Spider-Man: Far from Home Extended Cut

Spider-Man: Far from Home Extended Cut starts screening today with 6 more min. than the normal version. Anyone gonna see it?

Attached: qpalxz8zt4j31.jpg (1886x2786, 770K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/RKMNPQ35OUc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Fuck off, shill. DLC is cancerous regardless of the medium.

Shills don't exist.

No.
/thread

Sony can fuck off if they think I am going to give them any more of my money after they took Spider-man out the MCU.

I'm out of the loop, what finally happened with Spidey? How the negotiations ended?

>6 more min
My god! How exciting!

... Yeah, no. I'm not going to pay money to watch a version that is barely different. I don't even think I'd notice the difference unless I were to watch the cuts back to back.

RotK was extended by an hour and Terminator 2 by 17 minutes. Some movies like Blade Runner and Alien don't really get longer but are noticably different but I doubt that's what they're gonna do here.

Attached: time to die roy.jpg (1724x921, 172K)

couldn't care less about ironboy and his lame ass cast, hopefully sony keeps Spidey away from the MCU

>I'm out of the loop, what finally happened with Spidey? How the negotiations ended?

Here's the rundown:
>HC and FFH were entirely funded by Sony, while Disney earned 5% of the box offie and were allowed to use SM characters in other movies.
>After the success of FFM, Disney wanted a deal where they funded 50% and reaped 50% box office (while presumably also being allowed to use SM in other movies without Sony getting cut).
>Sony didn't like this deal and didn't renew the partnership.
>Disney allegedly tried a 30% version of this deal but that didn't work out either.
>Sony still has Tom Holland on for 2 more movies and might intend to put him in Venom 2 and/or Morbius.
>Sony wanted to keep Feige on as a producer but Disney would not let them.
>Sony are still going through with Nightwatch, Kraven, Sinister Six, Black Cat and Silver Sable.
>Spider-Verse 2 and the all-female spin-off are still happening along with that TV show.
>On Disney's side, they're still making the 2017 SM show. It looked to be dead but there seems to have been given extra attention now that the movie rights thing happened.
>In addition to that, Disney Jr will air a chibi Spider-Man cartoon for toddlers.
>There might be some loophole that allows for MCU Spider-Man to continue in some form.
>There is always still time to allow for a new deal but considering one company wants a 95% profit and the wants a raise by 10 times, it seems unlikely for now.

TL;DR: Disney grasped all and lost all.

Attached: spidey and his amazing friends.jpg (1944x1400, 331K)

Thanks for the rundown user, appreciate it.

Maybe, I liked it enough but it depends on if I get my brother or friend to go with me. I wonder if they’ll change the ending to not make it quite as awkward with the separation from the mcu

If they announced that they were able to iron out a deal for Spidey to continue in the mcu I'd have considered it as a thank you. Until both sides accept a deal I'm not seeing anything Spidey related at the movies. Yes I'm pissed at Disney too.

Agreed. You don’t put Spider-Man in the position where he interacts with a greater universe of other heroes and larger stakes only to shove him back into a solo universe where nothing extends beyond his small corner of the universe. That’s a major backslide. The genie is out of the bottle, you can’t shove it back in and expect to have the same effect and excitement

Wasn't there a rumor by a Mikey Sutton, who leaked the original deal from 2015, that a new one was looking more likely now? It's in both parties best interest to keep the deal going as long as they make a good one cause they'd make more money working together in the long run.

The problem is that HC and FFH were both hangling Spidey on the strings like a MCU puppet. This incarnation was NEVER independent. They turned major hero into sidekick. I agree you can't shove him back into something that doesn't exist.

That would be the smart thing to do especially when seeing the success of Far From Home proving to be some of the most successful the franchise has seen. However, why would a company think about smart things like that when they can be more like this:
youtu.be/RKMNPQ35OUc

I've seen people say fans won't care but I feel they most certainly will. Spiderverse was animated so it's its own thing. Normies assumed Venom was mcu even if wrong. For Pete to ignore all of the past movies, characters, Stark, it'd all be bullshit. If Sony thinks fans will accept that then they're retarded. If Disney thinks folks will be happy with the mcu now without Spidey then they're also retarded.

If no deal is made they're both fucking retarded basically.

Based
Fuck Snoy

What? Why? He can ignore Uncle Ben just fine.

Daffy works for both parties here. If Spidey gets kicked out because of this sorta mentality it's insane. Like these multi-million dollar companies can't think beyond their noses and let a ton money go to waste just because they don't want to share even a little. Why share a little of a billion when you could make a million?? They're like babies fighting over a toy in a room full of toys instead of sharing and having a TMNT vs Heman battle.

Thing is, they were clearly building him up to become that, essentially developing him from a teen hero who was still green and brought into the bigger game to a hero who stood on his own. Hell both movies even had the point of him having to step up on his own and save the day his way. Homecoming when his suit was taken away leaving him to rely on what he originally had and Far From Home when he realizes what Mysterio was up to and goes off to stop him even designing his own suit rather than using what someone else gave him. His narrative was him stepping out of Tony’s shadow

>new post credits scene
>the New Avengers show up saying "there's a new threat and we need your help Spidey, you in?"
>just before he can say yes a bunch of Sony execs show up and drag him away

They didn't ignore him. Pete and May touched on that in Homecoming. They just never lingered on it cause it's been done to death.

...The shadow he should never have been in to begin with...

Except he didn’t ignore Uncle Ben. He wasn’t mentioned by name as we’ve seen the story a million times but he flat out voiced Uncle Ben’s lesson back in Civil War when he first met Tony. Who do you think he learned that from?

What's wrong with Spidey having a hero mentor?

Considering that their relationship was used to develop both characters, it kinda served an important purpose for the overall universe. It exists for a reason

I liked how he phrased it. Felt more natural than with great power. Was something like when you can do what I can and the bad things happen but you don't stop it it's your fault.

Disney shouldn't have been so greedy then

Fuck megacorps, all of them

Its funny that you can say that without a hint of irony. Going all the way back to day fucking one, Spidey's major appeal was that he was a teen hero who wasn't some faggot sidekick, but a guy that stepped up and learnt all his own lessons the hard way.

If you've ever heard Stan Lee bragging about what a success Spider-Man was, that's his major point of pride.

Gj user this is a quality post

That's about as much of a mention as the MCU will get in the new films, and you cucks will be crying about it.

There’s a fine line between not having to rehash the same thing for the 50 millionth time and half-assed ignoring continuity that shaped the character because you can’t use it. That’s a major false equivalence

>They totally acknowledged Uncle Ben, even thought they didn't even say his name
>But if they do the same to muh MCU, its a tragedy
mousecucks need to have sex.

I agree. And with Tony gone he's hit with the harsh reality that he's on his own. Ignoring all that happened isn't a good way to go about it though.

Not if they make a new deal which is still possible.

I watched this movie twice to help FFH reach a billion so it can stay in mcu.
Now it's not in mcu.
I dont care who's fault it is for fucking u ppl the deal, if I see this extended cut I'm pirating
AAAARGGH

Please tell me you're joking. Otherwise...
wew lad. I feel bad even making fun of someone with a legitimate intellectual impairment.

Disney got greedy as shit, Sony was right to pull back on the deal. If Disney wants Spiderman, they better buy him, but they won't. Don't blame Sony because the Mouse wanted to rework an already one-sided deal.

This movie doesn't exist to me anymore, literally not canon and it never happened

>he watched the movie so it could reach a billion
>"if spider man reaches a billion he stays in the MCU"

lmao, that wasn't a real thing you idiot, it was a rumor started by the same guy who said Kathleen Kennedy was going to get fired

I would watch it if there were added scenes of Mysterio/Beck, but it's just one fight scene with some mafia goons.
So no.

>>HC and FFH were entirely funded by Sony
Wait I thought they were fund by Disney, and the fact that they only earned 5% from box office is the reason why these two movies have such low budget when compared to other Spider-Man films.

Disney had some production people there, but the actual funding was from Sony.

they were funded by Marvel Studios (that's why Feige is a producer) don't know where the fuck the "Sony funds them" came from
You're right, next Spider Man movies if done by Sony will have pretty expensive budgets which is the thing that killed ASM

>You disagree with my supreme opinion so you need to have sex
Congrats, you don’t know how to respond without throwing shade

What's the point? It wont matter to the general narrative within the MCU or the following Spider-man movies.
Pass.

>Lone Star Fundsalso co-financed the film with Sony, via itsLSC Film Corporationdeal,covering 25% of the $175million budget,whileColumbia Picturesofficially served as co-producer with Marvel Studios.Sony also paid Marvel Studios an undisclosed producer fee.

Continue to pull shit out of your ass if you want though.