So despite this being pushed like crazy by woke media, it crashed and burned worse than a Soviet moon rocket...

You consume product too, user, just a different one. But you’re just another consumer nonetheless.

I've never heard of it in my life except from on Yea Forums, and I still have no idea what it's called.

Woman problems are hard to relate to because they're practically non-existent

There isn't anything there good enough to mine for future seasons, it wasn't bad enough to warrant a hate watch and it wasn't good enough to get a recommendation beyond the fact that it was a show by women for women. Honestly if the creator didn't so poorly bait people here I bet more of co would've watched it for the hate threads. But the fact that the first thing you see on the screen are a pair of big ol floppy tittes and the only thing I can say is "Oh" not a delightfully surprised Oh for seeing titties but a depressive exasperated Oh for "oh so this is all this is"

That being said I didn't hate the show but I got nothing out of watching it because I wasn't the target audience. Which isn't an indicator or quality just an expression of my reaction

>Was it really that great compared to Bojack?
>It looks just like a clone but with girls

Completely different tone and character dynamics. People say it's similar just because of the art style and "omg secretly dark storyline" but it's not really.

Wasn't it axed by Netflix when the studio started to unionize?

Also because it's the same team, so that's something.

More like women like cute shit and the character look hideous. See Aggretsuko. Girls liked it and the character design is very cute

That make a lot of sense. Anons don't realize that woke "leftist" media are radically anti-unions and hate workers rights

This. So many of the companies you guys complain about being leftist are hardcore anti-union. Please finally learn that leftists and liberals hate each other just as much as you hate them and they hate you.

What? and Who?

We don't know how popular it actually was because Netflix doesn't release viewership numbers. All we know is that it got cancelled. They might have cancelled it because of other reasons.

It's wackier than Bojack and more visually interesting. But it's also not as funny.

>no more speckle
A fucking national tragedy.

Attached: speckle.gif (600x338, 2.15M)

But the third season of Bojack is the first bad one.

And it was well-written.

I don't include quality writing as a factor for success. See the fucking MCU or The Lion King dominating the world box office

>being pushed like crazy
Where? I literally only saw it while browsing Netflix and never bothered to watch it.

>So despite this being pushed like crazy by woke media
was it really?
i saw like 3 threads about it and 2 where ironic
who the fuck gets excited over a spinoff show?

What's it a spin off of?

>they didn't seem to have a good understanding of the demographic it was aiming for
haha i hate myself and watch cartoons ironically, please donate to my patreon, im unemployed crowd?

Bojack art-style.

I thought the joke of that scene is how easy males get praise for barely doing anything. While women have to work harder to get the same praise.

jimmy newtron

The joke is just architecture, you see him doing legit designs later at their apartment

It's not really that? It's more for women in their 20-30s who like bubbly comedy, not sure it hit that mark, seems cartoons and comics are always trying to get that demographic but have no idea how to advertise to them.

But the butt of the joke is another male architect and there's a running gag in the show where Bertie half-asses her job or even stops showing up and her boss keeps thinking she's hard at work.

Attached: maxwell.png (1051x591, 645K)

Yes, but actually no. They did get scrapped when they started to unionize, but Netflix already works with Unionized studios and studios have unionized under them.

it seems like a demographic that doesnt exist, 20-30 year old women are too busy working/getting drunk with their friends/sucking cock to watch anything that isnt the office

The show was okay, not great. It was also personal, which is often an asset for art but not for mass media, unfortunately.

It was visually fun but too in-your-face. The first half of the series was unfocused. It was only when it slowed down that some of the drama was able to hit. This was an instance were the number of episodes worked against the core plot. If it were tightened up and had better priorities, this might have been something special.

Hate to sound like a broken record, but Aggretsuko and Rilakkuma were thematically similar, but much tighter and relatable shows that were able to get their point across without any smarminess or antagonism. They were effective were T&B was not. Its cancellation is lamentable, but doesn't need to be blamed on anyone but itself.

>it crashed and burned worse than a Soviet moon rocket.
It didn't; The show was good and got good feedback. could you not use BS in your observations?

Touca and Bertie, it's good.

just by looking at it's trailer it feels like they took Bojack and made it le funny random for social media girls. which is perplexing to me
why pick such an ugly style for a group of people that base their lifes on appeareances.

It was in the front page every single day wtf

It looks like bojack but it’s not bojack, so I’m sure it got dropped when viewership was low because everyone knew what this was: a bait and switch using bojack a visuals.

MAYBE it’s actually good, but I haven’t had time to watch it yet.

Attached: shill 2.jpg (1916x945, 238K)

>The show was good

Attached: the soy dance.gif (224x224, 3.98M)

>BoJack except girls ha ha ha vaginas I'm cool right guys

This garbage was on page 1. The reason is because no one watched it.

>Was it really that great compared to Bojack?
Best description is, this show is a family-guy-esq sitcom that Bojack would make fun of.

Tuca was so insufferable the show became unwatchable any time she was on screen.

I actually thought they used the bojack style better than bojack

stop posting this or I'm going to punch you in the face

First episode sure, I actually grew to like her, she had good character growth

If Big Mouth deserved one season this deserved a hundred.

And I'm saying that as a decrepid being who actually watched 2 full seasons of Big Mouth.

Have these adult animations ever considered making the characters not repulsive and ugly?

What's the point in making animation for adult women with female characters? No one is going to watch that.

Attached: shill 2.jpg (1913x945, 340K)

Bojack wasn't good either, but this was even less clever.

It was about 7 out of 10 and very easy to watch, and had a few interesting moments that suggested it could have built up to 9/10 as the writing team got more comfortable and learned to work with these characters more smoothly. Cutting down on the loud, energetic obnoxiousness that popped up from time to time would have helped.

Given the amount of shit that gets second seasons on netflix it definitely deserved it.

Only a handful of side characters and background nobodies aren't cute though.

Attached: wtus.jpg (1920x1080, 905K)

Yes indeed. I am glad we agree.

>gamers complain about women and SJW because they shame them for their taste in video game and wan them out
>start making meme like that to shame people who enjoys game
And we have gone full circle.

80% of what Netflix shits out gets a second season, imagine the cope of belonging to the 20%.

Gamers want to feel oppressed no matter what so of course they will eventually do it to themselves

>Aggretsuko...(was) thematically similar
Was it? That show has nothing to do with muh feminism. It's all about Retsuko becoming a "real adult".

What on earth are you on about?

The joke is that a lot of times writers for TV and movies write characters with jobs they know nothing about (and architecture is a really popular job for TV and movie characters)

$oyboy is literally about making fun of a certain category of gamers. That enjoy games lots of Yea Forums posters used to like in the first place.

I am going with this.

Talk about completely missing the point of agretsuko, jeez...

I thought it was mocking them because they like those games because they're not "problematic"

It annoys me with how often writers write office scenes where the characters talk about work, without even bothering to state what their occupation even is.

What are examples of this?

the only women who can relate to this show have to be the same age and live the same society/context the creator does and, well, many of us don't. Sally Cruikshank or Silvia Ziche convey women in a much broader, relatable manner; Ballmastrz and Vermin do the 'women representation' thing much better.
I'd rather watch stupid men do stupid things

Attached: tumblr_nom7u4yH0K1rsbftzo10_500.gif (500x382, 1.2M)

BK kids club!

Honestly it's just Bertie who has the storyline that only women could relate to, but Tuca has a fairly open experience that anyone could relate to for the most part

I really liked the way Malcolm in the Middle joked around with this with Hal. They purposefully never showed what his job was and then they pull this:
youtube.com/watch?v=JvwVJ3zhARY

Most people can relate to being a filthy 30+ child living on allowance from daddy?

>directionless
>lack of self worth
>poor relationship with siblings
>rough time growing up
>loss of a family member
>recovering alcoholic

I wasn't talking about feminism per se. Both shows started with the frustrations of being a single working woman, and trying to balance their professional and social lives. But whereas Aggretsuko was cathartic in season 1 and gut wrenching in season 2, T&B veered into trauma and pop psych that was kind of patronizing and left a gross feeling behind. It was still engaging, but it's just not for everyone.

This reminds me of another difference between the two shows. Whereas the antagonists in Aggretsuko turned out to have real emotional depth, T&B's antagonists were muddy. They're cartoon caricatures dressed in a facade of real and edgy.

I think our shows have trouble making something appealing, but without being obvious pandering fap-bait to the mainstream audiences. So we end up going towards one extreme.

Attached: Rilakkuma.and.Kaoru.S01E01.webm (640x360, 2.76M)

You only watched episode 1, didnt you

>Aggretsuko was cathartic in season 1 and gut wrenching in season 2
I don't know, there were "Retusko you need to grow up" bits in the first season; Washimi telling her off for wanting to get married just so she can quit work, having a mocking song sung about HER and told it "wasn't wrong", or the humiliation of being a useless load while everyone else is working hard.

>I think our shows have trouble making something appealing, but without being obvious pandering fap-bait to the mainstream audiences. So we end up going towards one extreme
Burgers are still scared of sex

Attached: salem-witch-trials-1692-granger.jpg (900x655, 189K)

They are redditors. On reddit there are several weird factions of losers who drink their clan’s kool aid and come out retarded.

$oiboi is a /pol/ meme to make fun of “nu-males”. Morons.

You're picking out individual setbacks rather than looking at the entire story arc, which climaxed with her telling off her boss and getting over Mr. Bland. She's setting her terms instead of settling for someone else's. I found that cathartic, at least.

$oyboy literaly stem from cosmos, a Speedrunner, drinkingtons of $oymilk and ending up changing of gender. this is where some uniformed Yea Forums posters assumed it was due to $basedmilk containign oestrogen (it doesn't really) and thus people who drink it end up weakboy or trans. lots of crossing between /pol/ and Yea Forums so it caught on quickly.

On Yea Forums, it evolved in gamer liking Nintendo-style games.

She never told Ton off. The closest is her blowing him out with her death-metal scream at the department party, but that just made her vulnerable to revenge...which he does not take because apparently because he thinks he would not be fair. The climax re: work is her begging to be given some of the killer workload instead of being left to slack off.

Her infatuation with Mr. Bland was something she inflicted on herself. Resasuke is deliberately made a non-entity so their relationship is just a mirror of Retsuko's own desires. It's why he isn't even shown reacting to their "break-up". She didn't "set... her terms instead of settling for someone else's" rather than accept reality instead of indulging in a shallow fantasy.

They unionized and Netflix punished them.

I'm dumb. Explain what unions are and why companies are against them.

>She never told Ton off. The closest is her blowing him out with her death-metal scream at the department party,

It was still cathartic when it happened. The aftermath is the real world tempering that makes the show genuine rather than a power fantasy. Still cathartic.

>Her infatuation with Mr. Bland was something she inflicted on herself.

No disagreement there. But in that, there's still the realization that yes, she can do better than this. She deserves better. That still is some part of why the fantasy shatters.

Incorrect. It started with /pol/ bagging on left wing males all being similar looking and that feminism was creating a pathetic nu-male that had shitty beards, cared only about toys, yada yada. Then they noticed a some of them, tech guys really, enjoyed soimilk as a meal replacement, and meme’d on the fact that soi has estrogen. Then they noticed cosmos was obssesed with it.

All of the above is their viewpoint, not mine.

It’s when workers work together so they can have more power to negotiate with their bosses. There are pros and cons to unions from both sides, but that is a very long post.

>It was still cathartic when it happened. The aftermath is the real world tempering that makes the show genuine rather than a power fantasy. Still cathartic.
The "tempering" was her learning that Ton isn't simply a nasty bully who wants to hurt her as much as he can. This is emphasized again when it's his advice that gets her to value her job and free herself from her phony love affair.

The single point of the first season is that Retsuko was selfish in the way she viewed others. She thinks everyone at work is an asshole (Tsunoda, Kabae, Ton) but learns that each are more complex than her shallow judgment. She resisted revealing her harmless hobby to Washimi and Gori when all they wanted to offer was friendship. She latched onto a bland nothing of a guy because she wanted to pretend to be in love.

This is why the final scene is her showing kindness and consideration for another instead of thinking of herself. A man is telling her he loves her but the first thing she does is gets him to calm down because he's getting overexcited.

>, cared only about toys, yada yada.
Hence my point of Yea Forums being a moron using it to complain about sjw.

Most or all employees band together to put pressure on the company to give them better conditions.

If I as an individual am being underpaid sometimes you can fix that by finding another job. But a lot of the time it becomes the norm to underpay people who do your work basically everywhere, or you're paid okay but have to work 60 hour weeks.

Alone you can't do shit. Your boss will just fire you if you complain. But if everyone who works there decides to stop coming into work until you all get better pay, or does other stuff like that, the company starts hemorrhaging money, and if they fire all of you at once that's going to lose them a lot more money, so they ideally give in and increase wages. This is the kind of thing unions organize.

Of course companies hate this because the owners want to pay you as little as possible for as much work as possible, where unions usually fight for the desires of employees to be paid more for a more reasonable amount of work. So companies will stop at almost nothing to try and crush unions.

Unions are literally the whole reason we have weekends and a minimum wage and workplace safety laws.

People who liked Bojack wanted more of that and this wasn't it.
People who didn't like Bojack assumed this was more of the same and didnt watch it.
Making spinoffs of something that's only marginally popular to begin with is rarely commercially viable.

>unions usually fight for the desires of employees to be paid more for a more reasonable amount of work
Sometimes they fight for employees to be paid for doing no amount of work. Government unions are notorious for this because their bosses are spending other people's money and can't be bothered not to get swindled.

Right, and you make that point because you are a retarded redditor who can’t spot crossborders and need to niche things. We’ve gone over that.

>Sometimes they fight for employees to be paid for doing no amount of work.
No.

>and you make that point because you are a retarded redditor who can’t spot crossborders and need to niche things.
Not really.

Attached: 1361918507355.png (203x209, 3K)

If no work is done, then it get shut down. That include government agencies.

It's not that no work is done, it's that some workers spend some time being paid while they do nothing, inflating staff roles and wages paid.

nytimes.com/2017/12/28/nyregion/new-york-subway-construction-costs.html
>The budget showed that 900 workers were being paid to dig caverns for the platforms as part of a 3.5-mile tunnel connecting the historic station to the Long Island Rail Road. But the accountant could only identify about 700 jobs that needed to be done, according to three project supervisors. Officials could not find any reason for the other 200 people to be there.

>For years, The Times found, public officials have stood by as a small group of politically connected labor unions, construction companies and consulting firms have amassed large profits.

Sounds like boilerplate anti-union propaganda to me.

Look at what working and living in America has become for most people since most unions got broken. It's so bad they look at people in the public sector live a little better than dogs and think they're a bunch of pampered layabouts.

>The "tempering" was her learning that Ton isn't simply a nasty bully who wants to hurt her as much as he can.
Again, no disagreement. Doesn't change I felt about that arc.

>Retsuko was selfish in the way she viewed others.
Selfish may be too strong. Self-centered and guarded and insecure. Dropping the bland guy was still liberation, even if it is of her own preconceived notions.

My job isn't unionized, but government unions are the reason I get 7 weeks paid vacation, and every time the unionized employees negotiate a pay raise my salary goes up too.

>people in the public sector live a little better than dogs

Attached: 1517621393949.jpg (326x326, 8K)

Ha, it happens, but yes they don't intentionally fight for it.

We got a couple native-american guys at my job who get by doing as least as possible. There's no incentive to get their asses back into gear, but at the same time some people like them slip through the cracks so its a bit frustrating.

Haddish and Ali Wong are both pretty hilarious, imo. But the show didn't use them as writers for some reason and them aping shitty focus group tested, woke woman scripts felt really hollow without their distinct humors behind it at all

But you do not do "no work".
>But the accountant could only identify about 700 jobs that needed to be done, according to three project supervisors.
That's not an union issue, but a corruption one.

>That's not an union issue, but a corruption one.
Totally different things, right?

I get it can be frustrating, but between
-some slackers get paid doing nothing while other chumps work
And
-People literally die or are ont he vergor break-down and living in misery while other chumps work unpaid over-hours while some rich asshole get money out of it doing nothing.

My choices is quickly done.

Indeed.

The rot grows until the system is paralyzed because the cost of getting anything done has become too high.

I do work when I'm at work, but I also get paid 7 days a week even though I never work weekends, paid stat holidays, unlimited sick days (as long as it's justified), etc. I rarely deserve my pay cheque, with all the days I'm paid to not be at work.

S1 was pretty bad too. Also S5 while we're at it.

>propaganda
No it's true, police unions and teachers unions are shit. Unions are supposed to stick it to their employer, but public sector unions stick it to the taxpayer. Look at this situation where public sector unions gave themselves insane amounts of benefits the state couldn't afford because they were essentially on both sides of the negotiating table.
illinoispolicy.org/reports/whats-driving-illinois-111-billion-pension-crisis/

Teachers literally do one of the most important jobs for crap pay. Seems like their union doesn't go nearly far enough and should actually be demanding a lot more.

They often do a bad job and the union prevents serious attempts to improve education it it'll reduce its own power.

They do a terrible job and protect bad teachers from being fired, like police unions protect bad cops from being fired.

Never have we reached that point in history.

>Dropping the bland guy was still liberation, even if it is of her own preconceived notions.
Well the same is true of the second season. She breaks up with Tadano because she figured out what she wants and that he can't give it to her. She's never even shown being sad about having to part with a guy she likes.

Compare to earlier in the season with her rejecting Shirota, whom she liked some, because she was afraid of marriage but regretting it later.

>paid stat holidays
Paid holidays is a right in most country, including mine, so I don't really see the issue.
If some people really have their nogging creaking about the concept, just imagine you have got a raise, but the pay is evenly distributed on working and non-working days.

>but I also get paid 7 days a week even though I never work weekends
Not much different than people having a monthly salary instead of a day-pay or an hour-pay.

What's so woke and original about it ?

>She's never even shown being sad about having to part
I disagree. It showed enough, it just didn't revel in it.
>with a guy she likes
Mmm, that's what made it gut wrenching, but not unsatisfying. It's a wonderful balance that show strikes.

>we haven't ruined it yet
>let's keep making it worse

I didn't like the second series as much as the first and Tadano is a significant reason; he seems too much ripped from the pages of a generic josei manga (a cute appealing man the lead intellectually rejects as a mate despite her attraction because she thinks he's a loser but he turns out to be an eccentric zillionaire) but I did like how he was completely serious about wanting to be with Retsuko for life.

>>let's keep making it worse
there is no indication that things woud go worst in the first place.

Most country with solid Union laws tend to have good economy, so the opposite seems to be the case.

It has literally never been shown anywhere that making it easier to fire people makes for better employees. It's just a doctrine of faith news channels regurgitate because they're owned by billionaires who hate workers and labour power.

You can so easily spin it the other way, that making the lives of teachers easier to fire will make their lives more precarious and insecure which will stress them out, make them feel devalued and disillusioned, and make them perform worse.

Like what specifically can a teacher do because of unions that should get them fired? All the things they obviously shouldn't do are still grounds for dismissal with the full support of the union.

Plus if you took away all the labour rights of teachers to create a """competitive market" and it actually worked, which there's absolutely no evidence it would, wouldn't that just reinforce the pattern of rich schools having good teachers and poor, community based schools having shit ones, so you're actually just hurting poor people?

What you'd have done is made teaching a less appealing profession by removing all the union benefits that are its best feature now, so you're not going to get a flood of new teachers. It will just be moving around the ones already there, and the best case scenario is the good ones just get funnelled away from the kids who need them most..

>Let's keep being exploited out of a fear that has never been proved true
Sure.

There's definitely a feeling of going through the motions with that character. It's such a genre convention, and we all know what the end game is going to be so there's no surprise. But the execution itself is excellent, so I set those feelings aside and just enjoy the craft of it.

It's not that it being possible to get fired makes a person a better employee, it's that bad employees can be made to stop being employees and weighing everyone down with their dead weight.

The 100% conventional thing to do with this kind of character would have him only want a playmate or be intolerant of the woman wanting something that didn't immediately interest him, which they did not do, but he's kind of boring and lame compared to the quality of writing from the first season or other parts of the second season. For example, the positive portrayal of omiai was interesting given that it's usually been portrayed as an old-fashioned pain-in-the-ass for decades in Japanese pop-clture.

Public sector workers already have representation through the political process. Even FDR said public sector unions don't work, and I don't think he hated workers or labor power. "All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress. Accordingly, administrative officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many instances restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters"

>Plus if you took away all the labour rights of teachers to create a """competitive market" and it actually worked
It wouldn't work, because schools already aren't susceptible to market signals, that's why public sector unions don't work. Private unions work fine.

>Pushed like crazy
>Dropped out of no where

There was nothing even remotely woke about Tuca and Bertie. Is this another 0.25lb thread?

Even if we accept the premise that the US government is democratic, and therefore the employer of public workers is the people, it doesn't in any way infringe on the ability of the government to negotiate. In most cases the requests of a public union will not constitute a constitutional crisis, just a slightly different set of procedures and minor budget changes. That's all very moderate. It is common practice and the intended function of the government for representatives to be able to make decisions and pass legislation on that modest scale without directly consulting constituents. That's how almost all legislation works, it's literally the whole idea of representatives. You ideally elect someone who aligns with your opinions as much as possible, and then they make day to day decisions about details, sometimes having to compromise to external pressures like an economic downturn or a wave of protests or a hurricane or a labour dispute.

As for any given administrator not being able to sit down at a table and unilaterally agree to things on behalf of the government, this is not a problem at all. In fact this is how negotiations in every sphere of human activity usually work. The administrator/representative will have a broad idea of what the government might accept, hammer out a deal, and then go and get it ratified. If it doesn't pass there's another round of negotiations. This is how most things are done, not just public sector labour disputes.

As it turns out, slapping bird tits on everything can't save a directionless, unfunny mess from being terrible.

Bertie masturbates in an episode, so this show is okay with me

It's never been demonstrated that this is a serious problem or that teachers unions really do regularly prevent the firing of people objectively unfit for the job.

Seems like destroying workers rights for teachers would be an absolute catastrophe compared to the dubious benefits of getting rid of a small minority of possibly fictional bad teachers.

I'm pretty sure Ireland's teacher's union is stronger than America's. I went to pretty average public schools and out of however many dozens of teachers I met, not even limiting it to ones who taught me, I can think of maybe 3 that were actively incompetent and 1 who was mentally unstable but could still muddle though and cover the curriculum. Of them there was only 1 who I'd definitely say was not doing her job and they gave her the tiny bottom of the barrel classes that straight up were never going to do the work anyway.

It was definitely not a high enough number to justify destroying teachers lives by taking away their workers protections. Faculty was fine.

So you can believe that police unions protect bad cops but you refuse to believe bad teachers are protected by teachers unions? That is pure ideology. I already showed what happens when public sector unions have too much power. Taking 2 million dollars worth of pensions you can access at 50 years old that exceed your own contributions by 94% and forcing everyone else to pay the bill is not a "worker's right", that's extortion.

It was a low budget show run by first-time showrunners, it was lucky to exist at all. To quite h, I want to see more Bojack extended universe

This doesn't take place in the Bojack "universe" which is the same as reality except where they can make a joke, like the underwater fishpeople city.

The cops could literally not have a union at all and be this well protected and riddled with abuse. The problem isn't the union, it's the entire structure and nature of the police force itself. You can't assume 99.999999 percent of lines of work map onto the one of the most singular and bizarre lines of work.

You know who doesn't have a union? The military. You know what organization routinely gets away with much worse shit than the police? The military.

When you become an enforcer of state power with a long leash a lot of contravening factors and abusable power dynamics come into play that don't when you're a geography teacher. I almost suspect they let the police have one of the few strong unions in the country just so they can dismiss real criticisms of power structures and claim that really the problem with the police is worker's rights.

I didn't even know it existed til a month after it came out and I didn't end up watching it til late July and I only watched a few episodes.

The show is just alright I guess? It's sometimes funny but the style/characters are kinda obnoxious (especially the Tucan bitch, just reminds me of Mabel Pines but older and sluttier).

It definitely doesn't have mass appeal and Netflix is kinda struggling financially at the moment and Disney+ is about to steal all the content and viewership so I understand trying to cut things that don't make a lot of money.

like they consume all the Bojack Horseman stuff out there? For example......

>easy males get praise for barely doing anything
Women really belive this kind of myth?

Whatever it takes to feel like a victim.

I haven't seen this show but is it an animated sitcom but with animals?

People in general like to feel like victims. See /r9k/ or MGTOW. It's easier than take responsability

Attached: sexual failure.jpg (1280x720, 109K)

>make tweet about right wingers and how shes fine with them hate watching it for views
>torrent it instead, dont give it views
>its shit
>gets cancelled
feels good man, eat shit.

I didn’t even know it existed until I heard it was canceled

Outside of this shithole and you cunts crying about it constantly I saw one maybe one or two puff-piece articles about the creator and it was on the splash page for like a week. Quit being such a fucking triggered pissbaby

>haha my VAGINA and also SEX and DRUGS and DEPRESSION haha and ADULTING amiright gals??!??!

>haha my PENIS and also SEX and DRUGS and DEPRESSION haha and ADULTING amiright guys??!??!

it felt like it was a half season.
i didn't even know i was watching the last episode until i went to put on the next one.
they introduce more plot points near the end tuca's aunt getting cancer,speckle buying the house,and bertie getting her own bakery
i think they should have just cut the whole bertie in the workplace thing seeing as how that didnt matter after she became apprentice baker.
I thought they were gonna go somewhere with DJ parkour and tuca untill they killed him off screen with little to no reaction from tuca.

Also no bertie tits

Attached: 1544825546752.png (521x396, 130K)

>the worst of Bojak Horseman dealt with existential crises and ideas of self-worth and society
>Tuca and Bertie dealt with evils such as sexist air conditioning, gender pronouns, and manspreading

Attached: 1565625199642.jpg (1200x900, 718K)

>sexist air conditioning, gender pronouns, and manspreading
When? They deal with manspreading once but it's treated as a joke

We got her ass at least.

Nobody actually likes female lead TV unless it's a Disney princess.

Netflix has been canceling shows left and right