Why?

Male nudity okay

Female nudity bad and forbidden
Why american cartoons do this?

Attached: No thanks.jpg (260x194, 9K)

One is funny, the other is cunny.

Boys can be cunny too,what if they sexually identify as girls? get with the progressive times gramps.

American cartoons exist to entertain and not necessarily to exploit sexual desire like that other form of animation does

Patriarchal and puritanical values that date back generations.

>not necessarily to exploit sexual desire like that other form of animation does
With this kind of merchandise it sure feels like they do, user.
Maybe the shota market is just bigger in the west?

Attached: Sempsens.jpg (2821x923, 715K)

Boy bends over and shows his butt: Rude, improper, misbehaving little punk.
Girl bends over and shows her butt: Basically presenting herself for doggy style sex.

Unless you're a priest, that's how general people react to gender differences in things.

That doesn't make sense! why are the boys less protected than girls when it comes to stuff like this in American media?

Because our culture has a history of believing gays are bad, women have no sexual desire, and therefore the only concern there is when it comes to sex is male on female.

>women have no sexual desire
Ha!

I didn't say it was correct, just that it's what our culture (I'm not going to say Western or North American, I'm only familiar with the US) pushed for a long time.

It was never pushed.

There's no need to lie.

Unironically the patriarchy.

We already have constant reminders from every corner of fucking everywhere that a few decades ago women were kept as housewives and ideally stayed at home to keep care of children, we don't need more shit on top of that that's stretched to be even worse than it is. Women had sexual desires and "culture" never pretended they didn't.

What the fuck is with this board and its constant women victim shit god damn.

I'm pretty sure if doesn't count either way, if they're a skeleton, but go off I guess

Attached: nude skeleton.jpg (543x543, 37K)

Easy there.

>Acknowledging history pisses you off

Talk about fucking triggered.

Billy was naked a at least once each season and Irwin was naked twice too.

Attached: 1559076067020.png (366x409, 183K)

Because amerifats are total prudefags, they cant stand the idea of sexuakized women on display for fanservice. Thats why both the neocons and feminazis both decry it for different but similar reasons.

Attached: D7CB986A-B44D-4FCF-87D1-AB827BEB5C58.jpg (511x732, 129K)

Feminists have made me think that this is true

Attached: 8FFA2B75-E994-47DE-8675-100997E8CD07.jpg (900x1400, 233K)

Keep doing that shit and it doesnt change anything except make you look more retarded. That kind of response is the worst shit you could do for your argument but everyone does it anyway because after they get a response it goes from making an argument straight to bait to get more/get them mad. What's the point of trying to say anything genuine?

Nice,We need more female butts in American cartoons.

You get female asses and hips a lot, it's the chests that are rather off limits.

Easy there, Fedora Man.

My mistake was thinking anyone on this board had the mental capacity to understand human behavior can be annoying as fuck.

man bart sure exploits my dick i tell you what

>You get female asses and hips a lot
Almost never, unless you mean clothed.

Seek help

>Unless you're a priest
Then this user is a priest?

At this point your argument has become that people can't be annoying. If you want to keep this going at least spin it around to something more believable to get annoyed about. Before that take these responses back to Yea Forums or wherever the fuck they keep originating from.

There was never an argument, it was just you freaking the fuck out because someone pointed out that something happened in the past.

The argument has been from the beginning that this board has an annoying tendency to always do this poor victim females shit. We have enough of it, and we have enough of it where it can apply even if stretched and exaggerated.

Cringe.

Sorry, meant

Nope, meant

k

Why can't I get this right? meant

Americans are Puritans since the country started. A small percentage of them aren't. These are the facts, Jack.

Attached: 1548730664028.jpg (789x475, 53K)

Sorry my mistake it was this

Buddy. . .

Attached: 1548667014426.png (1169x911, 197K)

Sad but true.

I really can't tell, I go back and forth on the amount that are keeping this shit at bay (read: nonexistent), sometimes it feels like its the majority of who is in charge and a loud group of not-in-charge people that are being pandered to, essentially making them in charge, while a lot of the average folks don't get that puritanical or whatever the term is, then other times it really does seem like there is only a select few left that doesn't have a stick up their ass about women and how they're in media.

Honestly this whole planet needs a reboot already. It's really tiring.

that also applies to posts on Yea Forums. I could post an image of a loli with her chest uncovered in a non-sexual situation and eat a 3 day ban for posting loli porn, but if I said that she is actually a shota trap absolutely nothing would happen to me.

>Boys can be cunny too
no, boys are wild and silly

Attached: 1563479528017.jpg (576x1077, 223K)

>that also applies to posts on Yea Forums
True but I'm thinking about it in a different light. We really are Tumblr, no matter how many retards have said it its still true.

>Honestly this whole planet needs a reboot already. It's really tiring.
America isn't the whole planet. From a scale of North Korea to France, there are many Goldilocks countries that aren't too hot or too cold.

it's even worse here on Yea Forums. shota threads with various degrees of lewdness can stay up for days, while loli threads usually are quickly deleted. Ironically, the opposite happens on Yea Forums where shota threads archive with two replies or are deleted by a janitor. the only exception to that point is when the shotas are traps too

Attached: 1556467733111.jpg (579x819, 397K)

Attached: shirtless.jpg (1200x1200, 166K)

You can also post naked shota butts but if you post a loli you get banned for like a week.

That's because we worship Zardoz, the true god.

You honestly don't spend a lot of time ok this board if you think that.
For fuck's sake, how many violence against women threads are there per week?

WHY ITS THIS FAGGOT BAN EVANDING AGAIN?!
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST

Attached: images (3).jpg (656x468, 25K)

I don't know how American puritanism is an argument when the majority of modern puritans come from the political wing most unlikely to comprise fans of religion.

No one worship Zardoz!

Everywhere has its own problems man.

>implying it has to be threads
There are a lot of faggots that constantly bring up shit women either think they go through, used to go through but don't anymore, or shit that doesn't even make sense.

Triggered?

Why are you like this?

That doesn't mean you have to force those problems onto generations worth of people.

It is an incredibly basic thought that the world needs to be rebooted. It doesn't take into account shit like lots of pain to destroy everyone, it is wishful thinking that with a snap of a finger things can get better. That's it. Don't read too deep into it, we can't do that shit.

Calm down.

Why do you feel the need to bump a thread to reply to an hour old post that has already turned into a chain since then?

>turned into a chair since then?
What does that even mean?

The last IQ of this board just vanished.

Because white-knighting is and has been a thing for generations. It's part of what led to our current state.

>It's part of what led to our current state.
And what a state it is.

Attached: CLOWN WORLD.jpg (1072x846, 256K)

Unironically because puritanism is burned into this country's psyche. America has an insatiable bloodlust is fine with violence and "witch hunts", but god forbid anyone have any lewd thoughts.

where can i find this?

I feel like its more the womens fault than the guys just trying to appease them. You need one for the other. We're a far cry from regular niceties, we're essentially apologizing for inhabiting the same breathing space as them because they've gotten too pampered the past decade or two.

No, this isn't all women, this is a generalizing situation.

So stupid.

not nude but a bit lewd

Attached: Untitled.png (1735x1179, 2M)

I don't wanna go full /pol/ so here's in short how it goes:
>women need their nude bodies to be special because for them it's a tool of control and a bargaining chip
>so they push for nudity in media to be shamed
>female nudity has it extra hard with them accusing any male who shows or watches it as a vile monster or a pervert
>other men wanting to stay on their good side also chime in with the chivalrous angle and protecting the female image (see putting pussy on a pedestal)
>men themselves gain nothing from nudity (partially due to our expendable nature) so male nudity is disregarded, as females have no interest in defending it either
And that's how you get to the standards we have today.

In thw Yea Forums booru.

SEX BAD
VIOLENCE GOOD

I know it's you spamfaggot
Get lost

I never understood why America is so okay with violence but afraid of tits and ass.

fuckin hell user, this is a blue board

Violence isn't free of its problems and we have a bunch of hugbox baby media for "any ages" right now. Violence is primarily pushed in action blockbusters and stuff right? That and video games which are their own thing.

"Adult cartoons" like the Simpsons have no problem with blood but they do have issues with nudity (only female nudity that is).