>blocks your path
Katie Rice
Other urls found in this thread:
skadicomic.com
youtube.com
vimeo.com
campcomic.com
drive.google.com
desuarchive.org
hollywoodreporter.com
en.wikipedia.org
murderpedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
imagine
I keep seeing it reposted does an user know where it was?
Do you think they ever reconciled?
>thinking that loincloth offers any kind of protection or veil whatsoever
It's really just there to cover her gross bush.
Its Skadi yo.
>gross bush
Please, I can only get so hard.
Was tryin' to smash, get her cash
But her mouth was hella fast, so I threw her ass (in the trunk!)
And even though she had a
>BIG
>PLUMP
>RUMP
I threw her in and let the beat bump
(Threw her in the trunk!)
>You will never huff the deep meaty braps of your bootylicious barbarian girlfriend
user pls
Loincloth son
I wanna smooch that ass
>You will never feel like a doll being hoisted up on Skadi's shoulders, her glutes easily overcoming your entire bodyweight
>You will never feel helplessly pinned underneath Skadi as her thicc thighs hold you in place
>You will never feel your hips being crushed as Skadi pounds away at your member
>You will never feel the tickling of your ball hairs as stanky protein farts blow past them with every thrust
>Skadi will never make you her bitch
Aside from glorious faps there's something real special about these types of comics that I just really like. A type of charm you can't really capture with anything else.
It's fitting that John is a bear, an omnivore. He's a predator, but at his roots he's also a herbivore male too.
>aborts your baby
>herbivore male
What is this herbivore male meme? Is this another term for soiboi or beta?
>Herbivore men or grass-eater men (草食(系)男子 Sōshoku(-kei) danshi) is a term used in Japan to describe men who have no interest in getting married or finding a girlfriend. The term herbivore men was also a term that is described as young men who had lost their "manliness".
Seems like it
Sounds like a term created by forever alone incels and roasties.
I mean it's a Japanese term that got aped by weebs, so it's safe to assume that the former is more likely.
Just sounds like it comes from a bitter and jealous place to shame those who do not want to be tied down for one reason or another. Why fall into the trap of commitment if you have reservations. Literally created by people who cannot get any attention from the opposite sex.
Best webcomic
Examine blockage
She kind of stabbed him in the back, I don't think there's any hard feelings on his end and he's being the bigger man in all this as he has been from the beginning of their relationship. But it's kind of hard to repair a relationship where you threw your beloved mentor who taught you everything you know about art, animation, and other fun things under the bus to get headpats from #metoo. Hopefully when she gets bored of all the glitz and glamor she has access to because of the pity-job Animaniacs gave her for her sob story she will look back on what she's done with some shame and contrition and come back to set things right with him. His reputation will never be the same but it would mean something on a personal level.
The creator got abused by John. K, right?
>he's being the bigger man in all this as he has been from the beginning of their relationship.
You generally are bigger than the child you are molesting.
He never molested her. He never even tried to have a romantic relationship with Rice until she was the legal age of 18.
Yes of course.
You realize their birth rate's at an all-time low right? Men are becoming neets and women are getting predatory, more of the former than the latter though
>deadly STDs are at an all-time high
>birth rates are at an all-time low
>Harry Harrison is rolling over in his grave
I agree but think it would only have been creepy if he was grooming her. Yet how would you define grooming and then a whole can of worms would fall on the floor. You would have people making arguments about how parents raise their children to be a certain way for marriage or for dating. What about people in a position of power?
This can range from a mentor to a guardian figure. It is also not uncommon for the younger person to develop a crush on them and pursue. Would the fault be on the older person to be aware if they are taking advantage of them? At what age is it appropriate for a man or woman to interact with a younger person before they are legal to become romantic? Then you also have mental compacity thrown into the mix. What about the emotional innocent or mentally underdeveloped?
This is the modern age and the world is so much bigger than the states. This should be a case by case basis as different nations and culture obviously know how to raise their children to a mature mentality to handle these situations.
You realize it is so much riskier being a male pursuing a relationship unless they look or act a certain way. The manly man is seen as toxic and undesirable unless you're handsome, rich, or famous. Men will always be put to stigma towards rejection. This is just a fact. If it is okay for women to be more forward and for men to reserved like feminism claims. Why is it not working?
He should make her sit in the corner and think about what she's done.
I was talking about Japan, the nation this fucking phrase originated from. Ifou want to bitch about why you somehow can't manage to get some tail and attempt to plop yourself on some moral high ground, go somewhere else.
Everyone has been, is, and will continue to live in a society, squawking about it for the umpteenth time isn't going to change anything.
>wojack cancer
post discarded
Those statistics are world-wide you mong. Nobody's excluding your xenophobic bugs.
>He never even tried to have a romantic relationship with Rice until she was the legal age of 18
Nah, I believe Katie and not John K because he is a dick outside of this issue so I have no reason to believe him.
Please go work w John. You’re perfect for him.
Then please post them, user. I mean we've gone this off-topic, why stop
Well regardless of the topic I'm going to post some stuff I have in a folder I saved from Yea Forumsa few years back. There is already a John K thread so take your "he said/he said" crusade there.
Don't spread that cancer here.
/pol/ says only non-whites enjoy ass, are they full of shit?
Oh, they are right, but it is the "potato niggers" that complain.
>that moment John turns to look her in the eye and she slightly backs away
Kek.
It is very depressing how corporate scumbags made sure this will never get animated outside of that one pilot Nick produced.
Pilot
vimeo.com
Web Comic
campcomic.com
>All it took was one butt joke and a quick caricature by katie to produce all this cute butt art.
If you actually believe any of this shit you should be tied down an have your penis slowly disintegrated with a cheese grater.
>Nah, I believe Katie and not John K because he is a dick outside of this issue so I have no reason to believe him.
..but she never even claimed otherwise.. She never claimed he tried to have sex with her before she was an adult. Get it together.
it's just a temporary bottleneck. 3 maybe 4 generations and it will all be bred out
What exactly do you think his motivation was for approaching her when she was 13?
Writing lewd things and masturbating on the phone when talking to someone constitutes trying to engage in sexual relationship with them. You don't have to defend a creepy weirdo just because he used to make good cartoons.
I have no idea what the story is and im not that guy but it seems to me that finding someone hot at 18 does not automatically make you a pedophile because you also knew that person at 13.
When she was 13 he sent her messages like "I want to squeeze you. I’m crazy about you, Katie. Do I ever make you tingle?”. On her 15th birthday he sent her “I’m thinking about you very hard right now. And I have a little tickle in my chest.” Also he masturbated on phonecalls with her. He was 46 when she was 13.
There should be more.
What would you like to see from Katie's avatar?
ok, case closed then.
Maybe Katie covering herself in this Skadi outfit.
Hopefully someday you get literally fucked in your ass without lube to get empathy, crazy motherfucker.
Wouldn't it be funny if Katie Rice didn't like rice?
Are you incel by chance?
>All this cute, amazing butt art that I love and I want more of.
>Her self-sona is really dang cute.
>Can't help but feel guilty cause its based off of a real person who had weird creepy sex stuff happen to her.
I want more, but I feel bad for wanting more.
Ok, i need really ask this fucking question:
Why PSTD women always draw fanservice shit?
Katie wearing either of these outfits.
To nurture the raw creative talent he saw in her?
It's fine. The grooming failed.
>To nurture the raw fertile ova he saw in her.
Translated.
good lord
>>You will never feel the tickling of your ball hairs as stanky protein farts blow past them with every thrust
I lost it there.
>To...raw...her?
fixed
Katie wearing a bikini that's giving her a wedgie.
Aw Fuck. I can't believe you've done this.
man imagine actually thinking this whole mess is the fault of the abused person,what a fucking retard
Is that supposed to be John?
I'm sure she wouldn't mind it honestly, she took there being some porn of her chars well enough. Besides it's just a heavily stylized version of her, practically different people.
Supposedly John K. drew it himself.
Nope, Kali (John’s Ed) drew it for him as a Christmas gift.
Ex, not Ed.
That makes it worse in a weird sort of way.
Thanks.
>one pilot Nick produced.
Nickelodeon is probably the worst offender of not producing shows but keeping legal rights to the pilot. People should just come legally correct so when Nick passes, (which they will because SpongeBob) they can take it to another studio.
Don't wanna take any chances after they blew it with Adventure Time
Something quick for tonight, as well as an updated folder. drive.google.com
Something about cartoony butts can be appealing.
Ooh, that's a good one!
you mean the Irish?
Excellent!
Wow, I never even heard of this girl
Her name is REMARKABLY similar to a girl I had a crush on in elementary and high school
Always good to see new content from ya dude, and in a Katie thread no less!
i'm new here
can someone give me a quick rundown of Katie?
>Hey John, just to show you there's no hard feelings, here's a drawing I did of you under the mistletoe with that middle schooler you tried to hook up with.
13 year old fan of John K back in the day. The smell of underage pussy gets John's attention, he decides to "take her under his wing" and spend far more time alone with a teenage girl than should be considered appropriate. Outside of grooming her, though, he actually teaches her a lot about cartooning, and she gets several jobs in the industry and a successful webcomic.
Hol up hol up. This was turned down?!
Any news on Camp Weedonwantcha or the Animaniacs reboot?
Nothing on CW yet.
It would actually be funny.
Was delivered a while ago
Very good dude. As for more sugestions maybe try putting Katie in a sling bikini, but with a front view?
Or her avatar in an oktober fest dress? Katie seems to enjoy that theme.
Make one of her in her "character designer stage", pretty please.
It’s supposed to be Kali in the drawing, not Katie
Still creepy
When is the Animaniacs reboot supposed to come out? Is it gonna be on netflix?
I’m hearing next year, and yes.
I don't know why, but that one where she confidentially grabs her butt just drives me wild. But in a good way!
Those belly ones are also hot as heck.
Thank for sharing man! Good stuff!
Are there other avatars with a big butt?
They should just import thirdworlders like Europe and America. We all know that Abdulaziz and Aisha are perfectly willing to work hard until they're 75 to support an increasingly feeble western population.
Nice try boyo, fuck outta here with that
>chinese tickle time
Have you ever watched a pornstar interview?
she's just autistic
It's still going to Hulu, though I have a feeling AT&T could just take it back for HBO Max.
Too many fucking streaming services now.
>tfw ywn see Skadi's shame
>Sb98
Any art that's not by a huge faggot?
Women can't feel shame. They are heartless creatures that only think of themselves
I’d smooch her filthy butt
I want to die like that
Skadi breast expansion when?
Several pages later.
>was an intern
>willingly was in a relationship with him
>claims she was 17 when it began which even if she was it's still legal in a number of states
>years later cries about it since John K hasn't made anything decent since the 90's and everyone will side with her
>was naive about sex
>"Bitch you don't know how to hang up the phone?"
My heart bleeds for this legal to have sex with woman, who could not figure out how to possibly hang up the phone and then end continued to interact with John K and even reciprocate.
shut up john
>willingly was in a relationship with him
She was not in a sexual relationship with him at any point. You are confused.
Cry some more about your buzzfeed articles. The dumb cow could have opted out at any time, but didn't, because she wanted to have a career.
>The dumb cow could have opted out at any time, but didn't, because she wanted to have a career.
Well no, because he wasn't upfront with her about his desire to groom her into his child bride. She thought they had a wholesome mentor/student relationship but he would randomly pepper in creepy come-ons which were (from the naive perspective of an actual child) completely out of left field. So even by your own idiotic position, where you attribute the dynamics of an exchange between two peers to a rich and famous man preying on a starstruck child, he is completely in the wrong for never being upfront with her about what he wants. She never had an informed opportunity to opt-out before he got creepy and traumatized her.
Skadi reminds me off Dumm comics.
The amount of people here so ready to defend a child molester is unnerving.
Yeah, Robyn Byrd was the one he actually had sex with. Rice has even less to complain about.
Come for the Skadi.
Stay for the John K.
That site has been taken over by spambots and they STILL won't take it down
I really want to see Skadi's gross bush, haha, as a joke?
>Well no, because he wasn't upfront with her about his desire to groom her into his child bride.
She was 18 when she was working for John, and everything else is vague. The only thing he did was date her 17-year-old friend who also could have not moved in with him, but shocker two women wanted to make it into show business, so one of them dated him, then her friend, Katie Rice said John had hit on her also and once masturbated on the phone while she sat and listened and never considered hanging up.
That's a shame to hear. I stopped browsing when their top comics ended.
Adding to this:
She was 14 when he started creeping on her
She brushed it off because she was 14 and he was 40, and he was her hero
She came to work at Spumco and all of the crew just accepted his behavior. Gabe Swarr in particular says he feels awful for not standing up to John
The crew thought they were reviving cartoony animation. After the gigantic failure of APC they finally realized they're just coddling John's ego and left.
Abusive relationships, especially ones that were formed when the victim is a child, are very difficult to leave.
Fucking moron
Her teasing a small dick with her big butt.
>Help! I'm being oppressed! A world-renowned genius plucked me from a trailer park shithole and gave me a masterclass education in art and animation which is paying me dividends to this day! True, he never laid a finger on me, but he came on to me once I was a legal-age adult woman, which is wrong because reasons!
lol, never change, Yea Forumsmblr.
>Kricfalusi’s alleged crimes against her were too old to investigate.
Well fuck, I guess we have to take the accuser's words as 100% since the law isn't involved, that she just by accident moved in with him and became his girlfriend, and that she must have always have been 14 when everything was happening and had at no point aged to 17 and even worse... older.
As for Rice she claims that John flirted with her when she was 15 and that when she was 18-year-old intern he began hitting on her.
She also remarked that when he flirted with her that he was never perverted stating, “But, he’s never perverted. He is also very nice. He gives me a lot of drawing tips.”
She also had multiple phone calls supposedly in which she claimed that he masturbated. Why keep taking the calls?
>The conversations left Rice shaken, but she trusted him. Lonely in her new school in Nevada, she viewed him as her only friend. He attended her 15th birthday party, which he later confirmed on a DVD extra for the 2003 Ren & Stimpy reboot. (“I was at her 15th birthday party. We’ll tell you that backstory a little bit later,” he said with a grin.) She was devastated when he abruptly stopped talking to her in early 1997.
And then they stopped talking because John had a girlfriend, and Rice was sad that she didn't get to talk to him anymore. For fuck sake you retards are the worst. Wait till you discover that Jerry Seinfeld had a 17-year-old girlfriend, or that David Bowie fucked a 15-year-old.
Go away, john
user, are you aware of what grooming is?
John K admitted to being in correspondence with her since she was 12. He went to her 13th birthday party. user, John K grooms children and we have direct evidence he's done it to multiple girls
Says 12 or 13 in the Buzzfeed article. So you can't fuck a girl once she's legal, just because you knew her when she wasn't? Try being less gay user.
It's okay to encourage young artists and nourish their budding talent.
Based. tumblrites can't handle this amount of truth
That's not the budding he paid attention to :^]
No user, you can't groom children to eventually fuck them years later. That's the kind of shit you see from kids in dragshows
>user thinks anything is grooming even when age of consent laws in many states are 16 and all of Canada where John's from
>He began dating his accuser when she was 16
I meant her straight up saying that.
user, what do you expect from a withdrawn autistic girl being groomed? Of course she's gonna say yes to everything he asks until she gets to the outside world. Which is exactly what happened. He has groomed children
>My heart bleeds for this legal to have sex with woman,
>legal to have sex with woman,
She was 13
>autistic girl being groomed? Of course she's gonna say yes to everything he asks until she gets to the outside world.
user, I hate to break it to you, but that's all women, adult and otherwise. Money and fame are known to be kind of a big deal.
Im not saying women aren't retarded but I don't get why so many people are trying to defend JohnK here. He was near universally hated on Yea Forums until this debacle
nigga she said she was somewhere between 15 and 18 in the buzzfeed article where she claims he was never perverted to her when she was underage and that she had multiple masturbating phone calls with him that she could have hung up with.
As for his girlfriend, she was 16 when she began dating him and 17 when she moved in.
>it's unverified that it happened at a specified date and age
>involves famous people
>statue of limitations is expired so anyone can say anything, much like in the Kevin Clash sex abuse accusations made by an ex-boyfriend of his which ruined his career in voice acting, only for his accuser to recant, because he was only in it for money
As for John K, the girls were around 16 and 18 when he was involved with them. And second the age of consent is 16 in Canada and in several states in the US, including my own. Further it's arguing in favor of the infintalization of women.
No, his animations were hated. Separating the art from the artist is important, but when everyone overwhelmingly disagrees that both are terrible it's easy to get mistaken over the context for them.
That reads like justification.
Lets put this in further perspective. Jerry Seinfeld at the height of his career was around the same age as John K when he was involved with these two women. And Seinfeld openly dated a 17-year-old and nobody acted like a fag about it and whined and wrote tumblr posts about it.
Have you ever heard Honky Tonk Badonkadonk?
That's not Katie, dummy. That's the other girl, this is what he did to Katie when she was 13-15.
cry more furfag
>That's not Katie, dummy.
I never said it was fucktard, that's why I said:
>As for his girlfriend, she was 16 when she began dating him and 17 when she moved in.
> Katie when she was 13-15.
She said 15-18 and tries to make it younger, but also said that John was never perverted toward her in her diary from when she was 15 which is cited in the buzzfeed article that I posted the image from that you're directly referencing. Please try not to be too retarded and too much of a crying woman now user.
oh you sure got us with this one user.
"How can you say that this is bad if jerry seinfeld. one of Yea Forums's favorite people, did this creepy as fuck thing too/"
a truly unassailable argument.
I've noticed this, I've posted really mild SFW stuff in Summer Camp Island threads and they get deleted, whereas way racier stuff in, for example, SvtFoE threads are apparently fine. Dumb furphobe jannies.
>She said 15-18
No, she doesn't. She specifically says sent her lewd messages and masturbated on the phone when she was 13-15.
>if you date a legal woman who's younger than you it's creepy
Please try to be less of a male feminist user, you'll get so much more pussy
Adult males have been fucking sexually-developed young adult teenage women since the dawn of time, user, biology doesn't care about your fee fees.
That's not ok either. Saying somebody else did it so it's ok doesn't make it so.
She also says in the same Buzzfeed article:
>“But, he’s never perverted. He is also very nice. He gives me a lot of drawing tips.”
We also don't get to see the email, just her word for it on the date. But her diary from the time says he was never perverted, but hit on her when she was 15. The legal age in Canada is 16, where John's from.
>it's not ok
>it's legal in many states in the US, all of Canada, much of Europe, and most of the rest of the world
Imagine being this much of a cuck
Shifting goalposts didn't work so maybe ad hominems will?
>The legal age in Canada is 16, where John's from.
That doesn't matter in America, dummy
Is that really...?
Meanwhile, my on-topic thread gets deleted for no reason while this butt thread stays up for 200 replies:
desuarchive.org
Hell, that thread didn't even have any arguing in it. People were just responding to my question.
That's a nice "no u" you got there. Try having sex next time user
>She also says in the same Buzzfeed article:
>>“But, he’s never perverted. He is also very nice. He gives me a lot of drawing tips.”
Hey guys if you molest a child and they don't realize you're being sexual it doesn't count.
>That doesn't matter in America
>the age of consent is 16 in many states including my own
Haha you should try being less of a shrill woman user You act like a crime has occurred instead of an "EW, GROSS!!! THAT OLDER MAN FUCKED A YOUNGER GIRL!!!"
No crime has occurred here, nobody went to the police except his ex almost two decades later who says she was told that the statue of limitations expired, so much like when Kevin Clash was accused of having sex with underage gay men by his ex, we just have to take the word of the accusers as fact. Clash's accuser even claimed he had email "proof" which never materialized which supposedly showed he was underage when he dated Clash.
hollywoodreporter.com
Since local legislation constitutes the ultimate moral authority I suppose you're okay with, take, Saudi Arabia decapitating faggots and stoning women?
>15-18 is a child
>at 14 all the boys in my class used to sexually harass my 22-year-old high school teacher, because she was a cute red head with a pixie cut
>everyone used to try to get her to bend over, because you could see her ass crack and her blue panties
Everything I've posted has been about Rice. You are completely confused and keep bringing up this other girl who I don't care about.
Dude shut the fuck up about Elmo.
John's social media team murdering tumblrites ITT
Jerry also didnt groom her from age12
>the age of consent is 16 in many states including my own
It's not in California where Katie lived, and 16 doesn't matter when she was 15 when all this happened.
>15-18 is a child
She was 13.
>You are completely confused
No user, I believe you're confused and that's why whenever you see crying women you rush in to defend them as if believing it will earn you pussy as a reward.
>who I don't care about.
You mean the actual accuser? The person who's most relevant and not Rice her friend who claims John had phone sex with her when she was 18? Stop being a faggot just because reddit wants you to act like one, you'll have a more enjoyable and fulfilling life.
>groomed at 12
>Says she was the one contacting him at 13 or 14
Everything everyone has been posting has been about Katie, he seems to be confused that there were two different women in the story because he keeps saying Katie was 18.
As this user said : If local law is what matters to you, would you be fine with cutting the heads off of gay people if that was the law in a particular country?
>She was 13.
She said 15 to 18 and that he was never perverted with her in her diary from 15. You can keep lying to try and not be wrong, because clearly you don't want to be and want to act as a puritan moral authority like a christian parent's group from the early 1990's
>AHaha observe howastute I am!
>He didn't groom her when she was THIS young
>But THIS young
>Katie was 18.
She said 15-18. And that at 15 she says she wrote in her diary that he was never perverted with her. It's like you haven't read what she said or something and just want to make it younger and more and more sinister, because then it's even more sensational.
>You can't have sex with someone, because they were underage when you first met
>If you did it's grooming and they have no free will under the law
>however if a teenager of the same age commits murder they are tried as an adult and incarcerated for the rest of their lives, because of selective moral outrage
>She said 15-18
>She said 15 to 18
Why do you keep saying this like it's going to make it true?
THose are nowhere near comparable, at all. No one is saying you cant fuck young pussy my guy. What we're saying is that coaching a young person to eventually hop ony our rod is called grooming. You're using the same argument Dragshows use to let kids on stage
>entering thread expecting yet another Yea Forumsmblr moral outrage circlejerk
>mfw Yea Forumsmblr is getting anally groomed, molested and raped way worse than all of their imaginary accusations combined
>with on point arguments at that
What a nice way to end the day. Good work boys
She does say 15, and that he was never perverted with her. She slides around back and fourth on her age in the buzzfeed article however.
>She does say 15,
Yes, and it started when she was younger as stated in the paragraph one line above it. That's just how linear time works.
Hold on, America should kowtow to international law on fucking children but now you are trying to claim moral superiority on other laws? You are making no sense.
She says that he was never perverted at in her diary, which is in the screenshot, with the diary entry supposedly written when she was 14. But again with both the diary and the email, we don't have copies of them to verify the ages or dates. We just have to assume.
She also says she was 18 when John was hitting on her. So between 15-18.
>You are making no sense.
I said he was from Canada where the age of consent is 16. It was cited by anons that that didn't matter in America. I pointed out that would they be ok then with a gay person being executed in the middle-east then, because under their law he deserves to die. I mean where are we exactly drawing the line here or are we forming selective moral outrage because the media tells us to?
>So between 15-18.
Please come up with another argument that isn't just you pretending not being able to read and repeating the same wrong thing over and over.
>I mean where are we exactly drawing the line here or are we forming selective moral outrage because the media tells us to?
I'm comfortable drawing the line at masturbating on the phone with 14 year olds.
>THose are nowhere near comparable, at all.
>One set of laws says teens are morally and legally responsible
>Another set says they are not, but those same laws are different state by state and country by country
>coaching a young person
You keep saying that as if it means anything, but it doesn't. He was just some guy who flashed his fame and money at a young girl and she immediately road his cock for several years and then they broke up.
She wasn't 14 though, she was an 18-year-old intern who participated in several of these calls.
>a young girl
An underage girl. Actually multiple underage girls.
See:
She was 14 when living in Nevada. Please come up with another argument that isn't just you pretending not being able to read and repeating the same wrong thing over and over.
>underage
>Not in all states, and not in Canada where John is from.
The girls were also somewhere between 16 and 18 when any sexual contact happened. And one of them moved in with John when she was 17 and dated him for years after.
You're making the "Ew, Gross! Old man dating a younger girl" argument and making it out to be criminal, despite that these accusations were way past the statue of limitations and unprovable beyond that he dated one of them and hit on the other.
>16 and 18
14. In no states is 14 the age of consent.
Finding preteens and goading them into phone sex until their 16-17 for real sex is grooming. It was an open secret in Cali for years that John would only apprentice girls he wanted to fuck
That doesn't state her age at the time of the calls user. Please try some reading comprehension. I know the buzzfeed article is purposely and misleadingly written, but you you can see it says she was 14 before she moved, when the calls supposedly occurred. And that she says in her diary from when she was supposedly 14, that he never said anything perverted to her, and in the same article that the first time anything perverted had even some what had been said was in an email when she was 15. So then, how old was she when those calls happened then? It also says she was 18 when she became his intern and he began sexually harassing her. It also says that he stopped talking to her, implying because he found another woman, and that him no longer talking to her, hurt her feelings.
>16 and 18 when any sexual contact happened.
You are acting like it's only illegal to have sex with a minor and any other lewd contact up to fucking is okay when there are numerous laws that can be applied to sending lewd messages and phonecalls with a 14 year old.
She wasn't 14 see here And here And here So at what age did the actual calls happen at? She says not 14, because of her diary, and after she moved. So between 15 and 18?
>Please come up with another argument that isn't just you pretending not being able to read and repeating the same wrong thing over and over.
No phone calls happened at 14. She said so herself. What can't you understand here? She's purposely vague on when the calls happened.
If you're whole argument relies on reading between the lines to infer the exact opposite of what is said it's a very poor argument.
Please come up with a new argument that isn't about your lack of reading comprehension user. She was between 15 and 18, and of that we can't even be sure, because there's no provided evidence that we can scrutinize as would be the case in a court of law, which this will never be heard in front, of because it's well beyond the statue of limitations.
>says in her supposed diary from 14 that nothing happened
>says at 15 he might have hit on her in an email
>says that she was 14 before she moved, and that the calls happened some time after she moved, therefore she wasn't 14
>Says he sexually harassed her at 18.
So where's the proof that the calls happened at 14 then, which you've asserted?
Again user, if you want to read between the lines to infer that John K isn't a pedophile that's fine but it is a shitty argument. Katie said it happened, provided evidence from when she was a minor and I believe her.
I know your pain user...
And crossing state lines with a minor or getting a minor to cross state lines is gonna add on.
Does is matter what age? Your boss calling you up to jerk off is never ok.
>Your boss calling you up to jerk off is never ok.
He's the one paying you, he's free to call you up at any time for any reason. Most companies have this in their contracts.
That's not reading between the lines that's the evidence that we're presented with to either accept or dismiss as well as scrutinize.
>provided evidence
Evidence that we don't get to see, just her word for it
>Does is matter what age?
Yes, because it's been claimed by anons here to be 14, but Katie never says 14 in the Buzzfeed article. Second she had repeated calls from him, seeming to reciprocate, and then was bummed out and sad when he stopped talking to her for another girl.
>Does is matter what age?
Yes user, because in these NAMBLA supporting losers minds if 16 is okay then 14 is and if 12 is then 9 is too.
>16 isn't ok
>legal in most of the world and many states in the US and all of Canada and much of Europe
Yeah dude, 9 is okay in Saudi Arabia let's make it okay here too!
Did I say 9? And by that reasoning, 16 is fine then if it's not based on local laws.
But if we're basing what's right on other countries laws it must be okay to fuck 9 year olds by your logic since it's okay there.
I'm not exactly certain why you want to push goal posts that far back, but whatever, John's from Canada where 16 is fine. 16 is also fine in my state of Michigan and numerous other states.
John K was just in a relationship with a 17-year-old, much like Jerry Seinfeld, and hit on her 18-year-old friend, Katie Rice who didn't know how to hang up the phone during multiple phone sex calls and continued to praise John K for years until her and his ex metoo-ed him.
At this point you're just behaving like a fatass neckbeard who gets no sex
So grooming's ok so long as you don't actually fuck her until she's legal? You can certainly tell John's been at this for a while, has several loopholes. Also have to remember that this man is a narcissist with major daddy issues, if anything he's primed for this sort of behavior.
>Canada says 16 is fine so its okay
>Saudi Arabia says 9 is fine so its okay
That's a bold stance to take on child fucking user.
16 isn't a child user, and my state, which in the US says that's legal. There's a difference between 16 and 9 and you're well aware of it.
Bold choice user, bold choice.
It's not bold. Under Michigan Law, consent is 16. And for that matter it's 16 in Canada where John is from and 16 in many other places in the US.
And for that matter the courts have fluctuated with the laws due to moral outrage on when someone's considered an adult and legally responsible for their actions, such as when a teenager kills someone
>Eric Smith was 13 when he strangled a 4-year-old out in the woods and sodomized his corpse with a stick, and yet the courts considered him an adult and he'll likely remain in prison for the rest of his life.
en.wikipedia.org
>Alyssa Bustamante is doing life for slitting a little girl's throat when she was 15, and will likely never be released from prison
murderpedia.org
>Craig Price is doing life for murders he committed between 13 and 15
en.wikipedia.org
Yet a 17-year-old girlfriend, who moved in with John K and fucked John for several years, is some how not responsible for her actions, and neither is Katie Rice who may have been as old as 18 when she was having phone sex with John.
>It's not bold.
Being okay with child fucking and advocating for the entirety of the US to adopt new lower age of consent laws of other countries seems pretty bold user.
16 isn't child fucking user that's why 16 is legal in many states, and even in states where it's not legal the FBI notes a difference between child molesters and statutory rape. Someone who fucks a legally underage girl who's consenting, but unable to legally consent based on local law is different from someone who forces themselves on a toddler.
Thank you Namblanon, your advocacy of child rape has been eye opening.
>Reed Richards is a pedophile because he knew Sue before she was an adult
The absolute state of Yea Forumsmblr.
I'm simply stating the laws in my state user, which is in the US. In Michigan it's 16, and several other states also have it at 16. You keep referencing Saudi Arabia and 9-year-olds, but I'm basing this on my own states laws and the laws of the US.
Under Michigan law(my state) 16 is legal. John's also from Canada where 16 is also legal.
You're not allowed to legally fuck girls you met before they turned legal. It's the new cuck law enacted recently to win arguments and shame people
Thanks user, I'm gonna call my congressmen today and tell them that I want my state to adopt the child fucking laws of other nations!
>fictional scenario has a direct 1:1 comparison with the real world
>targetting young girls in particular and buttering them up is totally the same as just knowing someone
How many levels of delusion and/or irony are you on, user? I take it you'd defend Schneider's actions too?
If you thought fucking a 16 year old was okay and normal you wouldn't be fighting this hard to defend it.
>inb4 "uwaah Yea Forumsmblr doesn't understand my innate need to go after underaged girls, y-you're all cucks!"
I don't think 16's a big deal user. It's the law in my state. My state says it's not a big deal, and I can drive 20 minutes away into Canada where it's also not a big deal, because 16 is the legal age.
Lurk moar faggot. Unlike the Connie's Mom and Peridot thread, the Gumball one that was deleted would be filled with the same furry /ss/ images that every Nicole thread gets filled with.
>"I have no argument and just imply you're some limp-dicked soiboi"
Called it
I'm not even the same user. I just thought you sounded fat
Yeah but you are adamantly defending it because you don't want to be seen as a pervert childfucker in the eyes of society, which you are. Everyone has the weird kinks user but the more you defend them as "normal" the weirder you look, and nothing makes you look more like a pervert then having a copy of your states fuck age laws handy.
Oh no, I just knew someone would. Keep posting weird fat dudes, I'm sure it won't get old.
More belly stuff would be good if we get some ideas.
Also, I like the confidence too, and Katie having a big bubble butt is hot in itself.
>Yeah but you are adamantly defending it because...
it's perfectly fine in my state and several other states, as well as in John's home country. You're only whining about it to maintain the moral outrage and wanting to be right, as if wanting ask everyone here, "AREN'T YOU ALSO UPSET ABOUT THING!?". Yet you feel the need to attack when someone's not upset and says you need to step back and look at the situation objectively, of which there's very little evidence and the case will never go before a judge and is contained entirely in an internet smear piece.
>Everyone has the weird kinks user
Could you be anymore projecting and gay?
It wont :)
Not to mention John Hartigan from Sin City. Clearly a hardcore pedo since he knew Nancy Callahan as a child. How did Miller get away with this?
>it's perfectly fine in my state and several other states, as well as in John's home country
See this right here is what I'm talking about. You sound like a defensive pervert, exactly like people defending their weird cuck or feet fetishes. If you think it's normal you wouldn't be acting this way.
>if you thought it was defensible you wouldn't defend it
lmao, cuckold what?
>See this right here is what I'm talking about. You sound like a defensive pervert
>Having sex with legal women is defensive
>If you think it's normal you wouldn't be acting this way.
>If you're not upset and want to change the laws of the US and the rest of the world to make something a crime then you're also a pedophile!
How odd that John K's spiritual successor has that same look to him.
John K isn't a pedo but he IS a Hebephile and that's pretty much just as bad
>Hebephile and that's pretty much just as bad
>Being attracted to physically developed women who may be considered legally underage in one state but not another is just as bad
The law says it's okay to fuck Asians too but I'd look like a fucking weirdo if I had a copy of that law ready to post and couldn't resist defending my asian lust to every post calling me a pervert.
>breaking the law is bad
Yes, there ya go user. Ya got there.
Surrender to the smell.
>having to make a point that they aren't underage
>going after/luring underage girls and cottling them so they won't rat on you when you start fucking them as soon as they turn
Up until 2006 it was legal to fuck animals in my state, I'd look like a pervert if I defended that and had a copy of the law to defend myself against neighsayers even though its completely legal.
16 is legal though
No one tries to claim fucking asians is illegal the way you weirdos do with 16 year olds, if they did of course it would be normal to debunk their idiocy.
>going after/luring underage girls
Didn't they contact him first? Unless you consider making cartoons the lure
Nigga one dated him and then Katie Rice, who was 18 got upset when John stopped paying attention to her, because he was boning her 17-year-old friend and not her
>fucking animals is the same as people
It was legal though, just like it's legal to fuck a 16 year old, or are you going to backpedal again?
But it's legal user, I have the law to prove it so it isn't weird at all! Please trust me, I'm not a pervert!!!!
>neigh sayers
Pun intended or happy accident?
>this is your brain on denial and self induced naivety
I'm done here
It's still weird, either you're going to have to accept that you're always going to be seen as a pervert especially for defending it or you'll always have to hide you weird child lust.
I thought it was clever
It's not legal currently user. You're advocating that the law should be changed in all states, because you want to feel good about tumblr shit. Why not raise the age of consent then to 21? It's the same age you can drink?
You were done the moment your mom didn't swallow your dad's jizz
>It's not legal currently user.
It is in the green states! Please user, I'm not a pervert! It's legal in these states and other countries that don't matter!!!! Please user, it's very important to know that I'm not a deviant pervert!!!!!
Well why shouldn't we? Stops people like you dead in your tracks, and gets rid of all the potential loopholes. Does it suck for some? Maybe, but I'd say the pros outweigh the cons.
Of course you're just trying to get a rise out of me by suggesting something ridiculous. A universal 18 would definitely help.
Right back at ya, bud
You're sliding goal posts. It's still not illegal in my state or several other states to sleep with a 16-year-old or 17-year-old. You whining like a like a middle-aged woman wont change that and wont change my opinion. I didn't care yesterday. I won't care 5 minutes from now, and I wont care tomorrow about if some 16-year-old retard fucked a famous guy for hopes of starting her animation career.
>but I'd say the pros outweigh the cons.
This is easy to say for user who never had sex
>automatically assumes she's some whorish gold-digger
Don't you have some other board to shit up?
>I won't care 5 minutes from now,
You've cared for over an hour so something tells me you still will.
Ah so you have an innate need to fuck boderline underage girls, or think that every man wants to do something similar? Talk about projection
>people still defend john k
Look, laws aside, men fucking sexually developed, fertile teenage women is normal and always has been for many thousands of years, and humans fucking animals has been seen as bizarre and perverted in most if not all societies for thousands of years.
>John K's spiritual successor
Who?
Guy who did Ollie & Scoops, pretty much has that same gross-ass animation style.
Didn't she run to buzzfeed?
>boderline underage
>legal age is considered borderline underage
I don't actually care, but it's like hearing some retards whining and trying to make a big deal out of someone fucking an 18-year-old. Who cares? That's legal everywhere. And 16 and 17 is legal many places as well.
The fact people are having an issue is an antithesis to your point. But of course our country's just run by dykes, right?
>I don't actually care
You know what really shows how little you care? Feverishly defending your position for hours at a time.
People are made to have sex after puberty, you societally-conditioned Pussy.
>15 is underage
>16 is the minimum legal age
Yes that's what borderline means, user.
>he's a fucking fag
kek
How long have you been replying user?
I said 16 was ok user, because that's the age in my state
>How long have you been replying user?
The same amount of time, the difference is I'm not trying to pretend I don't care. Making you feel like a disgusting pervert gets me off.
>Ollie & Scoops
meh, it's not that good.
>I'm not trying to pretend I don't care
I know. You want everyone to feel as outraged as you are, that people are having sex, but not you
It's been over 5 minutes user, do you still care?
I guess the real question that should be asked:
Do you?
Yeah, I already said making you feel like a pervert is important to me.
>DURRR why don't people post pics that are Yea Forums related but aren't porn on these boards for porn instead of Yea Forums???
>other countries that don't matter
All of the civilized world actually. Except a few South Asian, Middle Eastern and Sub-Saharan shitholes. The US is in a really "prestigious" club on this one.
She could be bullshitting about everything that happened to her, and I would still side with her because John K is a creepy motherfucker with shit taste in cartoons.