This

This

Attached: Literally this.jpg (996x913, 266K)

Do these people lack any self awareness or do they want more people to hate them?

Attached: 800B58A3-F33C-4353-9D9D-268DDB7878E7.jpg (403x450, 59K)

Go to /pol/ and look at all of the alt-right posts on that board, then come back and ask that question again.

Quit deflecting and answer the question, do SJWs not realize that theyre making their hatebase grow stronger or do they just not care?

Oh just get out of here with this twitter screencap shit

But is right.
One part do it for audience, some want to shock "the enemy" and others are just egoistical narzists.

can't wait for the bald natalie portman cancer patient scene

I really want to kill these cunts evety fucking day.

Roasties mindset. Have sex.

>Superhero movies are important - that's not an opinion, it's just true

Attached: 0gL4oxd.jpg (994x745, 162K)

>One part do it for audience
Moves like this will only kill audience interest

I'm only here for Hershlag.

Attached: neta-lee_hershlag2.jpg (637x940, 77K)

Not really, if you dont want to expand your audience, than not.
They strenghten their audience and gie them what they expect.
The only problem could be that it gets stale and repetetive and that will cost youur audience.
But if you lapp at new stuff you can get angry at, it means a steady income.
Because you cant try to appeal to the other side without loosing your old audience. That only works with not polarise topics. But this could mean you competete with more influencers or get too mainstream, soft washed, that you get recognize but cant amass a following.
And its difficult if its only a trend.

>"If we make an off-brand version of Thor, they'll become the default Thor in the public consciousness"

ok.

The people cheering this or getting mad about it are either casual or outrage-grifters.

They still don't understand that legacies and off-shoots are downgrades; minor leagues to the original when it comes to the public psyche.

If Marvel wants a character to become have more notoriety than their own Thor Odinson then they have to create an non-legacy character

only an original non-legacy can surpass a non-legacy

I can't help but think about gender/race bent heroes as used goods

>Bitch the ruined Star Wars hired for the MCU

But i wont see this movie because of the feminist angle its pushing now, why do they think this is anything but box office poison after ghostbusters and sequel wars?

>Superhero movies are important
i want the nightmare world to end

They always mention white males as part of their complaint, But it's almost always the male part and not the white part that's the focus of their attention, probably because it's largely privileged white females who screech about this stuff the most.

Would excluding them give them some self-awareness? I'm not for perpetuating more exclusion, but I don't see an end to this.

Some will see it because they want to virtue signale or others will see to hate it.
But i agree that hate watcher will find a way to avoid to be counted to their success, pirate it, buy a tiket to another movie and sneak in.
But we talk about thei audience, their clicks, their donations or their income.
We didnt talk about pr or advertisement, but about them.
And for me this means hte ones writing this or their agenda peergroup.

They just parroting buzzwords or labels they made to easy name a problem.

>The retard normies actually think they will adapt the female Thor storyline and not just make her a Valkyrie and make a combo of different storylines that Ragnarok was.

Attached: 1456526162611.png (133x236, 100K)