Fuck Caillou

lol

Attached: preferred-pronouns-comic.png (1000x500, 53K)

Attached: f5gid0sxny631.png (1000x1000, 390K)

>reddit antifa edits
yikes

Attached: antifastonetoss.png (1439x2267, 448K)

His joke is literally "What if /pol/ memes were real"
The humor comes from reminding the reader what kinds of baseless nonsense rightwingers think is happening.

Lmao is this sub real? I can’t seem to find it.

unironically better

Four more years lol.

r/antifastonetoss

lol

Attached: lefty-vs-right-wing-memes-comic.png (1500x500, 72K)

Attached: 1549215208842.png (512x1024, 14K)

/pol/ was a mistake

Nah, the humor comes from reminding the reader that rightwingers believe nonsense and leftwingers are fucking insane and often bring that nonsense to life, and they're not so different as a result.

Yea Forums is so devoid of any comedic talent that it actually manages to make me laugh when they criticise joke strips

lol

Attached: antifa-shooting-comic.png (1500x500, 99K)

this ones my favorite

Attached: 1564207381113.png (1025x344, 505K)

This edit makes it all worth it.

Mine is the "Be yourself" edit.

Funnier than the original

Did you notice how he has exactly four different jokes?

>Women and Minorities are weird, stupid and probably evil
>Everyone on the left is a hypocrite and probably evil.
>Random groups I have a bone to pick with like bicyclists, foot fetishists or vegans sure suck.
>The Holocaust didn't happen.

>baseless nonsense
Flag burners are real, though.

Jokes?

you mean the Moku Moku no Mi (Smoke-Smoke Fruit) right.

lol

Attached: race-mixing-advertising-comic.png (1000x1000, 89K)

kek

Attached: siri-alexa-cortana-bixby-comic1.png (1000x1000, 109K)

>recognizing reddit memes
>recognizing ultra niche reddit memes
oh no

Reminds me of a French ad for McDonalds back in the early 2010s or some such.

>get simultaneously called out and blown the fuck out
>"n-no you..."

Attached: DyQzhGSU0AEzhMZ.jpg (513x1055, 40K)

I can't imagine what kind of messed up thinking leads to people blaming immigration for low wages instead of the government.

>devalue labor through unlimited low-skilled immigration
>"wtf why is my labor not as valuable??"

>remove the credits in all comics

Literally worse than Hitler

I don't recall any of his strips being anti women as such
And the holocaust didn't happen, at least not to the level claimed.

>bicyclists, foot fetishists or vegans sure suck.
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day

>devalue labor through unlimited low-skilled immigration
Yeah it sucks, something should be done to stop the corporations and the conservatives they have in their pockets that let it happen

That argument might work if you are complaining about jobs not going above minimum but when talking about the actual minimum nobody is to blame but the government.

>Everyone can be white collar! And just to prove it, we'll start exporting millions of blue collar jobs overseas!
>"B-but then I can't be a plant supervisor!"
>One day, it will all be done by robots, and you can repair and design them!
>"A-all 100 million of us?"
>Wellllll

You're right, that's totally a just a conservative problem. Liberals would never behave the same way.
You are a very intelligent person.

Double down if it helps you cope, the disease will still be inside of you.

you really cant put 2 and 2 together?

Someone explain the popularity of this crap, I'm not seeing it

Sure is a good thing Donald pink-slipped all his illegals before becoming the HERO THAT STOPPED ILLEGALS! eh?

The only reason they're "minimum wage" in the first place is because they don't actually have to offer competitive wages; they can just import third worlders who will literally eat shit for minimum wage.

Childhood is Stonetoss
Adulthood is Murdoch Murdoch

Attached: D57AsDtTHRxO_640x360.jpg (640x360, 73K)

it's a super low easy effort way to get /pol/ shitposts on Yea Forums

- Nazis are good, lighthearted people
- Don't feel bad about being a Nazi
- People who punch Nazi's are worse than terrorists, and will start shooting people like the Alt-Right Nazi-larpers. Any day now. Any dayyyyy.

Holy crap, DRUMPHIE WUMPHIE blown the HECK out!

It's the only semi far right humor thats somewhat funny
Semi far right is a popular political position on 4channel.
He keeps the things he complains about varied enough that centrists often find themselves agreeing with him.

lol

Attached: automation-stealing-jobs-comic.png (1500x500, 81K)

And this is a problem that can be solved overnight with a higher minimum.

Trump will stop the Jews! But only after he's helped them to such a degree that they let their guard totally down!

I guess you forgot where that one guy who posted his manifesto on FB while trying to commit arson on a ICE detention facility.

Or that the Idaho attacker was a dyed in the wool liberal. Or that one guy who tried to assassinate all those republican senators at their baseball game

I'm sorry, but that's funny. Probably his best comic.

>any day now
more like last week sweaty

They didn't kill any tho well at least the ICE dude and the baseball wiffer. Who's the Idaho guy? Are you talking about dayton or some one else?

The Dayton shooter was liberal, borderline Antifa and his parents are extremely anti-Trump. Everyone keeps talking about El Paso for some reason.

Or that tranny who tried to shoot up their school a few weeks ago.

Cause the dayton shooting doesn't have any real connections to his ideological leanings. If anything it's more accurate to say it was an incel attack considering the dude's history and the fact he targeted his sister and her boyfriend. El Paso get's talked about more because of two things; He had a clear ideological motive and he had a higher body count.

>dude just because they're bad at being murderers its ok!
please just stay in your basement and dont shoot up anymore bars or shools or grocery stores you fuckin tranny

>The Dayton shooter was liberal, borderline Antifa
Nice fantasy, he was an incel who shot up his tranny "sister" and a bunch of bystanders.
Have you tried not getting your facts from Breitbart?
>borderline antifa
lel

>some faggy leftist is craven enough to murder his own sister in a mass shooting
>not ideological
sounds like a perfect description of the leftist ideology to me. but keep coping sweety

>this cope
just keep it online incel

>His parents voted Democrat, that makes him a super-liberal borderline antifa!
Thats.....not how generational politics usually work. It's not like your parents are Jewish so you become a Jew.

And here's the difference between the left and right.
The right disavows spree killings from the right.
The left tries to pretend they never happen from the left.

>The right disavows spree killings from the right.
No they don't, they immediately start trying to paint the left as just as culpable.
The night of the El Paso shooting, Faux News was running a report on "TERRORIST ANTIFA, GONNA GETCHA!"

>he had a higher body count.
Kyoani had a massive body count and was barely talked about because there were no guns involved.

The point of the geological yeet comic was saying that antifa now had a body count. Yet these antifa attacks haven't killed anyone. I really don't understand you can just change the context of discussion on the whim. After all nothing in my post condoned the attack, if any thing it mocked them. Political on either side is pathetic and cringe, it's just that the right are the only one's actually managed to kill people.

left can't meme

The right doesn't outright deny the killings like the left does.

Oh and my favorite "It's too soon to politicize this!", when the shooter pre-posted a political manifesto.
Somehow it's NEVER too soon to politicize some crime by the Left. Had the El Paso shooter been an illegal, Fox would have been hot on it like a motherfucker.

Cause, one it happened in Japan. Two, it happened to a Japanese animation studio. Three, it got plenty of coverage of the attack but due to no ideological reason for the attack. It just faded out from the news cycle as there was no more "discussion" to be had.

You don't watch "Faux News", you fucking faggot.

Yes. Instead it's proud of them.

cope, nigger

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7337373/Dayton-shooters-chilling-notebook-scrawls-reveals-fantasized-hunting-humans.html

He is a confirmed antifa
bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-democrat-dayton-shooter-was-part-of-antifa-participated-in-armed-protest-this-year/

I don't know how it was in America but my local paper that reports on all the mass shootings in America only gave kyoani a tiny write up in the back of the paper.

oh no, he said nigger all my self worth has disappeared and i've faded out of existence. My life is now over cause some meanie said bad word over anonymous russian water diving forum. I'm truly distraught

Attached: Tails.png (290x333, 95K)

>The right doesn't outright deny the killings like the left does.
The Right blames it on "mental illness, he was a poor sick kid". Like they plan to solve gun violence by giving the entire country a mental health screening. St. Ronnie defunded all those mental institutions in the 80's.
He wasn't mentally sick; he was angry and felt threatened. Because Faux and Dolan have been telling him he's in danger and America is threatened with invasion and murder-rape and the destruction of "our way of life".

He was radicalized by the Far Right, just as much as any ISIS fighter. Sick my ass.

I'm pretty sure there were also two mass-stabbings last week, but those will be memory-holed because it doesn't fit the gungrabber's narrative.

I work in a plant in NE Missouri. They have Faux on consistently in the break lounge.
Stop being ignorant at me.

Sounds like it would have been avoided if the government would take the problem of illegal immigration more seriously.

Unpopular opinion, but the """mainstreamnews""" in America is pushing the meme that right-wing White men r duh real terrorists, which is fake and ghey:

1. First and foremost, they cherrypick a timeline which always precludes 9/ll

2. They'll claim that white neb just barely make up over 50% of attackers during some years, but white men are over 60% of the population, so this means white men are actually underrepresented.

3. Moelims make up 1% of the population, yet account for well over 70% of terror related deaths in the entire history of the US. Even if we ignored 9/11 like the left does, they're still way way way overrepresented when we take into account the Boston bombing, the San Bernadino attack, the Pulse nightclub shooting, the NYC truck of friendship attack, and many smaller lone wolf attacks.

4. The ADL and SPLC who provide the source data for much of this meme include people like (((Nicholas Cruz, James Fields))) (who was Jaywsh according to his lawyers) and Jeremy Christian in their data, as well as half-breeds like mulatto Chris Harper-Mercer, hapa Elliot Rodger, and filipino Cesar Sayoc.

5. The ADL and SPLC are conflating several different ideologies into their definition of 'r1ght-wing," some of which are not at all alike or compatible with each other, including militant pro-lifers, anti-government patriot types, inc31s, 9/ll and pizz@g@te truthers, c1v1c nationa1ists, and Wah1te Supremist Neon-Nahsis. Every foreign attack in America is always done in the name of sunni jihad, there's never been a shi’ite moelim attack.

6. Of the recent sh00ters, the double-in-one-day. One of them was a literal-Satanists as well as a leftie-Socialist. His entire social media was all about hailing S@t@an and loving c0mmunizm.

That uhh dailymail link doesn't exactly prove ideological motive. If anything it provides proof of the "he was mentally ill" narrative. Next time read your sources sweatie

>the shooter pre-posted a political manifesto.
Not relevant, but the shooter didn't post it. Someone else did. Police were made aware of this before the public was by a great deal. Who posted it or why is uncertain. But it wasn't the shooter.

I would have believed "my parents watch it, and overheard it".
There's exactly 0% chance you're old enough to work, and unironically call it "faux news".

seven plus one chan admin claims that, anyway. Sorry. That's just as important. No idea if it's true.

Whereas Betts WAS actually just a violent crazy person, who was known to be a sick little fucker.

>"Authorities have said that Betts “was exploring violent ideologies” before the shooting. Former classmates described him as a sick and twisted individual, who often talked about torturing and killing people. He allegedly made “hit lists” of students he wanted to rape and murder in high school and was also in a “pornogrind” band — which released songs about rape, murder, necrophilia and other gruesome acts against women."

dilate

What's with all the suspiciously specific spelling errors? Is this a bot?

>If anything it provides proof of the "he was mentally ill" narrative.
Mental illness is a prerequisite to being a leftist. That's why communist tend to be trannies.

I mean...
Yeah? He was violent, so he attacked people. That happens. Sometimes it's politically motivated, sometimes not, but if not politically motivated, I'm kind of convinced that since we have people who are violent and crazy that attack people without political motivations, it would stand to reason that those political motivations are necessary for them to become violent and crazy.

oh no, he said dilate all my self worth has disappeared and i've faded out of existence. My life is now over cause some meanie said bad word over anonymous canadian inuit seal clubbin forum. I'm truly distraught

Attached: Blank+_bfa49aaa37baf5c48e43f0cdcaaa32ae.jpg (326x222, 21K)

As we know, the Dayton shooter was a far-left extremist. It has now been revealed that he was an active Satanist attempting to manifest demonic entities on earth.

This connection between Satanism and leftism needs to be examined further.

It just keeps coming up, doesn’t it?

As a Christian, I have always believed that the Jews are Satanic, and that these agendas they have are inspired by Satan.

I think it is obvious and probably non-controversial that trannies are being possessed by demons, and that this is being encouraged by the Jews as part of a plan to transform the realm of men into a satanic hellscape.

Attached: 28025100690_2e60c6f4f8_c.png (800x534, 865K)

>I can't imagine what kind of messed up thinking leads to people blaming immigration for low wages instead of the government.

It's not about immigration, but that's a common enough mistake that both political sides make.
The problem is temporary/transient migrants & illegal immigrants creating a market for inexpensive, low-skill, expendable labor. Now, things get a little complicated from this point on because they don't actually harm anyone in the middle class or even the lower middle class, but what they 'do' do is they completely devalue is the lowest and poorest people's availability to find work, to gain equity, and to even access the job market in the first place. The availability of an endless supply of inexpensive foreign work basically means millions of poor people in America have no means of economic advancement or movement because they're, quite frankly, completely and utterly disposable.

It also doesn't just harm the incredibly unfortunate, but it also creates something of a large gap in the job-knowledge or skill-set of the youth. Entry-level positions and service-jobs were at one point 'the job' for teenagers and young adults. It was something they could do during the summer: gas station attendant, grocery store clerk, farm hand, etc.. And it wasn't just important for saving up a little expendable cash while living at home, it provided important work experience and context.

This is how everything is supposed to work when the economy is functioning 'normally', but we're in a bit of a dive where some educated people have to accept whatever's available to them.. Well, they're not gonna get much of anything. Employers don't like hiring over-qualified people: they might ask for more, they might even take their own job one day, foreign labor is appealing because they often don't or can't 'legally' pursue 'upward momentum'.

Attached: Anime_Confused.jpg (314x291, 16K)

Your birth was a bigger one.

>As a Christian, I have always believed that the Jews are Satanic
You are saying that Trump's family are Satanic?

why do you guys make this show and just trace art/edit it?

i see it shilled a lot here and i have to imagine its just the creator and his inner circle shitposting

Never trust a politician. Not once.

>w-w-whataboutism
One party does it far more often and currently has control of the government, why wouldnt you look at the people holding the reins first

It's based.

>increase minimum wage
>suddenly there's more money going to the workers but the value of the produce doesn't change so the money is inherently worth less
>inflation happens
>independent low and middle level businesses bankrupt and everyone is forced to wagecuck for enormous multinationals that can afford the running costs and logistics with the higher wages + automatization and offsourcing
>higher minimum is even less worth it because of the higher amount of liquid assets going around fucks over the bottomline more than the top
>workers are even more fucked because unions get bought out by megacorps and the masses of retards want more short term solutions like muh minimum wage instead of making everything cost less fucking money like it used to

How fucking dumb are you people? just what the fuck do you think money IS? Have you held a job, paid taxes or even rent in your life?

Attached: D_3MLrWXoAA2sF2.jfif.jpg (2138x2958, 769K)

It's not "whataboutism" if you're blaming one side for what both are equally guilty of, you retarded faggot.

>As we know, the Dayton shooter was a far-left extremist.
nigga he was an elizabeth warren supporter, if anything he's an honorary republican.

whats it about? just seems like /pol/ jerking off with "bro what if nazis were cool"

I came onto it recently.

I like it because it does in part capture the old feel of Adult Swim shows with its irreverence to cultural golden cows and surreal structure.

It can get really cringy when it tries to do actual propaganda though. And it's literally only 3 people who work on this cartoon so it's about what you'd expect.

He was a Jared Holt fanboy, the literal Soros twitter leftie shill

Edit a smile in that last panel and its perfect

A lot of different topics. Every episode is different. You should watch it.

Tankie be gone

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 15K)

its true they havent killed anyone meanwhile white supremacists have

Why take turns?
Why say we can only condemn it one party at a time? Why can't we just categorically call violence and intimidation for political aims, regardless of party, what it is?

i might if theres any truth to which is more in line with what i wanted out of an an answer

Then I hold this American, this Elizabeth Warren of yours responsible for this blatant diabolism. Your entire government is full of this blatant witchery.

independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/marianne-williamson-occult-task-force-2020-election-democrats-campaign-a9029796.html

Attached: unknown.png (792x200, 57K)

Not really, no. As a matter of fact "Satanic Communism" is an even less common ideology than Christian Communism, which is already pretty unpopular. Most communist nations have disavowed religion to some extent.

HEY AINT MY BOY BUT THE BROTHER IS HEAVY

Because despite being a political association held by only 20% of the population, alt-right violence makes up 90% of terrorist acts in the US.

Because one party runs on promising Gibs and Healthcare, and the other one runs on dog-whistling violence and intimidation.
That wouldn't be fair and balanced at all.

Oh man.
A whole thirteen fucking chaos witches.

it does not make one a tankie to point out that the woman who was a committed republican until the mid 90s and still holds republican viewpoints on healthcare, labor rights, and financial regulation is not actually a part of the political left by any definition

GAVE AWAY MY POSSESSIONS AND MOVED INTO A CHEVY

So we can't condemn or prosecute violence from someone if they commit left-leaning violence?
Why not?

>disavowed religion to some extent.
And they have to! Your Intelligence Agencies have been funding Christian cults and the Falun Gong cult for decades! For the purpose of trying to destabilise Chinese society! We know this for an absolute fact!

You then use your 'journalists' to call violent rioters who are stockpiling weapons and throwing white powder on cops "peaceful protesters," then you start saying the violence is actually justified. I remember when your country was calling a literal terrorist army in Libya "peaceful protesters." And they did the same thing with the terrorists in the Ukraine and everywhere else. And then all your newspaper publications and media lie about it.

Most recently, the US did this in Venezuela. And they were incredibly open about that -- "we're attempting to foment regime change" is what they were all saying on TV! You Americans stir up troubles and crave the whole world to be in chaos, acting like a sh't-stirring stick.

The US has done the exact kind of thing [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_revolution] we are seeing in Hong Kong in the Balkans, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, nearly every country in the Middle East and the Ukraine in the last few years.

>90% of terrorist acts in the US.
Fun fact, 100% of racially motivated domestic terrorism committed in 2018 was committed by white supremacists

90% of terrorism is obviously a bigger and more prevalent issue that requires more resources than 10% of terrorism.

Healthcare as a human right is guaranteed in the rest of the first world you blubbering faggot.

Attached: d0a.png (640x480, 14K)

begone filthy Chink CCP shill, one day the Chinese people will be free from your totalitarian boot.

Attached: tumblr_inline_pgv4wqsqmo1rx5x8z_540.png (417x395, 73K)

>the holocaust didn't happen

Aaaand we have either a winner or an uncommonly subtle false flag.

Although those two things are unconnected.

>the Idaho attacker was a dyed in the wool liberal

A dyed-in-the-wool nutjob who would have done the same thing regardless of his beliefs. No manifesto, no planning, no special location.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Dayton_shooting#Perpetrator

When you shoot your girlfriend or tranny-sister while being a Leftist, that is simple violence, and of course it's condemned and prosecuted....

When you are dog-whistled into "taking action" against political or racial targets, leaving specific writings about "doing it for politics", like the El Paso or New Zealand shooter, then its political violence.

I have little hope of you acknowledging the difference.

>Why can't we just categorically call violence and intimidation for political aims, regardless of party, what it is?
You know the left does do that right? The baseball shooter was brought up and was immediately condemned by the left, meanwhile Trump and the right make constant excuses for acts committed by his base and one GOP politician that pointed that out and decryed it in Nebraska recently is getting bullied out of the party

You're dividing terrorism into left and right as if we can't just prosecute and condemn all terrorism, as if that extra 10% isn't something we have the resources for. But it's all terrorism. We can condemn it all, and there's no reason not to.

He didnt say that, you are strawmanning and clearly arguing in bad faith

>>A dyed-in-the-wool nutjob who would have done the same thing regardless of his beliefs.

Not a rebuttal.

Liberals used to be way more violent. Just look at the Weather Underground. Some of those people are professors now

Trump and Fox always demur into False Equivalency as a reflex.

why is this artists interpretation of a centrist guy fieri?

Attached: 1557570667075.png (1600x900, 84K)

Op why did you post Mario saying “Fuck you”?

Hold up there, I'm a German leftist. And I'm very well aware that Germany is complicit in most of this but I certainly don't approve of it

Its a rather unusual situation when the sitting President of the nation is encouraging the political violence of extremists in his party.

>When you are dog-whistled into "taking action" against political or racial targets, leaving specific writings about "doing it for politics", like the El Paso or New Zealand shooter, then its political violence.
The point is, directly, there's no way to know for sure if he would or wouldn't have gone violent without political motivation, since crazy and violent people are not unwilling to go violent and crazy with little or no motivation, as evidence by the dayton shooter.

But not wholly unprecedented. Or exclusive to just the president, as several mayors of other cities have ordered their police forces to stand down during violent riots of violent groups both now and in the past.

动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门

The Dayton and El Paso shooters are not equivalent; The Dayton shooter was targeting his sister and her friends.
The El Paso shooter thought he was helping Trump in the "war on illegals".

I can't wait until ANTIFA gets designated as a terrorist organization so we can put you all into death camps where you belong.

Attached: -GTGebzP_400x400.jpg (400x400, 28K)

The question was valid. He suggested we "look at the people holding the reins first."
Which implicitly if not explicitly suggest we take turns condemning political violence

Ok, which politicians on the left do you feel are encouraging active shooters?

I said political violence.

>Calling a group with no formal organization or member list a terrorist group thus giving the government carte blanche to point at literally anybody they want and say 'they are a member of ANTIFA' to get rid of them.
enjoy your dystopia bootlicker.

This is his best comic.

Attached: iodyw2ab5wc31.png (1000x1000, 629K)

I'll wait while you furiously search Google for something, anything.

except Antifa operates in organized cells that run fucking twitter accounts like they're a corporation

lol

Attached: antifa-comic-1.png (940x300, 51K)

Search for what, exactly? Did you quote the wrong post?

I feel that shooting up churches, synagogues and grocery stores is (((Slightly))) more pressing than fights breaking out at rallies.

what about the firebombing of ICE installations and threats to storm border crossings

this feels like a motte and bailey argument.
this does not exclude all political violence, nor was the topic strictly shootings.

you lost

>fights breaking out
I don't think showing up to a free speech rally for the explicit purpose of violently trying to censor it is "fights breaking out", that's coordinated domestic terrorism, and is entirely antifa's fault.

These politicians "not holding the reigns" who are encouraging active shooters. You feel that going after the ones who are in charge, and encouraging it, is rather unfair, Ok, gimme some idea of the minority party members doing the same dog-whistling.

Nobody is encouraging shooting up Mexicans.

>You feel that going after the ones who are in charge, and encouraging it, is rather unfair
Where, precisely, did I say this?

laughing out loud

Attached: love-hate-relationship-comic.png (1500x500, 83K)

The police and quasi-military are under various threat all the time; they are heavily armed and prepared for this sorta shit. This is why the old firebombing guy got shot immediately, and the borders aren't being stormed.

I'm talking about the people killing random civilians over politics. The people that could kill YOUR family, as I assume your siblings and parents aren't armed ICE agents.

Attached: covington-smirk-maga-comic.png (1500x500, 67K)

>The Dayton and El Paso shooters are not equivalent;
Nor would I suggest they are.
Only that a political motivation is not requisite for someone to lash out violently, or in a 'crazy' manner.

>I don't think showing up to a free speech rally
Is that the Euphemism we aree using for White Supremist/Separatist rallies now?

Despite being 13% of the population....

>I'm talking about the people killing random civilians over politics
I think, categorically, killing or not, any political violence towards civilians over politics, should be categorically condemned.
Especially against people trying to protect minorities like homosexuals.

>reading local papers
i throw those in the fire i keep on the side of my neighbor's house to keep stray cats warm

I'll get back my ocean of piss one day, user. One day.

Attached: national-borders-comic1.png (1000x1000, 80K)

>I'm talking about the people killing random civilians over politics. The people that could kill YOUR family, as I assume your siblings and parents aren't armed ICE agents.

So arson and bombings? Or just being beat up randomly for being a few shades too bright to count as hispanic?

>political violence towards civilians over politics, should be categorically condemned.
I totally agree, which is why Trump writing it off as a "mentally ill" bad apple and not acknowledging that it was driven by political rhetoric (unfortunately his own) is disingenuous.
He has little qualms about condemning politically motivated violence from the left, I've never heard Trump or Fox call Antifa "mentally distressed people in need of help".

>muh per capita
How about whites being over represented in race based domestic terrorism? Why last year 100% of it was committed by whites according to the FBI

Except hyper inflation demonstrably does not follow moderate increases in the minimum wage. This is proven by the fact that we've raised the minimum wage multiple times yet it hasn't changed the inflation rate.
>calls other people dumb after saying deflation is a good thing
lol

At no point has Trump ever so much as implied that anyone should go shoot up Mexicans.

>So arson and bombings?
He means mass shootings like the five or so we had in this past week involving all white supremacists.
And that's not including the ones that got stopped by a bare handed 65 year old Muslim man.

The several hundred times he's referred to them as an "invasion", and "diseased rapists, murderers and drug dealers" who need fortifications built against them.

He has dehumanized Mexicans by calling asylum seekers "an invasion" or "an infestation", which is the exact same language the Trump-loving mass shooters used. Invasions is something you use to describe violent people storming into your country that you stop by force. That's just basic English.

This lil nigga always has my back

And he's absolutely right. But at no point has Trump ever so much as implied that anyone should go shoot up Mexicans.
If anything, the failure of our government to address the illegal immigration problem in a meaningful manner is what caused the mass shooting, not the "rhetoric".

You need to look up the term "stochastic terrorism"

>And he's absolutely right. But at no point has Trump ever so much as implied that anyone should go shoot up Mexicans.
"Invasion" IS the implication that you should shoot up Mexicans. You don't use "invasion" to describe something you peacefully stop.
>he's right
Alright shill.

So if your mayor got on television, and warned your town/city that it was facing a violent invasion, and your women were in danger of being raped, you wouldn't take that as a call to arms?

>"Invasion" IS the implication that you should shoot up Mexicans.
No, it isn't.
>You don't use "invasion" to describe something you peacefully stop.
Which should be the job of ICE and homeland security, not random civilians, which Trump has never advocated that random civilians do.

>No, it isn't.
How isn't it, then. How isn't characterizing asylum seekers as an invasion a call to arms. Where is your argument, shill?

No, because I am not a police officer, nor part of homeland security, or the national guard, or whathaveyou.

C'mon people we all know what really needs to happen. No Borders Initiative.

We simply have to back a governing style we can approve of (you know, meritocracy, strong monetary standing, reliable military, etc.) and push them into control of the entire planet, no more borders anywhere.

One flag, one group, one problem, what do we do with all the time and energy now available to focused on? my vote is for terraforming but we'll get to that when we get there.

Let's start having fun again

Attached: waiting4fun.png (523x398, 380K)

Calling illegal immigrants "asylum seekers" doesn't change the fact that they're illegal immigrants, any more than calling them "undocumented dreamer baby jesuses".
Fun fact: The vast majority of "asylum" claims are completely fucking bogus, and have 0% chance of being accepted.
immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-u-s-asylum-process/

>Which should be the job of ICE and homeland security, not random civilians, which Trump has never advocated that random civilians do.
You asked for an implication, not an explicit command. Stop moving goalposts.

>I totally agree, which is why Trump writing it off as a "mentally ill" bad apple and not acknowledging that it was driven by political rhetoric (unfortunately his own) is disingenuous.
It's very disingenuous. I apologize if I'm being argumentative, it's not my intent.

>He has little qualms about condemning politically motivated violence from the left, I've never heard Trump or Fox call Antifa "mentally distressed people in need of help".

At this point I feel I'm about to segue if you'll excuse me for doing so, do you think a violent, crazy person with political motivations would still be violent and crazy if they didn't have those political motivations? In some kind of crazy, and I admit poor example of a hypothetical, what if the dayton shooter and el paso shooter had both for some reason or another reversed their political affiliation at some point: Would that have stopped them?

Why would you even be using this rhetoric at a rally, if it's the job of Federal agencies?
Why even stir up a crowd if you have these organizations to deal with it?

To get people angry and scared.

The goalposts haven't moved at all. You're just wrong. Absolutely nobody has advocated for shooting up Mexicans, DRUMPH or otherwise.

>murdoch murdoch
>cool
No, it's about a young generation without direction.

Attached: 1534155067201.jpg (1280x1004, 44K)

>Calling illegal immigrants "asylum seekers" doesn't change the fact that they're illegal immigrants
Actually it changes the process entirely if they're seeking asylum.
>Fun fact: The vast majority of "asylum" claims are completely fucking bogus
That's the job of the courts to determine, not for ICE to independently jail people before their asylum status is confirmed. We had a working system before your president fucked it up. Illegal immigration fell under Obama and people had a viable path to citizenship and you fucked it up for no benefit.

>"Invasion" IS the implication that you should shoot up Mexicans. You don't use "invasion" to describe something you peacefully stop.
Sorry for interrupting:
Is your complaint semantic, then? Would you have objected less if he had chosen different language to describe them? Do you think the el paso shooting wouldn't have happened if he used a different word?

>denial
You don't get five white supremacists going on mass shooting sprees in the same week to "finish what Trump started" because of what Trump DIDN'T say.

Over here, people don't take notice of what a mayor might say as something that ought to be followed. All politicians, municipal government ranked officials, and the like, are viewed with suspicion, especially after so many councils had been dissolved right across the country over embezzlement incidences. Also, we have a relatively differnt history from much of the rest of the world, which might be the cause of that.

Because from trying to defund ICE, to providing benefits to illegal immigrants, to setting up "sanctuary cities", democrats are doing everything they can to stop the proper functioning of the institutions whose job it is to deal with illegal immigration.
When people feel that the institutions whose job it is to deal with an issue can no longer be relied upon, that's when they feel as though they have no other option but to take matters into their own hands, which is when you get mass shooters.
Maybe politicians should start paying attention.

>Over here, people don't take notice of what a mayor might say as something that ought to be followed.
In the united states, the mayor can give orders to the chief of police of their city, including orders to stand down if a protest turns violent.

Obviously this has happened throughout america's history with some very disastrous results.

This

Americans should never question or oppose government institutions. I'm tired of people trying to attack these core conservative values.

>what if the dayton shooter and el paso shooter had both for some reason or another reversed their political affiliation at some point: Would that have stopped them?
The issue is what drove them to action. If the El Paso shooter was necro-torture-porn kid hunting down his tran-sister it it's pals in a Wal-Mart, I really wouldn't give a fuck if he was wearing a MAGA hat or not.
On the other hand, if the Dayton shooter had written an MSNBC talking-points screed before shooting up targets that "Bernie says are out to get us", I would be seriously concerned about what Bernie is encouraging.

Did you quote the wrong post, or are you just retarded?

why did a Caillou thread become nazi wank?
is it because he's bald?

What do you mean? Is ICE not a federal agency? Are sanctuary cities not local government?

Hes a skinhead.

Attached: slippery-slope-comic1.png (1140x300, 53K)

>Americans should never question or oppose government institutions. I'm tired of people trying to attack these core conservative values.*

*(ATF, Federal Land Management, IRS and similar government institutions excepted)

Attached: Ammon Bundy.jpg (1390x1000, 103K)

Okay, you're retarded.
Realizing that the government institutions whose job it is to deal with illegal immigration are not functioning properly to deal with the issue is the very definition of "questioning government institutions".

>The issue is what drove them to action
I'm going to very politely disagree in as far as that if someone is violent and that violent behavior is the result of mental illness, then their motivation could have been anything.
For example, (I hope) you don't suggest we express concern that butch hartman is encouraging mass shooters because of randy stair.
Though, you have a very valid point in that there's a trend in politically motivated violence to be right leaning. It's not isolated for sure. But I merely disagree in that the correlation of the two is not evidence of their causation.

**(Note: these exceptions only apply to Whites)

Well yeah, that's why people set up sanctuary cities. Because states are ok with the level of immigration but the federal government isn't.

Why do you hate conservatives so much?

Whats the point of a container like /pol/ if these comments would still leak out?

I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that the El Paso shooter was mentally ill.
I haven't seen anything from his friends or family suggesting he was anything except political.

Please feel free to cite something that I can consider.

You really think the average person who saw their street turn into a shit-covered tent city is happy about illegal immigration?

>I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that the El Paso shooter was mentally ill.
I'm pretty sure shooting up a walmart is not something that sane people do.

In fact, the only thing I've seen citing El Paso's "mental illness" was the professional diagnosis of Psychologists Sean Hannity and Donald Trump.

Mental illness is a good scapegoat. Too bad there's no evidence to support it. The reality is that mentally ill people are more likely to be subject to violence than to instigate it.

I dont know but MOEslisms has to become a meme like those moe sharks.

I'm pretty sure you aren't any more of a Psychologist than Donald.
He felt he was acting on a threat to America and his State. A LOT of Texans are froggy to defend America and particularly Texas, with guns if necessary.

That's because "mental illness" is an incredibly broad topic. It's the same reason why people are rightfully skeptical about precluding the "mentally ill" from buying guns; as if the guy who suffers from insomnia is a ticking timebomb waiting to go off.

Which he wouldn't have felt the need to do if we actually had illegal immigration under control, which we don't.

>I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that the El Paso shooter was mentally ill.
His manifesto seems to indicate mental illness, to me. Particularly, his belief that mexicans were out to get him and if he didn't kill them first they'd kill him seemed like a paranoid delusion.

Wow, memory holed already, antifa scum?

Then don't use the vague idea of mental illness as a catch-all. Use a specific mental illness, I doubt you'll find any real diagnosis.

Why is this shit so goddamn funny?

And he got this idea of defending Texas from a "foreign invasion" from Right Wing media, The President of the United States and his party, and the people he routinely spoke about these things with on the internet. His dog wasn't telling him to go shoot invading Mexicans.

Attached: Groovy2.png (747x599, 500K)

>Do you think the el paso shooting wouldn't have happened if he used a different word?

The issue is entirely his hateful rhetoric, simply choosing another dog whistle word would not have changed anything. Trump has spent two years actively claiming there's an invasion happening that is a national emergency (despite the numbers proving the opposite), claiming that basically everybody crossing over the border are rapists, murderers and violent criminals. That type of reinforced, hateful fear mongering message blasting non-stop is going to inspire people to do extreme violent things. Because they buy into the fear and feel threatened personally.

>His manifesto seems to indicate mental illness, to me.
White supremacy is arguably a mental illness, but then that would disqualify most of the current White House administration.

If only bussiness owners wouldnt hire cheap illegal workforce, but we cant blame them right?

>The reality is that mentally ill people are more likely to be subject to violence than to instigate it.
This is not mutually exclusive from the fact that the majority of mass shooters had previous mental health issues or diagnosed issues before their shooting.

Most mentally ill people aren't violent. Most violent shooters are mentally ill; these two things are, like I said, not mutually exclusive and can both be true. A small, minority percentage of the mentally ill are doing this. Not the greater majority of them.

>His manifesto seems to indicate mental illness, to me.
Agreed, it read exactly like a Fox News talking points notecard.

This may surprise you, and probably uningratiate (if that's a word) me with the rest of the thread, but I'm not going to strongly disagree with you on either of those.

Because it literally happened.

1. Nigger has no cultural significance anywhere but the US so a Bong saying nigger would mean nothing. It’s like saying June 4th 1989 and getting arrested because the brainlet artist thought his culture was universial
2. He’s implying that saying Nigger is at or above National Healthcare

>the majority of mass shooters had previous mental health issues or diagnosed issues before their shooting.
[Citation Needed]

Also, the Good Ole Boy is actually not saying the word, he's using the safe version of it.

>Then don't use the vague idea of mental illness as a catch-all.
I don't.

And it's a problem when you have "News" anchors and politicians reinforcing the paranoia and anger and distress of the mentally ill.

fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view?mod=article_inline

The fbi found that 40% of the shooters had received a psychiatric diagnosis, and 70% had “mental health stressors” or “mental health concerning behaviors” before the attack.

Multiple studies have found that 40% to 50% of serious mental health disorders are undiagnosed. If you want, I can find a source on that one too.

>And he got this idea of defending Texas from a "foreign invasion" from
Observing reality.

I was assuming you were the user arguing that mass shooters are mentally ill without any specifics.

Statistically irrelevant, i live among far more leftist crazies than ecofascists.

>Oh my god I'm LITERALLY SHAKING

>Trump has spent two years actively claiming there's an invasion happening that is a national emergency (despite the numbers proving the opposite)
The libcuck paradox:
>dude there's not that many illegals lol
>OMG THERE'S SO MANY ILLEGALS THAT OUR DETENTION CENTERS ARE LITERALLY OVERFLOWING!!!!
faggot

>"News" anchors
Yeah Fox really needs to be shut down, you know it's not even registered as a news channel but as an entertainment channel, literally fake news

>I was assuming you were the user arguing that mass shooters are mentally ill without any specifics.
They are mentally ill. Mass shootings are not something that sane people do.
But it's about as broad as saying "mass shooters are gun owners". Yes, they are, but the vast majority of gun owners are not mass shooters, the same way that the mentally ill are not mass shooters.

>Even the people selling phones with Bixby are apologetic about its existence and that it can't be removed, recommending to new customers that they never use it.

The fact that you're singling out Fox means you're a fucking idiot. As if any other MSM news is any better.

>That's the job of the courts to determine, not for ICE to independently jail people before their asylum status is confirmed. We had a working system before your president fucked it up. Illegal immigration fell under Obama and people had a viable path to citizenship and you fucked it up for no benefit.

Literally nothing has changed except shitty NGOs and American politicians habe incentivized millions of people to attempt entering the US illegally.

From your own source:

Attached: Phase 2.jpg (1342x618, 136K)

they're just a series of strawmen comics

There you are using it as a catch-all again, you have no examples of specific mental illnesses that these shooters could have.

>And it's a problem when you have "News" anchors and politicians reinforcing the paranoia and distress of the mentally ill
Not wrong. But for a long time now they've been a business. They've no duty to inform. Their duty is to get ratings and clicks for their advertisers. If getting people scared, paranoid, or angry gets them views and clicks, that is what they're going to do. we could go on about why that is, but that would be a tremendous segue, wouldn't it?

As far as politicians go: It's also not an uncommon tactic to sell someone on a disease before selling them the cure.
Tell someone they're going to die of a disease they may not even have and then sell them treatment to prevent or cure it. But I feel we're getting off topic a little. If they feel it'll get them elected, they'll sell you anything. Reagan for example said, "I don't buy into this religion shit but if it gets me elected I'll wear any hat."

Reread my post.

The law isn't a government institution you fucking glownigger, the Fed doesn't decide what the law is, who is American or not, or where.

according to this
Only 25% had any reported psychological issues, and only 3 out of 67 studied had anything beyond depression, anxiety or anger-issues. None of which get you diagnosed as "mentally ill".

>inflating a sample of less than 100 into a percentage
You can throw that teenage blog paper to the toilets where it belongs

you know there is more than psychotic disorders when it comes to the mentally ill right?

>whataboutism
Not an argument, especially when one outlet is far far more egregious about it
And I'll let you in on a secret, just because you don't like it does mean it's fake, drain the memes out of your head and try to regain your critical thinking ability you rotten brained fuck

HE REFERENCED THE FUCKING LORAX

HE SHOOT UP A BUNCH OF PANCHITOS AT A WALMART BECAUSE HE WAS SPEAKING FOR THE FUCKING TREES

>not revealing the actual numbers in point 3
totally not suspicious

It's from the source quoted here
You complete dumbass; not mine.
He cited numbers from a study that I actually went and read, and his numbers are made up, the study doesn't suggest that Active Shooters are mostly mentally ill at all.

Attached: intredasting.jpg (685x567, 53K)

I didn't read wrong, "mental illness" is not an example. You're severely underestimating the ability of the human mind to commit atrocities if they believe themselves to be justified or victimized. This is literally how wars are justified.
Ideology is more dangerous than any mentally ill person.

>depression, anxiety
Those are mental illnesses, actually.
An example of a specific depression mental illnesses would be bipolar disorder and anxiety might be PTSD.

>left can't meme

Attached: 1542199783416.png (1500x1000, 751K)

I AM THE LORAX
I SPEAK FOR THE TREES
THEY COMMAND ME TO CAP SOME SPIC KNEES

Attached: huh.png (1358x2555, 14K)

Fine. Then by that loose standard 97% of the country is mentally ill, and again it's not a significant factor in Active Shooters.

>Not an argument, especially when one outlet is far far more egregious about it
It isn't, thats the point retard.
Whatever libcuck outlet you unquestioningly gargle is at least as bad; the only reason you're singling out Fox is because it's the only outlet that doesn't politically align with you.
>inb4 some "n-no you" cuck response
The difference is that I'm saying Fox is equally shit.

why has this innocent calliou thread been ruined by fake shootings?

Key word Demographics, you can't say who's gonna be a mass shooter weeding out by factors like that, and a big problem is that a large proportion of people with mental issues will not be diagnosed in their lifetimes due to refraining from seeking out care or lack of understanding their issues.

>It's from the source quoted here
your source is as goos as used toilet paper, andappeal to authority won't save it's totally unnacceptable ignorance of maths and statistics.
See also : the paper about the "wage gap" between men and women. that just made the sum of each salary for men and women, divided for average, then claimed all men at any job made more than women. Which is wrong.

Huh?

That wasn't my point. I was rebutting his assertion (and fake percentages) asserting that a large number of active shooters are diagnosed as mentally ill before or after.

Which is not the case.

>and his numbers are made up,
Sorry, got them from a WSJ article.

Can you believe shmorky would write such things

>your source is as goos as used toilet paper
It's not my source you triple dumbass
>Conservanon asserts most shooters mentally ill
>I ask for [citation]
>He provides an address and some figures (that aren't supported by his citation)
>I post a pic of the actual citation, showing that he's bullshit
>Some retard (you) keeps calling bullshit on "my" source
It's not my source, you microcephallic.

Attached: 1385662391465.jpg (300x311, 15K)

WHY would you post a citation from an FBI study, and then post %s under that link that are contradicted by the citation?
Are you Drunk? Dishonest? Dumb?

Again, sorry, entirely my bad. I failed to read the source cited in the article I read.

> and then post %s under that link that are contradicted by the citation?
I read a WSJ article and assumed the numbers they used in the article matched the ones in the citation.
Article in question:
wsj.com/articles/mental-illness-and-mass-murder-11564955203

>two different white guys that were kidnapped and murdered for a literal human sacrifice for some mexican voodoo religion
You just KNOW there have been way more but those are the among the couple that have been solved. Stay outta Mexico whities, y'all ain't safe there unlike what people tell you.

Attached: 75d.png (900x900, 175K)

>Moderate increases
The minimum wage will only climb higher and higher because libtards are never satisfied. Once the federal minimum is $15 you'll have unionists demanding $20 minimum.
Meanwhile the left wing openly embraces BOTH increased in welfare programs to even the illegals and the destruction of border laws to begin with. Millions of non-Americans will pour over into this nation for free healthcare and free food once Texas flips blue next election season.
There is no hope for the United States. You libtards have ruined everything.

Look at the bright side.
People will stop illegally immigrating to the US when it's been so thoroughly ruined that it's not even worth breaking into.

I have literally never heard anyone say Mexico is safe.

The problem is that by not asserting shooting up people is caused by a mental imbalance we are faced with the idea that it's not an utterly irrational and deranged behavior. Powered by ideology, it would be terrorism, but where were the Las Vegas, Sandy Hook, Parkland, Sutherland Spring, Aurora, V-tec, Columbine, etc manifestos?

Is shooting many people for a belief really different from doing it because you're sn edgy retard? Even if you accept people can be radicalized to such a degree by Trumps' boomer tier twitter account, how can the average person who WOULDN'T believe such things otherwise suddely be capable of something almost universally abhorred? Is the average person that easy to push into mass murder? If so, how did we make it through the 20s through to the 80s without collapsing into savage racial and political violence?

>When you shoot your girlfriend or tranny-sister while being a Leftist, that is simple violence
You can't say for sure what his motives is now being dead anymore than the right can say the Dayton shooter's motivations were political. If you're going to play by those rules then Dayton shooter shot up a bar that was conservative as evidence by the locals and the Blue Lives Matter flag shit at the bar.

Neither is any major U.S. city.

The detention centers are overflowing because Trump chose not to prepare when he changed policies and started prosecuting and detaining everyone crossing the border, separating and detaining children separately from their parents, as well as refusing to release them until their designated court date, like was the standard practice before he took office. His deportation policy changes have also made people scared of offering themselves to take in children and family members, etc.

It's only such a big a problem now because Trump refuses to do anything intelligent, like designate more resources and money to solving the problem, i.e. more judges and improve the detention center conditions, and instead wants to build a stupid wall that will not address things like years of backlog cases on the asylum cases.

Dayton guy literally said he wss tired of waiting for the revolution and wanted socialism now. Bit more succinct than the Lorax Fascist.

Major cities are safe enough if you know where to avoid.

>Dayton guy literally said he wss tired of waiting for the revolution and wanted socialism now.
why the fuck people saying it wasn't politically motivated then?

He did all of that, the numbers of crossings just grew exponentially in the past three years. Stop watching so much CNN.

This I've been to puerto Vallarta and Cancun

Because they are liars and want to bury it. They are in control of the narrative so long as you take their words at face value.

>The detention centers are overflowing
Because there are actually that many illegals.
The same retards who said "no, you're paranoid thinking that massive amounts of illegals are trying to flood into the country" are just pulling a switch tactic, without so much as an apology for lying out their asses.

>like designate more resources and money to solving the problem, i.e. more judges and improve the detention center conditions
There are the same amount of judges and detentions centers as there has always been. which is already excessive.
If these are no longer enough to deal with the flood of illegal immigrants, it's because the flood of illegal immigrants has increased.
This is pretty basic shit.

>Separating children from their parents
For a real good reason: trafficking. How can you be sure the child is their child when nobody had paperwork? Hell, how do you know the parent(s) aren't kidnapping them from their legal guardian due to losing custody? What if the parents are abusing the child?
This is why we place children in separate facilities. These used to be alright until the Democratic Socialists of America shouted that "the border must be opened!" and even mainline Democratic leaders said that illegals shouldn't be detained. There will be more and more illegals because we aren't using real force to stop them and they know breeding here makes their children American.

America is over. We will become a welfare state that drains money from productive people in order to fund the lives of people who choose not to speak English and wave their native flags around.

>people who choose not to speak English and wave their native flags around.
Cajuns?

Ask the wallstreet journal, I guess.

Honestly, this joke would work better if instead of aliens, it was Pizzagate.

Attached: loss pizza pepperoni.jpg (3264x2448, 1.61M)

Attached: stonetoss the dude.jpg (1000x1000, 451K)

I wouldn't know because anyone that would voice any concern would be deemed racist. And now you want to trust the same government responsible for guarding Jeffrey Epstein to surrender our firearms to.

Left wing Mexicans and their allies (including Antifa). Their attacks against Border Patrol have went from benign (tagging) to propaganda (replacing the US FLAG with Mexican Flag) to fucking terrorism (Attempted Antifa firebomber).
I'm a Hispanic living on the US Border and I'm fucking sick of all these NON AMERICAN SCUM. Fuck Spanish, Fuck those shitty countries, and fuck Chicanos.

The joke doesn't work at all because Russian intereference is a proven fact.
>Left wing Mexicans and their allies (including Antifa).
You're living in an imaginary fantasy land based on Facebook posts and screenshot edits.

>This is why we place children in separate facilities.

Except Trump was snatching every single child away from their parents or accompanying adult and then didn't keep records of who they took and from whom, which is why we still have numerous little children who have not been reunited. When Obama did separations, it was when they were actually had a good cause to do so. Trump did it to every single child, even toddlers. As a form of deterrence, saying "don't come here or we'll take away your child." And then when the courts told them they had to stop doing the separations and they had to reunite all broken families, the administration just went "oopsie, we don't know how to reunite any of them and we already deported some of the adults and don't know how to contact them. It's should now be someone else's job to fix this, not the current government who created this whole mess."

So any claim that this was all just about guaranteeing the well being of children is bullshit. Especially when the same administration then has gone to court to argue that they should not be legally obligated to provide detained children with basic hygiene products like toothpaste and soap. Or that it's okay to make them sleep in cold concrete floors while the lights are never turned off.

Obama deported more immigrants than any other president in American history. Melania caused attempted immigration rates to skyrockets because she embodies an American dream, that some thot from a former Soviet shithole can become the wife of the president.

Russian shitposting =/= stuffing fake votes in ballot boxes

So, at the risk of putting words in your mouth:
You don't think most mass shootings are politically motivated?

>Russian intereference
You mean some vodka chugging slavs buying ads on Facebook.

Just decrease shareholders cut.
DUDE MEMES LMAO
9/11 was an inside job

I was making a joke, Tweedledumbfuck.

If we're being objective here, most mass shootings are caused by niggers being niggers.
These tend not to make national headlines, because niggers.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that's a definite, "not political" thing, then.

It kind of is, because it's gangs.
Gangs are the nigger version of politics.

Shut up, putinbot.

I still swear that it was a dummy and the video was fake. is it? please say it was

What video are you talking about, dare I ask?

Recent mass shootings are part of failed antifa operation to copy Christchurch shooter.

Attached: Please reformat and try again.png (586x239, 16K)

And they're all registered democrat voters.

Attached: Doyouhaveasinglecioussatisfact.png (760x572, 247K)

I would think it's mostly business disputes and hostile takeovers in that case.

Outrage bait.

cartel Chainsaw Beheading, was all over gore threads years ago and people said due to an eyeball flying across it was a fake dummy

Oh look, a real world contemporary political discussion thread on Yea Forums that should belong on /pol/ instead.

Who could have POSSIBLY seen that coming?

so was trump

lol

Attached: christmas-race-statistics-comic.png (1000x500, 53K)

Attached: censorship-by-the-left-comic.png (1000x500, 32K)

So to be a complete internet tough guy. Even outnumbered how are men losing fights to antifa members?

VAN, YEAH THATS THE MASTER PLAN

if you insist

Attached: daddy isnt home rn.jpg (480x580, 21K)

Antifa tactics involve forming a line with a large crowd of other antifa trannies behind them, and pull people into the crowd to wail on them. It doesn't matter how much of a shoulin kungfu master you are at that point if you're getting pummeled from all sides.
Now that people are aware of their tactics, you see antifa trannies getting their asses beat far more often.

don't forget user your the bad guy for wanting this shit where it belongs rather than being a parasitic excuse to bitch and moan about politics.

Well, that and using weapons.

It's to make sure they can't be seen as official pebble flick strips. If they could, rock throw could most likely get the sub nuked for supporting identity theft or something similar.
It's not yet possible to virtually beat people into submission with bike locks and threats of being called a nazi, so they have to cover their own asses when they pick battles with people that can fight back.

It also helps that if you're a target of antifa you'll probably go to jail for hitting them while antifa thugs can bloody you with a bikelock and get off scot-free.

>They jump people
>And use weapons.
All everyone cries about online is antifa riots, and basically the whole battle is larping faggots who've never been in serious fights in their life.

>With a bike lock
Like they put a bike lock on a chain?

>All everyone cries about online is antifa riots, and basically the whole battle is larping faggots who've never been in serious fights in their life.
And people are getting seriously injured. I'm not sure what your point is here.

What is wrong with you?

>I'm not sure what your point is
That it sounds like larping faggots that peope are trying to paint as dangerous because it's Portland.

Yeah basic supply and demand sure is fucked up.

There's several types of bike locks available, commercially. The one used by Eric Clanton was, I believe, the "U" type lock that's available.

Attached: Kryptonite-Keeper-512-U-Lock[1].jpg (1280x853, 59K)

>people are trying to paint as dangerous
I'd say that's an accurate description of someone using a crowbar to attack an elderly man.
Again, what is your point? That they aren't?

The thought crossed my mind so I'm going to say it.

The kids at my high school could and did come up with better weaponry than that.

If you went to public school, I don't doubt that you did.

Any weaponry is good weaponry if you can attack with it without fear of reprisal.

lol

Attached: iq-and-race-comic.png (940x300, 51K)

>I'd say that's an accurate description of someone using a crowbar to attack an elderly man.
So wasn't it proven in both examples that the elderly man either was a willing combatant or drove his car into the idiots protesting?

>clap clap clap clap clapclapclapcalpaclacplacppalacplaplcpaclapcalcapcapl

No.

Well what example are you talking about then?

Dayton shooter didnt leave a manifesto quoting the president

>Who was the Dayton shooter

The portland one with john blum.

You guys still have Sandy Hook hoaxers on your side.

I know you're pretending to be retarded, but you're not doing yourself any favors.
dailywire.com/news/49029/watch-elderly-man-beaten-crowbar-another-has-head-amanda-prestigiacomo

>Any weaponry is good weaponry if you can attack with it without fear of reprisal.
Okay but I could get my little cousin drunk and he could come up with better riot weapons that can easily be broken up into shit to be disposed of.

I know half this thread is bait and shitflinging but this is genuinely something that I always thought whenever the Anti-Fa riots were brought up or their vicious attacks. Everything I always hear about it makes it sound like a mass of incompetence where all the combatants are figuring out how to fight and riot on the spot. I can only speak for my region, but the punk scene that died out still left a generational knowledge of how to riot and fight to those that aren't criminals. Didn't Portland have a massive punk scene?

Not that user but it's clear you're only using ANTIFA to deflect from white supremacist violence. They're not equal. 90% of terrorism is always larger than 10%. There is no horseshoe theory going on here, and if there is, it's an extremely lopsided horseshoe where white supremacists go for years holding the monopoly on political violence - and yet Trump only talks about adding ANTIFA as a terrorist group, and keeps defunding federal bodies that prevent domestic terrorists. The whole picture tells the story of white supremacy's extreme danger and you want us to look away to focus on a little dot in the corner of the one time someone got hit with a crowbar. "But why can't it be both?" That's what I'd like to ask you - why keep deflecting away from white supremacists if you think it can be both? Why do you need to play up ANTIFA and consequently down play white supremacist terrorism every single time white supremacy is mentioned? You say "Why can't it be both", but in truth you want us to pretend that ANTIFA is as big as a problem as white supremacy, and it is simply not. White supremacy is, without question, our largest and most dangerous terrorist threat today. And what's your response to them? Play "whataboutism" horseshoe theory bullshit. Good job being a worthless shill. I'm sure that will make a great story for your grandchildren - "The time I was in an internet argument to make people think white supremacists aren't all that bad."

No but he had a rapelist.

The guy who was filmed running at a crowd of people with a police baton?

>Everything I always hear about it makes it sound like a mass of incompetence
If they were competent at anything they wouldn't be antifa.

Ironically enough they can actually tell race from brains

It's clear you're using white supremacist violence to deflect from inner city gang violence. They're not equal.

Fuck is reddit down again?

El Paso shooter literally said in his manifesto that none of his views came from Donald Trump, and predate him

Stonetoss is the epitome of the "I AM SILLY" meme. It's a shitty MS paint comic with slightly better art. Even then the art is lazy and copy pasted.

>Deflect from something nobody was even talking about
Cute. Not clever, but cute. You're still a shill.

You made a very long post to put words in my mouth and make an egregious strawman argument.
I did not say in any uncertain terms that I condone any white supremacist violence. Where on earth are you getting this lie?

White supremacists do not exist

based retard

Wait, there are places outside 'murrica that still considers their mass shootings newsworthy?
Here in europe we don't even hear about them unless there's a 30+ body count.

Fuck is 8ch down agai-
Oh wait lmao. But really, go to hell, that's where you're going to end up anyway.

Murdoch Murdoch is unfunny trash. Just read a damn book at that point.

He also mentioned fake news in the next sentence. He also said "send them back" and he also called the Hispanics "an invasion" which came from Trump's campaign. You have to be stupid to think he didn't get his views from Trump. He was upset that Trump wasn't doing MORE to get Mexicans out, like that rally where the woman suggested they shoot them causing Trump to laugh.

>>the holocaust didn't happen
>Aaaand we have either a winner or an uncommonly subtle false flag.

Did you try reading the full comment, since that's not what he said.

That is a ton of words to say “no u.”

That is what he said.
>And the holocaust didn't happen, at least not to the level claimed.

>considering subhuman illegals invaders is trademarked by Trump

>He also said "send them back" and he also called the Hispanics "an invasion"
Man who wants to send immigrants back says "send them back" and calls a huge influx of people "an invasion". Neither of those need to have anything to do with Trump.

> Neither of those need to have anything to do with Trump.
Did you get a lot of vaccinations as a child?

Attached: Screen Shot 2016-11-10 at 11.39.58 AM.png (618x323, 76K)

For what?

user, ANTIFA is currently the only group in the United States that exists for the sole purpose of causing political violence against civilians, and get away with it.
Nobody supports the extremely rare fringe cases of "white supremacist violence". They go out of the way to disavow it. There aren't mainstream groups who unironically support the Aryan Brotherhood or some shit.
Meanwhile, you're literally trying to use every bullshit excuse under the sun to downplay years of consistent unlawful ANTIFA violence. The media runs interference for them, and activist judges let them off scott-free.
White supremacists are held accountable for their violence. ANTIFA trannies aren't, which is why people correctly consider them to be such a massive problem.

>And the holocaust didn't happen, at least not to the level claimed.
>not to the level claimed.
Which is true, the Holocaust has generally been exaggerated.

Antivaxxers also predate Trump so that tweet is just another example of trump saying something other people already believed

So if Trump says anything about any subject and someone else uses the same words they're a follower of Trump? If he calls a spade a spade everyone else has to call them a nigger?

You're literally deflecting right now. Follow the chain of replies to the post that started here - I'll even mark which posts are mine:
> Even outnumbered how are men losing fights to antifa members?
(mine)
>well that and using weapons
>All everyone cries about online is antifa riots, and basically the whole battle is larping faggots who've never been in serious fights in their life.
(mine)
>And people are getting seriously injured. I'm not sure what your point is here
>That it sounds like larping faggots that peope are trying to paint as dangerous because it's Portland.
(mine)
>I'd say that's an accurate description of someone using a crowbar to attack an elderly man.
>Again, what is your point? That they aren't?

In what part of that exchange did I at any point say that I do not condemn violence? What point am I downplaying white supremacist violence?
WHERE? Where are you getting these insane accusations from?

bruh I just butchered one of my chickens the other day and I could not believe how fragile the thing was. I have no trouble believe that the vid was real

When did Antifa go from knocking over trash cans to having “organized cells” that terrorize dozens of people?

Trump has repeatedly disavowed racism, so being racist is the best way to show that you do not support Trump.

Around 2016 and 2017 when they started burning cars and setting fire to universities.

Dude I dont know who you're trying to fool.

How do you feel about Trump blaming violent video games because the guy mentioned CoD?

Attached: 1564861005491.png (1200x1600, 1.21M)

I'm not entirely certain, but in recent memory, it was when they vandalized that university to keep Milo whatshisface from speaking.
That's when their violence seemed to have escalated.

>"You will not replace us!"
>"WE WILL REPLACE YOU! AND ALSO, ETHNIC REPLACEMENT IS JUST A RACIST CONSPIRACY THEORY LOL"

Ah yes, I remember how scared conservatives were. No way to defend themselves, right?

Remember that time ANTIFA had a big rally where they chanted YOU WILL NOT REPLACE US and then killed some poor conservative girl with a car?

Started in january of 2017 on the day trump was inaugurated, to be exact.

>setting fires to universities
>setting fire to a garbage can at a univeristy
ftfy
You're such a fucking shill it's embarrassing.

They actually just wanted to exercise their right to peaceful assembly, which is necessary for a free democracy.
I literally have zero sympathy for whatever happens to antifa trannies from this point onward, because they brought it on themselves.

Yeah the Unite the Right rally was super peaceful

>it is not cowardly to seek low hanging fruit
???????????
This is pathetic.

>Calling a group with no formal organization or member list a terrorist group

Al-Qaeda follows a very similar structure, so...yes?

>stand in the middle of the road
>attack someone’s car
>he runs into by mistake when clearly panicked, and even hits the breaks to try and stop
Fuck off commies couldn’t care less that the fat pig is dead but the guy obviously wasn’t trying to kill anyone and they were attacking him

It was, until antifa rioters showed up to try to unlawfully shut it down, as usual.
You don't get to claim victim status when you're fucking up other people's events. If antifa wanted to hold their own retarded commie tranny rally, that would be one thing, but they don't do that.

Anything to make him seem like a badass freedom fighter doing whats right in his mind.

Imagine identifying yourself as a political party.

No, user, they most assuredly did set fire to a limo that was owned by someone who didn't even vote for trump.
And there were in fact, several fires set at Berkeley.

Attached: 636215861515820160-AP-Breitbart-Editor-Berkeley.1[1].jpg (534x401, 31K)

Same way I felt when Clinton did it.

Look man nobody here unironically supports Trump. He's been a buffoon for 40 years. We just like it when the libtards get mad and when the Clintons get cucked.

Man you guys are legit cultists

Attached: 1532333472095.jpg (750x741, 104K)

100% of the violence was caused by antifa marching on a small event with a legal permit to organize their rally.
mobile.twitter.com/hbdnrx/status/1028769625096347649?lang=en

What on earth are you trying to say?

>Look man nobody here unironically supports Trump.
You are fucking naive

Attached: 57bbf7ca1700001108c74d44.jpg (720x623, 80K)

Your image does absolutely nothing to contradict either of the posts you quoted.

While I don't doubt there are legitimate trump supporters here, there's no shortage of people who don't like him arguing with you. Myself included.

lmao dude

Attached: not even surprised.png (730x796, 116K)

Ever notice how these threads are only made during Euro hours?
Just something funny I've noticed.

Attached: 4DF462554D8B4BE5B096E183CF25E3C7.jpg (476x359, 141K)

Nice retarded strawmeme to not have to answer to the reality of the situation. UTR had a permit for their rally. Antifa organized specifically to try and shut that rally down. We have video of people attacking James Field’s car before he plowed into the crowed surrounding him, we know he was panicked before that and didn’t know where to go while trying to leave the city, and we have video of an antifa good saying he’d threatened the guy with an assault rifle just before it all happened

This is a funny looking trash can.

Attached: Milo-B[1].jpg (1023x518, 69K)

>We have video of people attacking James Field’s car before he plowed into the crowed surrounding him
You should tell the police and show the judge, then. This could get him out of prison!

The video you fucking retard. You can admit you were wrong now.

Attached: For+next+time+_b761ce383f6c63dc8829fb1bcf7acdb0.png (1024x434, 256K)

lmao

Attached: lmao.png (744x588, 511K)

Ok, so - how does that prove he was wrong?

>
> Same way I felt when Clinton did it.
> Look man nobody here unironically supports Trump. He's been a buffoon for 40 years. We just like it when the libtards get mad and when the Clintons get cucked.
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:05:40 No.109295808▶
>File: 1532333472095.jpg (104 KB, 750x741)
>104 KB
>
>
> Man you guys are legit cultists
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:05:56 No.109295810▶
>
> 100% of the violence was caused by antifa marching on a small event with a legal permit to organize their rally.
> mobile.twitter.com/hbdnrx/status/1028769625096347649?lang=en
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:06:11 No.109295812▶
>
> What on earth are you trying to say?
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:06:42 No.109295818▶
>File: 57bbf7ca1700001108c74d44.jpg (80 KB, 720x623)
>80 KB
>
> >Look man nobody here unironically supports Trump.
> You are fucking naive
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:07:29 No.109295823▶
>
> Your image does absolutely nothing to contradict either of the posts you quoted.
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:07:34 No.109295824▶
>
> While I don't doubt there are legitimate trump supporters here, there's no shortage of people who don't like him arguing with you. Myself included.
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:07:49 No.109295826▶
>File: not even surprised.png (116 KB, 730x796)
>116 KB
>
> lmao dude
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:08:53 No.109295835▶
>File: 4DF462554D8B4BE5B096E183C(...).jpg (141 KB, 476x359)
>141 KB
> Ever notice how these threads are only made during Euro hours?
> Just something funny I've noticed.
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:09:18 No.109295837▶
>

So you don’t actually have an answer to the video, and just want to meme with a genetic fallacy

Oh I was just mocking his incel twitter he linked to. This proves him wrong.

Attached: fieldshitlerredacted.png (686x454, 46K)

Attached: 1536536623229.jpg (882x624, 72K)

>to not have to answer to the reality of the situation. UTR had a permit for their rally. Antifa organized specifically to try and shut that rally down. We have video of people attacking James Field’s car before he plowed into the crowed surrounding him, we know he was panicked before that and didn’t know where to go while trying to leave the city, and we have video of an antifa good saying he’d threatened the guy with an assault rifle just before it all happened
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:10:14 No.109295845▶
>File: Milo-B[1].jpg (69 KB, 1023x518)
>69 KB
>
> This is a funny looking trash can.
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:10:31 No.109295847▶
>
> >We have video of people attacking James Field’s car before he plowed into the crowed surrounding him
> You should tell the police and show the judge, then. This could get him out of prison!
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:10:47 No.109295851▶
>
> The video you fucking retard. You can admit you were wrong now.
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:10:48 No.109295852▶
>File: For+next+time+_b761ce383f(...).png (256 KB, 1024x434)
>256 KB
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:11:53 No.109295857▶
>File: lmao.png (511 KB, 744x588)
>511 KB
>
> lmao
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:13:39 No.109295868▶
>
>
> Ok, so - how does that prove he was wrong?
>>>
>Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:16:34 No.109295892▶
>
> >
> > Same way I felt when Clinton did it.
> > Look man nobody here unironically supports Trump. He's been a buffoon for 40 years. We just like it when the libtards get mad and when the Clintons get cucked.
> >>>
> >Anonymous 08/12/19(Mon)03:05:40 No.109295808▶

Yeah no it doesnt