Why did they leave his character on a cliffhanger when there was a chance the deal wouldn't go through?

Why did they leave his character on a cliffhanger when there was a chance the deal wouldn't go through?

Attached: spider-man-far-from-home-early-reviews-00.jpg (1200x720, 150K)

Leverage.

>sony, n-no, you can't have him, audiences will be so mad at the unresolved cliffhanger! gives us ten times more money!

I mean TASM2 ended with a huge cliffhanger too.

A tease is not the same as a cliffhanger

So they have a built-in explanation for why he doesn't show up in Marvel movies anymore

Do you remember The Leader from The Incredible Hulk? that's the Disney way! nothing happened! just forget it!

So much for a slow burn, Harry Potter approach, right?

Attached: 1559949135387.gif (700x700, 96K)

overconfidence.

It's still gonna get resolved. There are two more movies.

That shit was never gonna work. At least Radcliffe and gang were children when they started. The problem with Holland is that he's already in the prime of his life and still looks and sounds like a kid. You could never buy him as an adult Spider-man.

You should check the updates on this, the original offer was 25% and those fuckers didnt made a reply until Disney change it to 50% after Far from Home sucess

It shows the obvious, Sony are still a bunch of retards

Wait until they show him for Thunderbolts

I mean, people were shocked when Ross was confirmed for Civil War back then

To Screw up Sony, ofc.

Cliffhangers are never a good idea.

Learn from this.

To take a big shit in Sony's bed and leave them to clean it up.

>there was a chance the deal wouldn't go through
You know that there already was an established deal between Sony and Disney that was far from over right? Disney tried to renegotiate their contract before it was even close to over

But wouldn't it affect more the MCU seeing how one of their top superheroes suddenly is not acknowledged anymore?

Because everything works out for the mouse. They will work something out or they will buy Sony.

>Peter wakes up in bed
"Wow what a strange dream I had..." says Peter's inner monologue
>walks up to look in the mirror
>it's TOBEY
I'M GONNA TAKE YOU ON A ROLLER COASTER

Isn't there a chance they could still make a deal though?

>TASM2 is now the norm for Spider-Man movies

>buy Sony
Hey, do you suppose that constant expansion like this might actually be bad for a company? Like, maybe if Disney keeps buying assets, eventually it'll get so bloated it won't be able to support itself anymore. Like a really fat guy who can't move on his own.

No Sony! If you put Spidey away, they'll take away my revenue. I'll be trapped with these useless cap and iron man franchises.

Attached: Mahvel.png (1200x675, 797K)

>or they will buy Sony

You cannot buy something that isn't for sale.

>a deal where sony holds literally ALL the cards
>disney asks for more
>then asks for more again
>sony is the retarded one

Sony did a noble move and tell mouse that they won't tolerate their shit.

Sony are a bunch of retards and Disney a lotta greedy jews.

In retrospect it was only a matter of time until something like this happened. In fact, it was only because the first Spider-Man appearance in the MCU was so close to the big crossover movie finale that there weren't any troubles earlier, otherwise I could picture Sony trying to be all clever and threaten to pull Spider-Man out in the eve of the Infinity War shootings.

>Disney with the X-Men, Deadpool and Fantastic Four rights back plus Black Panther and Captain Marvel already doing 1b at the box office
Gee how will Disney ever recover?!

Sony will still use Spider Twink and still make more Spider Twink movies.

The "deal" is meaningless, for all practical purposes.

The deal ensures creative control is in the hands of at least someone half competent as well as letting Spidey interact with the mcu. Without the deal he can't meet Wolverine, Fantastic Four, anyone but his characters. It's a shitty outcome after everything up to now.

So if they buy Sony, they could collapse under their own weight and the empire of the Mouse crumbles while Sony gets the idiots cleared out?

I'm not seeing a downside here

>disney takes funimation down with them
even fucking better

>Sony will still use Spider Twink
Oh, dear summer child.

Companies are always for sale.

Um sweetie.

Attached: disson.png (669x928, 269K)

They only need the film company.

>the entire Sony corporation instead of just Columbia Pictures

stupid retard

Attached: 1549637620132.png (894x773, 48K)

They're ready to timeskip to a more adult spider-man, so they need to wait a bit for Tom Holland to age up. To make more money they let sony have him so in a few years when they buy him back they can market his next movie as his big triumphant return to the mcu.
Sony Spider-man is new coke.

Attached: spidy and marvel.jpg (769x703, 176K)

Sony isn't hurting for money so there's no reason why they would sell off their film division. Now Apple? They can buy Sony.

far from home is incredibly overrated
these movies he's in aren't that good but holland himself is a great spider man that bit at the end

>''you can't trick me anymore''
his stance and the way he says it you can see the outlines of the youth becoming the man, he's got the physicality down so well, and the vulnerability and grit. i want to see this guy playing spiderman for the next 20 years but the material he's given isn't good enough for him.

How old do you think Tom Holland is?

The answer should be that Microsoft buys both

In universe nobody really cares much about Spider-Man and the most relevant thing that he did was dying

Tony was his only hero fren.
Skrull Fury was interested in him tho.

>You could never buy him as an adult Spider-man.
Totally disagree.

This. Everyone seems to be really misinformed as to what's actually going on. A 50/50 deal wouldn't benefit Disney in the slightest, since the company already gains a fuckton of money. Disney even gains all the profits from merchandise, so why the hell would you propose a 50/50 deal?

I'd prefer that Spidey stays with the MCU, but at the same time, good on Sony for standing up against Disney like that.

A deal was in place. Then Disney retroactively wanted more money.

WHAT DISNEY WANTS DISNEY GETS

>Sony is now the good guy and the underdog.
>people are happy that the Spider is in their hands because the mouse is evil.
>no one seems to remember how much a shit was Sony against Raimi.

This is not a battle between a noble hero and a monster. they are two baphomets.

Attached: nic-cage1.jpg (644x386, 28K)

>...Sony? Where are you going...?

Wrong. Marvel want Spider-man back, not money. But due to a bad deal they made in 1998 Sony has practically absolute and unlimited power

people acting like Sony is some struggling indie company getting bullied by Disney is hilarious, but then so are the people defending Disney trying to browbeat people so Spider Man can come ''home'' to marvel

The entire reaction to this situation is embarrassing.

Most people don't care about the war between these two giants. they want Holland Spider-man in the mcu to develop into the adult A-Tier hero they all want.

however, the timing is not accidental. they have plenty of time before New Avengers. if holland makes a film totally disconnected from the MCU and then they will find an agreement later it will not be a big deal.

>Sony fucking Disney over with the movie rights
>Universal fucking Disney over with Theme Park rights

Glorious

>Most people don't care about the war between these two giants.
Nobody cares about it except the companies themselves, like you said it's an emotional topic because Holland is (rightfully) very popular.
Fact is Sony are simply cow towing to Disney and in return Disney are trying to push the narrative that Sony are big mean babies who won't let them play with their toys, and people are buying it and doing Disney's job for free.
Jeremy Renner stoking the fire with that dumb tweet about SpiderMan coming ''home'' and all that shit. It's just ridiculous.

**not kowtowing
obviously

23 right?

Yep. And he's usable up to 38-42 if he keep fit.

Yes, best scenario for Disney is that Sony start losing money with Spider Man and decided to sell or they sell the Movies division and Disney adquire the rights

it won't happen in this century. Sony would rather lose money by making bad movies than giving Spider-man back. Furthermore with Venom they understood that they have a potential beyond Spider man.

this
they'll have to pry Spidey from Sony's cold dead hands.

B-but Disney bad m'kay? So Sony good, obviously.

Dude, most spidey related media outside of the comics ends in some sort of unresolved cliffhanger situation
-90's animated
>wraps itself up mostly but ends with him going to dimension hop to look for the real Mary Jane. Never resolved
- Unlimited
>ends after 1 season on a giant clifhanger
- 2000's MTV cgi series
>ends after one season on the "spider-man no more" type clifhanger
- Rami movies
>wrap themselves up mostly. But 3's ending leaves room for a sequel
-Spectacular
> ends after two seasons with a cliffhanger setup for future seasons that will never happen. Aka. The wiseman curse
- Ultimate
>,gets to end on it's own terms. No clifhangers
-TASM movies
> ends litteraly mid fight after a tease for sinister six movie and series continuing
- marvel's new animated spiderman
> no idea. It looks eh.
- Mcu Spidey
> ends on a clifhanger

Attached: 1565920768432.jpg (300x452, 22K)

Based

poorfag alert

They better get a clue and make a deal with Sony, goddamn.