Are there any cartoon Youtubers than don't suck?

He has taken a lot of his criticisms on board, stopped with the wonkey editing, got a decent mic and stopped getting too emotional over stupid shit. I think as well, at lot of online harassment has kind of helped him grow up a bit. Not saying cyber bullying is a good thing, not at all, but I can only imagine shit like that must help you get some perspective

>TEEN TITANS GO SUCKS REEEEE
>STEVEN UNIVERSE IS A MASTERPIECE!!!!!

they literally the same thing...

None of them.

Attached: really nigga.png (333x453, 172K)

Does therealjims count? He focuses on the Simpsons but his Pixar essays are good too and I hate video essays

Congrats on liking that guy who lives with his parents loving nothing but 2003-2007 trash.

He's really good at his job

>Pan used to shit on Le 90s kids retards
>Now he's become a total Bush jnr era fan boy

Attached: 3456789876.png (1026x770, 1.56M)

He sucks, but I can say with 100% certainty that he is better than anyone posted in this thread.

No you suck too Enter, try not to sound like a passive aggressive mood ass every review

I like his Pizza Party podcast because he brings Jim from nockFORCE on.

Attached: 186F250A-44A0-4535-9C99-D96397BC7BAD.jpg (900x900, 60K)

literally who

no they're all weird creepy retards

MarsReviews

Your first mistake was being concerned with worthless e-celebs of any kind in the first place.

Realest people ITT

Attached: 1537374780720.jpg (500x492, 76K)

I unironically like rebeltaxi's videos.
>Great editing
>reviews both old and new cartoons
>Talks about lots of animation trivia/history in his videos
>Rarely does the whole "Let's recap everything in the show and THEN get to the points I want to make"
>Plain funny at times.

I know his podcast is mediocre and Loki IRL is garbage, but his actual videos are pretty decent.

Its sounds cringey but unironically Doug/Linkara havea better opinion than those literal whos in this threads.
Its sad yes but its the absolute state of cartoon critics.

No

Don't forget that he does more research than anyone else and uses industry connections to get info most others could only dream of having.

Daily reminder that this guy is going to be a dad

Jim is based. Izzy is also interesting but fuck Nolan. Catty cunt

>samefag this bad
pizza fuck off

youtube.com/user/PIEGUYRULZ

THICK. AFRICAN. ACCENT.

Attached: thafnine.png (400x384, 65K)

I thought his gf got an abortion

his videos are ok but his complaining about Butch Hartman was pretty annoying
he did get my favorite Youtuber on for his podcast a couple of times and he seemed alright in those

I actually met Pan. He seemed like an alright guy.
And he told me he actually likes thin and crispy pizza as opposed to pan, pretty ironic, right~?

You know it's true.

Attached: e semicolon r.jpg (288x288, 12K)

>he likes thin
what the fuck, fuck you pan i fucking hate you now

lolno
most recent video was full of mic redlining, and plenty of artifacts on his own assets, as well as comically missing the point of whatever individual episodes he decides to review. Furthermore, he lacks any sort of understanding of human relationships nor characterization, as evidenced by his diatribes on how people *should* behave in situations when no one behaves close to as he describes.

He's still as cringy as he's ever been

Attached: Basement Gremlin.png (798x625, 469K)

Attached: zone pan enter.png (779x799, 967K)

I want to see Enter go on Pan Pizza's podcast
Remember when they got this guy on? Good times

Attached: edgelord.png (1260x1459, 231K)

Who's that edgy OC?

hate this guy also who the fuck is baseball sam 1

I enjoyed that he came back this year and has now gone dormant again.

I think it was that or hand-tossed. I forgot which one, actually. I like those ones more than pan too.

I watch Enter, Rebel and CellSpax. They're alright.

who

That guru larry video he made had to be one of the most unbearable things ive had to watch. How can someone be so unaware of how stupid they are?

cosmodore or saberspark I guess?

Chuggaaconroy

I liked Saber before he became a pseudo-reaction channel, but his essays are well done

No, Youtube seems quite devoid of authenticity and production quality. Hotdiggedydemon seems alright though.

rebeltaxi and marsreviews. that’s pretty much it.

So he's /ourguy/?

i like his podcast sometimes FUCK NOLAN

Nolan is an insufferable cunt.

When are we getting Enter as a guest?

He'd be okay if he stopped trying to be funny. He's somehow more unfunny and lame than the fucking nostalgia critic.

I tried watching the last episode and had to stop about 10 minutes in
it's so vapid and annoying that it's completely unwatchable

I wouldn't call him a cartoon youtuber
the guy's done mostly stuff about whatever he wants, and over half of his videos are on live-action stuff

Dunno, OP. Is there a human being alive that don't suck?
We all do suck. We also rule.

Enter was getting better, then he released his newest review of MGPAM and it's apparent he hasn't grown or improved at all. Technocracy is interesting though. Wish it was done by somebody with a bigger perspective though and not a fucking manchild who talks about cartoons

I agree but there’s things he does that suck. Like he’ll be in the middle of quality content and then go on a three minute tangent about why The Simpsons Hit & Run should be remade.

I miss when he was just a less cringey Enter. Is his podcast any good?

Nope. And it makes sense when you think about it. What kind of person would start a cartoon commentary channel on Youtube? The type of person that we keep getting. Namely, obsessive, cringe, and focused on all the wrong things. No sane, reasonable person with a working set of priorities is going to do something like this.

Lord Bung's Containment series is pretty good. The animation is like lower-budget Rick and Morty.

OP is referring to animation """critics""", not animators.

I mean i dont hate mr enter like some do but if you need suugestions then
Mars reviews and toonrifictariq arent half bad.

Hey guies, hee hee hee, I know the latest /pol/ and Yea Forums memes
He's a less bitter but more memey Mister Metokur

>He didn't get the Edward Youtube was a joke
This has to be full power autism

This, Jesus Nolan is the worst

Why do cartoon youtubers like avatars that look as if if they're exasperated all the time

At least it's not a OH BOY HERE WE GO AGAIN arms folded avatar

For me, it's Andrew Auld.

WHY ARE THERE SO MANY OF THOSE

Because many of them are too cool to like stuff because liking stuff is cringy insecure 14 year olds like Turkey Tom

This guy has pretty severe incel voice but I have to admit I'm bit jealous about his stalker :D

PieGuyRulz is cool background noise for working, but I guess you can say the same for most of them

>that one time he cried on his livestream because some girl rejected him
what a fuckin beta

Attached: C0jUo86xU1iXY24JErPbafk7sb0XZWyMdkBPjuuuoA0.jpg (630x776, 87K)

Link....?

youtu.be/-ZLDhCzIu3c

You’re funny user
there aren’t

That was....rather disappointing to be honest.

Enter has been improving after tha GA fiasco, his latest reviews are actually watchable. Of course, he still has those annoying mic cuts, but I believe he's getting there

Cosmodore uses the term "torture porn" for cartoons, any opinion discredited

I mean, Jake really was a shitty friend.

Saberspark

What kind of things do you guys look for in these kinds of videos? I've been tempted to try making my own, but the mere concept is so cringy I don't know if I could ever make something I'd be satisfied with.

Attached: MV5BMDlhNjlkNGEtNDBlZS00NjQwLWIxNmQtNzMzOGQwMGNhMWJmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzExMzc0MDg@._V1_.jpg (1280x720, 85K)

>dude Pocahontas is racist because it doesn’t portray the native americans as completely 100% peaceful and accepting saints
some of her non-cartoon videos are alright though

It is fascinating how no other cartoon reviewer has yet to really be as capable as mrenter when it comes to cartoon reviews.

Good analysis of how the story portrays its themes throuhout the characters and the events that occur. Analysis of the animation itself wouldn't hurt either. Don't take yourself too seriously.

Schafrillas is hit or miss, his Frollo video was insightful and I liked his ranking of the award winners too. But his old "top 10 scariest cartoons" vid is downright Tv Tropes Nightmare Fuel tier. And him aping in his latest video was disappointing. Like dude, do you even know what the Native Americans did to real life Ratcliff?

Nobody is more lame than Doug Walker.

It’s boring as shit

Try again later.

Attached: nope.png (1600x900, 195K)

Calm your tits Yea Forumsmblr

He talked about the Sonic cartoon once so I guess cybershell
youtu.be/ZAyDGWOooas

I only watch Cosmodrone
He's... A chill guy, i guess?

none because of Yea Forums tradition, you should rely on actual reviewers Yea Forums respects and endorses, like fellow Yea Forumsmrades, rotten tomatoes, and IMDB.

I like this guy; I don't know, I just like hearing his opinion on things. Maybe it's the fact that they're simple and easy to watch. They're not overly edited and you can just listen to it in the background.

>hurr everyone are of equal value
fuck off

Content creators who parasite on others' material always suck.

>Content creators who parasite on others' material always suck.

Attached: Ebert1.jpg (500x250, 100K)

he is fun

Your point?

muh ponies

Emplemon's spongebob video was great, i hope he do more videos about cartoon in his new series

All I can think about when I see him is that time he started crying while playing a Toy Story game because he remembered when spilled his spaghetti asking a girl out.

Anime & (begrudgingly) Star Wars

>Content creators who parasite on others' material always suck.
virtually impossible to come up with anything truly original and all content creators are parasites. "Nothing is new under the sun remember"?

anim8ball
That's about it.

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 52K)

isnt anim8ball that guy who used to make ytp?

I find Mr Enter as one of the most insightful reviewers around. Granted, he does have fuck ups but he isn’t obnoxious and it’s far easier to tell when he’s joking or when he’s serious. Pan pizza is extremely enjoyable but that’s because of his unique and atmospheric presentation, not because he is a good reviewer.

>Cellspex
That's not a name I've heard in a long time. I used to really enjoy her videos, especially her yearly recaps which were such a big event for me when they came out, but at some point I think she got a little too left-wing for me. I don't care as much about politics anymore, so maybe I'll take another look at her newer videos. I do miss watching her.

Attached: cellspex.jpg (375x667, 17K)

>El Reviewer random
>Historia del arte 2.0
>Vailskibum94
At least those are my favorites.

He and Big Joel have some pretty good videos but occasionally they'll get too preachy and left-wing, Still good channels though.

Why are you in this fucking board?

Lily Orchard

EmperorLemon

I like marsreviews

for some reason i always lose it with "that was his mistake" some of his videos are too preachy

Eh, she's not really a "cartoon" youtuber is she?

user, Pad has better insight and does more research than Enter every single time without fail.

Just compare the Rapsittie Street Kids videos. Pan is the only one to actually ask the important question of "why?".

quit shilling your videos

>handlebars
the only thing I wanna hear coming out of lindsay's mouth is my dick.

Attached: danny.gif (250x239, 479K)

I don't need some spazz to tell me whether a cartoon is good episode by episode. In the time it takes them to "review" it you could have watched the episode yourself.

>and then go on a three minute tangent about why The Simpsons Hit & Run should be remade.
I mean...

>guys Blazing Saddles IS a great movie but let's be real Mel Brooks IS a racist and an anti-semite and if a white guy likes Blazing Saddles it's just because he wants to say the n word, censorship in the name of social justice literally doesn't exist stop crying about it
>also please cancel James Rolfe, he said Ghostbusters didn't look very good

I dumped Schaff after that bit in his Megamind video where he was like
>it's ironic that Megamind was taught cops are bad and criminals are good because that's usually how it is in real life

He makes some pretty decent content but none of it was especially insightful aside from his take on why Shrek and Shrek 2 were so good.

dubs of truth

I agree. He's very sporadic, though. Always happy when he uploads.
Yeah, MoBrosStudios was his name. Compared to other movie/animation "critics", he stays low-key and tries to find merits in even the most flawed of works. He's pretty enjoyable.

Animesnob

Sauce?

chinga tu madre dum

Animesnob
youtube.com/watch?v=ZK_iDop19Eg

Moviebob
youtube.com/watch?v=dgdGm7gbEms

Lily Orchard
youtube.com/watch?v=flLEr_sYC-k

Lindsay Ellis
youtube.com/watch?v=KznZcK7ksf4

Silver-Quill

Overly Sarcastic Productions
youtube.com/watch?v=afuwh0GXwbQ

Schaffrillas Productions
youtube.com/watch?v=VyRbIg64oiE&t=706s

Schafrillas is just left wing Emplemon with a lower production value

1) Decide what you're going to do. For example specific series or themes in multiple series, specific issues (such as trans representation) or generic issues (best beach episodes), which series were well made or how to improve series, only things in the source material or including info from the developers. Don't try to do everything or you'll end up as a generic show with no identity.

Personally I analyse the plot of arcs and compare it to overall plot. I mainly focus on whether the arc made any sense and where there any inconsistencies with earlier arcs, though I also cover characters when necessary.

2) Start simple. Use you early videoes to determine if what you're making is interesting or if you're just rehashing what others have said. If the latter examine how to improve.

3) Once you've decided what you want to discuss and figured out how to do this make the videoes that will be easiest to make. This is so you can develop your skills.

4) Once you know how to make these videoes focus on the videoes you feel need to be made.

Attached: animemaniacs.jpg (300x300, 28K)

He did Korra.

Wait isn't OP Mr. Enter?

>MovieBob
>Lindsay Ellis
>Schaffarillis
Cringe

How when Dobson exists?

Attached: tumblr_pafd07Cbqx1x4dymxo1_400.jpg (254x600, 61K)

He's more of a general media reviewer, but he's still really underrated

youtube.com/user/MangaKamen/videos

esta chiquito

>I do think it is fair to say that Roger Ebert destroyed film criticism. Because of the wide and far reach of television, he became an example of what a film critic does for too many people. And what he did simply was not criticism. It was simply blather. And it was a kind of purposefully dishonest enthusiasm for product, not real criticism at all…I think he does NOT have the training. I think he simply had the position. I think he does NOT have the training. I’VE got the training. And frankly, I don’t care how that sounds, but the fact is, I’ve got the training. I’m a pedigreed film critic. I’ve studied it. I know it. And I know many other people who’ve studied it as well, studied it seriously. Ebert just simply happened to have the job. And he’s had the job for a long time. He does not have the foundation. He simply got the job. And if you’ve ever seen any of his shows, and ever watched his shows on at least a two-week basis, then you surely saw how he would review, let’s say, eight movies a week and every week liked probably six of them. And that is just simply inherently dishonest. That’s what’s called being a shill. And it’s a tragic thing that that became the example of what a film critic does for too many people. Often he wasn’t practicing criticism at all. Often he would point out gaffes or mistakes in continuity. That’s not criticism. That’s really a pea-brained kind of fan gibberish.

that pieguy dude, worst thing i've heard about him here is that some of his vids are a bit boring

>Jerry Peet
>Moviebob
>Lindsay Ellis
Bait harder user

Attached: 74ee4a54668d77805fd45d9f2c0ea52d.png (624x624, 53K)

based Armond White

Attached: co taste.png (931x160, 34K)

>outdoes the entire every cartoon Youtuber on his first try

Attached: emp.jpg (900x900, 126K)

The Ugly Mr Incel

You're retarded. There's no way about it. Comprehension this bad can only be from a significantly deficient mind.

>Tranny Orchard

Attached: get out.gif (496x368, 994K)

B-Mask (Sly Cooper counts as Yea Forums):

youtube.com/watch?v=FLOzaTJY9ok
youtube.com/watch?v=ll5NAC1Msyc
youtube.com/watch?v=CO-OPkBwLe4
youtube.com/watch?v=HWnsFLVZPoA
youtube.com/watch?v=UC2W8AYRAHw

Attached: ArabianHideoutConceptArtSly4.jpg (1280x853, 277K)

24 Frames of Nick

Mr Enter is a fucking idiot who keeps all his thoughts inside for himself and when he criticizes he does for all the wrong things. He often just sums up what happens in the episode without actually judging anything.

AvGN and Nostalgia Critic have more reviewing value than Enter because they at least say what they don't like and why.
Enter can't even say what he doesn't like.

That's literally what she said though. She's like the only female film person on YouTube so people give her a pass but her takes are all dogshit.

Start off with low hanging fruit like The Room, A Wrinkle In Time, etc.
Go for learning material like PPG and Dexter's Lab vs the Savino seasons.

Then keep going for low hanging fruit like Hasbro, Disney, CN and Nick's atrocious 2010s cartoons.

Keep judging every portion of them: humour, plots, characters, dialogue, soundtrack, pacing, logic, till you get an idea how to judge. Keep doing it till you can say at least 3-5 things every scene and you have something to say for 90% of the movie. Anything is good, even "I dislike X, Y did it better".

This is how AVGN and NC got popular. Reviewing stuff which is easy to review.

Bit by bit try to review harder movies and animated series which have much subtler+mixed ideas and executions which take a while to identify and judge and actually say something interesting and imaginative.

For example doing a comparison between live action Batman and TAS Batman is much easier than say all the batman shows and all the Marvel vs DC shows. And all the different incarnations of cartoons and movies: Peter Pan, Scooby Doo.

Review The Dragon Prince and say the most obvious things and the most obvious comparisons.
For example the characters in TLA are far more mature than TDP and the plots are much more adventure heavy and less filler.

The hardest to judge are movies with equal amounts of pros in the same domains. Like TLA S1 vs TLA S2

Shir becomes really hard when you're suppose to judge the tiniest differences and find something interesting to say.
Like try to review which 2010s cartoon is the absolute shittiest. You'll be running into absolute subjectivism and splitting hairs reviews in no time.

Seriously try to judge which is shittier in an objective way: Regular Show or Uncle Grandpa, Steven Universe, Adventure Time or Star Vs?

Teen Titans GO or Uncle Grandpa or nuPPG or the new shows of Scooby Doo?
The Looney Tunes Show or Bunnicula?

Those are the harshest reviews with the least amount of results.

Hi guys :)
Oh? You dont like nu Adventure Time? Yikes, that's problematic, chud.

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 121K)

This has the same energy as the contraboynts roller coaster pic

Attached: 4i9h2mioe0vz.png (1293x704, 669K)

I love how CHUD is the new lefty buzzword, considering how often they cannibalize their own over tweets or whatever

The equally hardest thing to do in reviews is coming up with saying things about it which aren't obvious but are important.
Judging songs, dialogue, pacing+storytelling is one of the hardest things to do, but also the most important.

And then there's identifying flaws unique to the show, movie, episode. Like for example in Dan Vs's season 3 he feels out of character because his neighbours didn't do anything to him to warrant revenge, but he still has a bone to pick with them.

And in Fillmore! you have to judge whether the characters are acting too cold or not. They're suppose to be professionals investigators, but their morals come off as hypocritical, their cold personalities as douchebags and their "funny" banter as pathetic attempts at humour.
You're supposed to give a specific rating; they're not shit characters, but they're neither good, they're something between X and Y, but leaning more on Y.
And the character will start od

>the concept is cringy
Then make something NOT cringy. Make content you can be proud of, don't just do the wacky cross-armed avatar funny scream shtick.

If you actually want to critique animation or film, there's nothing cringy about that. Just make sure you're saying something worth saying and presenting it in a format that's worth watching (or at least worth listening to). Wackiness and exaggeration is fine if that's what you're going for, but you can't have your cake and eat it too. When someone like Doug Walker tries to pretend his content is actual critique instead of riffing on clips juxtaposed with comedy sketches, it's laughable (in a bad way).

But when someone like RLM does the same, it's more legit because 1) it's REALLY obvious when they're just fucking around and exaggerating for comedic effect and 2) they've adequately demonstrated that they know what the fuck they're talking about.

That's what separates a critic from some dickhead with a mic and some editing software.

So far I haven't seen anyone make 1 serious review about MLP FIM season 1 vs seasons 2-9. It's all just a bunch of Adventure Time autists whining that their show was good before the relationship drama came along.

Based user

love his videos and can't listen to his podcast for 5 minutes before wanting to hang myself

thumbnails like pic related are peak aposematism to me

Attached: bad thumbnail.png (960x629, 192K)

The Steven Universe fandom* they only bitch about "muh morals, muh character depth, muh he should have fucked that girl".
I don't see 1 post about SU discussing anything else besides the stupid back story. Not the resolution, not the action sequences, not the intro, not anything which doesn't involve the villain's motivation.

Can you put up a good accent? then you're already 80% better than all the other chucklefucks.

Sorry for the late response but
youtu.be/MIERsgtYIao
@1:05:30

MarsReviews
PanPizza

Simply for actually being TOLERABLE. Even if I don't agree with everything they say, because like them, all they are expressing is opinions and nothing else.

How can anyone like this faget? And NO, he has learned NOTHING from Growing Around and is still trying to get that shit made. Also, he's still horrendous at this critic thing and needs to kill his channel, already. Then himself for being such a whiny, hypocritical, fucking manchild / loser.

What competition was there? MrEnter?

That is some SJW tier logic.

>IT'S NOT MY FAULT YOUR DICK GETS SOFT AND YOU CAN'T CUM INSIDE ME
I can't believe she said in front of thousands of people

Attached: Xhah.gif (320x240, 1.62M)

I like mrenter because of how he’s a true believer. There’s something compelling in that.

growing around would be such a better idea if he just removed the adults from the concept

I liked Robobuddies before she went fucking mental.

He's gonna start hitting her soon, isn't he?

Haven't heard about her in a good while. What's she been doing lately?

pan isn't a virgin?

what was up with him talking shit about zone that one time

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 98K)

The ones that ACTUALLY make cartoons are usually based.

Based

less a reviewer, more of an analyst that provides interesting information about cartoon production.

>cartoon Youtubers
>not suck
Not possible

>Nobody has mentioned Neros Q
youtube.com/watch?v=-8aelHRiMyM

Pan provides some insight into the creation of the cartoon or some of its history but he barely scratches into any actual topics about the content in the show. It’s extremely easy to tell that Enter is more considerate about the actual writing of the material, especially when you compare their insights into Bojack Horseman.

Except Robo fuck her

Never; Pan's indifferent to him and Nolen genuinely hates him, so it would literally just be two hours of them shitting on Enter and having to deal with his elementary school fans harassing them at next year's Momocon.

Friendly reminder poparena far more warranted of being made fun of than both Mr enter and pan pizza. He reviews the 70s and 80s era Nickelodeon, which he believes is the best era of Nickelodeon. That dude still butts hurt over Ronald Reagan winning a second term. And he literally rewrites history to fit his far far-left political views. Like outright lying about Synagogues being attacked by alt-right white Supremacists when they were attacked by a Palestinian Muslim militant. Sad Ronald Reagan visited a Nazi cemetery on the first day of the second term. Aka a cemetery that buried German civilian along with soviet and American dead. And my favorite. He has a creepy fetishized obsession over Ann Sarnoff. He even said Ann Sarnoff made Nickelodeon successful because she was a single mother that never remarried. poparena was pit on the YouTube map because he reviewed Animorphs and goosebumps books. Even in his goosebumps reviews, he can’t help but trash R.L Stien for promoting conservativism, heteronormativity and bad gender roles in his stories. He went on a bizarre Gamergate and comic gate rant during a review of attack of the mutants.

Attached: 1C23105C-8ACC-402F-84AC-F42737AF9A87.png (727x593, 294K)

>humiliation is Pan's fetish
If she wasn't pregnant before, he knocked her up then.

No
They all suck
Especially if they use some fuckin' "toon" avatar

CellSpex and J's Reviews

>Chuggaaconroy
Based

Nobody in particular, just whatever video where their biggest best video about a specific subject and agreed with, but then you realize their other tastes are hot garbage

Both Mr Enter and the guy who likes he hermit from Moana went through this

Reminder that Enter is trying to pull the
>Blame the industry
Card for why his project isn’t going to work instead of his actual incompetence

>Still uses pics of joshscorcher to represent strawmen like 8 years later
Imagine being that immature

>>Chuggaaconroy
>Based
Based

He still does? That’s hilarious.

>still bringing up Josh scorcher

Does this dude still make videos

MarsReviews is the only cartoon guy I watch. He is my nigga.

I think he does on rare occasions, admittedly the last time I actually watched his content was back when he still did gaming top 10s like the autarch of flame. The only reason I know about the drama between Josh and Lily is because of the latter's ED article

Last I heard about her she was doing a lot of Sonic shit and hanging out with that fag Nolan. Has she done anything else?

>Thinking anything on the streams are to be taken at face value

Attached: 1565395813671.gif (250x305, 305K)

She quit making YouTube videos about a year ago I believe to focus on college. She spends most of her time on Twitter (shocking) retweeting sonic stuff and politics. She sperged out on gun control issues by comparing her brother getting mocked to the El Paso shooting.

Attached: IMG_1166.png (297x221, 48K)

E;R

I honestly forgot about him since I couldn't stand his podcasts anymore and no one on Yea Forums talked about him for so long

Pan's an idiot who thinks he can just joke around the way he does without thinking what's gonna happen afterwards
Which is why he'll never be on Zone's channel ever

Attached: 1564500486039.jpg (500x419, 66K)

I feel like I'd watch his content more if he didn't do that thing with his voice. It's not how he naturally speaks and it's droning to listen to.

There are way too many of these channels.

He regularly uploads top 10s every week or so

this

Frederator?

No.

>Lily Orchard
>Being reminded of shit shitty Zero Punctuation Rip off videos.
>Being reminded of those stupid videos where he was bitching about that Josh Scorcher guy over something stupid
>"MLP is a good show guys honestly"

This guys content is fucking awful and I am ashamed to have sat through alot of it.

EmpLemon is alright. His editing style is a little rough but it is still entertaining.

Its refreshing to hear someone talk about just shit they want and not trend hop.

Literally goes from Spongebob, to WWE, to NASCAR to some rando in the Cold War.

>makes a 10 ten final bosses
>sans is on there
>kefka is on there

talk about a book by its cover.

This nigga proved his worth with the Stan Petrov video.

His rants are abysmal and his whining is cringy but his production value is beyond whatever all these other niggers have to offer.

not to mention stealing the entire style and even fucking titles of the only two good hbomberguy videos without a hint of shame and even manages to fuck that up by going off on needless tangents. say what you will about hbomberguy, which i do, often, but his tangents in his "this is garbage and here's why" videos actually related to the subject matter and strengthened his perspective and weren't talking about a star wars game for forty minutes just to say that steven universe handles the moral grey thing poorly. that's not even touching how he's an insufferable cretin or a horsefucker, what an awful fucking youtuber.

>hbomberguy
>...and here's why Marxism will save everyone!

Only redeemable nigga there is Scha, but even that nigga puts out abysmal content and rides the tier list shit really hard.

I actually reccommend you a youtube channel named Sideways. That talks about music theory, you're bound to learn something useful from that dude and still get the same entertainment than from the pseudo YTPer

>es by comparing her brother getting mocked to the El Paso shooting.
That’s hilarious. Have screenshots?

again i'm not a fan of the guy in the slightest, but his fallout 3 and sherlock videos are genuinely good. i'll never know if his other videos are good because i'm not going to sit through 20 minutes of some limey cunt being smug to me about politics he doesn't understand. if it's anything like his twitter takes then i think i'm smart for passing on that.

Attached: D1Uci6XWoAEEnSn.jpg (1076x1676, 218K)

Hbomb is literal weaponized autism, he's the counter to /pol/. He can take a blatant lie and sell it to you as fact with enough evidence and research and is fearless to take direct hits. Altho I disagree with shit he says, he is a hard guy to take down just because he's very well prepared.

They were pretty good, but I agree that it's often annoying of him to go the Ricky Gervais "look at me I'm an angry atheist" route by being as obnoxious about his liberal views as possible or listen to him use a Cthulu story as some kind gay acceptance platform.

Enter sucks user. He doesn't look at the writing in depth, he nitpicks and plays it off as in depth analysis. Compare his Mars Needs Moms review to the one The Blockbuster Buster did. THE BLOCKBUSTER BUSTER DID IT BETTER! THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN.

then how do you know he doesn't understand his own politics if you haven't watched his videos? I've watched them and they're pretty good, though also pretty basic-bitch-tier if you ask me

twitter.com/robo_friend/status/1158438828220276736
Link to the thread

alphajayshow has the common cartoon reviewer problem where he cannot understand jokes and rags on whatever he is reviewing for being unrealistic/nonsensical when he does not understand jokes.

It's enough to make me want to vomit blood.

The only true answer

JaxBlade obvs

How long ago was this vid? Dude sounds different. And what's up with YouTubers exaggerating their voices

He's a breadtuber commie so I know he's a retard, someone linked me a video of his that had an interesting idea about misogyny in the room that I was vaguely interested in and it was a 40 minute video where he did artsy shit and talked about politics with like 7 minutes of him talking about the room.

>Trans show up and pretend to be offended by the trap tag that's existed longer than they have

Day of the rope when

Attached: Capture+_2019-09-03-23-38-59-1.png (720x577, 108K)

Attached: Capture+_2019-09-03-23-42-17-1.png (720x955, 251K)

Attached: Capture+_2019-09-03-23-42-40-1.png (720x739, 165K)

Attached: Capture+_2019-09-03-23-42-53-1.png (720x952, 235K)

Attached: Capture+_2019-09-03-23-43-03-1.png (720x956, 224K)

i hate the news for enabling insane people like this to constantly be paranoid about unlikely dangers happening to them and thinking they deserve to be an overbearing asshole to everyone else because of it

Even the most racist gun men think that guns need to be used responsibly.

>Pan's an idiot who thinks he can just joke around the way he does without thinking what's gonna happen afterwards
>Which is why he'll never be on Zone's channel ever
What’s funny is that he will never learn even when Mr. Enter calls him out for this so badly, Pan directly responds to him.

I await to see the day where fucking Mr. enter comes out the bigger man against Pan

So just Max G then.

She never said that

how long until enter redeems himself and gets pan exposed?

Whatever happened to this guy?

This reads like a SJW parody account

>Half Native American
I highly doubt he is. He probably said he half Native American to make himself look like a bigger minority for points.

>LGBT people are being obsessed by white people
>We must disarm LGBT to protect them
I don’t know which part of that is dumber. Thinking anyone besides whites and Jews support lgbt rights in large numbers. Or disarming gays will protect them from white attacks.

mars review is the only one i can think of

Honest we should grab the reviews we find Yea Forums's fireden archive and simply put them in the description of a video on a Youtube.
It would be really lazy but also really easy to spam and get awareness.
By just writing text we eliminate all that visual audio garbage which 98% of anons suck dick at making.

The... the only easiest way to make it would be to grab the episode/movie you want to talk about, pause it at the correct time and add text over it if your microphone and voice are shit.

Was he the self hating black guy who reviews anime?

That's actually what a guy did a few years back, thing is he didn't edit some of the Yea Forums posts, and posted the raw shit in the video, complete with nigger jokes, rape jokes, 'comedic threats' to the people who worked on the shows, etc. His account got terminated.

I’d be tolerable if she ever had even a half way consistent upload schedule.

These are always insecure teens who think liking things makes them cringe

I blame Nolan for ruining her

I mean MrEnter seems like the type who is too attached to a concept to allow a cartoon company to meddle. Also autism is a massive assfucking in regards to being able to form connections and game social systems. I’m not saying it’s impossible, the creator of pokemon pulled it off, but it is certainly an additional barrier.

I mean I’m guilty of similar shit with my mindless attachment to my sci-fi setting but whatever. There’s a psychology where some of the stuff done to a media property by executives can come off as raping one’s own child in front of them.

Is Pan still the biggest cartoon reviewer?I mean he only has like 200,000 subs

e-celeb threads are cancer and against >>>/global/rules/11 and >>>Yea Forumsrules/1
OP is a faggot.
Do your part to help purge this board of subhumans like him by reporting this thread.
Here's a link so you don't have to scroll up to the top of the page.
sys.4channel.org/co/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=109755553

Yes, it's not like he has much stiff competition

Got a minor job in the animation industry then stopped posting things online.

>that Mary Sue video
Max cringe

Cosmodore is amazing

>it's literally rape to have sex with someone under false pretenses
>unless you're a transwoman tricking a straight man into fucking you, then he has an obligation to follow through
I wish these people would just fuck off already

>cartoon Youtubers
What, like Any Malu?

Attached: a3784714476_10.jpg (1200x1200, 288K)

>talking shit about zone
Aren't they chill with one another? Zone-Tan even cameoed in his Goth Girls video.

I think that's the reason Pan ranks above literally everyone else by default. He's autistic, but not autistic enough to look at a fucking Bugs Bunny cartoon and be like
>WHERE'D HE GET THAT HAMMER FROM? DOES HE JUST HAVE POCKETS IN HIS SKIN? WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE VEGAS, I DON'T GET IIIIIIIIT!

I wonder if this stooge also genuinely thinks we've got concentration camps at the border.
Because curiously enough,
>TRUMP IS LITERALLY ROUNDING UP AND EXTERMINATIMG POC
and
>WE NEED TO DISARM EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY POC
goes hand in hand for some reason. The authoritarian left cares not for the downtrodden, but rather enough to ensure they STAY downtrodden and remain dependent.

>>>Chuggaaconroy
>>Based
>Based
Based

Now this is epic

This guy's alright
youtube.com/watch?v=96_ALvh05bU

>I mean he only has like 200,000 subs
The creator of final space had far less and he gotten a show on television.

I used to love his vids but his humor is too wholesome for me. Still does great walkthroughs tho.

Gotta agree, I still watch his videos but he’s much more enjoyable when he’s with someone else to bounce off of.

WORD FILTER?

>>>>Chuggaaconroy
>>>Based
>>Based
>Based
Based

saberspark is alright, I like his commentary videos more then his reviews though. but I hate when he's trying pronounce some weird sandnigger name or whatever and is like "i'm sorry if I can't pronounce the name! i'm white haha"

>>>>>Chuggaaconroy
>>>>Based
>>>Based
>>Based
>Based
Based

>based
what the fuck, Mr Enter sucks and Yea Forums knew this, did he go full nazi or something so people from Yea Forums like him?
I don't know who this is, but just seeing this avatar that looks like it was made by a 10 y/o but probably made by someone in their 20s I fucking hate him.
I see this shit way too much on my recommended list, usually that fucking panda dude hating on Peggy Hill

Retard. There's a difference between drawing inspiration from someone else's work and blatantly using said work as your selling point.
Competent people do the former. Hacks with no talent of their own do the latter.

Attached: 5abde405d6cae_zw.jpg (595x630, 65K)

>>>>>>Chuggaaconroy
>>>>>Based
>>>>Based
>>>Based
>>Based
>Based
Eh, kind of based.

More Word filters

Personally, I don’t mind interferences as long it doesn’t fuck things up.

Short answer: no.
Long Answer: Nope.
Real Answer: Nope, mostly because most cartoon youtubers are just dudes that likes to watch cartoons but has no idea how critism or structured reviews/essays work, and those that do often broaden themself wider then fucking American Cartoons which has until recently just been either toy commericials or wacky sitcom.
But back to these dudes with cheap mics, often they have no idea how animation actually works, nor how fucking story structures work, so a lot of their critisms are just nitpicks and no analysm happens, and when they try it fails horribly.
This also leads to them not actually understanding whats good and whats bad animation, so the best they can do is digging up some obscure fact about the cartoon or movie.

Expections would be stuff like Pan, who clearly knows how the industry works and has contacts in it.

And like said, therealjims who actually dwells deeper into Simpsons episodes and what makes them work, plus he doesn't have a voice that makes me want to kill myself.
But basically, there are basically no good cartoon reviewers because 90% of them are morons who just got a mic and the ones that know this stuff probably do other stuff too (see Supereyepatchwolf)

That and American cartoons has no respect as an art form as they are all for kids, so no one actually takes a serious shot at them unlike anime and games

Attached: 67987978978.jpg (768x576, 50K)

Attached: 0021.webm (1280x544, 1014K)

But that's obviously not true.

this is what I meant when I said that people that could actually analyse cartoons at a meaningful level don't only do this, since all of these do other films too.

But seriously, Moviebob? Lily fucking Orchad? Schaffrillas Productions? terrible choices.

So the alcohol isn't just a gimmick?

mr enter is legit crazy
everyone should watch his trolls video where he pretty much advocates for killing people because he got bulied at school
it somehow worse than moviebob

tbf knowing the state of the world and living in fucking LA would you not also drink a lot?

Yikes
idunno how you get worse then Movie "Mario 3 was my 9/11" Bob, but Enter managed, would applause him if it wasn't so fucked up

Not to the point I go to jail, no.

>guys, I know what Tolkien said, but that doesn't matter, orcs are LITERALLY black people, look at how violent they are!

I used to avoid Overly Sarcastic Productions because of how tumblr it looked, but they're actually a pretty chill duo. Listening to Red talk about old literature and mythology is usually a fifteen minutes well spent.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 114K)

Make reviews nobody is willing to do; Hasbro's IPs for example.

This, it's a wide open market, also if you want easy bait just tell everyone just how bad Transformers Prime is.

That’s not even true. Mr. Enter was 100% discouraging harassment in that video because it leads into suicides.

Is he technically an animation reviewer?

Didn't he only reviewed spongebob and the rest of his channel is ytps and youtube exploration stuff?

Quinton reviews, before he went off the deep end?

Attached: F5A27C5A-797D-431E-B074-1F4B0BAFBE68.jpg (225x225, 12K)

He never reviewed cartoons. Only movies. Fuck off to Yea Forums

yeah, harrassing humans but trolls arent human so its fair game

Holy shit.

And I bet my ass everyone who disagrees with you is a 'troll'.

i meant thats what mr enter was saying
do you have autism or something?

I made the huge mistake of following that nigga on twitter.
His review quality is good, everything else he makes even as an ironic project is boring as all hell. And ever since he got bluepilled He became so incredibly vulnerable and easy to tick off with the slightest jab.

Mid level content, terrible personality.

Sabersparks is boring content just like NickT, PhantomS, and PGR

In order to rank your pathetic content creators I have designed this check list. This will ease you into knowing if the content they produce is just a time filler or it has something going for it.

>Has something to say other than show an episode and explain what's happening
>Has actual script and is not blabbering
>Has a consistent voice and knows how to modulate their audio
>Has an actual opinion that isn't just being a yes man
>Has experience in creation of media of any kind and has some insight into how the industry actually works
>The video is not padded and has actual focused direction
>The video is divided in easily digestable themes and topics
>Uses different terminology that isn't just "visuals" "style" and "design"
>Can actually bring appreciation and insight for the media you consume
>Actually cares what they're reviewing
>Is aware of their emotional influence over their opinion
>HAS DONE ACTUAL RESEARCH

The only name that comes to mind that fills the whole criteria is Yea Forums's Eyepatchwolf

I put him above almost everyone else because it's hard to watch a video of his and NOT come out wanting to play/watch/read the media he analyzed in the video.

That's the power of a good reviewer.

Attached: 1566866930651.png (638x480, 247K)

Pan's only big the way he is because nearly every other cartoon reviewer is either bland or on a scale of autism that isn't amusing

But you also have far more obscure cartoon fans who managed to pull off big shit like getting their own show or their college cartoon becoming an online shit among the cartoon community which resulted in it getting more longer online episodes
Pan could only muster up a comic that was incredibly confusing because he added in way too much shit for such a simple concept and had to redo it several times. It also doesn't help that he's stuck in the past so his cartoons look like someone barely managing to copy the art style of the 2000s

Attached: 1564304740371.jpg (442x442, 36K)

ENOUGH IS E N O U G H !

What do you guys think of Steve Reviews?
youtube.com/watch?v=Mhfdw74erqc
youtube.com/watch?v=5v38amCo0Q0

He's finished the tutorial/low hanging fruit by reviewing something as simple as Dexter's Lab and PPG which have immediate worse(r) seasons which are prime for reviewing.

He also reviewed A LOT of edgy horror cartoons because that's what he kept being suggested.
His voice is pretty alright, it doesn't sound annoying like a lot of people.

I wonder how he'd fare off against reviewing more complex movies.

I HAVE HA-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-AAAAAAAAAAA

let's be real here, if she didn't spout sjw jargon every video she would probably be a decent tuber.

Her reviews suck tremendous ass, I find her "loose canon" videos to be much more interesting because they bring something to learn from them. The reviews are just "WHY IT'S BAD" for 45 minutes

I'm half, and almost half my cousins are also half. So it could be true, but considering it's coming from a delusional sjw, I doubt it.

What about Alpha Jay?

Attached: Alphajay.jpg (900x900, 79K)

Shit tier, he's the literal definition of "20 minute video could be summed up in 45 seconds"

Padded annoying content, I personally have his channel blacklisted

Quintin doesn't really do much in his videos other than say "Thing good" He always fails to go i deeper

Watcher of the 2000s was good, but I never cared for his autistic story line. I wish he'd come back

I think his bloodborne video was pretty good as well, but it has a fucking half hour about dark souls 2 in the middle which really doesn't need to be there.
The massively bloated length of his videos turns me off the stuff he produces more than anything else.

The titles of his videos alone make him sound like he sucks ass.

who??

fucking terrible all his videos can be summed up as a dude whining and he really milks the Peggy Hill hate and I seriously don't think he understands that Peggy Hill acts the way she does for comedy sake.

How do you guys watch so many animation channels? I can't stand the majority of them; I'm only subscribed to two.

What about that blonde chick in a fedora and gloves? I used to see her videos on my recommended sometimes

I don't watch many if any of them on the regular, I've seen them for half a video and then never again, most are fucking garbage, like chockingly shit

That is funny. This actually seems like the exact video for OP. How serendipitous.

His only good video is Sherlock one because fuck Sherlock and fuck Moffat.

I work while watching Netflix/Youtube almost all day. I have plentiful time to check out these channels while working by putting them as background noise. They usually don't requiere me to pay attention to the screen since it's just cropped footage from the show.

>gave Where The Dead Go To Die a chance and a proper review instead of sperging out about how it's the worst thing ever conceived
He's awesome.

Attached: 15641728797650.jpg (759x847, 110K)

She told the cartoon YouTubers to fuck off and now parades around in a mask and cape telling people to watch movies credits or else they're an asshole

Felix Colegrave makes nice stuff

Emp is based

To shorten your list
>Has something to say other than show an episode and explain what's happening
>Has actual script and is not blabbering
>Has the technical ability to make a video, including editing
>Has an actual opinion that isn't just being a yes man
>Has experience in creation of media of any kind and has some insight into how the industry actually works
>[technical, see above]
>[technical]
>Uses different terminology that isn't just "visuals" "style" and "design"
>Can actually bring appreciation and insight for the media you consume
>[moot point]
>Is aware of their emotional influence over their opinion
>HAS DONE ACTUAL RESEARCH

What about this guy? youtube.com/user/ToonrificTariq

This

Of course, he's one of those kinds of Kefkafags.

Yeah,she just complains about Adult Swim and Frederator, last time I checked.

I didn't say we're all of equal value, I said we all suck.
I didn't say we suck equally or in the same way. Also, we all rule.

All 3 are capable of actually analysing the subject matter.

Also you failed to name anyone who was better than them.

They’re truly unknown.
This is the first I’ve ever heard of them.

No, she stopped doing that and put on a super edgy costume instead

>I mention I'm gay and people look at me like I'm a freak of nature
Pretty sure it's not from you being gay as much as it is your attitude about it, Olivia.

Will he dare to touch Shoujo Tsubaki?

>one of those unironic "Jontron is a fascist racist Nazi" niggas
Nah

If I want a review of shows made by people pandering to trannies then the opinion of an actual tranny is informative.

Probably. But by the same token, if you're reviewing some bigass commercial film from Disney or whatever and explaining why it's bad, the runtime better not crest 30 mins unless your channel name is RedLetterMedia or RalphTheMovieMaker.

Sideways reminds me of this guy
youtube.com/user/everyframeapainting/videos

I named people who can actually analyse things and have something interesting to say. Whether you agree with their conclusions or not is another matter.

Some of his videos are kind of bloated, but for the most part I think he's pretty good all things considered.

Wrong, nobody is below Dobson. Doug Walker is a very distant second.

Total retard seems a bit unlikely.

Except Lily can't, her video is a really bad example of it.
Moviebob probably knows but his conclusions are so batshit insane and so rooted in him not getting over being bullied in school you can't take them seriously.
Schaffrilla, well honestly he's just a moron with bad taste most of the time desu, least worst of the 3

>it somehow worse than movie bob
Mr enters a sperg. But he nowhere as bad as movie bob. Keep in mind movie bob called for violence against conservatives, Christians and student-athletes all the way back in the 90s. He still does on twitter.
>Halo has no black characters
>halo white supremacy propaganda because the Covenat are more multicultural than UNSC
>Halo has a lot of pro Nazi themes because character had blue eyes
>Halo pro genocide against covenat and the flood
Even with out advocating violence on twitter movie bob still a far worse reviewer than mr enter. Movie bob a more cuck Dobson.
youtube.com/watch?v=WS7eeGbDIz4

Attached: 417CE080-2B57-46E8-896D-33111074FE28.jpg (532x890, 120K)

Jesus fucking christ I forgot about this fucking Halo video, what the actual fuck Bob

His content is so fucking boring.

Eh that sounds like it could be hit or miss.
What did you like about it?

Pan actually puts effort in his videos and does some research instead of picking some low hanging fruit to screech "bad cartoon bad"

Schaffrillas is just a theater kid. He's got potential, his Shrek and Hunchback videos were really good. The problem is when he tries too hard to be le funny internet personality
>his Shark Tale video, which despite all the hype actually made Shark Tale look good because his points all boiled down to "there's puns" or "the main character of this redemption story is a dick until he learns his lesson"
or when he gets his liberal arts undergrad sjw shit everywhere
>older stuff needs to be censored, the Big Bad Wolf joke in Shrek 2 is problematic, cops bad criminals good

I could see him growing out of it and becoming a really good content creator, but it really depends on how his current approach works out for him and evolves.

>it's just a hook

>he's even triggered by chicken fries
I can't fathom living like one of these people. Just looking at that tweet and imagining the kind of mindset which must have spawned it makes me physically exhausted.

>his liberal arts undergrad sjw shit
he has none of that, the fact he jokes about those shows he thinks they're dumb.
He's taking far more from people like RLM and others by just trying to be edgy instead of having an actual good essay

>Except Lily can't, her video is a really bad example of it.
Care to explain why. Her video on why Steven Universe is bad made many valid points.

>Moviebob probably knows but his conclusions are so batshit insane
What about his review of Batman vs Superman? That had a sane conclusion.

>Schaffrilla, well honestly he's just a moron with bad taste most of the time desu, least worst of the 3
I'd say he's the least analytical of the 3.

Let me know when you can make an actual argument.

He is. He’s openly a white nationalist.

But RLM doesn't try to be edgy outside of maybe The Nerd Crew and one PhD off videos like the one with the action figures in acetone.
They're one of the few movie channels to actually back up their points instead of they just saying "MOVIE BAD"

>He’s openly a white nationalist.
wtf I love JonTron now

Attached: naf5fxJtZ71r9xitko2_400.gif (400x225, 1.4M)

>The persian man who works with black crew members is openly a white nationalist
Kek

Oh he is.
He's a virulently racist and nationalistic.
Which is fucking hilarious because he's a camel fucker and his parents are illegal aliens.

He litterally only got his gig with disney and all of the trending tab and suggestions tab pushing and fake subscriptions because he's an arab or persian or one of those middle eastern people. He's a self hating diversity hire.

>Jontron is literally Uncle Ruckus because he dared question why nobody says there are too many Asian people in Asia when everyone's complaining about Anglo countries being "too white"
Okay Destiny

user, it will take seconds for people to google up jontrons name and find out what went down.
You look like you're either him or your one of the people that he's got on Yea Forums shillign for him.

>anyone who doesn't believe white people are evil is literally a Nazi
>or a paid shill
You're either baiting or you're just very smug about being ignorant.

All youtube e-celeb threads are nothing more than advertisements.
Note to the mods, my behavior is known as scorched earth self moderation and is widely practiced by the denizens of your precious pet board, Yea Forums. Therefore, in your eyes, my actions are absolutely infallible and my demand must be met as soon as possible.

Attached: 1764166.png (908x682, 160K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1764056.png (1329x1485, 628K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1652951.png (565x496, 184K)

Attached: Boring.png (521x556, 549K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

>You don't know fear
Probably because they have a gun.
At this point the only real thing to be done against guns is have one yourself. Criminals aren't just going to give up their illegal guns because someone said so.

Attached: 1652543.jpg (874x1280, 120K)

e;r

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1764501.png (823x1500, 972K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1653780.jpg (989x1280, 236K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1653225.png (969x1059, 295K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1653195.png (800x1000, 222K)

ATTENTION MODS!
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS AND DELETE THIS SHITTY, RULE BREAKING THREAD!

Attached: 1653777.png (1080x960, 386K)

Then what is the fucking point you god damn asshat

>return to the thread
>see horse show porn
Wow, you fuckers really want to nuke this thread. And the fact someone has an entire folder of that shit.

Attached: Im_Sorry.jpg (567x405, 34K)

Oh no, it's some autist who does this every once in a while like a big baby. He thinks he can get mods to delete this thread when instead the jannies prune it and he ends up banned for 72
I believe he's genuinely mentally retarded, as in the non-pejorative sense. He actually takes what he's doing very seriously

The "mods" don't care about the quality of this board or this website or the collective sanity and intelligence of the human race. They want to bring in as many anarchistic, sociopathic, intellectually regressive subhuman troglodytes as possible so that they can make money off of them through ad revenue and because they're under direct orders from hiroyuki to do so.
The only possible way to salvage Yea Forums is by a changing of the guard, and since they refuse to step down willingly, they must be removed forcefully.
Desperate times call for desperate measures, therefore each and every single mod needs to be doxxed, hunted down, and murdered.
swaglord is an ideal starting point since his identity is already public knowledge and because the mod team is primarily consisted of moot's real life friends, which means that with enough torture, he can tell us where they can be found.

This thread just started getting good,but had to be ruined by pony fags.I cant wait your children show ends and you will finally fuck off and die.

MODS PERMABAN THE PONY FAG! NOT THE THREAD!

I WANT HIM BACK SO BADLY, GOD DAMNIT

Attached: 8449231f500b1604118ca0587bdeab1c.jpg (540x545, 27K)

He makes really good videos though

IraqLobster?

Why is Akagi a cartoon reviewer

Does Phelous count?
youtube.com/watch?v=m3PX7cdMOe4

that's an evader good luck banning him.

>taking anything Lindsay I'm so drunk I'll fight a cop Ellis seriously

Oof. Nope.

I don't like him, he's black.

Attached: IMG_1275.jpg (814x565, 78K)

Same.
Months back I finally took the plunge and watched her HP lovecraft video since it was always hanging around in my reccomended feed. Pleasantly surprised and while her style did have that distinct tumblr edge to it (not to mention the poofy hair+same face) it certainly grew on me.
Have to admit her take on things is rather well rounded. Her journey to the west, dante's inferno and king arthur videos were more engaging than I thought it would be.

Attached: red wip.jpg (703x1300, 206K)

Did you see his new movie When Black Birds Fly? I think he did a better job, it still looks like ass and has terrible kinect mocap, but the story was actually pretty interesting and the characters weren't insufferable. I think he should have kept his original ending though, it would have made the film better.

I’m planning on creating my own channel for animation discussion/review/analysis. I have drafted up a strategy on what my channel will be and I think I can do well, but i’m still stuck on one point, maybe you guys can help.

When reviewing something, i’m stuck between wanting to give a surface level 5 minutes or less spoiler free review that acts as a recommendation/anti-recommendation resource for viewers looking for stuff to watch, or a deep dive analysis/discussion breaking down the intricacies of a production, really going all out in every meaningful thing I have to say (20~ minutes).

My question is, what makes more sense:
A. Short and sweet recommendation videos only
B. Long form analysis for the hardcores only
C. Both types in separate videos (for example “Do I recommend Aeon Flux (5mins)” and “Aeon Flux: The Mad Mind of Peter Chung (20 mins)” releasing back to back
D. Both types done in one video with a spoiler warning after the initial opening recommendation and overview “Aeon Flux Review/Analysis (25 minutes)”

>literally HAVE to have a euro/aussie accent to produce analytical content that is light on humor that actually generates watchtime

People get bored of American voices drawling on for any longer than a few minutes unless you have a bit going on. Aussies, brits, scots, irishmen, etc are fucking lucky.

trannies kill themselves because they have a fuck ton of mental issues

As an american I literally will switch out of a video the second I hear a shit british or other related accent.
They're fucking grating to hear drone on.

D isn't a bad option, I've found.
I've made a few videos about movies and shit and I usually open with a "I did/didn't like it here's my recommendation spoilers start now" type segment

You should do C. I think more reviewers should do a short version for new viewers and a longer review for people who care. It will also help you make changes to the longer version if you made mistakes in the short.
Also be sure to have a good mic and speak clearly. I'd rather someone do a clear and concise review than someone using skits, jokes, or overly edited effects.

C. is what i’m leaning towards, my main concern with D. is scaring off some of my target market with the length of the video. Essentially i’m trying to balance two use cases:

Person A is looking for recommendations for what to watch. They want:
1. A quick spoiler free video that gives enough of a taste of the show/movie/whatever for them to make an informed decision to invest their time in it, without giving so much away as to hamper that experience
2. An explanation of the core appeal of the subject in question, who is it for, who is it not for
3. A short enough video to not feel like they’ve wasted their time if they decide the show/film/whatever isn’t for them

In doing this you create a library of easily digestible videos for people at every level of investment in the medium. With proper playlisting you have an incredibly bingable format with a relatively wide audience and a relatively low effort/time cost in terms of production.

Person B is either an enthusiast or a fan of the subject in question, they are clicking on the video to learn and to ruminate deeply into one specific subject they care about. They want:
1. A detailed, enlightening, informed and valuable take on a particular subject
2. A fine tooth comb that gets them thinking about something they love in a new way, or allows them to expand their own critical lens
3. A long enough video to really give the subject the time and respect it deserves, obviously without needless fluff or padding.

In doing so you tackle the enthusiast market, a relatively untapped segment for animation fans, especially cartoons. Enthusiasts are fewer in number, but are FAR more likely to support you through subscriptions, sustained watchtime and eventually through monetization like patreon.
1/2

I have a good format for both, right now i’m wrestling with titling conventions and thumbnail styles to help differentiate the two use cases for new people to find their “lane” so to speak. Ideally person A. would watch a recommendation video, become invested in the subject and become Person B. who will then watch the accompanied deep dive video.

Other conceptual issues i’m tackling is a general entertainment level. My preference would be to avoid skits or gags as much as possible, so i’m looking at how to keep the content engaging without sacrificing credibility or distracting from the goal of informing the viewer.

Finally i’m looking for a path of WHAT to tackle and discuss. I’m interested in just about anything in terms of animation, but I doubt starting out with obscure Russian animation is what drives those starting numbers. My tentative plans are a “Disney run” of their theatrical animated productions, and then picking one of the big two (Nickelodeon of Cartoon Network) and reviewing their original programming in chronological order. I’d also like to tackle anime if possible, but that’s a much more competitive market.

2/2

Thanks for listening to my autistic thinking out loud.

this is the guy that unironically said Korra was shit. How can anyone take him seriously

>dude /pol/ lmao

but it is though

This

I think you should use the short recommendation like reviews on more mainstream stuff like Disney and do longer analysis on obscure Russian animation that delves into both the historical significance and interesting information on it's production.
A good way to get the right people to be interested is to have a "friendly" looking thumbnail for the shorter reviews and purposely name them "reviews". Do a more plain looking thumbnail with "analysis" on the more lengthy ones.