Is this SFW?

Is this SFW?

Attached: cheese pizza.png (676x638, 257K)

They are blushing so obviously NSFW.

Which frogs boned and which ones merely jizzed all over the eggs?

Yikes, no. That's definitely pedophilia.

Fuck the blue board!

Attached: 1564125492310.jpg (235x223, 13K)

Please keep this on the porn boards

STOP. RAPING. CHILDREN. YOU. SICK. FUCKS.

why is this board even more retarded today than usual

Literally child porn.

Yes but it very clearly has horny energy.

>Everyone gets the joke but you
>"WHY ARE YOU ALL SO RETARDED"

Nope, child porn.

How do they fuck anyways?

but i thought the left supported pedophilia Yea Forumsros..!?

What would Anne say if she saw Sarah's cunny was filled eith warts

He can still do finger stuff.

>no using his tongue
you missed a big chance there...

That's different because they're both ladies. Gays can be pedophiles but not dirty cis.

Attached: Amphibia S01E20 - Reunion_Moment (2).jpg (1280x720, 70K)

Now we're talking about.

i like the fact some people in Twitter think that but completely unironically.

Male frogs mate by grabbing the female and squeezing her until her eggs squirt out, while simultaneously fertilizing them.

To be fair Amphibia frogs also have hair and general humanoid shape, so they might mate differently

How would she get unstuck though.

I've seen more reaction here than out of tumblr oddly enough

There, I've solved this months long controversy with 15 seconds in paint.

Attached: Censored.png (618x630, 239K)

>Months
Amphibia has only been out for a little over a month.

So a bunch of assholes started drama over this just when it came out?

No that is love, they will marry and on their honey moon Sasha will fuck him so hard that he will have a heart attack leaving her as a rich widow.
Remember she is a master planner.

This drama started just with that image. Which is maybe a couple weeks old.

No, the picture is maybe a week or two old. I'm pretty sure the artist posted it in reference to one of the season final episodes where the Toad saves Sasha. It's pretty recent.

ah, cool, didn't know this "controversy" is that young.

I still don't get the reasoning for calling this pedo content and that all animators are pervs and in general acting like a big brat over literally nothing. What was the point of treating the people, who make content that they supposedly like, like shit all across social media for everybody to see? All over that not even remotely pornographic or lewd image.

Virtue signalling. The high obtained from denouncing things as wrong is pretty dope.

Because that¡s the fashion now days user. If you don't like the color of the clothes of a character, for example, you can go to every social network and start a rant about how that is racist or promotes segregation or something and that it offends people.
Other idiots that have nothing better to do with their time like you will agree with you and start a massive rant that will draw the attention of the media who will start articles with "Is X cartoon creator a pedophile?" to gain views/readers it's a vice cycle.

People like nonsensical outrage and are able to feel justified by saying anyone who disagrees with them is regressive. Example, if you were to respond to pic related:

>Oh, you disagree with me, so what, you think all girl toys need to be pink and frilly, huh?

Even though no one is forcing girls to buy these toys, boys can get them too, and there are other versions of LEGO boxes right next to them, doesn't matter.

Attached: 2342525245.png (612x871, 555K)