The reporter who first leaked the story, Deadline Hollywood's Mike Fleming...

Alan Horn? If so what a fucking nightmare that room must have been. Throw in Pascal and Kennedy and you've got enough executive incompetence to crash the entire industry.

RDJ gives up all the future money he gets from MCU movies in order to ensure a deal goes through. Thus, sacrificing himself again for the greater MCU good.

You can tell that Rothman leaked the story since the original Deadline report is all weirdly complementary towards him. Venom is referred to as "polished" thanks to Rothman's efforts in the editing room etc.

>What they’re doing with Spider-Man is great.
You appear to have posted this in the wrong place, user.

EVERYONE ON Yea Forums MUST HAVE THE SAME OPINION! WE ARE A MONOLITH!

>What they’re doing with Spider-Man is great.
Youre joking, right?

1 billion dollars says otherwise

That proves nothing. People spend millions on crummy pokemon creatures.

They should be spending millions of dollars on pails of water.

It proves that people like it.

Grow up you fucking manchild.

It's not great. It is the same level of bullshit as Sony's solo run was.

well you need to understand Disney and their process in the first place. They are known for their very low underhanded tactics and pretty much Kevin Fiege hasnt been the most respectable director either. All in all it seems that since sony pulled out, then that means sony is at fault. So yeah I think I agree woth you when people say they dont give a fuck about the process they just want the outcomes

You mean Yea Forums
>implying Disney Spider was any better than Sony's
I don't see what do I have to lose from this.

they don't need to do this to show Disney as a greedy bully, because they ARE a greedy bully and probably is planning to buy the movie part of Sony now.

Also stop shilling for Disney's growing monopoly because you want more shitty movies starring a character that should've entered the public domain long ago.

>says the guy on 4channel

OP was 100% right
>Problem is people don't care about contract negotiations between two behemoths. They only care about the entertainment they are no longer going to get.
Literally how can you disagree with that

>This is what I think Sony doesn’t understand. We couldn’t care less if Disney wants deal where they end up with more money. What they’re doing with Spider-Man is great. So if you’re telling me I’m going to lose that because these two companies can’t agree to terms, then I’d rather the greedy Disney bullies own it so I know my money is at least going towards something worth my time.
Wearing a pair of mouse ears must lower your IQ by no less than 40 points.

Every fucking time Disney either fucks up or pushes absolute swill on their braindead audience, Yea Forums immediately starts to fill with:

>Sony won't take an objectively bad deal for them? FUCKING MONSTERS
>Some overpaid celebrity won't be in the next spiderman movie? POOR HOLLYWOOD STAR
>All creativity has drained from the company to the point where they're just recycling old stuff in live action? BRILLIANT MASTERPIECE
>Our newest superhero is massively disliked and no one smarter than a cat thinks the movie was good? LOOK HOW MUCH IT MADE
>Capeshit hasn't been good in years and relies on movies where they kill characters to maintain relevance? IT'S AS FRESH AS EVER

>YEHAHRHG YHRGARRGHH HAFTA DEFEND MY POOR INDIE COMPANY DISNEY FROM THE AWFUL REVIEWS, REALITY, FACTS, AND TASTES OF PEOPLE ONLINE

Unironically worse cult behavior than horse show fanatics for a way worse company with lesser return for its customers.

Attached: average_mouse_fan.jpg (673x481, 126K)

....NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Because if your response to reality is "Who cares about facts? I just want to consume products and was looking forward to next product" then you're a braindead retard.

Like this, here's a braindead mouse fan right now.
>Dude I don't care how shitty the movies get. as long as it's MCU I'll go watch it every time. Yaas Kween Slay!

it doesn't matter what you and I think, the public likes these Spider-Man movies they like the MCU movies. it's not just Disney look at the hot mess that is Star Wars. obviously they're going to be pissed when Spider-Man of all people isn't going to be a part of it. anyone with a brain could've seen this shitfest coming; how could you forget the fervor after Spider-Man was confirmed for the MCU in the first place. I personally don't give a shit.

I wonder what it's like to be you, angry at everything all the time. That dull headache every waking moment of your life.

Yea Forums should've stayed on Yea Forums instead of 4channel

Oh and I forgot the best one:
>HAHA DCFAGS LOOK HOW RETARDED I AM. LOOK HOW MUCH MONEY MY TRANSFORMERS-TIER CGI SHITFEST IS MAKING. WATCH AS ALL MOVIES BECOME THIS
>THIS IS ALL I CARE ABOUT IN MOVIES.
Followed by
>SEETHE DCFAG SEETHE

Sony thinks they held the power but they just end up spissijg fans off and the mouse.

Wow, you're still going. Maybe you should have thought about what you were going to post for a bit, instead of raging across three posts like a madman.

I don't understand why people is so obsessed with MCU's spiderman anyways. He was a nice touch in Civil War. But out of the two solo movie just Far for home felt right since it was basically a two hour spiderman cartoon episode, Homecoming was pretty meh except for the villain but the movie itself was pretty mediocre.

In short, with MCU spiderman lost nothing of value was lost, not that it was bad. but wasn't better than the previous spiderman either, actually I'd say overall the previous spiderman movies were better. Except for the actors Tom works better than the other two I'll give that but just because he has the looks.

Attached: confused venom.jpg (512x384, 13K)

they legit do have power here though, they own the movie rights to Spidey and if they make Spidey movies they'll still have it, Disney can't do shit, unless they buy them up, which we better hope doesn't fucking happen, Disney doesn't need a bigger popculture monopoly

>1 billion dollars says otherwise

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1280x720, 98K)

>u mad that we ruined cinema for the next decade?
I'm only angry when I think about how shitty you've made movies in general for the next decade. Every major release coming out now is some CGI trash or Cape flick, and they're not even good cape flicks anymore. The good ones ended decisively, and we're just left with the scraps that mouseketards hold up as being cinema gold.

Tell us how good the Lion King was again because it made a whole bunch of money for one of the most bankrupt ideas on the planet.

>Hee hee I'm basically a literal cleft-palate retard with a single digit IQ. You mad? Look how much you're raging at me being subhuman scum.

Attached: Literally_(You).jpg (509x697, 56K)

Yep, fucking knew it.

>Who cares if the idea and movie was trash. What matters is that it made a whole bunch of money!
Lion King Cinematic Universe is probably going to happen because of retards like you.

>lol umad
>why u so angry that we ruined Yea Forums with our constant bitching?
Mousefags should be hanged

Lol. "Ruined cinema." What a fucking drama queen. I don't know what you people even do with your lives, you spend all your time whining about Marvel and then you ignore any non-Marvel movies, then you keep complaining about how Marvel is "ruining cinema." You don't want to see "cinema", you want to see more shitty blockbusters and your complaint is "waah it's not my kind of shitty blockbuster anymore."

user, this series getting canned would only mean an inevitable fourth reboot. No matter what happens there's going new products to consume either way, even if you consider Sony to be in the right. It's not that absurd or drone-ish to just ask for once that we get a full Spiderman series without the same couple of Hollywood assholes either fucking over the director or canning the sequels entirely

How long should I give you before you're done making seething post after seething post, each time you hit the post button realizing "Oops, I forgot to say something in my last post, better make another one." 30 minutes, maybe? I'll give you 30 minutes, see if you've gotten it out of your system by then. Have at it.

>Who cares if the idea and movie was trash
Good thing it wasn't then

And yet you keep responding to him

Hollywood people will never understand regular people's perception of their stupid negotiation tactics, because they're not humans but demons from the dark dimension.

And they're all pedophiles.

how was the movie trash? the only arguments against it are irrelevant to a movie's quality
>muh uncle ben
>mj is black
>it's owned by disney
>peter looked up to tony
it was objectivly a fun movie to watch for 99,99% of people

>What they’re doing with Spider-Man is great.
But it isn't. It's on of the worst Spider-Man movie that I've watched. Only second to Amazing Spiderman 2. Him being a sidekick to Tony really hampers his character especially in a solo movie. Sure, his crossover appearance was above average but his solo shit disappoints me to no end. Good for Sony to finally pull the plug on this.

It's finally something different from yet another origin story movie because they can't stop rebooting this shit. They're finally doing what comic books are known for: Crossing over. This is like whining about Doomquest. How dare Iron Man interact with a Fantastic Four character! If it were up to people like you we wouldn't have iconic storylines.

How is replacing a bad thing with another bad thing is considered good? That's like celebrating eating horseshit after years of only getting to eat bullshit. It's different but it's still fucking shit.

>then I’d rather the greedy Disney bullies own it so I know my money is at least going towards something worth my time
>Im fine with Disney getting away with fucking others again for my googoo gaga cape films
lmaoing at your life

Lesser of two evils

As opposed to Sony fucking others again? Including the audience, eh, releasing TASM2 should be classified as abuse, especially with it's misleading trailers

Not him but I never watched those movies, what did they do with misleading trailers?

TASM2 was advertised as featuring three villains, but this shot right here that was in the trailers is literally the last frame of the movie thus Rhino is effectively not part of it, movie ends on a cliffhanger after Peter gets over Gwen's death in a last minute "months go by" sequence reminiscent of freaking Twilight of all things

Attached: amazingspiderman2-400x200.jpg (400x200, 43K)

Ah, I see. Well that's pretty lame but it's not as if Disney is innocent of that either, Ragnarok advertised Hulk vs. Surtur in the trailers only for it to be five seconds of Hulk smacking him a bit then stopping because they had to let Surtur destroy Asgard.

Attached: 1563980683154.jpg (1280x720, 243K)

For fuck's sake, these are both companies creating products. As long as we don't live in a socialist utopia, companies will keep creating products. But here we have one that creates products people actually want, while the other craps on its hand and tries to sell it. And if we're getting products anyway, why shouldn't we demand at least some modicum of quality while we wait for the communist revolution that I'm sure is just around the corner?

>But here we have one that creates products people actually want
Didn't Venom made a billion? Oh wait that doesn't count because it doesn't fit the mouse cult narrative

Which Sony movie made the most money?

Hint: It's not Venom.

The deal went through niggas.

There will be a three picture deal. Also there will be an amazing spider friends college movie. And a buddy hero movie with him and and the human torch. I knew rdj was going to do something.

First post best post
People have a hard time understanding disney just became cocky. Its not the first time

Spider-Man: Far From Home, which is a Disney/Sony co-production.
Second one would be Skyfall, and Fox (which is now owned by Disney) owns the home video/digital/streaming rights to that despite Sony handling theatrical distribution.

I know the answer. I was hoping the other retard would go look it up, and maybe get it through his thick skull that Sony isn't as competent as Disney in making movies.

Probably because after how Raimi's Spider-Man was cut short due to executives' stupidity and people not taking the bait, then everything with TASM's saga, people wanted to see a Spider-Man who actually grew up and not be affected by the same bullshit that ruined the previous incarnations. Hell, at least Iron Man made sense to be involved in his first movie, as Tony was literally the one who gave him a chance to become better than what he was, and both Vulture and Mysterio were well done considering everything.
Of course, that's not to say Spider-fuccboi doesn't have issues, but compared to last time and previous years, Spider-Man has it better now, and Sony again changed everything because of executive meddling.

What's it like using terms like "npc" unironically?

Does uncle be n.v even exist in the mcu?

>quoting RLM verbatim

You can't even argue without defaulting to other people's words.

Tick tock, Disney strongarming Sony as we speak

Attached: Screenshot_20190823-082726_Instagram.jpg (1080x1567, 726K)

It was mentioned in the first movie that aunt May is still grieving. We know what happened, we don't need yet another origin story.

>that Sony isn't as competent as Disney in making movies.
>800M is a flop i swear!
What a sad existence do mouseshills live

>800M is a bigger number than 1.2B
Do you realise how retarded you sound? It's not even quality bait.

>entire post about how people don't care about corporations and just want good movies
>durr disney bad

Is this post truly an automated response?

Yes, user.
If you actually watched Homecoming, while not blatantly told to you, Peter tells Ned that May's dealt with a lot of stuff since "last time", and he doesn't want her to have more pressure/grieving.

>entire post about how people don't care about corporations and just want good movies
Exactly so why should anyone defend nuDisney?

>Exactly so why should anyone defend nuDisney?
Exactly so why should anyone defend Sony?

Venom couldn't even crack 800 million, if people weren't tricked into thinking it had something to do with Marvel nobody would have cared.

We shoudnt so why are you bringing them up?is this an automated response?

NEW SPIDER-MAN DEAL POSSIBLY UNDERWAY WITH DISNEY, MARVEL AND SONY

According to the new deal Disney wants:

A 6-picture deal with Tom Holland, with an option for a 7th.

There are three more Spider-Man films after Spider-Man 3, which will be a new trilogy.

The second trilogy will focus on Peter Parker's college years including plans for Peter to meet up and team up with Firestar and Ice Man of the X-Men (based in part on the old Spider-Man and his Amazing Friends cartoon).

The other three movies are two Avengers films in which Spider-Man will have a larger role and become friends with Johnny Storm (Human Torch from the Fantastic Four).

Marvel Studios will helm and co-finance all Spider-Man related movies for 30% of the full profits (Disney previously wanted 50%, but Sony said no, which led to the talks falling apart).

Sony would distribute, but Disney will acquire exclusive digital and online rights for Disney Plus and affiliated TV networks.

Marvel Studios will helm and co-finance SpiderVerse live-action spinoffs under the same terms.

Venom will relocate into the MCU.

Sony will be given permission for TV live-action programs based on SpiderVerse properties (Sony only has film rights to Spider-Man, but needs permission from Disney for TV rights)

Disney wants the deal to be done before Saturday's Marvel panel at D23 Expo.

- Spider-Man is also said to be a part of a D23 Expo panel.

Holt fucking retard. Disney literally owns almost a quarter of all media you consume and you have the nerve to call them good guys? The shilling here is ridiculous

>if people weren't tricked into thinking it had something to do with Marvel nobody would have cared.
Same with every single MCU movie that wasnt about the Avengers :)

Are you legally retarded? What's this thread even about?

>"Lesser of two evils"
>WHAT HOW DARE YOU CALL THEM GOOD GUYS
ESL who has never heard that phrase before detected.

Venom made 700 million. It may not have been as big a success but it was a success all the same. And now Disney wants to Jew Sony even further by demanding part of the revenue from non spiderman projects while sharing non of the costs

>waaah waaaah we wouldn't have sold the Spider-Man movie rights if we'd known they were worth something!
If only Disney hadn't literally paid off Congress to ensure that Sony's ownership of Spider-Man will extend in perpetuity. Oops!

You need to be 18 to post here. Back to school retard

How disconnected are you from the world

I'd take the guys who made the Emoji movie than the ones remaking every movie they made in live action, at least that was new albeit awful

>while sharing non of the costs
THEY PROPOSED COFINANCING? DO YOU KNOW WHAT WORDS MEAN?

>Yea Forums's hivemind is "the world"
LOL

>attempt to fuck with Disney
>everyone blames Sony for it all

Plan surely failed

>Venom will relocate into the MCU.
NOOOOOOOOO
THEYRE GOING TO SANITIZE HIM AND RUIN IT

Yeah, shit, they might do something terrible like turning him into a good guy! Wait...

>Sony isn't as competent as Disney in making movies.

The original trilogy was a money making success. Homecoming wasn’t even able to surpass Sp3 B.O.

In the end you’re just another underage retard

Sam Raimi is not an abstract entity, he's an actual human being capable of artistic expression.

>We know what happened, we don't need yet another origin story.

The director said he doesn’t even know if Uncle Ben exists

>citing 15-year old movies.
Man, Amazing Spider-man sure was amazing. Andrew Garfield was perfect! Thank god Sony knows what it's doing and would never make unwatchable garbage.

I think they just wanted to get ahead of Disney's loyal, totally not robot, fans

Attached: bots.jpg (1920x1536, 572K)

I just want to know what absolute hunk played Uncle Ben, since he's clearly younger in this universe. Ryan Gosling, perhaps?

Only Amazing Spider-man 2 was irredeemable. The first one was okay better than Homecoming at least.

>Man, Amazing Spider-man sure was amazing. Andrew Garfield

Still made money you underage retard. The only one that “underperformed” (not bombed) was ASM2

>Thank god Sony knows what it's doing and would never make unwatchable garbage
Unlike Disney with Captain Fungus lol

You mean the movie that made over a billion dollars? WHOOPS! Looks like I just BTFO you.

Only for spiderman movies you fucking mouthbreather. Non spiderman movies Sony still had to pay all costs. Disney effectively wanted tribute.

>if people weren't tricked into thinking it had something to do with Marvel nobody would have cared.
Take advice from your kind and simmer down sweaty

Says the guy who just Reddit spaced. Yeah, I think it's clear you're the one we're better off without.

>gets told
>muh reddit spacing
Sad!

>monwy equals to quality
I guese Captain Marlel > Spiderverse.

I notice you stopped reddit spacing once you got called out. Hm, someone's insecure...

The point being is that you were stupid enough to call Disney the lesser when they're the ones closest to the monolithic companies you see in sci fi dystopia

>Disney makes bad movies
>Sony's movies are worse
>Sony still made money!
>But Disney made more money
>MONEY DOESN'T COUNT
Every single time.

I notice you used a non-argument once you got told. Hm, someone's butthurt...

Yeah, you.

Thank the gods Sony stroke the first blow that will slay the cyberpunk megacorporation. VIVA LA REVOLUTION COMRADES!

>Sony's movies are worse
Is that why Spiderverse won an Oscar last year and not Pixar?

Considering inflation, the Raimi trilogy made over a billion

I'm not a socialist, they deserve a bullet but I do think there's a point when an entity gets too big and Disney is past that point

>unironically using 'no u'
I accept your concession

>Kill everyone who disagrees with glorious leader, but socialism bad capitalism good!

Not how inflation works lol

As only a loser would do.

Not to mention almost every Sony Spidey film rates high with audiences on RT

What are you even on about now you retard?

Disney is the 3rd biggest entertainment corporation and doesn't even make it in the top 50 biggest companies overall. If they didn't own so much "nerd" properties none of you pretend anti-corporatists would care.

Attached: 1511854518860.jpg (944x308, 91K)

So Marvel actually does have a D23 panel tomorrow, huh? I guess if there does end up being some high-speed negotiation and they get Spider-Man back, we're gonna find out pretty quickly.

enough its over sick of hearing about this bullshit

>This would explain why the 50/50 partnership request by Disney made it into news leak but nothing else: Sony thought Disney would look greedy to the public. If Sony leaked it, it backfired on them.
I honestly don't get how people aren't seeing it like Disney is the one being an asshole.

That's because you didn't even bother reading the OP.

>This is what I think Sony doesn’t understand. We couldn’t care less if Disney wants deal where they end up with more money. What they’re doing with Spider-Man is great. So if you’re telling me I’m going to lose that because these two companies can’t agree to terms, then I’d rather the greedy Disney bullies own it so I know my money is at least going towards something worth my time.

Most people didn't bother reading the entire OP or else they would have noticed that each paragraph has a different writing style because they were written by three different people. Just shows how fucking stupid this board is.

On my hopeful days, I believe this is all ironic shitposting.

>bots exist but only when they spam comments I disagree with
Well, at least you're making progress.

If you care this much about generic cape movie #47276 you should probably neck yourself.

Why would you be surprised that a successfully-executed Sony plan made them look bad?

>What they’re doing with Spider-Man is great
so, WHAT? both movies are shitfests, bad movie bad cast bad script Iron Boy shit
>BUTT MUH BILLIONS!!!!
like Hobbs And Shaw, people love shit, so, no, seriously imagine being a cuck like you

Sony isn't what you would call "smart" or "good at what they do".

I personally don't blame Sony because what Disney wants was tantamount to highway robbery and I'm not a frothing MCU fanboy so this doesn't affect me much. People forget that the only reason Sony went through the deal in the first place was for their Spiderman game. Sony does in give a fuck about Sony Pictures, most of their media department money comes from PlayStation and music

Sounds like you care a lot more than him.

I can see it being true, if you ever been to Yea Forums PS4 owners are most likely to bring up numbers, money and sales and always bring up Nintendo at first sight of criticism who aren't much better

Look at who cares too much.

Attached: q9khzibd1x911.png (856x557, 540K)

What Sony did was very smart actually. Disney has pigeonholed themselves with phase 4 by giving Spiderman such a huge future file in it and now they've got no Spiderman. Disney needs Spidey in the MCU more than Sony does and Sony Pictures isn't Sony's bread and butter, that's SIE so they can wether the storm of autistic fanboys just fine.

Disney on the other hand is bleeding money. They made several major acquisitions which haven't paid off yet. Star Wars merch sales have plummeted, D+ is sucking down money, ESPN is on life support. The MCU is one of the few positive revenue streams they have right now and it's getting fucked.

Because the people complaining about Sony on Yea Forums tend to be seething Nintendo shills or port begging PC faggots

Attached: fE7C7Gn.jpg (679x825, 159K)

Nah, fuck Disney.

It takes another loser to know one
L

Unless you own their stock, being loyal to a billion dollar mega corporation is just fucking retarded. Arguing on the internet about which billion dollar mega corporation is better than another is even dumber.

>the amazon is burning down
>hong Kong is about to phooey the world into world war 3
>"waaaaah we want Spidey in a commercial with the other toys"

Imagine what alien species must think of humanity

If World War 3 starts I guarantee it will not be China that starts it.

Proving my point. Nintenshits get defensive when they get called out

It most certainly will because no other country is stupid enough while at least having some semblance of military strength to make a valid threat

America.

You know this is fake because of the college part. The secret is out, Peter's personal life is over. It's time for him to die in the third movie fighting Kragen and for Gwen to take over the Spider mantle

Cope

A retarded foreigner doesn't seem to know that we have no reason to start a war because we're the only country with enough force projection to turn any country into rubble without ever having to land boots on the ground

Really, they blew their load that early? It's like they knew they weren't gonna get more Spiderman.

I'm getting tired of this running gag. Haha the npcs think they are the playable protagonist and that everyone else in an npc. Good job, devs. Very funny. Very meta. You can stop now. This joke has gotten old the day it started. I'm tired of being in this simulation. Please take me out.

>everyone’s an npc except me
>he says, regurgitating the same old meme with no originality

The entire internet, from what I’ve seen, is leaning towards supporting Sony. People defending Disney get shat on to oblivion

go back there kids

Don't bother, they don't react to logic. They're at the point where they will tune out anyone who doesn't agree with them.

Venom already was

Attached: 81BF311A-4521-4538-AFF8-A3A4A4672A8B.jpg (927x3254, 2.35M)

Just like Michael Bay Transformers is good because it made money.

No, it is good regardless of the fact that it made money.

I hating hate Stan Lee's daughter, a fucking lying bitch

The one that entrapped the man with an abusive caretaker that wouldn't even let him outside the house, that daughter of Stan Lee's?

Maybe give Sony some profit from the merchandise to even it out....
How much money did Disney waste to buy fox again, and for what, Alita Battle Angel?fucking lol

Amusingly white people still haven't figured out that Fox movies are owned by Disney so they're happily spending money on stuff like Alita in order to "strike back" at Disney and in doing so they support Disney.

Attached: 60be635f-b31a-4810-a02c-887fe02aa02b.png (474x334, 275K)

weaponized fan reaction is a thing and Disney owns it

>The entire internet, from what I’ve seen

must be a small corner, because everywhere I go is mad as fuck that Spiey is out of the MCU and blame Sony for keeping the rights to themselves

the deal itself is meaningless to the masses, all they pick up on is that Spiderman is now out of the MCU, and Sony is the one that ultimately chose to make that decision, to walk away from the generous offer proposed by the mouse