Attached: AoStH-and-SatAM.jpg (620x300, 60K)
Which show was better?
Angel Myers
Luke Cook
Adventures of
Samuel Baker
none of them
Ryder Adams
Luke Baker
They had different aims and were at least competent at both.
AoStH was the better in terms of adapting Sonic, though.
Brayden Mitchell
Sonic Underground
Charles Perry
Pic Related is what the typical SatAm Sonic Fan looks like. So I’ll let you be the judge of which show you’d like to choose sides with.
Camden Mitchell
>AoStH was the sightly better in terms of adapting Sonic, though.
Fixed.
Noah Smith
Both were equally good.
Thomas Jackson
Why?
Colton Miller
Slightly better is still better, user. There's no need to specify.
Jordan Howard
Sonic X because it had Rouge and Cream the rabbit.
Jeremiah Long
Not Yea Forums.
Lucas Ortiz
Eh I never really looked forward to Sonic having Looney Toon invincibility properties, at least he's running for his life in some manner in the other show
Leo Phillips
Sonic is Yea Forums not Yea Forums, sweaty.
Logan Green
Neither.
Lincoln Ross
And it's also still only sightly, and therefore, not so motivating to consider that. My point is in this case, it's insignificant to qualify which show was better for adapting Sonic. Both are still, truthfully and in evidence, attempted very different interpretations of Sonic.
Thomas Morris
I've only watched AoSTH, but each show is so different that it is like comparing GPUs and high fibre breakfast cereals. At least apples and oranges are both fruits with popular juices that are served at breakfast.
Jaxon Jones
Come on now.
Surely they had something you liked about them.
Daniel Watson
>none
Not even the OVA?
Isaac Gutierrez
Pic related is what the typical Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog fan looks like. So I’ll let you be the judge of which show you’d like to choose sides with.