This interpretation of the character sucks...

This interpretation of the character sucks. Any of you who defends it convinced yourselves before hand that it was going to be good and now you're are too strongheaded to admit they were wrong. You guys have stockholm syndrome.
>b-but it will be better in the next movie!
No it won't. Unless they change writers, they're gonna repeat it and make it even more awful just because you can't help yourselves to acknowledge its faults..

Attached: collateral damage.jpg (1024x928, 103K)

Sorry, wrong image.

Attached: iron boy.jpg (1280x720, 53K)

It was funny to see so many biased fags in this board do a 180 because Marvel was doing it this time.

Whatever both versions suck, Superman is a charisma void, Spiderman motivations and personality are completelly bland and generic. Both characters have zero unique traits.

What is superman character other than being a farm boy and a parangon of virtue?

>modest
>always polite
>optimistic
>obsessed with hope
>human rights apologist

Gentle giant.

What if I never cared about either of these guys and don’t care if any of their adaptations are accurate?

Unironically the best Cavill’s Supes got was in Justice League. I can see how they were trying to go for cute and corny and also terrifying. Shame about how shit it was, though.

lunatic that wants everyone to like him but would rather spend all his time in the fortress of solitude

>Superman is a

Attached: Lame.jpg (779x601, 491K)