Spider-Verse Mini Series

Proweler, symbiote suit was made by the fans.

>But isn’t the WEB OF LIFE & DESTINY destroyed?

See that's something that happens in the event and not in the movie, the fact that the into the Spider-Verse artist made the cover might have nothing to do with it.

You shit-eating retard
The Prowler was based on a drawing by a Marvel artist's son, who quickly became an artist for Marvel himself. Spider-Man's black costume was based on a design that marvel bought from a fan.

Both are irrelevant because they aren't self-insert faggot characters drawn by self-inserting faggots like you.

I am not sure really, they talked about it a bit during a Marvel Live panel here, at around 21 minutes.
twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1rmxPeYdzmYKN

It stills fan designs just like spidersonas.

I find it strange that you think you wouldn't be able to write a story from the perspective of a different character using the Spider-Man mythos without circle jerking and self inserting.
That's how we got a lot of the great characters across the spider-man multiverse after all.

Ah yes, now she can be canon

Attached: 1545879785631.jpg (4096x3276, 709K)

cringe

this is probably the worst thing I have seen

Do you really expect that those who will write those characters aren't self-centered "fans"?
The writers have the IQ of a dead child, imagine their fans.

Guy, how about we start making new Goblins instead? That would be interesting change

I been following the hashtag for a couple of months now and, while I do agree that the great majority of people just draw themselves with a custom Spider-Man suit on, some people do create actual characters with a good concept, neat design and as part of an actual universe, with side characters and environment, which I am sure the creators of this book will focus the most on.
At the end of the day, they're not putting these people in the writing chair, they are just borrowing their characters and more or less canonizing them for this one shot.

Okay, so hear me out
There this other universe where Goblin is a kid, but he dies trying to stop Spider-man from saving people during a disaster.
So this other kid, who's also half asian and half white, takes up Goblin's mantle. Everyone who knew Green Goblin just gives him GG's stuff and says he's a totally valid Goblin.
Also he got his powers from some goblin serum that his aunt stole from work thinking it was tequila. He stole it from his aunt for his high school party. His has a goblin posse now.

Who is the writer?

Where do you submit your OC doughnut steel
What's the point of the hijab when the mask covers the hair?

Check out this no fun allowed, edge lord
He must get tons of pussy

Serves the same purpose as Gwen's useless hoody: stand-in for hair because she's a girl.

>Spider-Verse will be a six-issue mini-series written by Jed Mackay and illustrated by Juan Frigeri with Arthur Adams, Stuart Immonen, Stacey Lee, and more. Additionally, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse character designer Wendell Dalit made the main cover art, and each issue will feature #Spidersonas from Spidey fans and comics creators the world over.

At least I got some sweet MJ ass before I died.

Looks badass. The idea of a Spider-mech Spider-man is pretty sweet.

Attached: tumblr_mwsitaG4R51rrn7p8o1_500.png (500x290, 222K)

It's not that it's impractical it's there's no reason for it. She's entirely covered already what's the point

Jed Mackay wrote The Man without Fear miniseries before Chip Zdarsky started his daredevil run along with Edge of spider-geddon #1, the Black Cat series and a original comic book named Daughters of the Dragon: Deep Cuts.
Are any these books good Yea Forums ? I know during the storytime of the Man without Fear #1, the anons liked it and I've read edge of spider-geddon #1, but that's all I know about him.

Man Without Fear was great

no it's not, those are fictional characters. spidersonas are literally 'what if i was spiderman', now i won't be as harsh as that user, i understand it's just a fun exercise to design a spiderman style costume and people don't genuinely want to cram their OCs into the comics/movies

it's pretty harmless but i get where that user is coming from, and i'm sorry but your post is downright wrong. cribbing a character's mythos to use for your own self insert is pretty much inherently circle jerking. that's what spidersonas are; self-inserts, peni parker and spiderman noir are not '''spider-sonas''''

i mean, it is unbearably cringe to have heels as a part of a fighting character's design unless you WANT to make them look like a complete retard

good page though

Attached: no fun allowed.png (256x256, 42K)

You're saying all this about self-inserting like not all writers inject a little bit of themselves into their characters. After all, Parker's looks and many details in his life were based off of Ditko's life and appearance.
What about characters like Miguel O'Harra? Aaron Aikman? Pavitr Prabhakar? May Reilly (Lady Spider)?
These are all just "What if"s of Spider-Man that were given a lot of work and thought put into their design and personality and worlds and stories in order to distinguish themselves from the original wall crawler, while still using the same motifs and story arcs.
One person (or more than one in some cases) had to think of those concepts, so in a strange way, those characters are their creators' spidersona.
So, by that logic, what gives credence to these characters that show up in the Spider-verse movie and comic books, as opposed to similar characters made by some random twitter artist who put just as much thought and work into constructing their world and personality as their canon counter-parts?
Most likely the answer is "They're endorsed by Marvel", but is that all there is to it?
Again, as I already said here , I'm not saying that's the case for everyone, hell I'll go as far as to say that, based on what I saw, more than 90% of characters are just neat designs placed on top of the artist as a self insert, but at the same time, those less than 10% really do push this concept beyond that and make something original and interesting, and I think it's stupid to dismiss someone's work and dedication just cause it was made by some "rando on twitter" and cause it's based by another hero.

Edge of SG #1 was the one with Spider-Punk? If so, it was pretty good, same with Man without fear.
Never read the others.

So apparently according to the solicits, the "#SpiderSonas" featured in the comic are not only created by fans, but some of them are also created by people in the industry. Here's one created by Francesco Francavilla.

Attached: Dvb7KcMVYAADTV3.jpg (600x900, 109K)

>literally just brown Spider-Gwen with a hijab
ripoff of a ripoff

>spidersonas
kill it with fire

>It's not that it's impractical it's there's no reason for it. She's entirely covered already what's the point

I think she is doing it for fashion. Not something used for her identity.

yes, yes it sure is fashionable to make a mockery of religious traditions! *rolls eyes*

>You're saying all this about self-inserting like not all writers inject a little bit of themselves into their characters.

i'm gonna stop you right here. that's totally fine and is a way of bringing beatiful, very human stories to life and that's great. but i'm only talking about the uber-specific 'spidersona' phenomenon. i don't have anything against these creators, but 'spiderman except he's literally me and that's it' is wank in any context outside of just designing a costume for fun.

>What about characters like Miguel O'Harra? Aaron Aikman? Pavitr Prabhakar? May Reilly (Lady Spider)?

these aren't 'spidersonas'... i said as much in the post you're replying to.

i don't have anything against spidersonas dude, i think they're fun and harmless, you're making this into something it isn't. if you want to talk about fanfiction that's another discussion entirely

Alright, I think I can see where the problem in my wording stems from. Is me believing that "spidersona" is the same thing with "spider-person original character", which upon further reflection, it's not.

Spidersona is "me as a Spider-Man substitute". A "Spider-Man Persona", basically. So, yes, on that matter I do agree with you on what you previously mentioned. The twitter tag itself encompasses both previously mentioned ideas under the same "spidersona" term, so I guess that's where the confusion stemmed from. Sure, artist self inserts CAN become OCs all together, resembling the artist's IRL self loosely, but not necessarily and with varied levels of success.

With that in mind, I was previously arguing for "spider-person OC"s, which are characters that do not resemble the artist and are just what the label says "original character based off of, or around the Spider-Man mythos". Those are the 10% of interesting, original ideas I was mentioning previously, which I do believe deserve some form of recognition and should be most eligible to be a part of a project like this one.
Apologies for the confusion and hope this makes more sense.

Lasting until Venom shows up is pretty good.

Is this a spidersona thread?

Attached: Dvyku_1XgAU8YyE.jpg (1200x872, 235K)