Marvel Studios Has "Big Plans" For Galactus And Tyrant In The MCU

Blame the Russos for wasting time travel on Endgame.

He's pretty much the exact opposite of the Silver Surfer, right? Norrin rebelled too, but for entirely different and far more noble reasons. If you're going to put the Surfer in the MCU, Tyrant's not a bad contrasting figure.

Giffen later came up with another first herald so it's kind of funny that they're bringing up Tyrant again

Attached: 84213-11286-fallen-one.jpg (350x350, 97K)

He didn't have to be lonely though

Attached: Aegis-and-Tenebrous.jpg (1800x900, 260K)

It's easy tho
>OG Kang ends up in another timeline.
>Meets that timeline's Kang.
>They agree on keeping eachother in control of their timelines.
>They invade other timelines, meet other Kangs, forming the Council of Kangs.
>If a Kang dies when invading one timeline, another takes his place.

Don't do Galactus right now, just do Kang instead. It will great now that all the time travel thing has been established

So hold up.
What you're saying is that he wuz Kangz?

Well thematically they aren't real opposites, like the other user said Tyrant is basically Galactus jr. He was fully a product of the 90s and there wasn't much substance to him at all

What if Galactus is teased in GoTG Vol. 3 in the same way Thanos was teased? So that won’t be intill 2022/2023 the earliest.

Which actor could play Galactus?

Michael Cera

Paul Giamatti

Warwick Davis

Possibly, I love Galactus and Silver Surfer is a favorite but we can't do him yet. Casual audiences just won't be ready. They wouldn't appreciate Galactus as his own thing, people would just see him as Thanos 2. Casuals would see slight similarities and strip away his individuality. Kang is different enough from Thanos for movie-goers not throw a fit about. If Galactus was to come in the movies, whatever you do, don't make him an overarching villain with a "deep" motivation. Have him just be there, eating shit. He is a force of nature, a god, nobody can do shit to him. Once Kang and maybe another villain is done, then Galactus will be a villain.

Andy Serkis in MoCap

>Tyrant
Who?

Nicholas Cage

>Tyrant
Literally whom

Blame Feige. It was his idea.

Alison Brie

>If a Kang dies when invading one timeline, another takes his place.
so jojo part 7

>DUDE LETS TAKE OBSCURE AS FUCK CHARACTERS AND MAKE THEM INTO BIG CHARACTERS CUZ THATS WHAT WE DO

Other, better properties of the MCU have used time travel properly.

Doctor Strange played fast and loose with the multiverse, whereas Agents of SHIELD toyed with self-correcting time loops

Feige ruined Endgame with idiotic timeline shit with the sole purpose of referencing older films

Attached: brokenearth.png (1065x589, 377K)

Attached: 1546191219428.jpg (2048x2048, 700K)

go home ike

And that's bad why?

>Galactus
>obscure
Getting real tired of your bullshit

Yeah, they should only use b-list character like Kang.

We don't need any c-list and lower characters like GoTG, Ironman, Ego, Warlock, or Dormammu.

>agents of the not canon
lmao

He's talking about Tyrant dumbass

>CHARACTERS, plural
>Tyrant, singular

>Galactus
>C-List

ok kid

Great, another big purple enemy from space that requi a macguffin to deal with

Attached: mlUJYiKqtVoC7QxynEXE3pbFv_U=.gif (480x360, 1.26M)

Don't forget DC is doing New Gods so Darkseid is coming too!

I apologize, i did not notice the s

Keanu Reeves

Isn’t he doing Moonknight?

I was joking, but no, he's not actually doing anything, they haven't decided on a role yet. Some have been pushing for a Jewish actor in Moon Knight, so he's probably not gonna do that... Leaving to be either in Eternals or Guardians of the Galaxy as Druig or Adam Warlock.

Nobody's Moon Knight. Moon Knight is never getting a big screen appearance. Life isn't that sweet.

Kate Dennings

After the Blade announcement, which I wasnt expecting at all, I fully believe they could make a Moon Knight movie

I don't believe it

Attached: Hatchet.jpg (1024x777, 742K)

Yeah, and that time travel movie could have done some fuck shit to the time-space continuum that’s threatening Kang’s empire.

There's definitely more chance of a Nova movie at this point than Moon Knight. He should be in a Midnight Sons styled series, alongside Ghost Rider (which they're already developing anyway).

Attached: nova_and_cosmo1.png (806x789, 884K)

Or also, that time travel could've created an alternative timeline where Kang came to be, for example, the Thanos 2014 timeline. In this power vacuum, somebody from the deep future would've realized the anomaly that distinguishes his timeline from the others (the absence of a Decimation event) and seek to correct it, becoming Kang.

>Nova movie
Hahahahaha...no.

Look pal, I don't know how to tell you this, but he's coming.

Attached: richard-rider_nova1.jpg (1080x1350, 104K)

You can post that art til Doomsday (and I believe you might), but they are never going to greenlight Super-Space Cop mc Blandington.

After both of their inclusion in MUA 3, I bet Moon Knight will be a Disney+ series.

>Tyrant

Oh wow, so after a decade they finally found a character they could butcher without anyone complaining.

Gary Oldman

I'd become an asshole too if I had to wear this retainer.

We got Guardians of the Galaxy and Ant-Man movies. I don't think Nova movie is out of the picture. And no matter how bland you believe Nova to be doesn't mean he can't be made more interesting with the right script, Director and Actor.

>Nova
>bland
Dick Rider is a national treasure.

>dickrider

Agreed. I get the feeling those who think he can't be in the MCU do so because they have their own sacred cows to preserve and don't want them "tarnished" or some shit. Like I bet that guy is very into X-Men and considers them a priority.

I'd put money that they make Galactus a Celestial in the MCU

I didn't call him bland, the other user did. Infinitely better and more interesting and entertaining than Sam was. And I did like Sam.

He's not going to happen simply because they're pushing Captain Marvel

Yeah blah blah they're totally different, I fucking know. But they're both regular joe humans who got tangled in some alien shit, and now fly solo through space being a hero and shooting lasers from their hands. They've made the Kree/Skrull war foundational to Carol's movie(s). Oh, and Xandar's blown up.

If we get Nova at all, it'll be as a supporting role in either CM2 or GotG3. He's not getting a solo film and neither is Quasar who deserves it more

When is Marvel collecting the rest of Quasar's comic?

Doesn't Xandar get destroyed more times than any other planet in the MCU?

They could just asspull neo-Xander

>He's not going to happen simply because they're pushing Captain Marvel
>But they're both regular joe humans who got tangled in some alien shit
Entirely reductionist
>and now fly solo through space being a hero and shooting lasers from their hands
Mate, most cosmic heroes are "dudes/gals who fly solo and shoot lasers out of their hands". Quasar (both), Warlock, Kallark, Silver Surfer, etc etc, this isn't a deterrent.
> They've made the Kree/Skrull war foundational to Carol's movie(s)
Which had nothing to do with Nova/Rich
>Oh, and Xandar's blown up.
The very origin of Rich as Nova, BOTH times it happened, and they can repurpose the Annihilation version of it for the Thanos search of the Power Stone with a simple prequel. Boom, easy.
>If we get Nova at all, it'll be as a supporting role in either CM2 or GotG3
... And from that, a movie is easier, since there's so many they can do with him by adapting one of the many stories that came during DnA and afterwards (let alone stuff like Operation Galaxy Storm, Starblast or Cosmos in Collision, which prominently featured Quasar). Face it, you're simply not thinking big enough.
Probably not soon enough unless he gets a nod in a movie, because apparently the reprint didn't sell that well.
>289 153 Quasar Cosmos In Collision $34.99 Marvel 418
Only 418 copies in October 2018...

>Mate, most cosmic heroes are "dudes/gals who fly solo and shoot lasers out of their hands". Quasar (both), Warlock, Kallark, Silver Surfer, etc etc,
That's... exactly my point. Look at the MCU so far, every solo film focuses on a character that covers a unique niche. War Machine doesn't get his own film, because he's just Iron Man with more guns. Pym didn't get his own film, because Stark was already the "genius who builds a super suit." Lang DID get his own film, because "guy who steals a super suit" hadn't been done yet.

Audiences don't care how TECHNICALLY different the characters are, they care how SUPERFICIALLY DIFFERENT they are. And right now they're making everything that happens in space related to Carol and/or the Guardians.

Nova isn't getting a solo film for at least another 10 years. And I don't even know why it's an argument, because we already know that.

It's taken Widow 9 years to get her solo film, too, because she's just "spy chick" and they were already using Cap for their espionage thriller.

>It's taken Widow 9 years to get her solo film
That's more to do with Ike pushing back against it than a lack of interest, because her movie will be, after all, a goddamn prequel.
And anyway there's easy ways to distinguish these cosmic heroes by virtue of having different origins and motivations. War Machine doesn't get a solo because he's a goddamn Iron Man supporting character from the start, and he's literally just a soldier with the same suit as Tony, sans specific modifications. Really dumb to compare these to Nova, who has a very distinctive origin than simply "getting blasted with Space Stone fluid".

Tie his origin to the final days of the Nova corps and his arc related to some Kree/Skrull/whatever the fuck leader who assisted Thanos's destruction of Xandar.

Solo revenge/coming of age movie. Y.A. Minimal to no relation to IW other than a possible timeskip related to the Snap (not even necessary if the timeskip occurs post-movie), and like MCU Pym basically a different character to his comic counterpart with superficial commonalities.

There. Movie. Done.

I feel like you could have the Nova Corp go from a bunch of regular space cops who need weapons and space ships into people who can fly through space and shoot energy out of their hands explained as the Nova Corp was experimenting with something similar to the thing that made Captain Marvel only with the Power Stone as a power source. They create the helmets and they give the wearer the Nova Powerset. An AI regulates them and the main store of this power is run by an AI and it has universal energy network that connects the helmets to their powersource. Like wifi or The Cloud, only it gives you superpowers. Then have Thanos show up and wreck Xandar. Just have Dick be a green recruit on his first day in the Corp when Thanos attacks, the battle is going badly but Dick sees Thanos and being all cocksure and full of piss and vinegar he makes a beeline straight for Thanos. Only to get bodied by Thanos and tossed aside. Into space. Thanos gets the stone and decimates Xandar. They leave and we see Rider floating unconscious in space. Smash cut to title card.

Rider is woken up by the AI in his helmet and finds out that after Thanos destroyed the Nova Corp/Xandar and took the stone, it took all the Nova power and put it all into the only available receptacle which was Riders helmet, which explains why he goes from something more like a Captain America power level to a Thor or Captain Marvel powerlevel. Then we get a montage of him doing the Nova stuff over the next 5 years.

From this point on we just get the movie. Not really sure what else the rest of the movie could be about. I'd say Kree but I'm sure they'd save that for the Captain marvel sequel, they made the Skrulls good guys, they will save the Shi'Ar and Brood for the X-Men. So maybe the Badoon? If this is after GotG3 maybe use Magus and the Universal Church of Truth. I doubt anyone gives a fuck about Spartax. Maybe the Annihilation Wave but that feels like it would be better used in a Cosmic Team movie

Origins don't put butts in seats. Trailers do.

You know what the average normie is gonna say after they see a trailer for Nova?

"So he has the same powers as Captain Marvel?"

Again, it's a moot point. We already know what Marvel is releasing over the next 5 years, and we can be pretty confident about the next 6-8 years. Nova's not getting a solo film.

Only correct choice.

Yeah, he’s saying characterS because Tyrant wouldn’t have been the first z-list character the MCU has made into a household name. Or have you forgotten the GotG, Scott and Cassie Lang, or fuckin Thanos?

Are you seriously still thinking obscurity is any barrier to Marvel at this point? If anything, it's their biggest strength

Am I missing something or doesn't the way Russos did time travel actually make it way easier to do Kang? He can just come from another dimension's timeline

2022/23 is too soon. Galactus needs Thanos length buildup. However he also needs to show up more frequently

The Rock

I'm not kidding

morgan freeman

In theory they could retcon the Skrulls as a morally black faction that just so happened to be on the losing side of a war between two evils, with "good" outliers as shown in CM and FFH. But for the casual audience that would seem like a retcon, equivalent to a mythical Antman 3 which has Pym both young again and shot-for-shot is comic counterpart. It would create more problems than it would solve.

The Shi'Ar and the Sovereign could be interesting resurgent factions that filled the void of power after Xander's destruction and the fall of the (relative) order brought forth by the declining/diminished Asgardian rule.

(Unrelated, one thing I like in the MCU is that the humans---"Terrans"---are viewed as a pet project by the Asgardians and a backwater failed experiment by the Kree from eons past. Making Earthlings a known but otherwise unremarkable entity in the cosmic MCU going forward would be an interesting plotpoint.)

And yeah, the timeskip is good room for phase 4 origin stories to be built of Marvel Studios is smart, considering Endgame, Far From Home, and related properties aren't touching the implications of that period with a 50 foot pole.

On the unlikely event that Marvel Studios does ever choose to pursue it, why not use Phase 4.5-5 as a springboard for primarily cosmic threats, including introducing the F4 during that timeskip? Otherwise it would just seem like a bad worldbuilding choice in retrospect.

Attached: Xandar.jpg (2000x1011, 401K)

Were you trying to say this as if it was a problem?

>You know what the average normie is gonna say after they see a trailer for Nova?
"Oh boy a new Marvel movie"?

Mark my words, they'll do Kang and it'll be Tony Stark.

>Marvel would rather do Kang than the only "villain" that matters.

Attached: 1541337378356.jpg (825x558, 258K)

Kang is a disgruntled Tony Stark employee

Relax man, we'll get Doom soon. Feige would never pass an opportunity to have the optics of "actually a good Doom"

Kinda wished they didn't kill of Thanos, I would definitely loved to see a battle between him and Tyrant in the big screen.

Attached: 816d9eb4a86a3f1d0e77ddb4803c9e4c.jpg (1397x2094, 608K)

Kang is shit

>Again, it's a moot point. We already know what Marvel is releasing over the next 5 years
We actually don't, the revealed slate only covers the next 2 years. D23 is meant to cover at least one or two more years after that on Phase 5.
>You know what the average normie is gonna say after they see a trailer for Nova?
"Oh cool more space stuff"
Your response was basically what the average normie YouTuber says when they don't know shit about comics but wants to criticize them anyway, so they go after the lowest hanging fruit. It's precisely the kinda thing idiots like RLM would say to act jaded towards Marvel, then stare at the camera and say "well at least it ain't Carol *stock fart noise*", since they didn't give a fuck about her and constantly point it out the way retards here do.

because he wears white clothes?

Either Galactus is the next capstone villain or you're fucking misusing him.

people who think marvel movies will fail are not arguing in good faith. Marvel movies are insanely popular and it's been a decade of them putting literal who's into movies and making money.

>Tyrant
Ah, this brings back memories. Wonder if they'll bring in Ganymede and the spinsters? Hope they leave out that faggot Jack of Hearts if they do.

Attached: Cosmic_Powers_Vol_1_6.jpg (1073x1650, 551K)

>Gladiator
>hero

I kinda wonder would Tyrant be as popular as other marvel villains today like Thanos? They killed him off along with Galactus(which they retconned by having hid into a parallel dimension) before he could make a long-lasting impression in the comics.

Im not trying to be 60 by the time this is all over

Eh, from what I remember he was pretty lame and generic right down to the name. The story was likewise generic and tied too much to well-treaded territory. Anything's possible with a good writer though.

>he became a semi-recurring jobber villian used to make Thanos look good.
lol, Tyrant in his depowered state was thrashing Thanos powered with his stolen power orb. Thanos even admits himself if he stayed fighting, he would have lost to him.

Attached: 4356322-tyrant%20hits%20thanos%202.jpg (1392x2070, 764K)

I didn't understand what made this character "peak 90's" based on OP's picture, but now I definitely do.

The art and some of the paneling was pretty dope though.

Attached: hT9uXpL.jpg (2000x1800, 893K)

The fact that normies will forever view darkseid as a thanos clone from this point forward is infuriating. Almost as bad as dudebro thor, ironlad, and memeguardians. I wish this entire franchise would collapse already.

So possible Tyrant is gona be next big bad with Galactus as a red herring?

I feel like watching the Avengers confront Galactus without Tony and Steve just won't be as impressive as it should be.

Darkseid is

Darkseid always looked more like a Terrax clone to me. (Yes, I know Darkseid was first)

I love you Galactus but What do you expect when you call your creation Tyrant.

>Galactus rumored to be coming
>Slow thread
Is no one excited? I thought everyone wanted Galactus to be in the MCU to be properly depicted in the big screen?