JUST

so this is the future. Disney will hold any movie that isn't absolute guaranteed blockbuster tier hostage on their service.
pay the subscription or all you get is capeshit and star wars at the theater.

90% the same except for the siamese cats

Attached: IMG_20190420_101548890.jpg (4160x2340, 1.45M)

That looks nothing like Sam Lloyd

oh no, I'll have to torrent it like every other movie in the last decade+? what a shame!

Good for you. Some of us actually enjoy seeing movies the way movies are made to be seen though.

>Sam Elliott is in this voicing a Bloodhound
Not even he can save this movie

>streaming service
>the way movies were meant to be seen

Attached: 3E5542DA-1E49-46CE-A6DB-3CCF78348F01.jpg (546x539, 98K)

There's no siamese cats anymore

>reading comprehension
try that again,carefully this time

You do realize that you're talking about a streaming service here, right?

My good bitch, it isn’t gonna hit theatres.

which was exactly my complaint man. then user said just torrent it, which would be just as bad as streaming it.
I want it the way movies are meant to be seen.
well, not really L&TT specifically because fuck the remakes, but in general I mean.

>I want it the way movies are meant to be seen.
That way is dying out. Theaters are dying out. You will only find the most obscure ones remaining after the stream wars are over. Disney+ will destroy cinema as we know it. And you contributed to that.

t. Dumb TVlets that can't handle giant cinema screens

>which would be just as bad as streaming it
If you're using VLC.

>And you contributed to that.
How, you illiterate nigger? How does me wanting movies in theaters contribute to the death of theaters?

That's not what anyone is talking about.
Anyone that uses "brainlet" or any derivative is always a fucking retard.

>the media player you use is why streaming or torrenting a movie are lower quality than a theater
>not the 30 foot size difference in the screen size and the dozens of speakers difference in the sound system.

>That's not what anyone is talking about.
THATS EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!

>movie is streaming only
>fuck this I want it in theaters
>lol just torrent it
FUCK THAT. I WANT IT IN A THEATER!

WHY CAN'T NICE THINGS REMAIN UNTOUCHED

Attached: vlcsnap-2018-08-09-19h11m02s602.jpg (640x432, 80K)

Greed is one thing.

Playing innocent is another, if they wish to brush the Siamese cats under the rug to not be called racist.

>Yea Forumstrarians pretending they love siamese cats all of a sudden

Low point of an already pretty mediocre flick. That song is one of THE worst in the Disney canon.

Look, if you need racism in your fucking veins then just look at those singing italian stereotypes. IMO they were a lot worse than the cats.

Would say this is questionable at best, but too many focus on the crows from Dumbo and the cats.

Just waiting for that moment live action Peter Pan gets announced.

youtube.com/watch?v=f7yE8TKUB_M

They weren't even that good to begin with. Nothing of value was lost.

KNOT

That song is awesome. They better not fuck with it.

I heard they have a humping scene about 4/5 of the way into the movie.

If they can remove villain songs and the black crows from live action, you know they would never give the Indians their own musical number using that song.

It's the inevitable curse that these live actions have now with Disney.

It would be fantastic if Disney died.

Well it's not just you, really. To be honest, it was me too. It was all of us. Every cent we ever paid to Disney under Iger's reign helped contribute to the development of Disney+.

Nothing's changed. I doubt they wanted to offend people then either.

Live-action Oliver & Company, now.

You know damn well Disney would never touch their less popular stuff EVER

Oh no what a waste not Lady and the Tramp. How dare Disney hold such a masterpiece hostage?
Pro tip: none of the live-action Disney remakes were any good, not even those of their GOOD movies, why the FUCK would the live-action remakes of their DOGSHIT movies like Aristocats and L&T be any good?

We all know Lion King is going to subsidize all this crap so where's the risk? Expect it on Plus eventually.

I loved the jungle book, but I never knew how much the original deviated from the book so it was more in a "I wasn't expecting this but I enjoyed it" vibe.

These shot-by-shot remakes are baffling to me. They got it right the first time, and then they decided to fuck up the formula?

Did you just shade L&TT?

Agreed. But I love dogs so I’m biased.
Disney still needs to stop with the live action remakes though.

I would rather this.

Because nice things have rights that expire and or do not extend to all versions of the nice thing

So they gotta make all versions of the thing

>sub par remakes today
>pixar original features tomorrow
I guarantee you that something like Onward will be Disney+ exclusive in 2-3 years

Peter Pan already got a live action but it's a prequel

Not Disney.

It got a live action movie like 10 or so years ago I think. Maybe more.

well, if this one isn't even theatrical I bet it'll be even lazier than every other live action remake, so yeah it's just gonna be shot for shot

friendly reminder purebreeds are basically inbreds.