Character design

What do you think of human haircut over an animal? Yes or no?

Attached: sw2_005_1-1024x429.jpg (1024x429, 114K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/PEBQysgVZ_c
e621.net/post/index/1/ettie
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I think it’s ok in certain cases. This is not one of those cases.

i dont like hair on fur

i like fur marking that imply how would the animal character look as a human.

Attached: torres04.jpg (590x290, 42K)

It ends up looking like a person with some haloween costume

I mean, if it´s what you´re going for then sure, but I tend to dislike this style

only if the haircut is made by long fur(unlike your example). Adding hair on an animal that normally doesn't have it just looks wrong

No. God no. I hate that shit.

It worked really well for that white haired sheep to the left but holy fuck that fox wants my soul. I'm being judged by that fucking thing on the left for being afraid of a cartoon fox.

what fox? wolves only.

I tought all the wolves in this movie were blue, what's this orange one in the back?

Unrelated to this pic but the new movie legit has a fox and she's a cute

This.
If the hair looks like that and doesn't flow or look like it's a natural part of their fur then it just looks like a wig or a human cosplaying as an animal

As much as I detest the fucking Lion King cartoon and all it stands for, it did right with the hair.


BUT..
That can work well but the hair needs to be toned down and made the same color as the fur. It looks less striking.

I've legit seen furries working on their own with zero budget make much better looking CGI models than this.

it's because they sometimes walk on two legs and sometimes run on four.

russia, go figure

Attached: 1486136739841.jpg (1920x1240, 91K)

DEPENDS
ON
EACH
CASE

I like both.

Whatever works.

I'd say yes but only if it's organic enough
There should be a fur pattern that starts somewhere on the face and slowly flows into the haircut, so it won't look tacked on

No. It makes them look like DeviantArt furries

This is the only way I’ll accept hair on animal characters. Otherwise it just looks like a shitty wig and I’d just prefer them without “hair”.

>this movie and it's creators deserved to be locked away and incinerated to a crisp

Like all things it depends on if its done well.

Russia loves foxes. They used to be metaphors for vicarious whore capitalism, now they still are!

It usually looks borderline uncanny valley, and it's usually put on character designs that already look pretty bad. The more the design emphasizes the fur-ness of the fur the worse it looks. You pic is a particularly bad example.
Fur which evokes the shape of hair is pretty good.

Dude. They love WOLVES.

They're probably the only country who doesn't demonize them.

Attached: 8dkfbt91zc8jmsive3pmnk2rxjga7w7q.jpg (740x416, 46K)

>All that gay porn

Furries, go figure.

youtu.be/PEBQysgVZ_c

At least he got a gf, sort of.

That bird is cute! CUTE!!!

Attached: FIFA bird 2.jpg (1920x1080, 155K)

Depends on how anthro the character is. Bipeds shouldn't have human hair, and NO anthros should have mustaches and beards. That's a super-homo giveaway right there.

Shit, I meant QUADRUPEDS shouldn't have human hair. Bipeds can go either way (HAH!), but If they're beastly (humped shoulders, longer arms and could easily go either biped or quadruped to suit the situation), no human hair. Totally upright...ok, hair at the discretion of the artist.

It saddens me how much gay there is.

I'm not against it but it's not my du jour. I only really seem to like gay shit if it's feral. Otherwise straight please.

e621.net/post/index/1/ettie

Most of those are off-model and not cute at all.