A Yea Forums related problem that has been bothering me and I need to address

Why have western cartoons become more "PRUDE" in recent years? Many current animator and television networks claim to be progressive all the damm time,but aside from promoting homosexuality (Haha) Why the censorship has become more strict in current cartoons? Most female characters are either rectangles without curves and noodle limbs or covered as much as possible even when wearing a swimsuit, and that's not all even "adult" cartoons like FG or the Simpsons are being censored going from removing an entire episode from TV, official streaming sites and future home releases in the Simpsons case to deleting jew and gay Jokes during reruns of the old episodes in FG case, my question is why a country that CLAIM (really hard) to be Progressive acts in such a regressive way removing any kind of free speech as if this was some kind of dictatorship?

Attached: Raven crying.jpg (2000x2954, 541K)

Other urls found in this thread:

desuarchive.org/co/thread/108688705/#108689334
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Groups reacted to things the didn't like by boycotting products. Creators over-adjusted to it by assuming that doing the opposite would sell product.

That sucks.

Because one of the ways that gays, lesbians, etc got social traction was by disassociating with sex itself.

But user, is a well know fact that gays think about nothing but sex all the time.

Anti sex feminists. Aka fat mad uggo women.

So most female cartoonists then.

These are some of the longest run on sentences I've ever read in my life. Please learn how to use periods.

Once you fix western animation.

desuarchive.org/co/thread/108688705/#108689334

Why are you allowed to spam Amphibia pics on every thread but get upset once people disagree with you to the point of mass reporting?

Far left SJWs infesting the entertainment industry. Progressives are really contrarians by nature, so they simply rationalize doing the opposite of whatever is considered the norm. When popular culture was more prudish they were all about burning bras and dressing slutty because it wasn't considered socially acceptable. Now that it is considered socially acceptable to practically nothing in public they advocate for being prudes because you're not supposed to LIKE it, you're supposed to hate it.

That's why they love burqas so much, they think Islam is an oppressed religion and the burqa was created by Muslim women trying to out-modest each other. They're so big on homosexuality and transsexuality because they contradict norms on a fundamental, biological level.They see boundaries of any sort as a form of oppression to counter, which is why they hate the idea of borders between countries. They do nothing but destroy.

It not only applies to their shitty hair styles, piercings and choice of clothing, but their ideology bleeds into everything they touch, including comics and cartoons. If you find the female character design appealing, then they see it as something that needs to be fixed. The idea of good design is just another form of oppression, nothing is real and everything is open to interpretation.

Attached: Straight Male Being Oppressive.jpg (505x730, 77K)

"Progressive" and "conservative" don't mean anything

Time is a flat circle

So you're saying the world never changes that it only turns?

Go sit outside Nick or CN's offices and immolate yourself. That'll teach them!

No non no, that's straight guys.

>Far left
Ya killin me heah.

Time isn't a circle. That idea came from primitive cultures who's understanding of time came from observing things like the moon and seasons and thought entirely in those terms, assuming that on an even greater scale time would be even more cyclical. But the movement of the moon and earth through space isn't time, it's a way of measuring time. Time can also measured linearly with no repetition, but every circular form of measurement has an eventual beginning and an end, the moon was created and will eventually be destroyed. Not to say that time itself has a beginning or end, just the measurements.

Trends repeat across history, but history never repeats identically, if anything time is a helix or spiral.

Am I the only one who thinks these people are somehow Slaaneshi cultists?

That would be too cool to be true. They're just retarded.

There is sex-positive feminism and sex-negative feminism.

For some time, sex-positive feminism had a good foothold, basically saying "women have a right to use the sexual power their youthful and attractive bodies endow to them to manipulate men".

But as the powerful voices in feminism became increasingly fat and lumpy and old and ugly, and intersectional politics came about which increasingly holds the view that "in any relationship, the person with the most power is dominant, which is oppressive!", a paradigm shift happened. Men apparently have all the power in society, so to appeal to the desires of men is to actually be subservient to their dominent, oppressive power.

It doesn't matter if women are willingly doing this themselves, that's internalised patriarchy! So models and boothbabes and trackgirls all lost their jobs for the good of feminism. The idea of "visual appeal" and "sexual appeal" have become conflated, and so now all fictional female characters must not only be desexualised, but even be made just ugly.

There's also a side effect that "ugly = good" facilitates the careers of second-rate artists who actually don't have the talent to create appealing characters in the first place.

Attached: wonderwoman.jpg (1280x720, 98K)

Life is so much simpler when your only idealogy is don't be an asshole. Because holy shit none of this makes sense.

>trackgirls
*grid girls
it was on the tip of my tongue. Although I prefer what they call it in Japan, "race queen".

Attached: CRLemLvVAAAdkUc.jpg (2481x3513, 360K)

Because western society is a bad joke and only the retards are laughing

>Why the censorship has become more strict in current cartoons? Most female characters are either rectangles without curves and noodle limbs

What I find to be a larger issue is how many people are actually INTO these geometric abominations, those chicks from Adventure Time, for example, have a shit load of porn despite being about as sexually appealing as a stick figure.

Attached: seriosulybro.jpg (512x384, 13K)

Well regarding AT specifically in much/most of the porn they are given more realistic proportions. I think people find the characters as a whole attractive, not always exactly how they look on screen in the show. That said there is a ton of show accurate r34 and that I agree with you, don't know how people are into that.

That happens with practically every kids' cartoon, it just comes from wanting to taint something apparently wholesome and innocent, it's less to do with how the characters literally look, and more within the imagination of the person doing the tainting.

Attached: 1406833451809.jpg (640x800, 225K)

I don't really buy that as the case. For one it's more thought than I think people are putting in and what's more, and this isn't really directed at AT anymore, but a lot of these modern waifus, just aren't attractive. Even with the "improvements" fanart can bring I really don't know how anyone can look at SU shit or OK KO and think "Yeah, that's hot"

Then why America uses those words so much? is it a buzzword like freedom and talent?

That's also why Space Ghost was taken off the air, and also why when it was brought back it was more Scooby-Doo ish

>For one it's more thought than I think people are putting in
I don't think people are consciously intellectualising about it as they're doing it, lol
>a lot of these modern waifus, just aren't attractive.
People are just working with what they're given, people crave new things even if they're not great, like, I could make a Regular Show thread today and I doubt it'll get much traction. Regular Show was never spectacular, it was just on.
>Even with the "improvements" fanart can bring I really don't know how anyone can look at SU shit or OK KO and think "Yeah, that's hot"
how is this an argument against what I've said? The initial appeal is less about the canon design of the character than what can be done to it, and what any given artist does to it is down to their personal taste. So for example, I'm not a fan of massive tits, nor hokey porn dialogue, so if an artist gives a usually flat cartoon character massive tits, and has her saying "mmm yeah, you like that don't you?" I'll never be saying "oh, I see it now, this character is hot" as a response. The broad process of just sexualising the character is where the appeal is, rather than the details of it.

>I really don't know how anyone can look at SU shit or OK KO and think "Yeah, that's hot"
I don't know, the hip-to-waist ratio on Enid is pretty great.

Attached: Tumblr_or6w3lKBe31qer4obo1_1280.png (1280x1811, 1.25M)

this. first wave feminism vs modern feminism. any sex appeal is oppressive and has to be removed.

>There's also a side effect that "ugly = good"
I hate that shit.

>There's also a side effect that "ugly = good"
That would explain the whole stint of Captain Marvel having man shoulders and no chest in the comics for a while before Brie Larson showed up. Thankfully I think that's over now that everyone seems to associate the character with an actual human.

Attached: cap.jpg (1280x720, 151K)

Her legs are literally tree trunks this is terrible.

>how is this an argument against what I've said?

It really wasn't. Not a real one anyways. I just question how people can get into these characters sexually to the point where we even make sexy fan art is all.

>That Captain Marvel.
Gross.

I'm convinced people don't really find the designs sexual initially. They just like the basic archetypes and traits of a character or what they represent in the series. They also might be attracted to the kind of relationship type that character represents (all those people into the 'older sister' type for example) or are fans of the voice actor. The actual sexual stuff they have to invent for the character themselves, like
shows.

>shows.
Shows what?

It's a cycle. It's only a matter of time before the narrative flip flops and they realize making female heroes overly block and masculine gives the impression that a woman must become more like a man in order to be powerful and tough.

The difference between sex-positive feminism and sex-negative feminism is who have this moral right, all women or only precious dear me. Obviously it's the consequence of victorious allies getting rid of each other now that they don't need each other to achieve their goals.

>yfw they start doing male characters more feminine to counterbalance it
Is the era of trap incoming?

look around you

We are currently on said era.

We are entering Tranny Yuga.

>entering

Time is space hence space-time, and space is finite but is seemingly but not effectively infinity expending into what is probably a proxy dimension that lacks, or is sometimes theorized to lack, time but not space (hence proxy, and as to why it can expand at all), and as such if you could manage to get outside of our space into "proxy space" you'd effectively get out of time until it literally catches up with you. In some theories, anyways. S C I E N C E.

Attached: most hate.jpg (3300x2538, 630K)

Cringe.