anything passed.

No its not criticizing Israel, that needs to happen more.
Im talking about the literal islamists shit-flinging and how the left just lets it happen.

>hates jews
>but im not anti semetic
Sure buddy whatever you tell yourself

better than robot chicken

youtube.com/watch?v=N2thIPZEA9g

>technically it was hebephilia

Attached: don't tread on me.jpg (588x389, 45K)

Reminder that sick and injured middle class americans already have to pay for illegals' care because of an unfunded federal mandate that ERs have to treat every person.

Donald Trump is 73 years old (he'll be 78 by the end of his second term), so it's not unlikely. In addition to that, he's 243 pounds, not healthy at any age but really not good when you're his age. Even if he's not going senile, he certainly has other problems that could impact his mental state. It's also worth noting that this man was wall street business man in the 80's, ever seen Wolf of Wall Street? Don't be shocked if it turned out Trump used to be coke addict.

Attached: trump spasm.gif (459x364, 2.18M)

>Fall for that
Letting your hand slip a little there.

oh he basically admits to being wild in the past. But the weight may not be as big a deal as you expect. Depends on if its a gland or dietary issue. Plenty of 90+ can push over 200 and be fine.

>open borders

and thats why their run is dead on arrival.

>You're Boris Johnson without the class!

...Did the Simpsons writers just praise a Euroskeptic anti-immigration conservative?

by accident yes.

Boris Johnson is unironically based.

People tend to forget how tall Trump is, being as heavy as he is isn't that unhealthy for a guy his height. Plus the dude's mental health is fine, it's not like Biden who literally thought he was in Vermont when he was in New Hampshire and called the state a "town."

You said they called for open borders, they didn't. Why do you keep lying?

>people genuinely believe this

He's an idiot who brought in the most incompetent bootlickers to work for him.

Fuck off

Attached: 214490_5_.png (447x500, 288K)

Dont you know? anything thats european is cultured, anything that s not american is classy.
But in this case its to create a mental link between the two and later just deamonise one aginst the other

When did we start talking about Obama?

What's wrong with giving the needy healthcare?

What's wrong with open borders?

Biden doesn't even support free universal healthcare you absolute clown.

>Others, including former Vice President Joe Biden, the nominal front-runner, oppose full benefits, although that wasn’t apparent at the debate. The latter group would allow undocumented immigrants to purchase coverage through the exchanges established by the Affordable Care Act, but only with their own money.

>nuked his own party and is now forced to either resign and give power to Corbyn or delay Brexit again

B-based?

No, because Obama actually accomplished things.

Where's your wall?

Attached: 1274046711610.jpg (480x360, 35K)

They made a new party you stupid cunt. Farrage is back.
Boris dose the job of the 'wild man' and shifts discussions. Much like big G dose with the dutch

British Trump is as incompetent as Regular Trump.

Be honest - all any of you want from our world leaders is memes and reaction images.

That's not an answer. Give me sources. Oh, wait, you don't have any. You're just spewing the same bullshit rhetoric you hear all the time.

>pretty civilized posts considering the threads topic
>suddenly low effort spam from someone (possibly just playing the part o)f a upset leftist.

Attached: Report Rulebreakers.jpg (125x117, 2K)

Yeah that lowest economic growth since the 1940s was a great accomplishment. Politicizing the IRS to gain confidential information of campaign doaners was amazing, can't forget how he wiretapped a political opponent based of a factless document on an election year no less phenomenal, more drone strikes than any other president leading to be deaths of 2 US civilians, Fast and Furious, dude did so much great shit!

Attached: Beaver on Nations.png (947x2359, 1.02M)

>what's wrong with open borders?
Russian immigrants

Attached: Beaver on Immigration.png (1839x1123, 753K)

Attached: Beaver on Multiculturalism.png (1088x790, 580K)

alright, define your terms;
>giving the needy healthcare
>open borders

>sophistry

How are those fallacious?

I mean, the one about multiculturalism goes into a literal anime villain monologue about how war is necessary for human progress.

Competition is not necessarily war
Preserving different methods on thought is not a villainous motive.
Acknowledging the 'utipian ideal' as unrealistic and that suffering will always exist to some degree is not crazy.

It doesn't talk about competition, it talks about a literal war that is merely not happening due to the threat of mutual destruction. It's written by the point of view of someone that doesn't understand technological or scientific development.

>"In The Hall Of The Mountain King" starts playing

I disagree.
While educated guessed can be made we do not fully know how new tech will be developed, nor when, nor how it may affect society as a while until it appears.
Prepping your ideal civ on an idea that may never come or may have different effects is foolishness.

The first one assumes that large scale, perpetual projects are required for a government to become "impossible for the population" to go against in some sort of argument against socialism, but it ignores the fact that merely controlling the police force and the military is enough for a government to get away with whatever it wants to get away with. Corruption doesn't need universal health care to happen, it just needs a government without checks and balance to exist. It's making a dumb argument that completely ignores the fact that law enforcement is an perpetual social project and that the military is a perpetual social project. Then it defines nationalism in its own terms rather than on nationalism actual terms, and even in its own terms it's making no real point as to how nationalism could stop corruption. It's talking about the idea of nationalism in some sort of empty vacuum in which the national is all that exists. It's pure sophistry.

The politics junior is trying to make a point that competition is happening between nations and not between private, corporate entities, so he already made a pretty clear mistake to begin with.

Those private corporate entities have an agreement to crush any real start ups and cripple actual competition.

It talks about how establishing more commonplace national ideas could, at virtually no cost, help combat corruption. If people understood that by fucking over their own community they are fucking themselves, they would at least be hesitant too.
Also, there is no one definition of 'nationalism.' especially since its such a taboo idea now days. Some say its generally nation first, others full national superiority, your argument is flawed.

Literally go back to /pol/

Literally go back to /pol/

Healthcare is not the same thing as “open borders,” user

Not him but whats the fucking difference when they want to give them healthcare and not send them back?

>completely ignores the fact that a police force, law enforcement and the military are perpetual social projects
>thinks the powerful are subject to their nation, as if the nation existed in a vacuum and they couldn't just put their money elsewhere, which they already do

You in no way addressed that anons points, merely repeated yourself and implied international corporations would just offshore more.

In a more nationalist government offshoring would be punished and native start-ups encouraged.

>giving more power to the government
But user, that will just create more corruption.

Even the US used to have a law that to expand or start a business in an area you had to make a case in local court for it on how it would help that area in addition to the other legalities.

Its not really giving them a ton of power, in fact im more scared of the mega-corps we have now than not letting mr.chang buy another dozen acres of canada.