1989

>1989
>CCA-approved comic targeted toward kids/teens
>Maddy has underboob

>2015
>comic that doesn't need to pass CCA guidelines and is targeted toward adults
>Maddy isn't allowed to have underboob

What went wrong?

Attached: goblin queen 1989 vs 2015.jpg (2181x1651, 1.7M)

Her loincloth also covers more too.

Maybe she got tired of being pinned down and titfucked

"progress"

American's got whinier and more puritanical over the dumbest shit.

What the fuck happened to Havok he looks like shit

Real adults care more about physic laws that about fanservice.

The top got more prude and the bottom got more lewd

Who care

American values.

>Teens think fan service is cool
>Adults know fan service is shit
Not that hard to grasp.

The internet came out and we no longer needed funny books to jerk off

The comic code didn't mean fuck all after the 70s. You seriously think that X Factor comic and a code approved issue of Action Comics from the 50s have the same level of mature content? You're showing your ignorance.

Why does that lady have a black spot on her eye?

It was a Secret Wars mini set during the events of Inferno. Secret Wars was pretty neat.

Why do so many people respond with this? If you jacked off to comic books that makes you more of a faggot.

I jacked off to Betty and Veronica when I was 12. You gonna make a fuss about it?

You mean Domino?

Attached: Domino-Marvel-Comics-Neena-Thurman-X-Force-f.jpg (500x748, 76K)

Liberals and their toxic shitty views

For what other reasons you need lewd imagery in a comic book?

>I dont want a visual medium to be visually stimulating

the underboob costume is bad c'mon

>I can only read funny books with a raging hard-on

Got that page on the right is ugly. What did they do to them? Inferno is my fave Xmen story.....God no....

I think you sound more sex-obsessed than

All other things being equal (which they are not) the page on the left is drawn by Walter Simonson, so the right page has already lost.

Can't we have the occasional nudity and skimpy outfits just because we all agree that it's nice to look at human bodies?

> Sexy women would "happen" to be topless in the 1970s movies for no better reason than that everyone agreed, including themselves, that their breasts were a genuine pleasure to regard -- the most beautiful naturally occurring shapes in nature, I believe. Now we see breasts only in serious films, for expressing reasons. There's been such a comeback for the strategically positioned bed sheet, you'd think we were back in the 1950s
-Roger Ebert

But now there's no lewd pin-ups in her canon costume because it isn't hot