Whats her deal?

Why doesnt she care that her nephew is Spiderman? Or the fact that he literally died not long ago?
Is there are reason they took this approach?

Attached: 38B1121C-420A-4A67-8DD0-A72B7A71BC21.jpg (1200x600, 31K)

...

All those elements get in the way of the Wesley Crusher meets Iron Man fan movie they're trying to make

She's a skrull

Didn't she het dusted too?

That one teacher cared more about Peter than she did.

Shit writing and no respect for the source material pure and simple

Attached: 1563546408142.jpg (508x903, 58K)

>Didn't she het dusted too?
Yes. OP is a retard.

She trusts his Peter tingles, she got dusted as well and it would have been cumbersome and tiring to keep making jokes and references to Peter having to keep his identity secret from May. Next question.

>OP BTFO by trips of truth

Wait, I just realized. She talked about getting blipped back into her old apartment, and the footage of blips showed people returning to their exact spot. Imagine being the pilot/passenger on an airplane or something. Or a sailor.
Poor bastard returned only to die instantly.

That's not the question OP asked. This thread is about "why doesn't May freak out that her adopted son is risking his life constantly?"

>what do you even expect her to do about it
>secret identity shit is tiresome
>hes on a trip or fighting mysterio for 99% of the second movie

There's been threads that touched this topic. Apparently according to the writers or producers or some hobo outside the movielot that Hulk is so smart now he tailored his wish to account for things like that. If you want some real horrorshow, though, it was pointed out that some pregnant women were probably walking around when suddenly their wombs were full of dust. Or the pregnant woman dusted leaving a fetus to flop around on the hot pavement.

>Fetus
>Alive

Not anymore, user. That was the point.

What I want to know is why Peter was attracted to MJ? I understand her being curious about whether he was Spider-man, but for the most she’s rude and snarky and has no friends.

He was making a joke referring to the pro-abortion stance that fetuses aren't 'alive' until the third trimester

She is progressive

I mean the opposite would also have to have happened if they were alive in the MCU. With mothers turning to dust and the fetus just falling out.

Not really. Nobody argues that a fetus isn't living tissue. After all, if it were dead tissue there wouldn't be a reason for debate.

>why doesn't May freak out that her adopted son is risking his life constantly

Comics, movies and vidya have proved time after time that May can handle the knowledge that Peter is Spider-Man. Peter keeps it a secret because he thinks she can't handle it, but every fucking Spider-Man media ever always proves that he's wrong and that he underestimates May. Why do retards act as if this was a MCU-only thing? Do you shitposters have ever came into contact with any other kind of Spider-Man media at all?

Attached: 1522244198579.jpg (323x343, 12K)

But surely she's now aware of just how easily his lifestyle could get him killed, its been a while since i watched ffh but I don't remember her once showing a shred of concern for his safety. Infacts she actively encouraged him

Because he’s Spider-Man.

Theres no way in fuck silver or bronze age May wouldn't have a damn heart attack of worry. Nobody with taste gives a fuck about what Marvel did in the 90s

>it would have been cumbersome and tiring to keep making jokes and references to Peter having to keep his identity secret from May

While i'm not keen on her knowing his identity so early on that's not my issue, Im wondering why she doesn't care.
Even iron man with his infinite wealth and knowledge has people that care about his safety and recognise his mortality. That guy is a 40+year old genius and as the characters keep reminding me, Peter is "just a kid" so is in even more danger

She larbs what he does.

I guess becuase she clearly likes him so he's taking whatever he can get now liz is gone

That's an old argument. It was "untill they take their first breath" as of a couple years ago and now they're legit pushing for "until the parents deem it so".

Her nephew is Spider-man in a universe where superheroes are celebrities. Him being Spider-man got him that sweet Tony Stark backscratching.

Well, the bible starts counting at age three, so no help there.

A fetus wouldn't have been dusted in the first place. It's not a person. Thanos only killed sapient beings, not all living tissue. Otherwise the resources would've been halved along with the population, defeating the purpose. Fetuses are not individuals, not people, and certainly not sapient. They are organs of a pregnant woman.

You are legit a fucking moron.

>Why do retards act as if this was a MCU-only thing?

The secret to Spider-Man threads is that most people on Yea Forums don't read comics at all and only know the character from the cartoons or other movies or maybe there's a few old neckbeards around who stopped reading during the Clone Saga. Both May finding out his secret identity and Pete having an apprentice relationship to Tony Stark and joining the Avengers at his invitation happen during the JMS run.

I agree that May would eventually accept that Peter is Spider-man but it's odd that she seems to almost instantly accept it and never once seems concerned over his safety. I suppose thats the consequence of making the identity reveal a last second gag

I predict that we will eventually come to the conclusion that abortion should be allowed until age 3 or 4. Age 5 is when a human person actually emerges from the shell of meat. Before that, they are essentially pets and should be treated no different than pets.

You know what else happened during the JMS run? One more day.

You can already give up custody of your child and get them adopted by someone else.

That would depend on how Thanos feels about personhood at conception more than anything else. Given that every fetus represents yet another greedy, hungry mouth to feed it's entirely likely he'd dust the little shits along with everyone else. He wouldn't give a shit, they'd be collateral damage either way.

I doubt he would consider them separately from the mothers. He certainly wouldn't have qualms about killing them, but there's no reason to believe he would specifically single them out, especially since they don't consume any extra resources until born (unless the mom is one of those "I'm eating for two" people). Besides, Thanos doesn't actually care about resources. He is fully aware that the same crisis would be happening just a few decades later. If the Earth's population was halved, it would be at the same level it was in the 1970s. Ecologically, it's really not any kind of sustainable solution, not even a little bit. Thanos just wanted to make his mark. He wanted to feel powerful in a universe that made him feel powerless.

Really? I think that's exactly what he'd do. To him it isn't a matter of biology, rather he has a philosophy of the end results. He thinks as a consequence of living people are wasteful and self-destructive. Thus every child, regardless of the stage of development, is another greedy mouth to feed. I have zero doubts he had his troops gun down pregnant women and even children, just as toddlers were assuredly not spared from the snappening. Just because he has a moment with young Gamora doesn't change that. We saw what he turned his daughters into, after all.

I find it strange how that's played for a gag in the first place. MCU films have always been inconsistent on the mental consequences, but don't you think May should have been more empathetic to Peter's desire to relax given everything?
I understand she can handle him being Spidey, but why'd she essentially force him?

>since they don't consume any extra resources until born (unless the mom is one of those "I'm eating for two" people).
where do you think the mass for a baby comes from, and the energy it takes to stitch it together?

MCU heroes by and large haven't had secret identities.

The concept is counter-intuitive yes, but you should really look things up for yourself before posting. It would save you a lot of time.

kek
finish high school please

I think it might be that they just dont care. They have a list of things they want to do with these films and making aunt May a sane character is not one of them.
Everyone knows the mcu has issues with humour anyway, they can rarely go 2 scenes without a quip which often spoils whatever impact the scene might have had

ebin

So we can all agree abortion is an acceptable form of eugenics and a necessary evil but those who celebrate it are sick

she died too, dumbfuck

I could have fucking sworn it was stated after IW that May survived the snap. Am I imagining things?

There is nothing wrong with abortion and the overwrought hysterics surrounding it is very strange.

I think youre imaging things, that would imply she lived 5 years knowing peter was dead and is now pushing him to do it again

No, it was retconned to fit the movie.
I think it was an AMA or something.

Hulk's ability to not cause any death in his rampages was retconned as a sort of super math that allowed him to avoid casualties by subconsciously avoiding doing anything that'd kill anyone in his way or through his actions. Plus snapping isn't a split second thing, Banner Hulk saying he tried to save Nat implies he was able to have some time to reason as to how the dead and the Blipped should return, as well as apparently paying people's cell phone plans.

Its a bit weird to think that Peter and May were effectively homeless even if that stark money probably got them on their feet quick.

Peter apparently takes Ben's suitcase to Europe, though given the circumstances its a bit weird; did the couple who bought their old home just keep their stuff and just give it back to them? Maybe people just kept old owners belongings as a makeshift memorial or superstition? Realistically they would've just thrown them out but the whole Blip thing does have a lot of lasting cultural implications on this world that'll probably be glossed over as it happened in this movie.

Attached: xc1nm.jpg (2160x1080, 181K)

That's dumb, it would be more interesting for May to have survived. It's annoyingly convenient how every single even somewhat important Spiderman character got snapped.

She got dusted, but it pains me how much could have been fixed by not doing that with her and some of the supporting cast.

They could've aged her up a bit and make her more apprehensive towards peter being spider-man, because she already lost him once.

They could've fixed Flash very easily, maybe his parents got dusted and he had to grow up all of the sudden. MAybe he joined the military to be a hero like spider-man.

Maybe Ned now resents peter for leaving him alone o for not stopping the whole thing, teasing that he might turn bad later on.

Maybe MJ is the only one that got dusted from the circle of friends along with Peter and that's what drives them together.

They could have done so many things, but instead they went for the laziest fucking option

I was blown away at 100% of Peter's supporting cast having been dusted along with him. Not using it to change the dynamic between him and another character was a huge wasted opportunity.

What if someone got dusted on the toilet, and then gets brought back when someone is using that toilet?

Attached: b5b717574d0d6250181c18aadd89fbe0b3c7bf3a_hq.jpg (989x1024, 73K)

They took the easy way out, made a joke out of it and people just ate it up.

>Durp

The post.

Not really. 50% of people, this sort of thing would happen millions and millions of times. It’s not actually unlikely at all. It’s in fact, just as likely. I’m more concerned about May not being effected by Peter being in mortal danger all the time. But they have plenty of time to address that still.

And the JMS nostalgiafags on Yea Forums are the reason why Spidey threads suck.

How is that the easy way out? You really expect or want a Spiderman movie to dwell on something that will have various long term repercussions?

Maybe the annoying part is the five year gap in the first place that had no plot reason to exist? Literally just happened to give Iron Man a daughter for no reason

Nostalgia? JMS run was not that long ago....

Let me spell it out for you then, 90s cartoon, then Raimi movie, then JMS. That's what the current 20-somethings know Spider-man from. It's what they grew up with.
But since I'm not a massive faggot, after we came home from the Raimi movie I broke into my dad's stash of 70s & 80s Spider-man comics. That's why I have better taste than this shit board.

>your brain on leftism and polturdism

I really really wanna see Marisa Tomei molest Tom Holland.

Yeah you're right, the timeskip really didn't need to happen.

>did the couple who bought their old home just keep their stuff and just give it back to them?
Maybe they kept the useful things. Like a nice suitcase.

>the timeskip really didn't need to happen
Aside from inspiring the means to getting some new infinity stones and defeating Thanos.

You're not allowed to kill your pets willynilly.

And in JMS's run May freaked out and told Peter she'd celebrate the day he decides to quit, and Peter got disillusioned in Stark and everything he represented in 5 issues. JMS' run also didn't muddle his origin story with avengers fanboism and having a military industrialist sugar daddy at the age of 15.

If you shills actually read the comics yourself, you'd know why bringing JMS up to defend MCU dumpster fire is not a valid.