Why are love interests in comics such thots?

Why are love interests in comics such thots?
They literally sleep around with tons of men. Aren't superheroes supposed to be for kids?

Attached: mjgewn.png (944x934, 1.06M)

Other urls found in this thread:

time.com/3461485/how-previous-sexual-partners-affect-offspring/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Well I believe their target audience is young teens, teens and man children.

Usually they do the sleeping with other guys 'cuz the relationship just gets stale at one point. Which is close to reality I suppose.

Since when did Mary Jane sleep around? Are you that much of a beta orbiter loser that you treat all attractive women as bicycles?

>They literally sleep around with tons of men.
No, they literally don't. Nor figuratively either.

MJ never slept with other men when she is in a relationship with Peter.

If a girl has slept with any man other than you, you are a cuck.
Plain and Simple.

Even when she wasn't in a relationship with Peter, she was generally speaking monogamous, she would wait fucking months before even dating again most times. Gwen Stacy varied wildly in continuity.

So get'em while they're young? Is that what you're saying?

and if a woman has never slept with you, you're an incel. Plain and Simple

lol retard

>Imagine worrying about what a cocksleeve does after you fucked her

Do you fall in love too? Fucking beta.

just because you cucks are alright with sloppy seconds doesn't mean any self respecting man is.

MJ didn't even date when they were going through their separation.
I don't know about Gwen.

Oh, definitely an incel, the concept of pump-n-dump is beyond you.

For drama and the writers own projections. Some human beings don't like monogamy and virtually everyone is interested in character's love lives and each other's. It humanizes the protagonists and makes you root for them if they have a hot girlfriend.

I thought she canonically fucked Stark at one point? But don't quote me on it.

No she only briefly worked for Stark and she blew off every advance. I’m fact her and Peter are back together now. If OP wasn’t such a permavirgin faggot, he would have started this thread with either Kitty Pryde or Janet Van Dyne

Premarital sex is wrong. No real man would be weak enough to engage in it.

Pretty sure the only canon bicycles in Marvel are She-Hulk, Domino, Jean Grey, and Kitty Pryde. I guess Black Cat could be a maybe but MST writers have her pine only for Peter

Your "muh virgin waifu" never existed and never will exist. Fuck off and kill yourself faggot,

Mary Jane was late to her own wedding because she spent the night out with another dude.

unironically this is why anime is better

Attached: emilia.jpg (1280x720, 104K)

My mom was a virgin until she married

People have needs, the denial of those needs causes stress, the disappointment of your partner, in your performance, is also a problem, but I suspect you're a bigger disappointment to your parents than you will be to any potential partners. I'm willing to bet you'll never find a partner, because your mind is already firmly set in 'they're all thots'.

That's Dick Grayson you're thinking of.

cute feet

Women have autonomy man, you don’t have to agree with it (I myself think it was a terrible decision) but you have to accept it. You planting your feet in the sand and not accepting women for their past just makes them indignant and allows them to justifies sluttiness as a form of rebellion, which I suppose chads thank you for

time.com/3461485/how-previous-sexual-partners-affect-offspring/

And accepting it let's women ride the cock carousel for years before trying to settle down with a beta provider before her ovaries shrivel up. Women were best when they were treated like property instead of pretending they're competent individuals

Because the writers don't know what to do with them. These love interests need to exist because they're a core part of the characters cast. So they do dumb shit with them.

>Kitty will jump on the dick of any man named Peter
>Jan literally fuckes Magneto while he was still trying to genomics humanity

well think you can't say about comics is that the women aren't realistic

*one thing

Now this is a virgin take if there ever was one

No accepting it hold women accountable for their actions and doesn't let them think that fucking people isn't some sort of declarative statement of their individuality or adulthood. They do it for the same reason why we drink when we're teenagers, because it feels good and seems cool because it's taboo, then when you turn 21 you realize that this shit isn't taboo but its what the powers that be want you to do. You either accept it and allow women to grow up believing their bodies are worth more than the pleasure they can receive from any man automatically or you keep fighting and you let sluts think that they're "sticking it to the man" by devaluing themselves

If you respected yourself, you wouldn't be here.

>Fruit flies
Oh my God, the things the beta incel crowd believes.

>No accepting it holds women accountable for their actions and doesn't let them think that fucking people is some sort of declarative statement of maturity to their individuality or adulthood

there I just wanted to make that first statement cleaner

Because it's the nature of comics in general. The status quo must be maintained and the easiest way of writing friction in relationships or budding romances is infidelity and love triangles. It's why anyone who wants romance in their comics spirally with mainstream heroes are retarded.

Petes been a man whore in his own right (at least post gwen) so its not unreasonable to show the women being open about their sexuality

You know this require to have a baby, right? Like, she only get pregnant once (had a loss) and it was with Peter. you are not helping your case.

R9k is finally getting the point of wasp and catholic values.

Because men write them.

Not just one, but many different men who all have preferences they impose on the characters.

It's not completely accurate it just gets more harmful to all involved the older you get

>Crean conducted a series of mating experiments with female flies when their eggs were immature.
So now you think a single study made over flies is the end all argument for human development?

don't try to deny data

Honestly don't cats kind of do the same thing? A litter of kittens can all have different fathers? i don't think it's bad entirely that our genetic makeup can change depending on the partners we've had, it's just another point that the decisions women make have consequences regardless of how many of those consequences you pay to prevent

>Women have autonomy man
That's not how you spell "stupidity".

Attached: fantasy boyfriends 1471199545538-2.jpg (600x5865, 768K)

Good luck finding a non-christian virgin female past twenty willing to sleep with you. I really could not care if the girl I was dating has done to ten dudes already before dating me as long as she is not cheating on me.

>most of the thread is filtered
I can see this is a quality thread as always.

It's not like the male heroes are much better in their slutiness.

Attached: 1563666493246.jpg (5000x2000, 1.36M)

Like you wouldn't fuck tons of girls if you could.
Fucking double standards

Attached: 1393679838492.gif (312x250, 1.9M)

what're you filtering?

No, only worked for him

>any interaction involving a female with a male means they are having sex

This is what permavirgins actually think

When and why did everyone suddenly become so obsessed with cucks.

Attached: mehsuzu.png (177x152, 31K)

Reacts to the word "incel", I guess.

It’s people who literally can’t spend 1 minute off the internet and can’t hold a real life social bond with people

But those are the best reactions, even though I do find the word vile and unhelpful

Because love interests in real life (at least in freedomland, can't say for elsewhere because murrifat myself) are also thots. Dudes sleep around a lot less than women do unless they're jock douchebags or rich.

Sex is boring, we need more violence in comics.

Confirmed for never reading the original Spiderman comics. MJ was literal whore who constantly cucked Harry & whoever was unlucky to date her at time by hitting on men in front of her boyfriend. Then there's the infamous scene during McFarlene run where she's late to her own wedding since she the night before it with playboy named Bruce. Guess what, she arrives to the wedding in his car. More modern stuff? During RomitaJr's run she had literal open relationship with Peter for a time where she was free to fuck others & they lived apart despite being married.

Just face it user, OMD retconning their marriage was a fucking blessing since MJ was such a cheating slut

European women are sluttier than american women on average. Australian women ranked first on the official sluttiness poll

Yes she was struggling with the idea of monogamy, they made it a point to show she didn't do anything with bruch (besides remember she showed up late but pete showed up later). Yeah shw was cucking Harry but harry was a drug addict rich kid she didn't have the strength to help him. She isn't perfect but petes numbers are greater in terms of sleeping with women, its honestly why I was so pissed at slott for not doing a single thing interesting or fun with single pete on the prowl his whole fucking 10 years

He's right thou...

Harry was originally nice guy whose only sin was not really living up to the expectations of his father. Part of the reason he became so fucked up was MJ constantly cucking him.

I always took it as them going to the wrong parties and harry just falling into drugs to cope with the stress of his father.

Just realised that MJ is indirectly responsible for the death of Gwen Stacy

>constantly cucks Harry leading him to become druggie
>stress of his company matters combined with his son's drug addiction causes Norman to become Green Goblin
>cucks Peter with Gwen & kills her
>Peter is single again
>justasplanned.jpg

If MJ was supervillain I would be impressed. There's a real elegance in using your ex-bf to create supervillain for the sake of killing your love interest's current girlfriend so you have chance to take her place

He was always the green goblin and the worry over harry ODing is what stopped Green Goblin the last time he attacked before the bridging. Try harder slott

No, she never did even once, and you should consider what it says that you fell for Yea Forums shitposting and used it as justification to be angry without even fucking once fact-checking what you were told

The feminine form of evil has become so powerful that it's successfully manipulated people into viewing it as heroic. That's why people are so confused as to why everything is getting insane. They're trying to take the square peg that is feminine evil and shove it into circle slot that is a functional moral code, and it never fits. You just get more emotional blackmail, more backstabbing, more thuggery wearing the mask of altruism, and more weaponization of parties against each other.

Promiscuity and this "I have a right to be happy, my body my choice" approach to relationships is evil because it excludes the most important part of the relationship from the equation: the child. The child develops a deep-seated feeling of being unloved when his mother dumps him in a strange place with strangers all day. Because his mother either opened her legs to a bad guy or threw a good guy to the wolves (she'll try to belittle her own agency in these choices; civilization can't afford to let her), the boy lacks a father figure who will teach him how to be a man, and both the boys and girls lack the feeling of financial and moral support that a good father provides. Who do they turn to for that support? Politicians, judges, and bureaucrats; they'll VIOLENTLY COERCE you into supporting them. Worse still, children imitate the mating strategies practiced by their parents, and what does that mother and that father teach them about relationships? This is just scratching the surface of why the sexual revolution needs to be reversed, the family courts need to be dismantled, and society needs to become conscious of what feminine evil looks like.

>tfw no thot gf

Attached: jack_sadness.jpg (495x636, 71K)

Maybe lay off the pipe weed a spell, Merry.

Attached: Took.jpg (780x796, 95K)

Pretty much.

>he wants a whore for a gf
Fucking why?

that's what get for choosing wrong.

pic related : the superior girl

Attached: 2e189a4b32a929cbca519e54ee3ba5a7eecec5f41e2015dbefdca5efd1b9f71a.gif (395x599, 163K)

Why not take the anime approach to this problem? Stop just short of where good people in functional societies that aren't falling into hedonism and hubris will commit to matrimony. It leaves people happy enough, generally. Plenty of opportunity for romance and fanservice. If you want to move forward with those relationships, it's probably time to take them out of perpetual adolescence and have them marry. It's not like marriage is the end of your life. Actually, lately, I'm finding that the most interesting people are in stable marriages with children.

Dubs confirm truth

Remember that time MJ dumped Peter because she couldn't handle the stress of a intimate ones dangerous job, then dated a fireman?

Remember that decade that Queseda supported slott ruining MJ?

This is correct though and something to worry about. It actually does effect humans.

They were for kids in the 70s, for teenagers in the 90s and now for balding wizards.

Marvel had a number of married characters, from Spider-Man or Hulk being married to civilians, to hero/heroine couples. Most of them were broken up for drama, or because of one writer who hated one of the characters, or just wanted to ship one of them with someone else.

Sex education really should teach boys and girls alike that the more sexual partners you have, the more it erodes your ability to form lasting pair bonds, something which has left generations of screwed up damaged people trying and failing to recapture the feelings from their first relationship.

Superhero comics have been “for kids” for almost 38 years now, they’re for young adults (in the 90’s) and adults (modern day) and manchildren (all decades and the only consistent buyers).

But to actually answer your question, it’s because most writers can’t think of any way to write someone in a stable relationship in an interesting fashion, so they add all kinds of unnecessary and frequently unrealistic drama to flesh out a narrative. If superheroes marry/date other superheroes that’s easy to do; you can get them involved in nutty superhero shit that keeps them apart, like the X-Men were frequently subjected to in Claremont’s run for example.
However if one is a normal person, then you gotta somehow make job troubles and life troubles interesting enough to take up page time in a superhero comic, and most authors these days aren’t talented enough to pull that off.

So she or he cheats on them instead because it’s cheaper and quicker.

It also doesn't help that you have readers that rant that happy or married couples are boring, it needs to be a soap opera. Then rant that it's a soap opera.

I feel like the problem is more than sex education, but whatever's making people lack even basic social function and empathy period, or even common sense.

If would go without saying comics tend to be written for men and their fantasies.

do men want to be cucked?

With a solo book, the civilian life soap opera is usually a part of the book from the start, the issue is people self-inserting as the lead character, some wanting to live vicariously through a stable, loving relationship, others wanting to live vicariously through a mega-chad with an ever-growing anime harem of ready and willing lovers.

With team books, the larger cast of core characters allows you to cater to both groups at once, you can have that happy married couple, you can have that free and single mega-chad, and you can have other characters that fall somewhere in between. The problem is the people who don't want to see happy marriages are running the industry, and don't want to cater to readers who do.

Once both men and women started spending their days in the workplace, the wealthy delegated raising their children to nannies, everyone else delegated the job to television, and now to the internet as well. Western civilization is reaping the rewards of each generation being raised worse than the one before it.

God damn it feels like we've just been bought off as a species. The internet used to be the interesting theroy of what would happen if you gave people unlimited access to all collective knowledge and each other, and what did we learn to do with it? Just hate each other more efficiently and find groups hundreds of thousands at a time to believe an unsustainable lie

The internet >>> television and public schools. The internet is just the public square. It's not centrally controlled by a handful of elites like television and public schools. Which is why the elites want to crack down on it.

Gen Y is the most right-leaning generation since greatest, I think. I don't have a lot of faith in my generation (the millenials), but Gen Y might have it in them to turn us around, and to carry the load if society collapses in their prime.

It's recoverable. Getting rid of Twitter and Social media for a generation or two, the sensible people of The Left and The Right nutting up and not letting their crazies speak for them, and parents doing their damn jobs.

>and parents doing their damn jobs.
The entire economy and costs of living are based around two working parents to achieve a decent standard of living without handouts, it's going to take a lot to change that back, and convince people that it's better for the child if one of them stays home to raise it.

take the black pill and realize that all women sleep around. it is in their nature. this isn't a bad thing, nor is it a good thing, it simple is. don't be angry at a lion for hunting a gazelle, or a dog for licking its master. women sleep around in their 20s to test their mates. it's just simple nature. animals do it, humans do it too, to deny that is idiocy

There are ways to handle your children better even as a two income household, problem is that a lot don't even try and it's easier to hand the kid a cell phone.

But you can't make a wife, nor a husband out of a whore. Encouraging people to spend their teens and 20s sleeping around is not good for them.
Societies can be structured in ways to manipulate people to not behave in ways that are considered wrong. Look at the amount of effort, from education to legislation to social shaming that's put into "don't be racist" or "recycle, and don't pollute". Similar effort being put into instructing men and women alike to not be sluts would be for the good of society, instead of condoning or rewarding it, but telling people to control themselves and think beyond their immediate gratification is probably asking too much.

I want to lick aunt may's feet so badly

Animals don't sleep around though, unless they're actually mating and propagating the species

>Gen Y is the most right-leaning generation since
Lmao

They're still left wing, but much less so than the millenials and gen x at the same age. They're only going to move further to the right as they pay taxes and experience the real world.

I suppose that I need to describe what I mean by "right wing".

>DURRR DURRR LEFT WINGERS WANT CHANGE WHILE RIGHT WINGERS WANT THINGS TO STAY THE SAME

Trump has reversed a decades-long trend of globalism and a growing state. The Bushes certainly didn't shrink the state. Reagan just froze the growth of the state. Nixon was the one who basically took the cap off government spending. The Trump presidency is a massive change in direction. Is Trump left wing? Or what about actual fascists? That would be a massive change. Are they left wing? How many years does it take for them to become established enough to become right wing?

>It's globalism vs. nationalism!

So anarcho-capitalists, who don't believe in borders, are left wing? And national bolsheviks are right wing?

Left vs. right is big government/mob rule vs. small government/peaceful anarchy. Not everyone who's flown the flag of the right has acted in a way that's consistent with their stated beliefs, but they're at least hypocritical when they try to introduce the state into something (incidentally, that's why I don't identity as a conservative). I wouldn't really consider "ban drugs!" or "physically assault people based on who they sleep with!" to be consistent with the idea that people ought to the left alone to make their own way in the world. When I say that Gen Y is further to the right than the millenials, I'm not saying that they're more likely to be against gay marriage or whatever. I'm saying that they're more libertarian than the millenials.

Hey, I resent that! Gwen Stacy only ever slept with one man.

damn right she did

Attached: SMB6-18.jpg (1280x2066, 394K)

retconned

so was sins past, which was the only contradiction to this story, so its back in canon

>Ignore international cooperation, it's bad for you
>Don't worry, those fucking you over will do the same thing

Yeah, this is why no one buys "small goverment". When you dismantle government, and start taking away general well meaning services, as opposed to dismantling outright malicious ones that literally attack their own populace naming no names, all you do is hand that power and responsibility and power to corporations, who everyone assumes will never aspire to be more powerful, or wealthy, or the true rulers.

You know, despite the fact that this has happened repeatedly in the past. Your "small" government movement isn't new, it's the dying throes of old empires, acting against the work of reform and understanding. The government will still expand militarily and colonially, it'll just be middlemen and super companies taking the profits, and greasing the wheels with corruption along the way. You're not fighting a totalitarian state, you're trying to create new copies of the East India trading company, each more degenerate than the last.

Imagine choosing that over this
Imagine denying Sins Past is canon

Attached: 1559747577829.jpg (500x266, 208K)

It makes no sense if you've actually read any spider-man though, pete had contact with gwen's family after she passed, the family that the kids would've been with since that's the retconned reason she went to europe. Hell why didn't pete see a pregnant gwen when he followed her to europe? I know you miles fags find reading the comics racists but explain it to me

>Be a Normanfag
>Get called a Milesfag
How dare you?

Attached: 1533323151382.png (500x498, 76K)

>TMW you realize that miles has done more damage to pete than norman ever will

Your "international cooperation" isn't the people of the world holding hands and dancing around the campfire. It's the elites agreeing to centralize power around their circles on a global scale at the expense of their nation's people. That's why they're getting thrown out. People are tired of having their economies destroyed, losing their democracies, and being browbeaten whenever they try to defend themselves.

>Raise the taxes and over-regulate so that people can't accumulate the money necessary to grow big enough to compete with us!
>Flood the country with voter livestock who are dependent on the seized wealth of the productive classes! They'll never be able to vote us out!
>Put several degrees of separation between the voters and the officials who make the big decisions!
>Throw a list of -ists and -phobes at anyone who opposes us!

Also, almost none of these programs that the left champions benefit good, hard working people. Socialized medicine floods the hospitals, and regulation is what makes it so damn expensive here in the states. Socialized education takes 16 years to do what should be done in around five or six; they're also where the saboteurs receive their paychecks. Family courts incentivize women to behave irresponsibly; they leave men broke and children fatherless. Climate change is a fraud.

Also, it's funny how quickly the left flip-flops on their firm anti-war stance when the right elects a president largely because the candidate with the D after her name wanted to shoot down Russian planes and has a history of being a warmonger. Do you even know that Trump has been trying to pull us out of Afghanistan? Rather than quietly the killspree like Obomba?

> But you can't make a wife, nor a husband out of a whore. Encouraging people to spend their teens and 20s sleeping around is not good for them.
agreed, but i'm not encouraging it, and trying to fight it is a lost cause, you'll just be met with "muh sexual liberation, hurrr ur a sexisttt"

women's sex drive is still a basic biological driving force, they get hornier at different times of the month, it's just that it's in spite of man-made birth control. deep down their body wants to reproduce, so do men, it's why both genders all get horny

>Referencing Moblia
You couldn't have chosen a worse anime and a worse non-character. She is just a plot device for degenerates. You should feel bad and kys

Attached: 89d9b0eaa55b2f65f2c5070f58b64b9b.jpg (800x566, 86K)

better a plot device than a whore

Experience I'm guessing?

MJ looks really hot there.

Why can't Campbell draw women standing flat, even if they're already wearing heels?

Attached: idiot cant draw a woman standing flat.jpg (614x960, 128K)

because thots are hot and kids like the thot look

Robin's not standing flat either, user.
There's something sad about Campbell having to draw Rebirth Huntress, like the real one is gone for good and the Birds of Prey movie won't change anything.

If she had 10 relationships prior to yours, and none of them managed to go steady. What makes you think you'd fair much better?

>Domino
I'd fuck Domino too, so I guess her being a bicycle is ok.

The best love interest are the heroes nemesis FUCKING FIGHT ME!

That's what (s)he said.

based

People grow and change. The person you are at 15 isn't the person you are at 18 isn't the person you are at 21 isn't the person you are at 25 isn't the person you are at 30. Relationships change too. But also, do you plan to only have one partner your entire life? What if after 6 months or a year you realize you just aren't compatibile?

Peter definitely fucked Cindy

>But also, do you plan to only have one partner your entire life?
That's how the majority of my family/relatives lived their lives. Not all of them, but most.
Regardless, past failed relationships are always warning sign. There tend to be reasons for why things didn't work out.
Does that mean that people with past relationships can't have good relationship? Of course not, but it does leave good reason to be increasingly cautious relative to the number of their past relationships.

>the two most infamous sluts have the lowest scores by far
Like I knew the men were all manwhores, but I am still surprised by this.

What an alpha female

>Wont date a whore cus shes fucked so many people
>Would gladly date a slut who has fucked many people but didnt charge them

Attached: directions.png (984x695, 784K)

and marcy kaine but the media won't let you know that

MJ is good.
Gwen is completely disgusting.

Some people just aren't cut out for commitment or lasting relationships, and the sooner they figure that out the better for themselves and everyone around them. A lot of people never figure it out, and run from one doomed relationship to the next, and fool themselves into thinking the other party is always the one to blame.

The more sexual partners you have, the more difficult it becomes to form lasting bonds with someone. Society encouraging people to spend their teenage years and their 20s sleeping around, experimenting and 'getting experience' is actively harming their ability to settle down into a lasting relationship, the same as encouraging women to focus on career over family is causing western birth rates to decline, which is why we 'need' all those third-world immigrants. The normalization of divorce, of having several failed marriages, and of single parenthood as a lifestyle choice are all contributing to how screwed up relationships have become, and there may be no way to turn the clock back and fix things.

>internet poll
>400 votes

Nothing is supposed to be anything

Biased data.

>self-reported from blogs
>shitty sample size

Attached: Oh right the bait.png (500x294, 11K)