Why does every modern comic artist draw her as some blank-faced generic redhead instead of with the dimples and cleft...

why does every modern comic artist draw her as some blank-faced generic redhead instead of with the dimples and cleft chin?

Attached: d0882a2cc9282a6f78e9ae26d327d828.jpg (640x860, 190K)

Because redheads are nasty

Because it's easier for Editorial than having established design standards.

Because artists have diffrent styles?

Man, she's ugly. But they should stick with this design.
Anything worthy happening in the new Spiderman comics?

Wasn't she based on that bye bye birdie girl?

I'm suspicious of any style that forces the artist to sacrifice detail.

"It's not that I'm unable to pull off visual complexity, it's that I don't want to!!"

Cleft chin is a predominantly male feature and dimples went out of style decades ago.

because pretty looking female characters make the feminists editors screech

Cleft chin has nothing to do with sex and is just a genetic trait.

>Marvel
>in charge of editorial standards

It's not like DC is much better at this stage. It's the NoEditorsLOL Age of Comics

well to be fair she tends to change to match whatever is in fashion during the era

Cleft chin is ugly.

>deliberate, intentional design details
>BUH UNG UNGA BUNGA MUH STOYLE

Okay retard.

mary whore AKA tony's cumdump

What does fashion have to do with facial features?

>Man, she's ugly.
Faggot detected

You're wrong and thats not an excuse.

Marvel stopped caring about consistency a long time ago. The bare minimum should be that she has high cheek bones and sharp facial features, but even that's too much of a hassle.

those things aren't elements of style, they're fucking facial features.

Because what's what she looks like.

It happens with peter. Nothing stays the same.

Attached: maxresdefault (2).jpg (1280x720, 112K)

Attached: umc5t68bo8l21.jpg (1564x1564, 303K)

Most modern comic artists didn't grow up with comics, instead found them later in life and usually after movies.
Combine this with how variable art styles became after digital became standard and you have most comic characters no longer having a single, signature set of features other than the ones that manage to stay consistent across media adaptations, basically anything that can exist simultaneously on a McDonald's toy, a Saturday morning cartoon character, and a film actor.

For a variety of reasons this is limited almost solely to hair color.

I can't tell if that top right one is William or if I'm just losing my shit

>nothing stays the same
>except for having a prominent squared brow, generally defined jawline, straight nose, arched eyebrows, brown hair, and being caucasian
>Eyes are usually always brown
>Hair is usually one of three styles
>typically fit but not too bulky
>typically has a decent chin but not a captain america sized one

Also not even getting into how extremely specific design details like chin clefts and dimples have fucking nothing to do with art style.

Coipel Peter is the qtest

Attached: spider-man.jpg (950x534, 50K)