What about a young Syrian refugee Super-Heroe?

>>Syrian refugee super>Treats all the paranoid/racist delusions of Muslim migrants as fact>Uses his super strength to throw palettes of bottled water donated by relief efforts into the sun because they are poisoned>Super speed lets him snatch up all the care packages given by sympathetic people, finds Muslim tracking devices in the cell phones>Uses his heat vision to melt the walls erected along the Hungarian/Serbian borders >Communicates with sea animals to raft groups of grateful migrants into southern Europe
He's been in the USA for a number of years and has integrated.

If he was a hero wouldn't he have fought in Syria for what he cared for?

Oh I meant that the refugee super would love in a world where his delusions are fact, like the poison water or tracking devices in donated phones.

Like: after he's done hucking water into the sun he then "interrogates" aid workers into exposing the supply chain where he finds the villain dumping poison into the water. They fight, refugee wins but villain escapes, ends with a PSA about how you should never trust state provided supplies except money and housing.

See

Syrian refugees don't go to America. Please stop appropriating my character thanks you god bless.

>Has power to help his fellow Syrians and bring peace and stability to his home nation
>Probably uses his powers to invade European countries and ruin them instead

I'd like to see more superheroes that reflect the modern world, honestly. Like a Yazidi superhero from Iraq or a Rohingya superhero from Myanmar. Comics writers could bring attention to some real issues plaguing people in the world today if they looked outside of the US bubble.

That no more reflects the modern world than a white Christian in the US

He has to go back. So does Superman whole we’re at if. Supergirl can stay though.

>a white Christian in the US
You mean the story that's been told thousands of times before? I quite agree, and it reflects the modern world and its issues no less either. I can name 5 white Christian superheroes off the top of my head. Can you name any of what I suggested?

I am OP and I believe he got the superpowers years after his family run from Syrians. He believes in reality democracy and often uses he superhero live to inform the public about the Syrians government human rights violations.

The wording of your post implies that they don’t. More superheroes of that background is more superheroes that reflect the modern world.

Might be a little late for this superhero to have the kind of impact you want. Assad and ISIS pretty much crushed any pro-democracy rebels in Syria a while ago, and now with ISIS crippled, Assad seems to be solidifying his grip on the country. The war is winding down.

>He is a mutants age 16 and have the hots for ms marvel

I don't think a storyline about ms Marvel getting raped and then being forced to marry her rapist will be very popular.

Exactly what important issues in the modern world do you want to address with another white Christian superhero, user? You should be able to get from the full comment that I was talking about specific persecuted ethnic groups that lend themselves to a hero narrative. What pressing modern concern your white christian superhero address?

Salvini superhero when?

Attached: SALVINI-BARCONE-672x372.jpg (672x372, 42K)

He is hoping to help began chipping away at any support Assad have in the UN and another more pro-democracy rebels in like 10 at 20 years with mostly Syrian refugee. The geting ideas from the rebels from Cuba.

I don’t want superheroes to shed light on present day geopolitical issues

Your refugee just because a supervillain. Hope he gets torn in half by a sentinel

>Your refugee just because a supervillain.
What?

Why not? They've been doing it since the 1930s.

Jeez, your grammar is worse than OP's.

Marvel will send a scout to your house any minute now.

They were shit then too

Why do you think that?

What's his mutant power? To suicide bomb without dying?

Politics in comics back then could be summed up as "Fuck Nazis, fuck Communists." Politics in comics now are "Everyone to the right of Marx is a Nazi, institute Socialism."

Attached: PIC6.jpg (250x273, 18K)

I really don't like real world events to seep into comics. Events like 9/11 are Backpage news compared to the problems many villians unleash .

My comic-book dream is a universe that just goes back to the Bronze Age and stays there. A world perpetually suspended between the years of 1970 and 1986. The USSR is still an ideological, militaristic, and scientific threat, the United States is unsure of its position as a nascent global hegemon, but there's this sense of hope and optimism -- a people of the rise. At the same time, there are genuine social issues that need to be addressed, beyond the petty factionalism of the identity politics we're dealing with today. It was a better time period for stories.

Attached: a35b7-exceptionalism.jpg (900x1166, 236K)

>age 16
If he's like most "young" Syrian refugees, add 15 years to that.

The past is gone, and it can't come back.

Why not an Arabic Christian superhero fighting against the local Muslims in his country because they want to murder everyone of his kind?

Attached: Even nips like Kurdish battle waifus.jpg (600x817, 215K)

You say that, but you can never know for sure.

Attached: manifest-destiny.jpg (350x350, 26K)

>have superpowers
>instead of fixing your country and ending the refugee crisis just fucking leave and do shit in someone else's

Really makes me think

>Superhero who runs away from the villains
Great idea OP.

>a Rohingya superhero from Myanmar
Considering Muslims are considered colonizers east of Persia, which they are, it would be a supervillain and not a hero.

Assad and ISIS pretty much crushed any pro-democracy rebels in Syria before he got his powers.

There's one problem.
The over 7.5 million refugees are a result of dumbshit Westerners supporting ISIS/ISIL and protracting the war until it caused enough damage to infrastructure and economy that the refugees had no job to return to.
As opposed to the war being ended quickly and efficiently by supporting Assad against the fundamentalists before structural damage was too high.
So refugees would take a shit on him if he warred against Assad, Assad unironically has higher support now than ever before.

He is NOT a rapist.

I’m sure there’s plenty of work as a builder or in cleaning debris in Syria

So the good guys already won then

>ywn see superman beat a Muslim super villain to death to protect the Burmese Buddhist traditions from subhuman Muslims

Attached: E58D80AA-82A3-4516-84A9-AA5D8DD7DE78.jpg (1029x909, 182K)

Sort of difficult to be a colonizer if your country's Buddhist-majority government and army are trying to drive you into the sea. You really think they're the oppressors in that situation?

What do like

No it’s not difficult to be a colonizer in that situation. You think Boers weren’t colonizers because they never had a majority of Southern Africas population? The Muslims in Burma are being wiped out for being a foreign group that showed and started ruining shit for the native Buddhists. They aren’t oppressed as they deserve everything they get. Hope Burma kills them all and is done with it.

Is the UN doing anything about it? Or is the UN not doing anything because is cannot be blame on Israel?

This reminds me of white people in North America saying the Muslims are trying to colonize the European continent of North America.

What has the UN done about Israel? The kikes are still acting like Palestinians are an unwelcome invader to eradicate in a similar fashion that Romans did to the Samnites even though most of them only showed up 70 years ago

Glad you completely deflected and in doing so accepted you were wrong

>muslim
>christian
>superheroes
Hey, why do religious groups need a superhero to protect them? Is their god too weak or does he just give a shit what happens with his "children". Do you not pray enough?

Is the UN doing anything in general?

>The Muslims in Burma are being wiped out
>They aren’t oppressed
You don't see how these two statements conflict with each other, do you?

He's mocking you for how obviously wrong you are, you sperg.

It’s not oppression to kill your colonizers. Oppression is a denial of rights and they don’t have a right to be there.

*tips fedora*
Neither of those religions have any doctrine saying that God is going to protect them from being persecuted. I’m sorry you’re a retarded teenager without any knowledge of religion but feel the need to opine

Sort of not difficult to be a colonizer when your fucking religion is a foreign power which has no business in the region, which invaded it in the 8th century following the orders of a warmonger prophet who invented it and personally waged over 50 fucking war campaigns of aggressive expansionism and imperialism, and which forced itself into the region by creating death tolls that make Western colonizers later look small-time.
Islam has no fucking business outside of the Arabian peninsula, anything beyond it is colonialism.

The only difference between Western Colonialists and Muslim Colonialists is that the Muslim ones have been colonizing, enslaving, and terrorizing the region for 700 years more than the Westerners.

It says enough when even the Tibetan Empire and the Buddhists proclaimed that allying with Islam against China and the Tang Dynasty during the period was the greatest mistake in their history. Brush up on your history.

>It’s not oppression to kill your colonizers
1. When you control the government, the civilians from a former colonizing group are not "colonizers", they're just one more ethnic group in your country.
2. The Rohingyas are being deprived of their rights as we speak.

Except I’m obviously correct, and his deflection doesn’t fucking matter. It’s not insulting. I didn’t say anything about North America, and Buddhists in Burma are the fucking indigenous to it. I’m sure there’s someone out there that would say Amerindian tribes attacking European settlements in America was oppression.

>colonizers are no longer colonizers when you get back power
Unironically kill yourself. Brainlets like you should never breed. They are still the people that colonized you, they are still unwelcome invaders, and they still do not have rights to be in your land. They aren’t just “another group”.

>your fucking religion is a foreign power
You just keep coming in with these bizarro arguments. No a religion is not a "foreign power", it's a belief system a group of people subcribes to. And by what system of morality do you say that the descendants of people in the 8TH CENTURY have no right to live in a region they've lived their whole lives in?
>It says enough when even the Tibetan Empire and the Buddhists
You're betraying your western bias pretty strongly if you've bought the whole "Buddhists are always peaceful" line.

Nonstop war on one country since it was founded. Stopping any consequences to the Muslim to the Arab world from is genocidal war on Israel.And the Palestinians population in Israel has been increasing and unlike the Muslim world concentration camps for Palestinians in Israel recognized territory they are basic human rights. Israel is not a perfect but neither is the US. In contrast , I say most of is military enemies are Muslims, supremacists by their own laws.

Doesn’t matter. Burma for the Burmese. The Muslims in Burma ain’t Burmese and it ain’t their birthright. Simple as.

Yeah they are. They're human beings trying to live their lives and worship in their own way, and invasions by their ancestors centuries before don't make denial of their human rights irrelevant now. The kind of logic you're using is the kind that would support the Rwandan Genocide.

Hey angry Burma guy, learn how to quote posts.

Except Palestine is their native home for their people to settle, and enjoy self determination in. Israelis invading, taking huge swaths of land, and then claiming to be good for not just gassing them all is insane. No shit they wage eternal war on them. They want their fucking home, not a place as a powerless minority sustained only by Israeli benevolence.

They don’t have human rights. Human rights do not fucking exist. They are made up. Burmese want their home back for themselves and they are perfectly fine taking it back. Those Muslims can fuck off.

There's no bizzaro argument about an Imperialistic religion created for the purpose of Imperialism and War by Muhammad, by corrupting the teachings of Bahira, and infusing politics and a system of statehood into it which don't make it a belief system anymore as much as a political system, heralded by Arab invaders into the region who brought genocide, slavery, and colonialism into it, being a fucking Colonialist religion.

There's also no Western bias since i'm not a Westerner, in fact it takes a dumbshit Westerner historically unaffected by Islamic invasions that countries of over 4 billion people currently living have experienced, to be deceived by your stupid retarded replies.

There's only 3 people who have any right to debate territory in that part of Asia - Chinese, Tibetans, Indians.
Anyone Muslims is a Colonialist or a Colonialist-supporter/traitor and should fuck off back to the Arabian peninsula. That's also where the future is heading now that Muslim Colonialists are reaping karma.

reported to the fbi, the cia, homeland security, the nypd, the mexican police, the FDA and the internet police

I am a white Canadian. Do I need to be kill?

Canadians are the scum of the earth, unironically, and I’d be happy to see them go colonizer or not. If the First Nations had the ability to expunge you from Canada they’d be justified in doing so.

If individuals don't have rights, why do cultures have rights? You can't have it both ways. You're saying the Burmese people have a right to abuse and drive out a religious and ethnic minority, resulting in a horrific humanitarian crisis, because of some cultural birthright to the land. But cultures are made up of individuals. Why does a Burmese buddhist person's right to seize what was once their neighbor's land outweigh a Rohingya family's right to security?

>an Imperialistic religion created for the purpose of Imperialism and War by Muhammad, by corrupting the teachings of Bahira, and infusing politics and a system of statehood into it which don't make it a belief system anymore as much as a political system, heralded by Arab invaders into the region who brought genocide, slavery, and colonialism into it, being a fucking Colonialist religion.
Bold words for someone who is making excuses for ethnic cleansing yourself.

The Syrian refugee Super-Heroe believes in real democracy for all people.And freedom of religion.

>dude like whoa individuals
Individuals do not exist in reality. The pure individual has never been a reality. Humans are fundamentally interwoven, inextricably, with those around them. And human rights not existing means there’s no wrong in them doing what they want to the Muslim shits.

Can’t be a humanitarian crisis if Muslims aren’t human

Day of the rake soon
>t. Reptilian

>By day, he's a 16 year old doctor, lawyer and scientist.
>By night, he's lost all pretense of being a decent human being and becomes Sexual Emergency.
>the hots for ms marvel.
Of fuck she's getting raped, and there's nothing you can do but say thank you.
>And have a more exacting following of Islam
So the rape thing is definitely a go.
Lol no California is a much better Syria.
That's not true at all.
>white Christian in the US
Correct, it reflects it far less. White Christian Americans have a significant influence on the rest of the world.
Based
He's more a non-powered hero, just snipes their inflatable rafts from Italian rooftops.
Based.
Much more compelling story.
>ISIS
That's not how you spell CIA.
>Westerners supporting ISIS/ISIL and protracting the war until it caused enough damage to infrastructure and economy that the refugees had no job to return to.
Mission accomplished.
Wrong.
Also wrong.
What ya doin' Rabbi?
Gotem.

Not human?

Attached: 7bd946cc729fe56eda95d3f29ce18351.png (613x502, 593K)

*Rohingya's right to securely follow Muhammad's commandments in the Quran and start a subversion, rebellion, and war program after reaching a certain population percentage, following his warmongering example and shrewd politics.

There's a saying you have in English.
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
There's a 3rd adage for any nation which has suffered the same fucking cycle of fake peace and inevitable attempt at overturning government by Muslims to instate Islamic Slavery for more than 400 years and up to 1300 years of the Indian subcontinent and surroundings: Fool me for over 4 centuries and you are no longer welcome and permanently banned from the region.

If you have no education about a "religion" or the history of a region, you should really shut you dumb little ass up. That's the best that can be given to you in terms of advice.

>Individuals do not exist in reality.
You're so high on your own bullshit I can't even see you anymore. If individuals don't exist, you don't exist. And why should I believe anything from someone who doesn't exist? You can't admit you're just a piece of shit trying to excuse genocide.

>colonize Burma
>treat the natives like absolute shit in their own home
>they get power back
>you are not being expunged because this not your home no matter your birth, it was always their home
>w-wait now you have to treat me like I’m one of you
Nice try you faggot leaf. Thankfully third worlders do not accept the imposition f your faggot foreign “morality” that would allow them to be dislodged from their own damn home for some make believe right of invaders to be treated well in your home

It's baizuo at its worst.

Yes

It's honestly so tiring to hear these same excuses for genocide popping up again and again in human history. At least get some new material.

Is a Nazi.

More tiring for faggots like you to pretend you’re actually moral human beings as you try to impose your cuckoldry on foreigners having none of it. Don’t want to be treated like shit in Burma then don’t colonize them, and don’t be retarded enough to try and stay after your yoke of tyranny is thrown off.

>More tiring for faggots like you to pretend you’re actually moral human beings as you try to impose your cuckoldry on foreigners having none of it. Don’t want to be treated like shit in Burma then don’t colonize them, and don’t be retarded enough to try and stay after your yoke of tyranny is thrown off.
What?

Right? I think everyone's tired of hearing it, so how about we all just mind our own fucking business in our own fucking countries and not give them anything to complain about ever again?

Il est encore plus fatiguant pour des fagots comme vous de prétendre être des êtres humains moraux alors que vous essayez d’imposer votre cocu à des étrangers qui n’en ont pas. Ne voulez pas être traité comme une merde en Birmanie, alors ne le colonisez pas et ne basedez pas assez retardé pour essayer de rester après que votre joug de tyrannie ait été éjecté.

What?

Excuses like what?
That you have a unique one-of-a-kind Hitlerian prophet of war and political imperialism who is a documented and legitimate historical figure owing to the world powers having to actually document and pay attention to a vicious warmonger?
That his Mohammedian followers, Muslims, chose his branch of the Abrahamic religion over others because of the warlike and political characteristics of it?

Westerners have already been kicked out of the territories they colonized. The only reason Christianity has some modicum of tolerance is because Jesus Christ who is considered the Chieftain of the religion has no war, slavery, and childfucking to his name, he didn't even personally write the Bible unlike how the Quran was personally written by Muhammad.

By the same logic of Westerners being kicked out, Islam is being kicked out for 10 times bigger evils assigned to it, bust most importantly because a religion/ideology whose Chieftain and creator has a bio like Muhammad is considered an evil one at its root and for good 1300 years of reasons a dumbshit Westerner like yourself can't comprehend because your brain can't comprehend any history longer than 2 centuries.

They're saying religious persecution is fine if the religion deserves it. That's the crux of their argument. It's fine to commit genocide on a whole group of people because at some point in history there was an oppressive government that had that religion. It's not a very strong argument for killing civilians, but it's a depressingly common one.

Imagine living in an imagined world with billions of nazis.

>That you have a unique one-of-a-kind Hitlerian prophet of war and political imperialism who is a documented and legitimate historical figure owing to the world powers having to actually document and pay attention to a vicious warmonger?
>That his Mohammedian followers, Muslims, chose his branch of the Abrahamic religion over others because of the warlike and political characteristics of it?
Buddy, I'm not Muslim. I just know a pogrom when I see one.

>Westerners have already been kicked out of the territories they colonized.
North America?

>I just know a pogrom when I see one.
Oy vey.

Wasn't that basically done already? Has she even been used at all recently?

Attached: Dust.jpg (256x389, 19K)

A pogrom which will never satisfy the surrounding people and religions in the region because at the end of it the death toll they induced on Islam will always pale in comparison to the death toll Islam has brought into the regions.

Ironically the pogrom which unifies the varied religions of the region who are usually butchering each others, Hinduists, Buddhists, Daoists, Atheists, Tribal/Pagan, even the few Jew and Christian remnants and nomads there.
Who would have thought that kicking Islam slavers and colonizers would end up in the creation of a multicultural utopia even if for a brief moment?

I've seen her around recently, I forget where
not an x-book, something else

You think causing a massive refugee exodus doesn't affect other people? Fuck you. Why should other people have to bear all the responsibility to be accommodating and take in YOUR COUNTRYMEN who live under your borders, who you're too much of a pissbaby to live with peacefully? Why can't just just get over something that happened over ten centuries ago, instead of persecuting innocent women and children? Your mindset is everything that's wrong with the world.

Assad is evil.

In process. Shitloads of Native American blood have been retained in Mexican blood, so Mexicans cleaning upwards is in a way bringing the pasture back to the fold. Sadly the Northern Natives are pretty much extinct.
Now as for the nature of the Maya/Aztec blood and culture being retained, that's another topic.

>You think causing a massive refugee exodus doesn't affect other people?
No, I just don't care.
>Why should other people have to bear all the responsibility to be accommodating and take in YOUR COUNTRYMEN who live under your borders
I honestly can't tell the difference between bait and unhinged Yea Forumsumblr types anymore, but I'm going with bait.

I was talking about Burma/Myanmar.

Yes, your countrymen. If you are Burmese, they are your neighbors, and your concept of inherited guilt and collective punishment doesn't change that.

No, he's not.
Open borders for Israel.

Refugee conspiracy theories isn't something I'm too familliar with, but it's pretty interesting. This would never fly in practise, but that's an interesting Deus Ex style idea.

Kill yourself Baizou

Multiculturalism where you expel a whole ethnic group? That's a sick joke.

Gets superpowers after fleeing?

My mistake.But to elaborate . I think the people of Assad government need refugee status , even with the war.

The Jews deserved their pogroms too

You first, war criminal.

lul, and flood them with the very people that are part of the karthoum pact? Do you even listen to yourself?

Still going with bait, but
>Why should the Burmese have to bear all the responsibility to be accommodating and take in MYANMARANESE who live under their own borders?

Nah, that would be too interesting. Let's have yet another brown AMERICAN and claim that it somehow introduces more diversity into the industry.

Year after fleeing.

Nothing criminal about keeping your home for your people and evicting the invaders. They don’t have any right to be there.

What you and anyone like you who supports genocide deserves is execution by firing squad.

Considering the recently declassified documents of Canada also having a supporting role in the Islamic chimpout of 1971 which saw hundreds of thousands of Hindu and Buddhist people genocided, yes.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14623528.2011.625741

Islam is not an ethnic group, unless your ethnic group is defined by Islam in the first place while you used to call yourself by another name when you weren't followers of Muhammad and his warmongers.
You are gonna have a tough time moralizing for a fucking cult of people who believe in warmongering in Muhammad's name following in his example.
This is more like Multiculturalism to defuse a ticking bomb, if you want a joke out of it, which already blew up too many times in their faces since it invaded the region.

>lul, and flood them with the very people that are part of the karthoum pact?
Yes.

>kill people for wrongthink
Or maybe we should execute people for having designs against freedom of speech.

>Islam is not an ethnic group
The Rohingya in Burma are.

It’s genocide to demand Burmese submit their ethnic group to the whims of Muslims in Burma

Who is doing that?

It's not just speech, support for genocide has real deadly consequences. And you've got no recourse to appeal to enlightenment era liberal values when you sneer at freedom of religion, and freedom from state oppression of your religion.

So if the problem isn't free speech by your own admission, then why are you targeting it?

Just let them continue existing. That's literally all you have to do, and yet your mindset is still stuck in the fucking dark ages.

The Rohingya in Burma are an Islamic Cult which was formed by the Arab/Persian invaders for the sole purpose of establishing an Islamic front, by that definition a colonialist power, who have a chance of denouncing their Hitlerian ideology/religion and adopting the pre-Islamic ethnic name, or getting treated rightfully like the terrorists they themselves label themselves as. It's pretty fucking simple, and a Westerner's opinion, who used to support those same Muslims genociding everything in the region in 1971, is irrelevant to it.
In fact, the above all said is why the West is not responding to everything unfolding in the region anymore, as absolution for its own sins.

The problem is that people are being murdered for their religion and ethnicity. Why is that something you support?

>Just let them exist
Sure, in their own countries.

>Sure, in their own countries.
Freedom of religion.

>Why is that something you support?
I didn't say I did. Why are you arguing against something I didn't say instead of addressing the question?

>Hitlerian ideology/religion
You're making an absolute fool of yourself. You're comparing your enemies to Hitler while you genocide them. This is an almost unprecedented level of doublethink.

Lol obviously not in Burma dumbshit.

Nonsuch freedom exist so

>Sure, in their own countries.
Have you figured out where that is?

That is bad.

If your ethnicity and religion are harmful to the nation you earned.

Yeah, not mine.
That is your opinion.

What question? Does the fact that I think people who support genocide should be killed themselves offend you? Too bad. I don't care. At least I'm not advocating for the uprooting of families and children, just for the killing those who themselves would willingly kill.

I've heard some downright evil things on this board, but this is right up there with the worst.

Quite the contrary, I'm comparing one of Hitler's influencers to Hitler, including a religion/ideology he allied with and which was pitched to him easily by Himmler such that SS divisions full of Muslims like the 13th were created.
Also Muhammad and Hitler both have things in common, such as Hitler writing Mein Kampf and Muhammad writing the Quran which has the same fucking content in it which Hitler might as well has pilfered from Islam.
Try again uneducated dumbshit.

>What about a young Syrian refugee Super-Heroe?

Instead of a Refugee Hero, how about Captain Syria? A comic that explains in detail why the United States has been attacking and occupying them for years and caused the refugee crisis?

>Watch me now compare a religion's holy text to Hitler's prison journal!
You're making a complete ass of yourself, and you don't even realize it. You're obviously new to political discussion online if you're doubling down on the "My enemies are Hitler!" line.

>Instead of a Refugee Hero, how about Captain Syria? A comic that explains in detail why the United States has been attacking and occupying them for years and caused the refugee crisis?
Are you a Member of ISIS?

Fuck off Yea Forumsmblr retard
You faggots are the worst baizou neocolonialists trying to force the third world to accept your cancerous, and ultimately baseless moral judgements after they forced you out. Who is the arbitrator of evil to you? Yourself? Allah? Certainly not any Burmese Buddhist priesthood. And for that matter who the fuck makes your personal moral arbitration correct or objective?

>Sure, in their own countries.
Yeah, Burma. That's their own country.

No it isn’t. They aren’t Burmese.

Arguments about good or bad are not neocolonialists.

Yep, they are. Everyone can see you persecuting them, lying about it won't help.

>religion's holy text
>holy text
I love it when dumbshits who don't read any material try to debate on it.
Quran has more political ideology, ideas on how state should be organized, and social structure and behavior, how to wage war, when to wage war, how to prepare for war, than it does holy text, which is why it's said Muhammad corrupted Bahira's teachings.
Ironically the content which separates the Quran from the Judaist and Christian scriptures is precisely the material which it shares with Hitler's Mein Kampf in content.
Nothing entertains me more than uneducated dumbshits trying to debate, but do go on.

>And for that matter who the fuck makes your personal moral arbitration correct or objective?
The fact that we actually sat down and thought about it, and debated it rather than blindly following a tradition, you troglodyte.

>Ironically the content which separates the Quran from the Judaist and Christian scriptures is precisely the material which it shares with Hitler's Mein Kampf in content.
No its. not that's so obviously made up it's funny. You're grasping at straws now, because nowhere in the Quran does it assert the superiority of the Aryan race. And all religions have proscriptions on how governance should be done, that's not special.

>Dude muh Holy book
The only one making an ass of themselves is you since according to you their holy book is now beyond critique. Their holy book commands wars against the infidel, and unlike people of the book (Christians/Jews), Buddhists aren’t ripe for dhimmitude, and Jizya, they are for extermination or conversion.

>according to you their holy book is now beyond critique
I never said that, I said your critique is dumb, and it is. You're trying to discredit them with Nazi comparisons and it's childish.

>We debated about it
I don’t think you know what “objectively” means you retarded faggot. I don’t care how much ass sniffing you did before saying something is wrong. How about you actually justify with axiomatic truths, and an objective reasoning for “ought” that doesn’t start with an “is”, because those don’t actually lead to an “ought”, as David Hume proved. Why is your faggot morality “objective”

>What question?
Well now there's two that you're evading, and for the sake of clarifying those I won't pose any more. To recap:
>So if the problem isn't free speech by your own admission, then why are you targeting it?
>Why are you arguing against something I didn't say instead of addressing the question?
I'm not offended, and even if I were, it doesn't really matter, what with free speech and all. Meanwhile, you think you've justified the deaths of millions of people for no other reason than you're offended by their opinions.
>At least I'm not advocating for the uprooting of families and children
You are, you just don't have the capacity to see it. And you seem to be implying again that I did, which we've already established is not the case.
>just for the killing those who themselves would willingly kill.
Having an opinion =/= killing people.

Sitting down and “thinking about it” doesn’t make your conclusions correct, or objective, nor does it absolve you of the responsibility to justify it if you’re going to make an absolute moral judgement of someone else.

Good thing Mein Kampf wasn't just filled with racial jerking but also organization and statehood and warmongering tactics on how to "bring our people above the rest", same as the Quran under Muhammad's pen.
You keep revealing how uneducated you are on the matter, yet you keep farting shit out your mouth.
No, all religions don't have fucking descriptions of political state organization, they don't have fine descriptions of how war should be waged, they don't have fine descriptions of which hand to wipe your ass with and how to run economics especially for war.
The one unique one in that aspect is Islam, to a far higher degree than even Judaism which merely scratches the surface.
Most importantly, no religion has a prophet who is such a well documented warmonger and slaver who penned its ideological book personally and was scientifically proven to have existed.

>calling apples oranges makes them into oranges
Sometimes being retarded seems so much easier.

OP have.How did he coming up with a new Syrian refugee Super-Heroe become this?

Because Muslims can only be Super-Villains to 4 billion non-Western people in the world who were their slaves and victims of invasions.

>for no other reason than you're offended by their opinions.
Believing in genocide isn't an opinion, it's a statement of homicidal intent.

Because being racist in order to 'combat racism' and intolerant to 'combat intolerance' is batshit insane.
It's a western thing, don't worry about it.

Muslim Super-Hero.

Attached: 1559058395776[1].png (413x721, 248K)

>Because being racist in order to 'combat racism' and intolerant to 'combat intolerance' is batshit insane.
Try telling that to the Burmafags in this thread, they seem to have it all worked out that they're fighting oppression by abusing a minority in their country.

/pol/ threads are cancer and against >>>/global/rules/3 and >>>Yea Forumsrules/1
OP is a faggot.
Do your part to help purge this board of subhumans like him by reporting this thread.
Here's a link so you don't have to scroll up to the top of the page.
sys.4channel.org/co/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=109296896

No, it isn't. Believing in genocide is historically accurate. Supporting genocide is an opinion. Enacting genocide is a crime against humanity.
You can dance around it and try to blur the lines all you want, but that's still the way the cookie crumbles.

Are the people actually from the country of Burma?

You're quibbling about phrasing while trying to support the idea that advocating genocide is just "offensive" and not an active thread to people's lives.

No, I'm talking to the bleeding heart faggots ITT who think their new religion should undermine the self-determinance of sovereign nations.

Nothing I said supports /pol/.

It's not an argument, I stated facts and you clearly stated in your original post that you think people should die for having opinions you don't personally agree with.

I said people should die for advocating the deaths of entire ethnic groups. I stand by that statement. Prove me wrong.

>minority
Funny way to spell 1.8 billion warmongering colonists whose ancestors invaded the region, enslaved it, genocided it plenty of times and even with Western support in the later periods, and now keep colonizing it instead of fucking off like the Westerners did.

>and now keep colonizing it instead of fucking off like the Westerners did.
I'm a European in North America.

>Prove me wrong
No need, you've already donr all the heavy lifting.
>killing people for their ethnicity is wrong
>killing people for their beliefs is better
Well thanks, this has been hilarious if nothing else.

>and now keep colonizing it instead of fucking off like the Westerners did.
In what way do they “keep colonizing it”? Living in a place your ancestors did is not a colonizing act.

You’ve got no counterarguments though. No reasons someone who advocates a violent act shouldn’t be met with violence.

So?
Living in a place which your ancestors genocided and enslaved is when the original people of that land are still around and whose conditions of reparations are for you to go fuck off.
You will never have a morally sound argument against victims of 1300 years of foreign invasion and oppression kicking those filth out.

>You will never have a morally sound argument against victims of 1300 years of foreign invasion and oppression kicking those filth out.
And your intentions will always be transparent as long as you refer to the group you’re demonizing and scapegoating as “filth”. That’s classic dehumanizing language that accompanies genocide. It doesn’t matter how many times you try to pretend you’re the oppressed based on past wrongs, you’re the oppressor now, your words betray that.

Oh, I sure did, and you're evading them just like every question I've asked of you. I really would love to have an argument with you, but so far every single one of your replies have been logical fallacies, and those aren't arguments.

Not really. I just said people advocating genocide should die. Nothing fallacious about that. In fact it’s a form of self defense.

>hurf hurf hurf i want to shitpost about syria in the board that is specifically not about politics
>i know "what if a syrian was a cartoon character" heh heh heh mods will never catch me
mods do your FUCKING JOB

>Not really.
No, precisely, and that's not what you said.
I'm ready to start as soon as you are, just let me know by not utilizing a logical fallacy.

Oh no, i'm dehumanizing a Nazi-like religion which brought war, genocide, and slavery to a region unprovoked for 1300 years!
Islam is to everything outside of the Arabian Peninsula what Nazism was to everything outside of Germany. That's pretty much a globally accepted fact now, save for a handful of dying uneducated Westerners such as yourself whose opinions are now irrelevant.
There's over 4 billion non-Western people who are laughing at your face, and that doesn't even account for the division of anti-Islamic Westerners as well as atheists.
Your opinions on everything in this topic are irrelevant, and the global scene has dictated as such by example of nothing being done about Burma/Myanmar kicking warmongering terrorist colonists out.

He is a mutants age 16 and have the hots for ms marvel. And have a more exacting following of Islam then Kamala Khan family in his family . That's is why he happy about not have any sisters. He is worried about his mom and dad going old world law in the USA.

>Your opinions on everything in this topic are irrelevant, and the global scene has dictated as such by example of nothing being done about Burma/Myanmar kicking warmongering terrorist colonists out.
You can’t even come up with anything that hustifies what you’re doing other than generations old grudges, don’t try to spin it that you’re resisting oppression. You’re literally driving religious minorities out you fucker, you have no grounds to call another group genocidal, that’s you.

Nothing I said supports /pol/.

There was no logical fallacy in my last comment, engage with that.

>slavery and genocide in the middle east started with muslims
lmao that's just objectively incorrect
antara the slave poet pre-dated islam, so his slavery was just imaginary or what?

Justice is kicking colonizers, slavers, and warmongers out. In North America it can't be done since the original population, culture, religion is erased much like the Muslims would for all the regions they invaded, yet it would be called Justice if it could be done.
In the Eurasian continent however, there is still hope for justice of that kind.
What can't be done in North America, can and WILL be done in Eurasia starting with the Indian subcontinent and surroundings.
Your opinions on justice in defending a political ideology masquerading as a religion which is rooted in war and conquest, are irrelevant to the world, the growing one especially.

You lied, for everyone to plainly see. I'm going to risk moving the goal posts on this one and say that's worse.

Are you a warhammer fantasy Dwarf?

Good thing we ain't talking the middle-east then dumbass. Muhammad was a slaver and his religion is that of enslavement and warmongering which invaded east of Persia.

>Implying ethnic cleansing of Mudslimes is a bad thing.

So, he is non-Muslim Syrian?

>>Implying ethnic cleansing of Mudslimes is a bad thing.
Yes.

Attached: 1557591482218[1].jpg (780x643, 33K)

Inhuman.

That is what colonizing is you utter retard. Colonies aren’t single generation affairs.

Is this just some self-insert bullshit, Musanon?

Kys

Who's advocating for genocide now, faggot?

Bangladesh.

You and whoever that was.

What's the name of that super powered refugee kid living in Khandaq in Doomsday Clock? If Khandaq collapses at the end of the story, he'd be perfect.

You misspelled Bangladesh.

>Implying anyone reads Doomsday Clock.

I’m not sure why you’re so hung up on the “colonization” thing when most of these people were economic migrants in the 19th century. You know what you usually see with actual colonizers? Them existing in a high class over the native population. But the Rohingyas are a stateless group being attacked by the Burmese army. Nothing you’ve said has made any convincing argument that they’re the oppressors. Nothing has even been put forward as to what problems they’re causing now at all.

>a group invented, named, and created by Islamic colonizers and didn't exist in the region before Islam came
>which follows a religion of war, terror, and enslavement which has always made problems in the region since the day it invaded 13 centuries ago
>what's the issue?
The issue is Islam. Lose the religion of war and colonialism and you won't be persecuted.
Might as well argue that Nazis should be tolerated because they are a minority somewhere.

>I’m not sure why you’re so hung up on the “colonization” thing
It's a buzzword to signal that the liberal reader can now stop reading and just nod their head in agreement.

>The issue is Islam. Lose the religion of war and colonialism and you won't be persecuted.
People should be free to follow whatever religion they believe is true, free from government intervention. What business is it of the government what a person believes? That's a path to tyranny. Nobody should have to justify refusing such a request. "War terror and enslavement" only have to do with this crisis in regards to the Burmese army inflicting these things.

>People should have freedom of belief
>unless they believe something I don't like, then they should be killed.
How very rational.

>109302513
What?

imagine not recognizing the state but still wanting benefits from it. Arabs should stay within their own bounderies. Closed borders for Israel keeps the only western country in the middle east safe for suicide bombers

In my experience it's more like:
>Yazidi
>Kurdish
>aggressively anti-Islamist due to being forced from his home by ISIS
>also in Germany because the USA can't ever clean up the mess they caused

>unless they believe something I don't like, then they should be killed.
No, that's what you're saying.

I'm sure that in your wild delusions Nazism should be tolerated in Israel and in the same way Islam should be tolerated in the regions it enslaved and genocided, since you seem like a consistent person. Consistently retarded that is.

Burmese army is defending its people from colonizer filth who attempted to genocide them many times over in history and enslaved them at one point. Those same Muslims who tried every opportunity they could if it presented itself to overthrow the local populace and replace it with Islamic serfs, including the Pakistani genocides which your Western nation supported and which also had the Rohingya supporting them as Muhammad demands in the Quran.
Nothing wrong about kicking the only religion out which Buddhism has made a complete exception for when it comes to tolerance in history and which is a colonial religion.

>Arabs should stay within their own bounderies.
They were, and then with Allied help the Jewish people made new boundaries to exclude them.

No, it's isn't, that's very literally your stated opinion.

>colonizer filth
Mostly economic migrants far after what you're talking about really,
>who attempted to genocide them many times over in history
Find me one reliable source that says that the Rohingya enslaved or genocided Burmese.

I said everyone should have freedom of religion, what are you smoking?

you can't do the kurds user

>Mostly economic migrants
Ah yes, Muslims paid them well enough I imagine to betray their own clans and kill their own mothers and fathers in the future in the name of Muhammad. Ottomans learned well from the systems utilized there by the Caliphates.
>Find me one reliable source that says that the Rohingya enslaved or genocided Burmese.
Muslim rule equates to Rohingya rule.
Muslim genocide equates to Rohingya genocide.
The sources are all of history starting from the 8th century invasions up to today.
Might as well ask me for a source on Westerners genociding and enslaving black Africans.

>what are you smoking?
That's an ad hominem, that's how we know you're Hence,
>People should be free to follow whatever religion they believe is true, free from government intervention.
>>People should have freedom of belief

>What you and anyone like you who supports genocide deserves is execution by firing squad.
>>unless they believe something I don't like, then they should be killed.

>Muslim rule equates to Rohingya rule.
Nope
>Muslim genocide equates to Rohingya genocide.
You haven't shown evidence of a genocide perpetrated by the Rohingya.
>The sources are all of history starting from the 8th century invasions up to today.
You sound like you've been taken in by propaganda, and the fact that you can't name specific sources says a lot.
>Might as well ask me for a source on Westerners genociding and enslaving of black Africans.
Easy
amazon.com/SLAVE-TRADE-STORY-ATLANTIC-1440/dp/0684835657
You can find whole books detailing what White people did to Africans. What evidence is there of what the Rohingya people did to you?

>That's an ad hominem, that's how we know you're
>Only one person on Yea Forums uses insults
That's how I know you're new.

>Nope
Yep.
>You haven't shown evidence of a genocide perpetrated by the Rohingya.
Rohingya were invented by Muslim invaders and genociders in the region, so of course all Muslim genocide is also Rohingya compliant, just like all Muhammad's genocides during his over 50 war campaigns are genocides the Rohingya approve of since they follow his teachings.
>You sound like you've been taken in by propaganda, and the fact that you can't name specific sources says a lot.
What propaganda, that Islam is native to the Arabian peninsula and is a colonizing invasion force in these regions?

amazon.com/Muslim-Invasion-Muhammad-bin-Qasim-Plassey-712-1757/dp/B00KHT18MI/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=Muslim Invasion India&qid=1565641914&s=books&sr=1-2

Just one of thousands of sources explaining a foreign virus invading a region and killing it for over a millennia.

>Ad hominems for me, but not for thee.
But we're just playing by the same rules, and now you want to call foul? If I remember correctly and I do, you refused to elevate yourself to have an actual argument.

>Rohingya were invented by Muslim invaders and genociders in the region
You haven't come up with any proof of this though. What genocide are you referring to? Which people were attacked, and when?

My argument is Genocide is bad. Your argument is genocide is justified, if at some point in the past, the group currently under threat of genocide committed some genocide (that you can't name the specifics of).

The proof is in the fact that there were native people who existed in the region before the Rohingya, and we don't know who these people were because they were so well displaced and wiped out by Muslim colonizers, which is of course the point of colonialism.
What is factually known though is that the Rohingya we know aren't the original settlers of the region, that they are Muslim from start to finish of their identity, and that Islam is not native to the region and is an invading foreign virus with war, genocide, and slavery rooted in it.

No, your argument is people who have an opinion about genocide that you find unfavorable should be killed.
My argument is that you're retarded for entertaining freedom of belief when you can't cope with people having different opinions than you do.

>The proof is in the fact that there were native people who existed in the region before the Rohingya, and we don't know who these people were because they were so well displaced and wiped out by Muslim colonizers, which is of course the point of colonialism.
This is getting ridiculous. You claimed the historical record supports you. Now you're saying the historical record has been all but erased and that somehow proves your point.

Why did you jump onto my freedom of religion post if you're going to babble on about something completely unrelated? That guy wasn't even in the same comment thread.

There's nothing ridiculous in the fact that Islam invaded the region, Islam is not native to the region, the Rohingya are an identity invented during Islamic presence and don't exist prior to that, and this Islamic presence is an invading religion of genociders, slavers, and warmongers following in the footsteps of their cult leader Muhammad who was as such himself.
Do you have any more stupid arguments to try and paint people who follow a cult of war and slavery as anything but?
The world has already made the answer for you by not intervening in Myanmar kicking Muslim colonizers out, China kicking Muslim colonizers out as well now, and India kicking Muslim colonizers as well.
If only the Turkic tribes in Central Asia followed the footsteps of their former leaders - The Mongols, and renounced Islam for Buddhism or anything else instead, the justice that history has been working towards would be completed.

>You're free to believe whatever you want!
>And if I disagree, you should be killed!
It's pretty related.

You said you had actual evidence the Rohingya genocided people in the region, and when I called on you to prove this, you weakly offered
>and we don't know who these people were because they were so well displaced and wiped out by Muslim colonizers
So you're making things up, and when confronted on this, you just continue to repeat yourself about how much you hate Muslims. You're repeating Burmese military propaganda against a stateless group that is so abused they have been denied the right to vote, that re being murdered by the mob without protection by the state, and who are widely considered "The world's most persecuted people"
independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/burma-rohingya-myanmar-muslims-united-nations-calls-on-suu-kyi-a7465036.html

And to defend all this, you don't even have a single tangible thing you can say that they did to bring this on themselves.

I'm not arguing with you anymore. I already told you I don't believe that, and you're acting like an insane person.

>I'm not arguing with you anymore.
But you never were.
>I already told you I don't believe that
No, you didn't.
>and [another ad hominem]
What a twist.
But really user, crazy is thinking you can support free belief and call for the death of people based on their beliefs.

Rohingya are Muslims and Muslims have been committing genocide in the regions since Islam invaded it. Evidence has been provided to the same extent you provided for Western genocide in Africa.
Rohingya are terrorists by venue of following a terrorist religion and have brought it upon themselves by supporting foreign colonizers in the same way a person calling themselves a Nazi in Poland would bring upon themselves a proper kicking out.

All Muslim colonizers deserve to be persecuted by getting kicked out much akin to how Western colonizers deserve to be persecuted by getting kicked out of the lands they colonized, except it's actually possible to bring this justice to Burmese people and all the non-Muslim people in the region while it is sadly impossible for the same justice to be brought to American natives.

So again, you have no argument save for trying to excuse colonizers.

>except it's actually possible to bring this justice to Burmese people and all the non-Muslim people in the region
What's happening has no relation to justice. You're displacing families. The children who are forced to flee the violence you're inflicting on them don't know anything about what you claim their ancestors did. There's no fairness in that.

Attached: Rohingyas.jpg (1100x732, 25K)

Kicking colonizers out is justice.
Retards who follow Islam have perfect understanding of what their ancestors did since it is glorified in the Quran itself and the Hadith also, for Muhammad prided himself in his conquests, warmongering, slavery of non-followers, and other debauchery.
Replace your photograph with a Muslim soldier taking away the children to be brainwashed into Islam and later being sent back to murder their own parents and family for disobeying Islamic rule, and you'll have a more accurate representation of what every people experienced under Islamic invasion and rule during the last 1300 years, not limited to India and surroundings.

No. I'm going to keep confronting you with the reality of what is happening now, in Burma, perpetrated not by Muslims, but largely by Buddhists. You need to learn that discrimination is wrong no matter who is doing it.

Attached: Rohingya-crisis-update-100-days-3.jpg (1000x666, 131K)

Friendly reminder that they sided with literal nazis during WII due to being promised they could turn the country into yet another Islamic shithole.
They deserve to be persecuted.

You are not confronting me with reality, just you lack of education and your lacking relevance on the topic.
Discrimination against a cult of terror and slavery is perfectly legitimate discrimination, and discrimination in return for 1300 years of genocide and slavery by Muhammedian ideology is never ever going to be anything less than justice in the eyes of over 4 billion non-Western people, not to mention how many Westerners will do their due diligence as a party with no business in this natural order of things or in support of the natural order playing out.
In other words, you might as well wipe your own ass with those photographs.
The Rohingya cultists will get the same treatment that the people displaced and erased by the invading Muslims got, in kind.

Actually, it was Ba Maw of Burma, a Buddhist, who sided with the Axis powers under Japanese occupation, but nice try.

>The Rohingya cultists will get the same treatment that the people displaced and erased by the invading Muslims got, in kind.
You finally revela just how morally bankrupt you really are. But I don't care about that. What I care about is that you sit with these images and realize that you have defended the slaughter of children.

Attached: rohingya murdered children.jpg (864x486, 96K)

ymstop bumping this thread fags it's just you two mouth breathers arguing about off topic shit at this point

Moral bankruptcy is following Islam, colonizing a region, killing children for 13 centuries or taking them away from their parents to indoctrinate them with Islam so they can be sent back later to kill their own kin to enforce Islamic rule, and then trying to get a dumb uneducated Westerner to defend you when your colonization and warmongering doesn't work out for you and you start getting karma.
Morals are dictated by the majority, the majority has ruled - Muslims OUT.
What are you gonna do to stop it? Wage war against India, China, Myanmar, Slavs, Jews, non-Muslims black Africans who had a market value put on them as beneath other races by Muhammad in the Hadith, Armenians, Georgians, Pagans, Atheists, over 4 billion people in total?
I hear even Japan is starting to speak out against Muslims specifically.

Attached: 1227055824383.jpg (300x457, 22K)

It's funny that you think anyone is upset about dead terror-tots.

Why not?
They're pretty okay people.

>Morals are dictated by the majority, the majority has ruled
There's more people outside Burma than inside, and we're all seeing what you're doing.

Children. The word you're looking for is children. You're not upset about murdered children.

Terror-tots.
It's good that they died before becoming fully grown terrorists.

I've already named the 4 billion people who are itching to do the same as Myanmar, and many of them are in fact doing it now and starting it themselves now inspired by non-Western intervention in multiple cases in the past decade.
The only ones who can intervene are Western whites, but at the cost of losing trade and connection with the multi-culture of 4 billion people who don't bat an eye at your photographs because they've spent their lives reading their own history books of what Islam has done to them for between centuries and over a millennia.
The Western whites can only do shit if they have power, except the Western whites have lost their power for reasons obvious, wrested by their very own left wing because whites having power in the global scene is bad.
Now we get to the part where i'm laughing at the irony that you should be noticing in this global geo-political situation and circumstance.

Attached: 1227056310481.jpg (1024x768, 129K)

they're not sympathetic

When you make the claim that it's good that children died, you basically concede any moral high-ground on which you can criticize the Muslims for their crimes. You reveal yourself to be just as bloodthirsty as you claim them to be, so why should anyone take your side?

>I've already named the 4 billion people who are itching to do the same as Myanmar
Genocide. "Do the same as Myanmar" is in this case, genocide. Call it what it is.

Probably because I'm not the one who thought it was a good idea to slavishly raise my children with the teachings of a genocidal child rapist under threat of death if they ever decided they dont want to be Muslim.

I think most people would prefer they just fuck back off to any number of their failed Islamic states, instead of trying to turn other people's countries into even more failed Islamic states.

Nope sorry, you already showed that you're fine with genocide. You can't use it to slander someone else when you admitted you see not problem with it.

I'll call it what it is, kicking colonizers out and making them pay eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, child for a child, if they refuse.
The same condition Muslims gave their victims and the same conditions the Nazi got which the Muslims are equivalent to from the perspective of over 4 billion people.
So you will continue your pointless talk, while the world is doing the justice walk over Muslim colonizers and slavers.

>instead of trying to turn other people's countries into even more failed Islamic states.
And the Rohingya are trying to do this how?

You just compared yourself to Nazis. I don't even have to make the point, you made it for me.

By being Muhammedian followers. You have a choice between 3 Abrahamic branches and you choose the one which stipulates that you must corrupt every land you inhabit in the image of the branch's creator Muhammad. Not much left up to interpretation there chap.

There's no comparison between a Nazi and someone trying to kick a Nazi out. One invaded an area, the other one is defending it against an invader.

I asked how they are actually attempting to accomplish this, not for more rhetoric. What have they done to actually try to subvert Myanmar. This is just like the genocide thing. You called them genocidal, then when I asked for details on who and when they committed this genocide, you had no answers.

>you're fine with genocide.
So are Muslims.
So if we're all on the same page here, I think I'll side with the people who don't want to genocide me against the people who do.

>One invaded an area, the other one is defending it against an invader.
Nazis saw Jews as invaders and justified their genocide on that idea. You're digging your own hole here.

user, stop, your pilpul is showing.

They are attempting to accomplish this in the same way Muhammad teaches them in the Quran.
If a Muslim superpower gives you an edge over the local populace, try to hitchhike on that superpower to overthrow the local populace, as the Pakistani collaboration tried in 71.
If you are without advantage, act peaceful until you reach a certain population percentage and concentration and then start separatism and subversion until you overthrow, as every nation has experienced among nations of 4 billion people.
Pretty simple.

Nobody gave a shit about what the Nazis did until they started trying to invade outside of their shithole.
No hole is dug but your own.

I don't know what else to say to you. If you believe your fear of some future insurrection by Muslims justifies the killing of children now, then you don't know what justice is, and have a pretty poor grasp on morality, but you show a lot of your true colors when you reveal the mistake of Nazi Germany in your eyes was just to be expansionist, and all the genocide would be fine if it was inside the borders.

It's not a matter of belief but proven fact after 1300 years about a religion of invaders and warmongers doing what Mohammed teaches them to do in the Quran itself which includes insurrection tactics which you consciously sign up for by choosing this "religion" over any other.
Justice is throwing colonists out to appease the deaths created by them instead.
Justice is reaping the consequences of your actions the same way Nazis did. If you fail in your invasion and colonialism, you will accept them with dignity or cowardice, but you will accept them either way because nature demands so and not some social constructs.

Indeed, the Nazis were free to do whatever the shit they wanted so long as they did it within their own borders, and the world at the time deemed this fact and papers and books attest to it. The Muslims are also free to do whatever they want, by fucking off back to their dogshit lands of origin, but they made the same mistake of the Nazis and invaded outside.

So, now that we have established that the majority of the world doesn't give a shit about your subjective take on morals regarding a cult of terror and warmongering and slavery, what are you gonna do about it? Keep talking shit that everyone keeps laughing at?