>Kit Harington as Dane Whitman / Black Knight.
>Gemma Chan as Sersi.
>Richard Madden as Ikaris.
>Angelina Jolie as Thena.
>Salma Hayek as Ajak.
>Lauren Ridloff as Makkari.
>Lia McHugh as Sprite.
>Bryan Tyree Henry as Phastos.
>Kumail Nanjiani as Kingo.
>Don Lee as Gilgamesh.
>Barry Kheogan as Druig.
Black Knight and Sersi are the main characters and the movie revolves around their forbidden romance. Druig is the main villain.
Other urls found in this thread:
comicbook.com
twitter.com
Not a fan. All the outfits look too similar and not Kirby-enough. If Thor 3 can crib design from Kirby, this movie really ought to.
>Black Knight and Sersi are the main characters and the movie revolves around their forbidden romance
DCucks BTFO
Good luck doing New Gods now losers
I still don't know what this film is supposed to be about and that cast is just MASSIVE
This feels like a recycled script for that Inhumans movie before it got turned into that failed TV show.
I fucking hate that poo actor and his stupid smug face
>I still don't know what this film is supposed to be about
MCU Eternals are basically stealing the Inhumans' schtick as a race of superhumans who live in seclusion from norman humans. Since there's been zero mention of the Deviants and Druig is the main villain, it seems like they're going for the civil war angle with a Maximus-like figure, plus a Romeo & Juliet-esque love story between Sersi and Black Knight to rope in the female audience.
>No luchador Gilgamesh
>No red gloves on Ikaris
>No bare shoulders on Sersi
>Phastos not bald
>Niggkari
5/7 it's shit
They are were no one gives a shit about Eternals, so they did whatever the fuck they wanted.
:-(
Makkari is cute. Cute!
Why is no-one on Yea Forums talking about the blonde erasure of Ikaris?
Really boring costumes
Get fucked Aryans
Is Black Knight an Eternal though? I’m so puzzled as to when this will take place.
>Is Black Knight an Eternal though?
No, he's human.
>>Lauren Ridloff as Makkari.
.......
My guess is that Eternals takes place during Olde English/King Arthur Times?
Sounds fairly likely. They did say the movie would span "thousands of years in the MCU".
I wonder if they"ll show the Eternals do the Uni-mind.
I bet he just appears as Dane Whitman, human scientist
Their costumes look like MOBA characters. Maybe that’s what they were going for?
>MCU Eternals are basically stealing the Inhumans' schtick as a race of superhumans who live in seclusion from norman humans.
Okay you don't really have to out yourself as a casual this hard anonymously, but just so you know, this is literally the plot from Gaiman's and Knauf's Eternals, and Kirby's run also had them hiding among humans aside from a few who arrived again to Earth. This wasn't invented by Inhumans.
Eternals exist in the fringes of the Marvel Universe, Inhumans are the top secret superhumans, and what they do in the comics the Eternals will do in the movies.
>I wonder if they"ll show the Eternals do the Uni-mind.
This is all I care about. And then showing AND naming the Celestials in their whole glory.
Their suits aren't really they distinctive anyway, aside from the colors. I am beginning to think a lot of people really don't know how they're supposed to look like and are seething because they think they don't look "Kirby" enough when in truth they do, half-lit costumes aren't exactly a good way to compare them.
Inhumans aren't "top secret superhumans" more than the Eternals are. Both lived in seclusion, ones in Olympia (the Antarctic) and the others in the Himalayas before moving to the Moon and New Jersey, once they gained notoriety. But the Eternals have always, ALWAYS lived in Olympia while hiding among humans using fake names.
As a Heroclix fag, fuck Uni-Mind.
I'm starting to get more and more convinced it was a mistake to make a whole movie about these nobodies, even if I do want the Celestials expanded on. And I supported GotG from the day it was announced. I mean, at least GotG was weird and diverse in its characters' backgrounds and visual designs. These guys are ethnically diverse sure, but they all just look like generic humans, they all have the same genetic engineering backstory, and their costumes are different color variants of the same fucking thing. Oooh, people in shiny material with circles on it, so impressive. What's the draw? People at least saw the ads for GotG and were curious that there was a movie with a raccoon and a talking tree in it. People are going to see this and go "It looks like a more boring version of that shitty ABC show with the big cg dog and the magic hair". And they'll be absolutely right.
May I ask why?
I've been wondering about Heroclix again since I saw Zub sharing a Voyager piece (and she's one of my favorite new charades). So what's the deal with them?
They are demigods from a primordial era in Marvel, and as you can surmise by the names, inspiration for the respective mythos in these specific gods. But most importantly they're protectors of the planet that were seeded by the Celestials, who are themselves architects of the universe.
So yeah, they look human because bingo, they're an offshoot of humanity. But they're way beyond that, they have control over power cosmic and aren't afraid of shedding their ego to form a single intelligence called the Uni-Mind.
Motherfucker, I didn't ask who they were, I know, I read the comic, or at least tried to. They're the third incarnation of the "Secret civilization of sci-fi godlike superhumans" concept Kirby had been doing since the 60's, for two different companies by that point.
I asked what the DRAW is. Why should anyone care that they're the inspiration for the Greek and Roman gods? Why should anyone care they can form the Uni-mind? What is cool about their concept?
Well... I described what the draw was FOR ME, that's it. No need to act so aggressive when I'm merely conveying what I like about them.
>I described what the draw was FOR ME
Barely. You described the core franchise concept. You didn't say why that concept appeals to you personally.
ALL OF THAT appeals to me. That's my shit, I like cosmic stuff specially when it involves that era.
I'm not about to sell them to you in detail, if you don't like it that's your deal, but don't blame me for having different tastes.
Woah Marvel continues to have bad adapations and bad costumes. DC is basically dabbing on them in the costume department.
I don't really mind the base design of the suits themselves, but I'd the colors to "pop" more but Ikars' is fine. Also this film is more than a year away so I'm wondering if they'll change anything?
Would take another inhuman storyline over this garbage
Fuck Feige
Right, why don't you post that cosplay-tier bullshit from Aquaman again? Or the future Oscar winner Birds of Prey costume design?
I wasn't blaming you for liking them, I was shouting into the void about why Marvel thought the Eternals had enough mass appeal to base a movie on, and you decided to give me the back of the movie box description of the franchise concept. I like cosmic stuff too, but I don't get why Eternals is even a worthy concept as a version of Kirby's space-gods to focus on. To me they're essentially the blandest, least unique version of the concept he came up with, with the New Gods as the best. So the question of "Why to people like THEM, what's THEIR specific appeal?" Still remains unanswered.
>I was shouting into the void about why Marvel thought the Eternals had enough mass appeal to base a movie on
Feige's hubris finally coming to bite him. Nobody cares about the fucking Eternals, except as part of Thanos's origin (and that was a retcon since the Titans actually predate the Eternals). However, the movie will also have the Celestials. They're the real draw.
The draw is going to be Thanos. The marketing is going to connect it to him and knowing his history.
I'm so happy daddy ma dong-seok is in this, I'm sold on him alone. Kumail is nice as well. I don't really know anyone else though, so hopefully they don't suck?
Birds of Prey does look bad but Aquaman is better than the obviously cheap rubbery clothing most MCU characters wear. Worse if it's padded like shit.
Considering they haven't mention him once in the promotional material and they haven't even called him an Eternal in all of the 10 years, I highly doubt it. The main draw is gonna be bright colors a-la GoTG and Thor Ragnarok but leaning on more of a serous serious vibe and action.
>Nobody cares about the fucking Eternals, except as part of Thanos's origin
It's as if it's all connected on purpose. The fact they also decided to bring Black Knight into the mix (something that has been rumored for at least a year, by the way) tells me this movie will serve as connective tissue for other movies down the road, specifically MI-13 and Captain Britain, bringing the British Avengers and stuff like that.
Also there's a chance we'll see more of the cosmic pantheon given this little teaser right here, from this weekend's D23 presentation. (Right above Valkyrie)
>Since there's been zero mention of the Deviants
comicbook.com
>"The Eternals are arranged of immortal aliens," Richard Madden says. "Sent here by the Celestials to protect mankind from the deviants.
Dane Whitman is the modern Black Knight, not the medieval Black Knight. While there will probably be some stuff set in the past, seems like there'll be plenty of present stuff.
>fucking living tribunal
no one will be ready for Eternals
do wish the costumes were more Kirby. I also hate Black Knight because he's super boring but might be cool in a movie
It is pretty obvious it's gonna be connected to him though, since the planet of origin was the Eternal colony of Titan and he has been referred as such in the artwork.
There's no reason to act skeptical about it when one of the intentions of the movie was to act as a flashback to that time before the downfall.
That's the Watcher, you guys, and he's a teaser for What If?, not Eternals.
it would be cool if Jon Snow played a couple of Whitman's with the blade through history. I wonder if he'll still have the evil uncle back story
The last connective tissue, Agent Carter which was Feige-grade dogshit and Agents of SHIELD which is KINO but ignored, both suffered due to the negligence and incompetence of Marvel Studios
Feige will fuck up phase 4 spectacularly
That's actually Oneg The Prober, judging by the "flaps" on the sides and the radiator face, but still it's likely we'll get the Living Tribunal in this too, and other members of the Cosmic Pantheon.
Perhaps, but it makes sense that they'll show the First Host arriving to Earth with a narrator of sorts, and who better than The Watcher?
> Feige will fuck up phase 4 spectacularly
He will make another billion for Disney and Anons will scratch their heads like usual.
Okay, but all these shows are produced by Marvel Studios this time. And I doubt this level of confidence and ambition won't be rewarded, considering the only project that looks bland as hell happens to be Black Widow, ironically the one with one of the oldest MCU characters.
They're too unstoppable and they don't have to worry about being accurate anymore. No flop to make them rethink
Just ship it.
Why is no one talking about how they are not following anything by Kirby when shills promised they would?
See
Beyond the concept and the costumes, we don't know the actual plot of the movie. And we can only get some glimpses of it by the inclusion of Black Knight into the plot (coming from 80's Avengers where both were lovers), but overall this just show it could happen in the distant past with Dane Whitman and then skip to the present with Whitman already using a lightsaber for a sword and Sersi as a prospective Avenger, along with Makkari and Ikaris who are the most prominent if the bunch aside from her. I don't see Thena or Ajak coming back given their star status.
They're simply IP to exploit, user. Even better for being low profile and derivative. Gives the studio more leeway to do what they want and less risk of drawing fan ire.
>Black Knight
Well that came out of nowhere
It's okay, I already realized what Eternals accomplishes. See, it doesn't matter that they're not as good as the New Gods, because DC hasn't gotten their new gods movie out yet. And DC most likely won't before Marvel beats them to the punch. So there's plenty of ways that given Marvel's track record, they can make a better version of the concept and feel fresh to people and get praise while DC comes off looking like the copycat again. They even cast the movie diverse, and publicized this, so that when Ava Duvernay does the same, which she undoubtedly does given A Wrinkle in Time, it doesn't look like Marvel is the one with the all-white version and Duvernay is a trend-setter for making hers more mixed. They have pulled the rug out from under DC once again, to the point that when New Gods is released, people will ironically see it as a rip-off Eternals with a rip-off gray Thanos.
They were lovers in the 90s Avengers, and Whitman wouldn't be in any distant past scenes; he's never been an immortal, they even specified at the panel that he's not an Eternal. He probably won't even be the Black Knight yet in this movie.
How are they going to introduce ten main characters in one movie?
I know nothing about Marvel lore, are the Eternals and Celestials the same thing? Are they related?
This bullshit is not canon.
The Celestials created the Eternals through experimentation during the First Host, add they arrived to Earth and gathered early humans.
...And?
Black Knight in an Eternals film is not something anyone would expect. So I refer you back to: well that came out of nowhere.
Ya git.
There have been rumblings about Black Knight since before Endgame. Including him in Eternals is a bit of a surprise but Dane and Sersi are an established relationship.
I'll hate hearing the DChads laugh about it, but this is going to be the one that tanks. Inhumans bad. Normies ain't going to watch this shit.
the eternals suck, shoulda had a movie with Lady Death and Infinity instead
>Look at my handful of apes
I legit don't know what this film will be.
1) We have 11 cast members
2) We have the Celestials
3) We have Black Knight, so I assume they go to medieval times.
4) We'll probably have Deviant villains?
Like, this film just seems unstable. Like, they never introduced a team of characters this big from the get go, and even worse, none of these characters are well known to rely on fan knowledge. Say what you will about the GotG, but there were only 5 of them, and one of them only said 3 words.
Can we not have generic leather and rubber costumes in Cape movies for once?
It's the modern Black Knight, and it seems pretty straight forward that he and Sersi will probably have a love story. Also seems pretty clear that not all of these characters are going to have major roles.
Then why have Black Knight in it if it's current day? Wouldn't it be more fun if he was from medieval times and somehow ends up in present day? Makes more sense than a guy who just picked up the sword just being in the film.
Guardians introduced 5 heroes, 3 villains, Yondu and the Ravagers, the Xandarians, Knowhere and The Collector.
Eternals will be fine.
No. The only cool thing about BK is mixing medieval shit with casual clothing.
That's never been Dane's angle. He's always been a scientist who gets caught up in his family's magical legacy.
But that's not the character.
You're implying Gunn!Guardians was able to handle several new characters well. It couldn't.
It was the Star-Lord movie with his four wacky one-note sidekicks. Against Place-Holder-Thanos rather than Ronan.
Then why bring him into this film? It feels out of left field to go "Here are these people who live forever, and oh yeah, here's a guy who dresses like a knight that constantly craves blood but he's living in modern day England!"
Wouldn't it make more sense for these eternal beings to come across him in medieval times? It feels as relevant as Wonder Woman being in BvS.
Nobody left the GOTG film saying how great the villains were and the Xandarians were a footnote. This film is attempting to introduce 10 Eternals off the bat!
You're implying that all these Eternals are going to be pivotal characters with lots and lots of focus.
That isn't even true of all the Avenges in 7 man Avengers movies.
He's a hero with ties to legends from antiquity, encountering beings who've inspired legends from antiquity.
He's probably the most well-known love interest of the lead female character in the comics. Why not bring him in? Will it make you feel better if they run into Sir Percy in medieval times and he goes "Gadzooks! I'd better make sure my descendants keep an eye out for these guys."?
Even so, 11 characters is a lot of characters to just dump at once. Can you name the entire crew of the first Matrix without looking them up for example?
What's the point of the Eternals existing from the dawn of time if they're going to be part of boring present day Earth?
Blackwidow and Hawkeye were at least introduced in previous movies before the first Avengers (and it was going to be Scott and Hope originally anyway, in their own movie, but Edgar Wright wanted to finish his ice cream trilogy). Marvel films have only gotten worse at trying to have good characterization of new additions
Because having the Eternals, a bunch of characters who exist through all human history, just take place in the present day just means it's another "fish out of water" type of story Marvel has done a million times. Captain Marvel is pretty much the tipping point where people don't even react to major things. Aliens appear in front of people and they have the calmest reactions to them! The Eternals just skipping to present day so they can do the same pop culture references and shit would just be a waste of a property!
>What's the point of the Eternals existing from the dawn of time if they're going to be part of boring present day Earth?
It helps make them relevant to the rest of the MCU if they don't exclusively exist in the past.
And we already know there's going to be parts of the movie set in the past, so this is weird to complain about. The Eternals comics were mostly set in the present too.
Normies ain't going to watch this shit.
>Salma Hayek
>Angelina Jolie
>Kit Harrington
>Richard Madden
>Even Kumail Nanjiani
Mate if anything this is precisely the kinda movie normies will flock to.
They'll probably wear Kirby-lite helmets for one scene and then get rid, like in the first Thor etc.
For the promo concept art they would have wanted to show the actors full heads.
I don't really like Jon Snow, but when they announced Eternals the only thing I thought would be interesting would be putting him in there with Sersi and didn't think they would, so I'm pleasantly surprised, but still think the overall concept isn't too exciting. Remember it will be maximum unsubtle about diversity pandering.
Ah yes black people and women are a political statement now.
This is funny when you were just complaining about them not doing a "fish out of water" story with Black Knight.
In fact, one of the key things about the Avengers was that it was introducing characters we've seen across several films, while Hawkeye got the short end of the stick. GOTG worked cause the film went from Peter, introduced Rocket and Groot as a duo, Gamora as the den mother, and then Drax they meet into the prison.
You know what I expect from Eternals? Sersi bringing Dane to their home and going "That's Thena, that's Sprite, That's Gilgamesh, That's Makkari, That's Ikaris, That's Ajak, that's Kingo, and that's Phastos" as they did when Optimus Prime introduced the other Autobots in the Michael Bay Transformers film.
Do I expect them all to be a major presence? Hell no. Does this weaken the overall cohesiveness of the team? Hell yes. What chance does the Eternals get of becoming a greater part of the Marvel Universe when people probably won't be able to remember the names of half of them! People have problems remembering Mantis' name!
Like, I know we go through this shit with every new Marvel property, but this property seems to be too ambitious and on unstable ground to really take off.
They're used like that, yes, which I think is a bit of a disservice. But the main talking point which you'll see the cottage industry people objecting to all over the place will be the gay character.
It's going to detract from the movie, which I think is a shame.
>It helps make them relevant to the rest of the MCU
Oh boy, they get to be in the background shooting lasers for the bigger name characters.
I'm saying Black Knight is a really fucking weird placement for this story cause you're going to modern day with a guy waving his sword around suddenly joining a group of immortal beings.
>Marvel films have only gotten worse at trying to have good characterization of new additions
And by worse, I guess you mean "better received".
I'd say it's doubtful Eternals will continue as a sub-franchise, but you never know, most of the Marvel films get sequels. More likely that Sersi and the Black Knight show up in other projects down the road. The announced projects and people guessing/wishing for FF and X-Men in phase 5 make it see difficult to squeeze more Eternals in, but they could transpose Eternals characters for other characters more related, like for example the Inhumans. The MCU goes off in it's own direction enough that I wouldn't put it past them.
I mean, we got an ancient Norse anachronism waving a hammer around with a bunch of mortals, so why the fuck not?
Thor wasn't introduced in say, Guardians of the Galaxy. Squirrel Girl wasn't introduced in Dr. Strange. Usually if you're going to introduce a character like that, it has to follow thematic elements of the film.
We don't even know yet if he'll be Black Knight in this movie yet. He could pretty much just be Sersi's love interest here.
But it's not like the Eternals don't use swords and shit in the present day too.
We also got a normal 80's dude waving a walkman around a bunch of superhuman aliens.
Hawkguy was introduced in a Thor movie.
So much tragedy could have been avoided if he hadn't turned himself into a useless normie in GotG Volume 2.
And someone already said how he follows those elements
Basically Nimue or Morgana was Sersi, Merlin was one of the other Eternals, and bam Black Knight relevancy.
With the Eternals basically being commonly conflated with Ancient World gods, Camelot could have been the last time a few of them seriously got involved in the mortal world.
Also, this can be used to tie them into the Sorcerors from Strange's movie, Asgardians...
Basically Eternals is a good opportunity to world-build the MCU, instead of having everyone assume its just some weird offshoot of 616 or Ultimate and trying to apply it.
And most people don't remember that cause he was an afterthought.
What a stupid qualifier. Is that your favorite tactic when you are proven wrong?
"Well, that doesn't count, because I know what most people remember somehow".
Yeah but who was the gay guardian? the eternals have the gay highground now.
Alright fine! Introduce the guy with the magic sword who quests for blood in modern day with like 10 other main characters who live forever as they fight NOT SKRULLS and expect a massive hit! But hey, cause they're in the same universe, it must be a coherent film! Why not have America Chavez show up in Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness cause it's dealing with the Multiverse! That makes sense, right?!
You have zero notion of the plot or premise of this movie. All you know is that actors have been cast as Eternals.
Imagine having assburgers this severe.
Dr. Strange literally defends our dimension from dimensional incursions he detects. How would it NOT make sense for him to respond to America Chavez kicking in the door to our dimension?
How about this? Hawkeye is just a guy with a bow and arrow that was added as an afterthought in post production. That's vastly different than some guy who is running around in a suit of armor in modern day wielding a fucking magic sword to be introduced in a film about 10 immortal beings.
But sure I guess, let's throw all the shit in the stew at once cause it's comics and if it's as dense and stupid as those get, then it'll will be a gangbusters film!
We don't know what he's running around in, or for what purpose. For all we know, he's a supernatural investigator/archeologist who's stumbled onto the Eternals.
We don't know ANYTHING. Are you on the rag?
I know we have a film introducing 10 Eternals, Celestials, time periods, and know, of all fucking things, a magical knight warrior wielding a foolish sword in present day. It would make more sense to have the knight in medieval times cause you can actually make your film feel different than having the Eternals talking about Taylor Swift and Snapchat.
>he's a supernatural investigator/archeologist who's stumbled onto the Eternals.
But that's the thing! For a film about human history potential, why fucking waste it on Modern Day shit again for an MCU film?! This could be another Thor 1/Captain Marvel
>I know we have a film introducing 10 Eternals,
And Thor had 10 individual Asgardians,
Thor
Loki
Odin
Frigga
Heimdall
Sif
Volstagg
Fandral
Hogun
You seem to autistically assume these Eternals are all on a "team" or even on the same "side".
The Eternals comics never even worked this way.
None of the Asgardians mattered except Thor, Loki, and Odin, and even Odin only matters for three scenes.
Literally the entire plot revolved around Odin.
He sets up the entire premise of the story, Thor's banishment, he's the motivation for Thor trying to redeem himself in his eyes, Loki and Thor's conflict is over his throne. Wtf do you even think Thor was about?
Even the Warriors Three and Sif were in multiple action set-pieces.
Again, why do you assume all of these Eternals are going to be equal to Captain America or Iron Man in this movie?
Have you just worked yourself up into a stupid tizzy and can't let it go now?
None of the Warriors Three or Sif were played up in the advertising and first announcements as being key characters. It was always obvious that they'd be supporting characters. I'm not saying the Eternals will definitely be overbloated or something, but comparing it to Thor seems false.
Roughly as false as you making suppositions about movies you know basically nothing about except casting.
Suicide Squad had a cast at least as large.
You are just desperate for something to get upset over.
Deadshot
Harley
Flagg
Croc
Diablo
Enchantress
Capt. Boomerang
Slipknot
Waller
Joker
You can autistically argue that Joker isn't a main character, but at this same point in the media they were pushing him like he was half the movie.
Oh and Katana. 11 main characters. omfg so too much.
>this is going to be the one that tanks.
says increasingly nervous man for the 73rd time since 2008.
>This film is attempting to introduce 10 Eternals off the bat!
Eh. Thor introduced:
Thor
Loki
Odin
Frigga
Heimdall
Sif
Volstagg
Hogun
Fandral
That's 9 Asgardians. That's about the same as 10 Eternals.
This was already pointed out.
And Skwad had 11 main characters, and nobody had a problem with it at all.
He'll probably just be Generic Modern Human Protagonist who ends up wearing a helmet and wielding a lightsaber at some point.
>This was already pointed out.
yeah like I'm going to read the entire thread before replying.
>And Skwad had 11 main characters, and nobody had a problem with it at all.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
wait that undermines my point about the 9 Asgardians. eh, still funny.
Holy fuck all that gender and race changing, the costumes are also horrid.
Some guy from GOT, a comedian and two chicks way past their prime.
I'm the original MouseFag so you can blow a hobo. I'm just honest enough to know that eventually something will be too niche for the normies.
Imagine thinking so small that the idea of an ensemble cast in a cape movie terrifies you. Oh my god it has never done before! Well those characters interacting, how are we supposed to remember their names by heaven's sake! Not like there's two explicit main characters already designated or something! The mind boggles, I'm telling you.
>Some guy from GoT
Not one, but two, and it's the most famous show in recent history, with a season that ended barely months ago. Of fucking course people know who they are, this attempt of yours to undermine them is ridiculous, same as trying to paint the other A-list actresses as "way past their prime". Fuck you.
Gemma Chan is one of the eternals? I thought she played Minerva in Captain Marvel?
>Not one, but two, and it's the most famous show in recent history, with a season that ended barely months ago
Apparently you didn't read about how shit the last two seasons were, and Jolie and Hayek were really great actresses 25 years ago..
Listen, kid...I appreciate the enthusiasm but at best this severely under-performs.
it was makeup and frankly a waste of her talent
Shut up faggot you're probably 18 and have never read an Eternals story in your life.
Too many white people
>shota-coded character becomes ugly woman
Gross, gross, gross
Golly-gee, I haven't been this excited since picture related!
Don't worry, Tom King is writing it.
>Jaws
>Boomer
>wheels
Kek
No.
She was barely a character in that one and had heavy makeup. Easy enough to retcon.
It will need me A LOT of time to process all these similiar looking outfits and weird names, I only know Black Knight desu
Wtf does Black Knight have to do with the Eternals?
Also, Sersi has always done whatever the fuck she wants. Thena was the "forbidden romance" one.
Sersi and Black Knight were lovers in the 90's.
That is going to be so much fun that the audience will weep blood.
Was that when Sersi was in the Avengers? I meant to read that run when I was on the Eternals leg of my Kirby kick.
Yes. You can read that in the Epic Collection "Fear The Reaper", it's one of these stories where he's prominent (since Black Knight has never really had much of a story beyond his Avengers stint).
Where the fuck is Zuras ?
I'm 50 and I've probably got t-shirts older than you, sport.
Aryans on suicide watch
Odin might appear