Do you prefer Fidelity or Creative Freedom in Capeshits?

Attached: _92757_Medium.jpg (916x689, 659K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/ReelAnarchy/status/1167802813881245696
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>fidelity
is that the codeword now?

Creative freedom is only acceptable when it produces something good.

The BOP outfit is a fucking abomination. One of the worst designs in the history of superhero films.

Pic related minus the dress with more red would have been perfect for live action and instead the fuckers pissed in our faces.

Attached: 4013931-4010307-10517381_794562063909621_7081613011641423776_o.jpg (333x647, 59K)

Why didn't they just ditch Margot Robbie and hired a girl that was willing to dress on a slutty outfit? Those yellow overalls are an abomination. I'm sure you can get a girl on Hooters that can do a better job than Robbie

Neither of those have "fidelity". They're both new, creative designs that didn't exist before. The only difference is one is good and one isn't.

>Arkham hooker Harley is now considered the baseline from which new looks deviate


Fucking end me

Trenchant insight.

creative freedom when it comes to good movies. DC movies however would be better off being as faithful as possible or not existing at all

There has never been a character as badly passed from one generation of writers to another.

>Uses shitty comic costume instead of based classic.
You're part of the problem

Attached: HQ_BT_2.jpg (700x896, 62K)

The modern costumes are clearly better tho. I'm sorry you love living in the past.

Attached: harley-quinn-birds-of-prey-movie-gets-an-official-title-ign_rg2j.jpg (1920x1080, 234K)

>A New Error
>Heads Will Roll
Guys, I think these Birds of Prey teasers are trying to tell us something

>The modern costumes are clearly better tho.
>The shitty modern hooker Harley costumes are better

Attached: 1566781883930.jpg (500x371, 52K)

Why didn't they just ditch Margot Robbie and write a different film about different characters with better actors.

that is literally a lolita outfit
even without the skirt she is essentially wearing nothing at all

so now the big hill to die on is about whether she looks male gazey or not?

Attached: jojkj.png (540x300, 257K)

user the only redeeming part of Margot Robbie in Suicide Squad was that she bent over in booty shorts for the trailer. "Male gaze" is her only selling point.

she started out as a nurse and then that look got popular
then she became a biker in city and then finally she became a lolita
her fans have no concept of what is a baseline look for harley quinn because like iron man she is always changing her costume/suit now

Attached: iiijmog.jpg (640x800, 62K)

Lolis are sexy, so it's good

this

I mean do you really think Tarantino hired her for her acting "talent"

meh she looked hot but so did katana
harley's biggest selling point now is that she is visually stimulating to the masses

her costumes have to pop and become meme's

Attached: d8c539c482b9a4345bc9c33b802db5eb.jpg (640x872, 172K)

Creative freedom is important, it's how we get new innovative takes on things, and more importantly it's how we get new media that isn't a sequel.
That said, it's also how we get terrible things that shouldn't have been made.
So while it varies hard it's still essential.

That was bait user, no one hates the og design.
It's literal art.
Well, twitter feminists probably do because it links back to a woman being abused by a man, but it's still a great design most people will always prefer.

Her costume looks terrible though. That's why, if Margot doesn't want to dress like a slut, they should just get someone who will.

she was perfectly willing to dress in slutty outfits until she hit 30

twitter.com/ReelAnarchy/status/1167802813881245696
yikes

Margot Robbie just need to wear a corset in a tight Harley Quinn suit
It would be perfect

Attached: corset-overbust-arlequina-harley-quinn-corset-overbust.jpg (1200x1200, 317K)

a shame i can't speak italian

The actress made Harley a popular character with audiences. Why would they replace her with a literal who? And no making your pp hard is not an answer

>Why didn't they just ditch Margot Robbie and hired a girl that was willing to dress on a slutty outfit?
Robbie was one of the highlights of Suicide Squad. She was one of the most marketable characters and pretty much the only one any fangirl cosplayed that year. My dick was quite pleased at the time.

But Will Smith decided to quit DC and without him, Robbie didnt have much reason to stick around either. WB decided to sweeten their deal with her by giving her more creative power (big mistake), make her the leader of the Birds of Prey (another big mistake), and then they hired a lady director, which was perhaps their biggest mistake of all. Now, the movie won't be about Harley being sexy and free, it'll be about female empowerment in general, with zero eye candy.

Isn't Harley is one of the only female cape characters girls like. What's wrong with making a movie for them

>The actress made Harley a popular character with audiences
The slutty costume being easy to mimic did that. Many of the people dressing up as her didn't watch the film.

>Why would they replace her with a literal who?
Because she's not wearing an attractive costume, which was the only reason anyone cared about her in Suicide Squad.

Name ONE franchise that didn't get ruined by creative freedom

>Robbie was one of the highlights of Suicide Squad
She was almost the worst thing in the film, surpassed only by Leto Joker. I don't think you watched Suicide Squad.

DC need to make generally good films to capitalise on the few ones they have. They can pander to demographics with shit films after they've done that. Imagine if the first Marvel film was Captain Marvel instead of Iron Man, they'd be sunk.

Girls like her because she's sexy, not because she's some type of feminist icon. That's why they dressed like the Suicide Squad version. That version was still tied to Joker.

But you already know that. You just wanted my (You). I'm giving it to you for anyone who sincerely believes the way you pretend to believe.

You say that because you prefer Classic Harley. That's fine. I'm speaking about the normie reaction to her. SS Harley was popular, despite how poorly the movie was received overall.

Shut up retard

>You say that because you prefer Classic Harley. That's fine. I'm speaking about the normie reaction to her. SS Harley was popular, despite how poorly the movie was received overall.
SS Harley's outfit was. No one cared about Harley herself. That's why most of the memes were still written like she was Mad Love Harley, most of the people who loved her look didn't watch or care for the film.

>Girls like her because she's sexy, not because she's some type of feminist icon

This
Hollywood producers need to understand at once that only, like, 1.3% of all the women in the world identify as "feminists". Most normal girls can't give two shits about boring political movements for fat women

Im falling for your bate but fuck it. The originals a cheap jester costume she just steals.It fits with her gimmick and name. Despite covering more skin its even more sexual and attractive as its skin tight.

We won't have Huntress wearing this suit
Why have her in the movie anyway?

Attached: 1564046853919.jpg (515x780, 105K)

Freedom, so long as the person in charge is an auteur like Gunn and not a hack like Whedon or Snyder.

If they don't come up with something as good as or better than the source material, either find someone else or force them to stick as close to the book as is sensible.

Creative freedom has worked wonders for the MCU, warts and all. Off the top of my head, the following improved on the source material
>vulture
>ego
>mysterio
>falcon
>helmutt zemo
>pre-endgame thor
>thanos
>civil war
>guardains of the galaxy in general

Birds of Prey is pretty useful in terms of being the "containment" movie, desu

Why even bother with superheroines they're boring and just fapbait.

Confirmed for not reading any Simonson or JMS Thor or any Guardians comics pre-Bendis.

> even without the skirt she is essentially wearing nothing at all
What in the fuck are you talking about?
Their are pants under the skirt.
The only exposed skin are part of her arms, her head and cleavage.

Because those dont sell to her fanbase.

Her "fanbase" are looking for fashion or wank material, not characters. Write a better film and have one of the characters you kill off early dress like a three dollar whore. Best of both worlds.

Half of that list is wrong

> Off the top of my head, the following improved on the source material
>pre-endgame thor
Have you read any Thor you fucking psychotic?

neither capeshit movies were a mistake

Nah, they'll go not muh harley and bitch about that too.

>>vulture
>>falcon
>>civil war

Shit militar tatic suits

>>guardains of the galaxy in general

LMAO, they covered all women
Oh, this is good now, lol

Attached: 31457hgxx.png (476x356, 108K)

Aren't you supposed to have an example of fidelity when you make one of these posts?

>her fans have no concept of what is a baseline look for harley quinn because like iron man she is always changing her costume/suit now
Well for one thing it's red and black instead of fucking blue and pink. Getting the costume wrong is one thing but not being able to get the basic fucking colors down?

Fidelity of course

Attached: 1563913739078.jpg (1023x767, 224K)