What an incel!

t. Hal

I too got recommended that video, user. I wonder how the youtube algorithm works. How can so many people get the same video despite (presumably) wildly different search history? I barely look up Yea Forums stuff, I just use youtube to watch fighting game tournaments.

>Metro Man took the MGTOW pill
so this is why there have been threads about Megamind popping up here and on Yea Forums

a movie with two incels perhaps?

Wasn't the main girl showing signs of attraction and was basically put off by his boring personality?

OP doesn't know what an incel is

Usually when you see something trending across all boards out of nowhere, it's because the youtube algorithm decided everyone should see it.

How much you wanna bet he uses Yea Forums daily.

There is literally nothing wrong being an incel

That part was pure virtue signaling and everyone knows it. Oh wow, you hate parasites how believe everything should be handed to them. How progressive. Here's the trophy you get for not being a piece of shit and for grandstanding.

Good movie.

>5:20
Bonus points for police bashing

>incel

Attached: 7ECEF7A6-17B2-4700-8604-4C4C8FB997F1.png (227x228, 91K)

Their job is actually pretty fucking taxing and dangerous. They see a lot of shit and experienced cops have stories. Any dumbass who tries to pull something on them deserves to get fucking shot.

Except none of them make it past 30 and they will more likely turn gay than have a woman ever hold them.

to be fair he's not wrong

if only he didn't have an agenda

Police suck, though, and people who deny that are the kind of people who sell their neighbors to the Stasi. Don't be a bootlicker, user.

Megamind is a pretty good movie actually.

This. Cops serve no purpose I can't serve with my own concealed weapon.

I feel like I'm the only person that watched Megamind in that year but not even bothered about Despicable me

Although i'm not a fan of cops they still do things like solve crimes and bring criminals to jail

You mean they kill and arrest black people for imaginary crimes like raping women (impossible, women consent by choosing to be women) and smoking weed (doesn't harm anyone)?
Fuck cops. They're fascists and so are you.

Attached: Malcolm X.png (2020x2540, 2.59M)

>gets assassinated by the very same group he made

Attached: War on drugs.jpg (720x960, 74K)

>you hate parasites how believe everything should be

Attached: 1549254617371.png (700x700, 50K)

who*

>black panther leader
>was in fact a rapist
>people protected him from the police
>continued to rape people
>fuck cops
This is why nothing ever gets better

Taxes suck, but we still need them. Needing police doesn't mean they don't suck.

>Implying it's a race thing
>Implying the just aren't plain incompetent
Remember that video of the FBI brutally shooting a crying white man to death because he accidentally tripped?

Or that cop that demanded that white guy to cut of his dogs head right in front of him because he thought it had rabies?

>Needing police doesn't mean they don't suck.
What we NEED is ACCOUNTABILITY. The cops we have right now are bumbling buffoons who beat their wives and protect each other because of the good old boy's club. The police have zero accountability and that's why they're shit. The amount of horrible things cops get away with is pure insanity. Obviously we need cops, obviously good cops are great and an asset to their communities, but the police refuse to get rid of their bad apples and that's a systemic problem that the people in power refuse to fix.

Cops refuse to get rid of the bad cops -> people keep seeing bad cops get away with it -> people resent and distrust the police -> police say "This is why are we're trigger-happy violent sociopaths, because civilians all hate us and we don't know why"

All this "Cops good / cops bad" shit has to stop, bad cops are bad and there are too many bad cops and nobody's doing shit about it. Every other argument or discussion is a distraction you fucking mongoloids.

Attached: spongebogb.jpg (678x678, 82K)

A magically incarcerated male in a rape buffet called capitalism's end.

>Hal Jordan
>John Stewart
>Hal Stewart

wait a second...

>see this video pop up about how good Megamind is
>few hundred thousand views
>feel good knowing that people will be able to appreciate Megamind and now maybe people will make threads about it
>watch the video
>guy starts talking about how one of the characters is an incel
well at least now there are threads about Megamind

those poor oppressed incels, in such need of Social Justice

Megamind sequel, Y/N?

what's wrong with him saying he's an incel? is he not right?

>Man states a fact about the movie

Titan is the poster-child for involuntary celibacy

I thought this design was pretty cute for a guy. Like a nerdy but hot librarian.

Yeah I wonder why

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 61K)

It's the way he does it, man.

He is correct but I wish he would have been more subtle about it
right when the guy started talking about incels I knew that any discussion on Megamind was going to be "INCEL INCEL INCEL"

Bootlicker

Attached: a67.gif (417x219, 1.85M)

>aw sweet a Megamind thread! I loved that movi-

Attached: 3AF49788-A4FD-4E6B-80D0-6EADFE208B73.gif (236x265, 383K)

I wonder if that was on purpose.

this, he puts it on him self its just unfortunate what he is going through.

>A friend of mine quit after 10 years of bullshit out in the streets and in the force
It was around the time the neighborhood started going to shit, as well.

Attached: 1554476465033.png (1912x792, 1.02M)

>Join extremist group
>Leave extremist group
>Get killed by extremist group
Malcolm X, teaching us even in death.

Attached: wackity shmackity doo.jpg (229x250, 9K)

This is probably the best deconstruction movie of capes I have ever seen. It really balances the protagonist and antagonist as people who understand the concept they deal with people who don't. Megamind understanding of what a super hero is, and general faith that fate will pick him another hero, leads to the creation of Tighten (who did a lot better then Bright burn)

Metro man Superman powers of God on one human showed us how much pressure of hero has with generally no rewards they actually get.

Along with Roxanne Rictchy as Lois Lane constant need for validation only to find it in the person constantly kidnapping her Megamind. Is honestly the Best Pack meets Superman vs Lex Luthor.

>smoking weed doesn't harm anyone
underage detected

Attached: 1547357340162.gif (680x384, 1.61M)

>Usually when you see something trending across all boards out of nowhere, it's because the youtube algorithm decided everyone should see it.
I thought its because megamind ia showing on hbo right now

Bernard did nothing wrong.

pretty sure is because of this faggot, just like the Nox threads because of Plague of Gripe video
youtube.com/watch?v=c-2Tjm2M2cg

Attached: RIGHT FOOT RED.jpg (1024x597, 60K)

Put your hands up. Get on the ground and crawl towards me. I SAID KEEP YOUR HANDS UP!

Incels are just mad because he calls out incels

>"You can't criticize the police"

"Society teaches men that they're entitled to women"
If anything isn't it the complete opposite? Men are always taught that they have to "prove" themselves to females while women are taught that they deserve to be treated like a princess no matter what.

I WAS RAPED

>it's a forced QTE that insta-kills you if you get one thing wrong
shit game design

That's what you think because you're an incel, meanwhile in reality every movie ever made has the guy get the girl in the end, every song is a guy bragging about how girls want him and you fry your brain with porn every night where guys can fuck any girl on command.

This is why America will rrmain degenerate. They base people's worth on sex, and everything revolves around sex to them. Sex, sex, sex. Having sex makes you a good person, makes you a good member of society. It's insane. In my country being chaste until marriage is a virtue. No one will say it out loud but sleeping around is heavily frowned upon.

well, involuntary celibate? Yes, no need to make fun of him. Blaming it on women? no. That's what this guy do.

>in reality
>porn, movies, songs
Excuse me what the fuck

>I too got recommended that video, user. I wonder how the youtube algorithm works
Well enough, I'd say, it's actually a good video.

>That part was pure virtue signaling and everyone knows it.
No, it wasn't. calling a cat a cat is not virtue signaling. I mean, fuck, when a full group of people who blame women for being single self-refer as incel, you can't really blame him for using the word according to their definition.

>you hate parasites how believe everything should be handed to them.
She has a job, user.

Sounds like you spend too much time consuming media you absolute faggot retard. Go outside for once.

It was a good review. what is the issue?

Jews want us to revisit an underappreciated Dreamworks movie?

JEws are the chosen people. they are literally the manifestation of GOD. They are GOD. It means that everything that happens in this world, in this universe, every events, from a star exploding to a cell replicating, is the result of their collective will. They are the will of god.

So, yes, they are behind that too.

>Pretty good video about an extremely underrated movie
>Say 1 thing about cops and how tighten is an incel, which is true
>The cop thing was like 2 seconds
>The tighten part was a regular character analysis more about how he's a dickhead than anything
>All discussion is MUH BUZZWORDS COPS COPS COPS INCEL INCEL INCEL

Attached: 07d2e9e08a7c4789a538fcecc3e29f33.jpg (556x418, 31K)

Hmm I don't think sleeping around is seen as virtuous in the US either. It's more about excluding virgins because from their inability to have sex follows an inability to form relationships and connect with other people, which in itself is associated with being repulsive and undesirable.
Hits all the bullet points of making someone a social outcast.

And every movie ever made has the guy bust his ass off, jumping through hoops to get the girl.

Never once have we seen a movie where the Girl has to go through tons of effort to get the guy.

I'd like his videos more if they didn't end with a generic spiel about his personal life

Attached: 1563214383435.jpg (462x625, 69K)

Does Little Mermaid count?

Does Hal really fit the definition of incel? I thought incels want to get laid no matter and can't; after that they tend to project their dejection on the entire female sex or a considerable part of it. Hal's only obsessed with a single woman; I think calling him a "stalker" is much more appropriate than "incel".

>Shallow two dimensionsal review of a movie with opinions everyone already has
>pepper in your naive ideas about cops and use buzzwords like Incel
>Get angry when people point out his shallow opinions and naive theories are retarded

Here's a hint, if someone uses the term Incel, they're probably a sheltered middle class fuckwit who's best attempt at a sexual life was having someone tolerate their pathetic humping for 2 seconds once every month.

There is a reason despite the world being more sexually liberated that people are having sex less.

He did fall in love with her right from the start, and the more sound of her voice was enough to decide he wanted her. She did struggle, but only because of very specific conditions.

Sort of, but Ariel pretty much ends up being a femcel due to her inability to just talk with the man she loves.

You know, because I am 99% sure everyone wants to fuck a Mermaid.

Eric was rich and handsome and had the advantage of being the first one Ariel meet.

Ariel didn't struggle getting the Prince at all, she just complicated it with her own naive stupidity.

A Key that opens many locks is a Master Key.

A lock opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

Boy it sure is Yea Forumstumblr in here

Those other dorks are wrong, this is a good review!

>>Shallow two dimensionsal review
no
>>pepper in your naive ideas about cops and use buzzwords like Incel
Didn't do that and incel is how the group chose, themselves, to call themselves
>>Get angry when people point out his shallow opinions and naive theories are retarded
Well, there weren't any, so not really.

>Here's a hint, if someone uses the term Incel, they're probably a sheltered middle class fuckwit
Incels are the one who use that word. they created it to refer to themselves.

I know he's supposed to be ugly but his face genuinely detracts from the movie a bit for me.

Good for them, I guess?

Everybody except the fishbowl was ugly in the movie.

>I know he's supposed to be ugly
I don't think that's the case.

Malcolm X wasn’t in the black panthers and he never raped anyone. The black panthers literally weren’t a thing yet while he was alive.

It’s forced QTE that’s impossible to do right. Like really, the police were too pussy to handle a guy that’s crying and begging for his life without shooting the guy?

Really? I thought it was supposed to show that even with super powers he couldn't change his old ugly self.
Still didn't like seeing him emote though.

>Or that cop that demanded that white guy to cut of his dogs head right in front of him because he thought it had rabies?
Wait what

I don't really consider him Ugly. I mean, once fit, he could have easily picked up a few shallow chiks with no issue, if he was about to act suave enough.

So you're arguing a very specific group of people used a self referencing term and now that's carte Blanche to apply it sporadically to people with vaguely similar situations?

It's a naive and sheltered worldview that shows a complete lack of nuance. Titan was an obvious stalker with all the typical hallmarks of the socially maladjusted stalker that have been down in movies for decades, yet some wispy middle class baboon on youtube thinks Dreamworks was the first people to apply this to a movie.

Incel is a very specific word, Involuntary celebate. Titan probably could have hooked up with some dumpy girl and been happy, but his stalker obsession with one girl overlooked everything else.

In short, brainlets pretending to have knowledge and wisdom are the reason the world today is full of shit.

He didn’t show any interest in being with women and when he found one he wanted to be romantic with, he got her. Not an intel. He was more asexual.

>So you're arguing a very specific group of people used a self referencing term and now that's carte Blanche to apply it sporadically to people with vaguely similar situations?
No, it's okay to apply that word to people who fit in that group perfectly.

>yet some wispy middle class baboon on youtube thinks Dreamworks was the first people to apply this to a movie.
He didn't says that.

>Incel is a very specific word, Involuntary celebate.
Created by a group who blame the woman for not falling in love with them and consider they are owned the girl.

>Titan probably could have hooked up with some dumpy girl and been happy, but his stalker obsession with one girl overlooked everything else.
Irelevant, the issue is thathe consider he is owned the love of that journalist, which is the exact mindset of the group who refer to themselves as incels.

It's spelled Tighten.

>Who fit the group perfectly.

That's ironic, because the criteria for Incel and the group who called themselves that were first formed about figuring out what they were doing wrong and how to improve.
But it's okay, a first world crusader like yourself co-opted the term to use as a slur to blurr the lines between confused and emotionally vunurable men and boys and creepy entitled stalkers and sociopaths.
Unironically proving their worldview right because if you're able to paint every single "incel" with the same brush, then they're fine with calling every women a slut.

You don't quite get it do you? Generalisations help nothing, especially when you make the label as vague and far-reaching as possible. Your desperate attempt to win some kind of political war with men has proven their argument for them. If Incel is accurate for Titan and for all the "nice guy" sociopaths then "Slut" fits every single woman ever.

Thats untrue though and the idea that all Incels are sociopathic nice guys is spread by people like you who don't understand semantics due to having zero abilties of introspection.

>Titan
It's spelled Tighten.

>women consent by choosing to be women
hm yes he was being serious

Does it matter at all?

Attached: tgs12.png (895x661, 615K)

He was a Muslim.

People who unironically use the term incel are embarrassing to acknowledge or associate with. They're like white Americans on Twitter who reply to other peoples' tweets about capitalism being the problem, or identifying as marxist/communist/marxist-communist. Or people who use internet memes and lingo in real life. They should be publicly humiliated.

Ultimately; they're sheltered people unable to deal with complex social issues and have a distinct need to catagorise everything into neat little boxes.

It's why the LGBT+ movement is a big self defeating hydra.

Lesbian and gay are both Homosexual.
Bisexual is a spectrum of tastes.
Transexualism isn't base in sexuality but physicality.

Yet for some reason we're having an Alphabet soup form because people are unable to cope without distinct labels due to a lack of depth in their life.

It's also why LGBT people deep into the LGBT agenda are some of the most soulless and boring people ever.

Yet the most spread idea among them is that the woman is to blame and that they are owned love.
>d the idea that all Incels are sociopathic nice guys
No, the idea is that they blame the woman and consider they are owned to be loved.

Not what Incels were first concived of; You're applying a label to groups that are simply not related.

You're generalising for the sake of creating a slur. All this argument does is prove them right.

If these kinds of men are Incels, all women are whores.

>They're like white Americans on Twitter who reply to other peoples' tweets about capitalism being the problem, or identifying as marxist/communist/marxist-communist
Not really, people who call themselves incel don't really behave this way.

>Not what Incels were first concived of; You're applying a label to groups that are simply not related.
no. I am applying an attitude featured by people who refer to themselves as incels.

>If these kinds of men are Incels, all women are whores.
There is no logical connection, there. at all. the way people who self-refer as incels act get to be called out does not cause to define how all women act.

People who refer to themselves as incels because people like you force that lavel onto others.

Generalising terms to the point of redundancy is the logical connection, a vague idea of sexual fustration somehow coming to mean the term "incel" is the same level of logic as a level of sexual gatekeeping as "Whores"

But if you want a complex social-political answer; Incels are on the rise due a greatly inflated egotism among women. So ironically, it is women who are at fault for Incels and the idea of "Being owed sex" is completely moot when young men today are spurred for absolutely paltry reasons anyway.

To add, this has also led to a majority of women unable to find lasting relationships, especially as women get older.

>what they were doing wrong and how to improve.
While I agree that the term was co-opted into something verging on bullying at this point (which really isn't helping the situation), when it was still just a self proclaimed title I don't think those people were really interested in self improvement. They were just sharing their sorrows and generally reflecting the same negative attitudes back to each other until it became a community dedicated to villainizing the world outside of their own kind, and wallowing in self pity.

There are several assumptions in your post, user
>people are only virgins because they can't have sex, not out of choice
>inability to form romantic relationships means inability to form relationships in general
>being unable to form relationships means you're ugly and repulsive, or vice versa

>People who refer to themselves as incels because people like you force that lavel onto others.
Uh, no. I didn't force that label. People who acted self-entitled about women did.
>Generalising terms to the point of redundancy is the logical connection
It objectively isn't. One is a word to a specific attitude, coming from people who self referred as such, and is solely given to people who act that way: being self entitled about a woman's love, AND ISN'T GIVEN TO ALL THE CELIBATE WANTING AN OTHER HALF? BUT ONLY TO THOSE WHO BLAME THE OTHER FOR NOT LOVING THEM AND ONLY THOSE ONES, while the other word is applied to all women (your words) regardless of attitude.

you are not very good at making parallel, there user, or making a point.

It hasn't.

>something verging on bullying at this point
user, it's explicitly bullying and has been for months.

>divorce rate on the rise
>average number of partners per woman is on the rise
>nearly a third of all young men under 25 are virgins
Uh huh

As someone who watched the situation happen due to the curiosity of my profession; The movement was co-opted and turned into a cesspit by people using the term, a sort of self-solving prophecy that allows all the sociopaths and elliot rogers to find an excuse and idea to rally behind.

Sort of how Wizard-Chan was turned into a villain when they are some of, if not the most docile and meek people to ever exist.

The origin of incels and indeed nice guys is found in the gatekeeping of sex, in that todays day and age we are supposed to be the most liberated and sexually free society yet women are becoming more and more conservative about their sexual partners, only picking the absolute highest"

Just because you are unable to mentally grasp my point doesn't mean it's not there. I am taking the piss out of your stance of vague generalisations and umbrella terms. Incel is a word that has lost absolutely all meaning and is used to vaguely determine every single male with sexual angst in all spectrums. Your point is clumsy as is everyone who uses the term incel.

It has, more women post-30 today have no relationship than any point in human history. This is because men simply outlast women in sexual confidence and biology.

>Uh, no. I didn't force that label.
It's literally a catch-all insult for socially undesirable people at this point. It's even being used as an insult in schools filled with kids who are barely old enough to understand the responsibilities of being sexually active.
Yes, it's a forced label.

Tighten was the incel

>Man decides to focus on work and resource gathering
>Can start a family post-30 with little to no biological impact

>Woman decides to focus on work and resource gathering
>If she goes past 30 the rate of biological compromise for the childrens he may have becomes dramatically higher.

A dude has to be particularly good at resource gathering to be netting -30 ladies when he's +30.

>I didn't force that label.

Considering the video in question uses that label while directly using another label "nice guy" shows it is 100% force.

Incel used to mean a specific group of virgins. Now it means ALL virgins because women are angry there may be issues they caused.

Statistics show that's actually the most attractive age for a man.

It's not particularly hard when you
>have ~10 years to work on your career
>have ~10 years to focus on investment, since you're living just for yourself
>have ~10 years to get and stay fit

>Just because you are unable to mentally grasp my point
It's not that I am unable to do that, it's that you didn't made a point in the first place.
> am taking the piss out of your stance of vague generalisations and umbrella terms.
That's the thing,t hough it never was generalisation nor umbrellas term. and that's why your equivalence fail.
>ncel is a word that has lost absolutely all meaning
Wrong, incels is a word whose meaning got changed by people who ranted online on how they are owned love for being "nice" and calling themselves incels. they caued that shift, not the people who called them out.
It has a very clear meaning: people who consider they are owned love and blame the love-interest for not loving them back.
>and is used to vaguely determine every single male with sexual angst in all spectrums.
It isn't and this the founfdation of why you got it all wrong, incels as it is currently used has never meant anything else than that.

>It has, more women post-30 today have no relationship than any point in human history.
still not caused by the use of the word incel.

> The movement was co-opted and turned into a cesspit by people using the term
There you have it. This isn't a generalisation or a loss of meaning, this is a shift of the defintion due tot he people who popularised it. Not because of the people who called them out.

>It's literally a catch-all insult for socially undesirable people at this point.
No, it isn't. it speficially desing people who consider they are owned love and blame the love-interest for not falling for him.
>Yes, it's a forced label.
It isn't.

That's still not cause by the use of the word incel.

I'll remember that when I get called "incel" for finding Captain Marvel a boring movie.

Wrong

>No, it isn't.
It absolutely is. This isn't up for debate.

>consider they are owned love and blame the love-interest for not falling for him.
I thought the catch all insult was “have sex” now people aren’t entitled to sex? You are sending mixed messages.

>Considering the video in question uses that label while directly using another label "nice guy" shows it is 100% force.
It still isn't, just like incel, "nice guy was self-used by people acting as if love was owned to them.

> Now it means ALL virgins
No, it doesn't. It only refer to people who consider they are owned love and blame the love interest. Even character who just seek love don't get to be labelled this way.

That's called being entitled you fucking idiot.
Incel specifically refers to men too ugly or, for whatever reason, have zero sexual success despite active attempts.
I.E., Involuntary Celibate.

"Being owed love" is nowhere a part of that.

So your argument Incel is an acurrate term because it's been used to describe so many different things and has become such a vague insult can be used to describe any sort of negative male idea?

So then my vague statements about a generalist insult are exactly the same.

The word incel is a symptom of the rising egotism in culture, not the cause.

>No, it doesn't. It only refer to people who consider they are owned love and blame the love interest. Even character who just seek love don't get to be labelled this way.
Serious question, are you an idiot?

It's the go to insult for people who express disinterest in the next Star Wars movie. It is a catchall used with little context.

That only mean people assume you hate all women becasue you blame them for not loving you. Also, CM is not boring, IMO.

True.

>I thought the catch all insult was “have sex” now people aren’t entitled to sex?
I always thought that "have sex" was stupid. It's just an other way to say "you need to get laid" and is just as stupid.

I don't get your stance, you're trying to argue Incel isn't a phrase that has lost all meaning..... by proving it has lost all meaning because it's thrown about for EVERYTHING nowadays.

I have a feeling we're dealing with "Yea Forumsmblr" here. A person who buys into most of the Post-modernist identity politics so when confronted with the main issue of post-modernism: the lack of definition. They stumble and cannot actually resolve this issue.

Incel has a distinct meaning, while the Yea Forumsmblr identitarian abhors distinction.

>That's called being entitled you fucking idiot.
Incel refer specifically to being entitled TO BEING LOVED

You can be entitled to many thing. and the fact is, in his review, he only ever use the erm incel in that context: being entitled to love, yet you assume he use it in a generalised way.

>Incel specifically refers to men too ugly or, for whatever reason, have zero sexual success despite active attempts.
No, it doesn't, incel only refer to people who throw tantrum and blame the woman for not loving thme despite being nice to them. Currently, it has no other meaning.

>"Being owed love" is nowhere a part of that.
It's 100% what people acccuse the person to act like when they are being called incel, nowadays.

>That only mean people assume you hate all women becasue you blame them for not loving you. Also, CM is not boring, IMO.
If people are willing to project to such an incredible extent to make the insult work, then yes, it is a catchall. It's no different than how 'retard' was used as an insult used when people acted stupid.

>Serious question, are you an idiot?
I am not, I just know how the word is used.

Further more, it's that exact definition of the word that was used in that video review.

Then how do yo explain people calling James Rolfe incel because he refused to review the Ghostbusters 2016 movie?

Nothing about Incel implies anything you have said. All you are saying is you use the term incorrectly to apply to things we already have labels for.

>by proving it has lost all meaning because it's thrown about for EVERYTHING nowadays.
I haven't proven that at all, especially has I have said it is only thrown to meant one specific thing. Read better.

>I haven't proven that at all
You just presented a scenario where someone had to make up an identity for someone else just so they could freely use incel as an insult.

>then yes, it is a catchall
it sitll isn't. it still has a specific meaning.
>It's no different than how 'retard' was used as an insult used when people acted stupid.
Retard specifically is used to means stupid.

Incel specifically means "guys who hate all women related thing because he blame them for not loving him".

>Incel refer specifically to being entitled TO BEING LOVED
NO IT DOESNT YOU ROOM TEMPERATURE TARDLET
.That may be a common quality, but it's also common across non-Incels, and is NOT the defining feature.
Simply thinking that you're entitled to reciprocation if you put effort on does NOT make you an Incel
Being utterly and completely unsuccessful in sexual or relationship pursuits, despite active pursuit of such, makes you an INCEL.

This is not up for debate, this is not open to your reinterpretation, this is what it actually means and describes.

I don't think he was called incel precisely, especially as the term wasn't commonly in use already back then. (also because he already was married).

>it sitll isn't. it still has a specific meaning.
It's SUPPOSED to have a specific meaning. Which people ignore so they can use it as an insult. Kids are calling each other incels now.

Then both you and the video maker are idiots, ggnore bitchboi

I provided a scenario about someone making an assumption about you, that does not in no way lead to the conclusion it has lead all meaning.

Quite the opposite, if a specific scenario needs to be build to apply the term to you, then it means it still has meaning, otherwise, the scenario wouldn't be nescessary on the first place.

>especially as the term wasn't commonly in use already back then.
Yes it was.
>(also because he already was married).
A good chunk of the outrage culture only know him as 'the man who said mean thing about lady Ghostbusters'. They didn't bother to look into that.

You claim it's used for "Nice guys who think they're entitled to sex"

Which isn't that Incel means at all, so either you're trying to co-opt it for another specific reason or straight up misuing the word.

This is the same reason why Trump is a Nazi; Nazi has a specific meaning and emotional people are using it dramatically incorrectly.

I want to have a gf i just want to loved

His point is that it's being abused to the point where the word is being meaningless. You are assuming that everyone who uses the word is using it correctly, so you think everyone should just shut up and take it if you get called that, even if you get called it for no good reason (ie. Not liking a movie that has huge feminists tones, even if your dislikes are related to the movie's own failures outside of the feminists tones)

So you're trying to apply a meaning to a phrase that doesn't fit, proving you're trying to use it as a generalisation and a slur.

Which means you're point doesn't fucking work of it having a concise meaning you think it does.

Fuck off with your post-modern viewpoints you brainlet.

If people are willing to make giant assumptions about people they have never met and know nothing about just so they can use a word as an insult, the meaning of the word is irrelevant.

It's okay user, we're all gonna make it.

>NO IT DOESNT YOU ROOM TEMPERATURE TARDLET
It is how the word is interpreted nowadays due to the way people who self-reffered as such noisily behaved.

It's how the word is understood and he even spcifically make the distinction between Megamind and Titan, noting that while both single and seeking love, one is an incel and the other isn't.

Speaking of which, the guy who made that video about Megamind? He also made this:

youtube.com/watch?v=bff2VKq2Qvw

>Yes it was.
don't remember it.

>They didn't bother to look into that.
then they assumed he hated women because he couldn't get laid, which is how the word incel is used. So you have your explanation.

The Author of the video is using it wrong then considering by the actual definition of Incel Megamind is also a fucking Incel.

Literally the entire story of Megamind is he doesn't know why people don't love him and he finally overcomes his issues.

No it isn't. Pretty much everyone knows it's a contraction of 'involuntarily celibate', a very concise self explanatory phrase. Anything else added to that is outside of the universally accepted meaning.

No, it's used as a general insult because people don't understand how words work anymore.

>then they assumed he hated women because he couldn't get laid, which is how the word incel is used. So you have your explanation.
That's quite literally the conclusion I was trying to lead you to.

>His point is that it's being abused to the point where the word is being meaningless.
My point is that he is mistaken about it and that incel nowadays precisely refer to "single person blaming their love interest and being entitled to being loved". so no, it hasn't become meaningless.
>You are assuming that everyone who uses the word is using it correctly
I can, at the very least, state that the guy in the video used it according to that definition, therefore, user didn't pick the best example to go on a rant about it.

>incel nowadays precisely refer to "single person blaming their love interest and being entitled to being loved"
No. Full stop.

And both you and the video creator are idiots.

It's the literal opposite, if big assumption is required to make the word apply, then it has meanings. if it was meaningless, then it wouldn't require assumptions.

It's like talking to a fucking robot.

The point is Incel was used incorrectly to be used as an insult.

I have seen Volcels be called Incels for this very reason.

Megamind is battle of the incels, idiots

Braincel vs Gymcel

>That's quite literally the conclusion I was trying to lead you to.
therefore, it show the word effectively has that meaning.

This is your brain on Post-modernisms my friends.

>An unclear meaning to a word is better than a concise meaning because there is more.

Incel is literally an ad-lib replacement for virgin now. Don't know why you think this definition you discovered is the accepted one, since it's not the one implied by the phrase the contraction is derived from (simply being involuntarily celebrate), or the definition implied by people using it as an insult (virgin loser).

Was Metro man a Volcel?

>Could have had all the pussy ever
>Just wanted to focus on his country music

>The Author of the video is using it wrong then considering by the actual definition of Incel Megamind is also a fucking Incel.
He sin't.

What incel mean nowaday: someone who think he is owned love and blame the love interrest for not loving them back. the term apply to Titan, but not Megamind, therefore, he is not using it wrong.

No, it's used specifically to call out people who think they are owned love and blame the self-interest, the guy in the video only ever use it in that context.

It's because alot of the post-modern Californian-Maoist crowd are also virgin losers.

They just need a word to make them different to the non "male feminist" virgin losers.

Yes and its exactly the meaning the guy in the video give to the word.

We aren't. it is effectively how the word is interpretated. it wasn't always meaning that, but people acting noisingly like ass on the internet ans self-calling incel give that shift to its meaning.

At the sacrifice of ignoring the reality of the situation (James Rolf is a married man). Therefore making the word meaningless.
Are you starting to connect the dots here, or should I assume you're stuck in a loop?

Attached: wallet.jpg (1280x720, 48K)

>The meaning of Incel is what I think it means because I am a post-modernist retard

Incel has a very exact meaning which has zero bearing on WHY the person is an incel. Deal with it.

Absolutely, a true paragon of virtue.

Also, it's important to note that volcel/incel doesn't necesarilly imply virgin, and not all virgins are volcels/incels.

It's both at the same time, which is why this ends up being such a contentious point of argument.

>It is effectively how the word is interpreted

The word you're looking for is Misinterpreted.

>The point is Incel was used incorrectly to be used as an insult.
And d the point you keep ignoring is that the word incel now is used to means "ass who think he is owned love and blame the love-interrest". He isn't using the word incorrectly. he is using it according to the meaning self-called incel gave to that word.

>We aren't
Yes you are. Wipe the spittle off your shirt.

>>An unclear meaning to a word
Not what I said, I repeatedly gave a clear meaning to that word.

>Incel is literally an ad-lib replacement for virgin now.
It isn't. it only ever mean "someone who think he is owned love and blame the love-interrest for not loving them".

So then the word Whore used by Angry entitled virgins is entirely correct to be used?

Because this is your argument, that words can be misinterpreted if you use them as an insult enough.

>It isn't.
Wasn't asking.

>At the sacrifice of ignoring the reality of the situation (James Rolf is a married man). Therefore making the word meaningless.
The opposite: they have to ignore that rolf is married fobeing able to use that insult. that that condition is requitred specifically means the word has meaning. if it hadn't, ignorance wouldn't be required. therefore it has meaning.

>if I repeat something often enough, it'll be true!
Boy, the fact that you're the only person in this thread defending that idiotic definition, and that multiple people are telling you that you're retarded, should clue you in on the fact that your definition isn't definitive or commonly accepted.

Everything you said was wrong.

Incel has a very literal meaning, and your conjecture is purely fabricated.

If he was an incel he would have murdered the girl when she rejected him.

At best, he's a "chuck" because he loves a woman but is having difficulties with her.

>it only ever mean
Only? You've gone from arguing the most accepted interpretation of the word to just flat out ignoring it's original (self explanatory) meaning.

>>The meaning of Incel is what I think it means because I am a post-modernist retard
Not what I said, I said incel means "someone who think he is owned love and blame the love-interrest for not loving them back", because people who acted precisely like this behaved noisingly like ass on the internet.

this

That's not how language works. You can't give a word meaning by ignoring it's meaning.

At first I thought you were being obtuse, but now I am doubting your grasp for the English language.

That's not what incel means though.

It's what smoothebrain retards like you use Incel for, but that's not the actual meaning of Incel.

Language isn't subjective, especially informative language.

No matter how much you "feel" Incel is used to interpret entitled men, that's not it's meaning.

It's just Post-modernism; Nothing has any meaning that we describe to it.

So this means the middle class retard thinks slang is as equal to actual informative language; I guess Faggot is a perfectly fine word to describe gay men and gay people need to just accept it.

God you're a retard.
Incel means involuntary celibate.
Why they are incels isn't in the definition.
FA (forever alone) Vocels and Mgtows are called incels all the time. Incel doesn't mean what you think it means.

It is effectively the widespread interpretation of the word. No matter what, saying it is meaningless is false.

>So then the word Whore used by Angry entitled virgins is entirely correct to be used?
It isn't, because it isn't the widespread meanign of the word.

>Because this is your argument, that words can be misinterpreted if you use them as an insult enough.
Not my argument, my argument is that the people who self-refferred as incel are the one who made the word widespread.

It still doesn't change the word has that precise meaning.

>Boy, the fact that you're the only person in this thread defending that idiotic definition,
It's not idiotic, it's the widespread interpretation of the word. Not my fault you keep insisting to means all virgin or all celibate looking for love. It's especially stupid of you as the video this conversation stem from make a point to make that distinction.

>should clue you in on the fact that your definition isn't definitive or commonly accepted.
we are 4 or 5 people arguing in a dead thread everyone else has abandoned because it isn't about megamind anymore. that's not really conclusive.

>Incel has a very literal meaning, and your conjecture is purely fabricated.
Meaning that was shifted when noisy asshole made the term widespread online redfining the term to their attitude.

Attached: wallet2.jpg (1280x720, 82K)

Excpet the meaning wasn't ignored. what was ignored was that James was married.

A word that has no meaning don't need context to be used. A word that has meaning can only work in a certain context.

>A word that has no meaning don't need context to be used.
...Which is exactly what the James Rolfe comparison is supposed to reveal to you.
>A word that has meaning can only work in a certain context.
That's the point. People use it in whatever context they want.

>Incel means involuntary celibate.
That's the origna of the word.

What its widespread meaning has become is " guy thinking he is owned love and blaming the love-interrest for not loving them back". It has acquired that meaning because the one who made it widespread self-reffered as such.

> Incel doesn't mean what you think it means.
I am not telling you what I think it means, I am telling you what most people assume the word mean.

Furhtermore, it's quite idiotic to take offense of a video who effectively make the distinction between the self-entitled and the one who is effectively rejected but not being an ass about it. It is a mistake to think he lump them all together for just using the word incel.

Language is not a popularity contest where the largest context suddenly takes over all meaning of the word.

If you need to ignore the context of the situation to incorrectly apply a word then the word is being use incorrectly.

Incel was a niche descriptor, using it as an insult when it's a literal discriptive word is niche itself, even moreso when you need to add a whole new context to the word.

In short; You don't understand language and your Post-modernism shows why it's a philsophy for literal brainlets.

Have sex Incel.

Funny really, the only people who use the term incel to mean "Guy thinking he is owed love" are the same people who also destroyed the meaning of Racist, Nazi and Homophobe.

Sounds to me like you just don't grasp laguage mate.

>It is effectively the widespread interpretation of the word.
No it isn't

>No matter what, saying it is meaningless is false.
Correct, it does have a meaning. Yours is just completely wrong.

>It's not idiotic, it's the widespread interpretation of the word.
No it isn't

>Not my fault you keep insisting to means all virgin or all celibate looking for love.
It's litterally IN THE NAME.
INCEL
IN CEL
INvoluntary CELibate

>It's especially stupid of you as the video this conversation stem from make a point to make that distinction.
Yes, and the video is wrong too.

Using words incorrectly doesn't make the word suddenly fit the incorrect meaning retard.

>It has acquired that meaning
No it hasn't.

you are not making a point. A word that has meaning rquire the good context to be used correctly, a word that is meaningless don't require the creation of a context to be used.

>...Which is exactly what the James Rolfe comparison is supposed to reveal to you.
Except we established that >They didn't bother to look into that.
If they didn't knew Rolf was married, they assumed he was single and hating women for that.

> People use it in whatever context they want.
We have established before that a particular context/scenario was required to use that word.

>That's the origna of the word.
You said it was the ONLY meaning of the word a few posts back

Just a question here.

But do you think Xenophobic and Racist are the same thing?

take off the tinfoil hat and stop believing everything you read from pol

Attached: nono.gif (280x206, 859K)

YouTube can sniff incels from miles away

>you are not making a point. A word that has meaning rquire the good context to be used correctly, a word that is meaningless don't require the creation of a context to be used.

That's the exact opposite of how descriptor words work you fucking retarded.

The point of a word like Incel is to specifically remove the need for complex context in a sentence, Here let me fucking show you.

>Steve was a man with who constantly failed at initating sexual relationships.

>Steve was an Incel

THAT IS HOW LANGUAGE WORKS.

>Language is not a popularity contest where the largest context suddenly takes over all meaning of the word.
Language is also the emergence of a word.

>If you need to ignore the context of the situation to incorrectly apply a word then the word is being use incorrectly.
If a word has no meaning, then you don't need to ignore the context, as it doesn't matter.

>Incel was a niche descriptor,
That's the thing, it was niche and those who made it widespread caused it to get a different meaning.

>In short; You don't understand language and your Post-modernism shows why it's a philsophy for literal brainlets.
I understand langauge perfectly and I understand it well enough to understand what the guy in the video mean. whereas you fixated yourself on one word and ignored everything else to insist he was insulting all virgins, whereas 10 more seconds of watching would have lead you to effectively see he doesn't.

>are the same people who also destroyed the meaning of Racist, Nazi and Homophobe.
They didn't.

>you are not making a point.
Making? Everyone else has made their point long ago. You are just going in circles because you're stuck on one subjective definition of a word, which doesn't even match it's universally accepted meaning.There's no further point to make. You're living in your own subjective world and you've made it clear that it's impenetrable by traditional conventions of language.

Attached: hulk.png (513x394, 305K)

Trump physically cannot be a Nazi though.

He also literally isn't a Facist, Hobophobe or Racist because his policies are not in line with the definitions of those words.

Why do sexhavers post about incels?

I motion to call sexhavers "noncels"

>No it hasn't.
>No it isn't
It is. when you say incel amongmost people, they will get "guy who hates women because he can't get sex".

>Correct, it does have a meaning. Yours is just completely wrong.
Min ackowledge its most widespread use and how it got to get that meaning.

>It's litterally IN THE NAME.
But a bunch of people online, calling themselves incel, made ass of themselves widespread, thus shifting the perceived meaning of it.

>Yes, and the video is wrong too.
It isn't. It just rely on the widespread use of the term.

He used the word how it is the most commonly interpretated, that it hasn't its original definition is due to people acting like ass noisingly.

>You said it was the ONLY meaning of the word a few posts back
I didn't.

>But do you think Xenophobic and Racist are the same thing?
Xenophobic is the fear of the one that do not belong to a group, Racist is the fear of a race.

>perceived meaning of it.
>perceived
You're so, so close to solving this puzzle you have in your lap. I'm rooting for you.

>Xenophobic is the fear of the one that does not belong to a group

>Racist is the fear of a race

Wrong on both accounts.

Xenophobia is the fear or hatred of that which is perceived to be foreign or strange. When speaking of people it is often a fear or distrust of foreigners.

Racism is to be prejudiced towards someone based on race.

Hint: Literally everyone in the world is Xenophobic to some degree unless they're some kind of weird cultist.

>That's the exact opposite of how descriptor words work you fucking retarded.
A word that only work in certain context has a meaning.

A word that can be thrown out regardless of cotnext has no meaning.

-I eat an apple.
apple has a meaning because it work in the context of being eaten
-I run an apple
apple has no meaning because it doesn't work in that context. what would work instead would be "I run a race".

As apple work in certain context, but not in other, it means the word apple has a meaning.

>I didn't.
>it only ever mean "someone who think he is owned love and blame the love-interrest for not loving them".
>only ever mean
You're just contradicting yourself at this point. You're not even good at being stubborn.

>It is. when you say incel amongmost people, they will get "guy who hates women because he can't get sex".
That's very different than the definition you've been pushing, "men that feel entitled to reciprocation", and even still you're wrong, because they won't.

>But a bunch of people online, calling themselves incel, made ass of themselves widespread, thus shifting the perceived meaning of it.
Except the meaning didn't change, you're just using it improperly.

>It isn't. It just rely on the widespread use of the term.
Yes it is, because he's an idiot like you.

>Everyone else has made their point long ago
I ahve explained they haven't.

>You are just going in circles because you're stuck on one subjective definition of a word
Not the subjective defintion, the collective definition, of an emerging word as it become widepsreingly use. The thing about incelis that it's a rather recent words that hasn't got the time to be set in time.

But he can be a supporter of Nazi, by calling them fine people.

>He also literally isn't a Facist, Hobophobe or Racist because his policies are not in line with the definitions of those words.
The policies a man try to establish aren't the sole definers of what he is.

You know your argument there shows why Incel being used as an insult to James Rolf has no context right?

>I ahve explained they haven't.
No you didn't.

I'm starting to think he's being so stubborn because the actual definition of the word (Involuntarily Celibate) applies to him, so he's adding qualifiers to stay out of the crosshairs.

But that's not how language works. The context of a descriptor or an object is not changed.

"I run an Apple" has perfect context, it's just nonsensical because how the fuck do you run an apple?

>You're so, so close to solving this puzzle you have in your lap. I'm rooting for you.
You still ignore the fact that incel is a recent word and that has been the core of my point.

you don't call someone an diot for using the most common meaning of a word. And you can't say he is using it incorrectly when he use the widespread meaning of the word.

for a new emerging word, yes, the perceived meaning matter and the meaning that become widespread is what effectively start defining it.

He's a male feminist then?

>You're just contradicting yourself
"Ever" in the present, nowadays. It should be obvious to you.

Maybe he's just ESL and/or slow?

>That's very different than the definition you've been pushing, "men that feel entitled to reciprocation"
Saying the same thing in differnet way doesn't mean it's not the same.
>and even still you're wrong, because they won't.
Yes, nowday, whenever the word is used, that's the meaning of the word.

>Except the meaning didn't change, you're just using it improperly.
It changed when asses calling themselves incel made it widespread.

>because he's an idiot like you.
He isn't, he is only using the only meaning of the owrd he has ever encountered.

No, simply because that's how the word is mostly used.

For newly emerging word, it is.

I see why you're confused.

Personally I never got to choose being called an incel.
Incel was always something other people called me.
I looked up incel forums in the first place because other people insulted me with the label.
Then I quickly left them because they were mostly under 18 kids and dank memesters.

I am a virgin, I am autistic, I have a lot of personal problems and struggle with basic social relationships and I don't like incels.
But I have to call myself an incel because that is what other people call me.
If I said I was not an incel people would just call me an incel anyway.
I am forced to identify as an incel because other people choose to lump me into this group even though I don't agree with many of their viewpoints and actions.

Incel is a social construct like gender, race or caste.
Doesn't matter what you identify as yourself.
If you dye your skin or move somewhere else you're still going to be found out and called a faggot a nigger or a dalit.
The trouble with social constructs is you don't get a choice in them.

>"Ever" in the present
Ever doesn't just refer to the present. Again, you have a problem with words.

Attached: ever.jpg (677x268, 42K)

well this thread went to shit real fast didnt it?

Attached: vlcsnap-2019-07-10-22h36m42s763.png (1920x810, 642K)

To English speakers, 'ever' does not mean 'right now'.

>But I have to call myself an incel because that is what other people call me.
you can be called/accused of being a lot of thing while not actually being it.

>I am forced to identify as an incel because other people choose to lump me into this group
If they have never called you out for thinking people who'd like to be with are to blame, then they might actually have not.

>Incel is a social construct like gender, race
It's an aside, but Idon't consider those are social construct, but that a lot of non-sensical social construct are build around them.

I've seen worse

>Saying the same thing in differnet way doesn't mean it's not the same.
Except it's not the same thing. Both sentences have entirely separate meanings.

>Yes, nowday, whenever the word is used, that's the meaning of the word.
No it isn't.

>It changed when asses calling themselves incel made it widespread.
No it didn't, and your specific wordchoice makes me think that you're biased.

>He isn't, he is only using the only meaning of the owrd he has ever encountered.
And he's wrong, and an idiot, like you.

Be honest, are you just an ESL that is only moderately fluent in English?

>Ever doesn't just refer to the present.
Not always, in this case, it does. At worst, you have caught me not expressing myself properly and that's it.

Soem decided to feel offended by the use of the word "incel" in the video and ignore all the rest of it, including the part where he praise the attitude of an other involuntary celibate.

>Except it's not the same thing. Both sentences have entirely separate meanings.
They haven't. at best one is a sub-category of the other.

>No it isn't.
incel is almost always associted with an hate for women.

>No it didn't, and your specific wordchoice makes me think that you're biased.
I am not. and it's how it work for newly emerging words.

>And he's wrong, and an idiot, like you.
One is not at fault for using a common interpretation of a word. Especially in this case has he make clear of the meaning he is making of it.

>you can be called/accused of being a lot of thing while not actually being it.
That's not how social constructs work.
You can call yourself a priest or a fireman all you want but you won't be treated as one unless OTHERS consider you one.

>>Incel is a social construct like gender, race
>It's an aside, but Idon't consider those are social construct, but that a lot of non-sensical social construct are build around them.
Yeah well semantics, doesn't matter what incel actually means an incel is what society says is one and society calls me one.

>They haven't.
They don't*

They do have entirely different meanings.

>incel is almost always associted with an hate for women.
It is, but that doesn't mean it's part of the definition. Being a scheming asshole is part of the public perception of lawyers, but you don't have to be a scheming asshole to be a lawyer.

>I am not. and it's how it work for newly emerging words.
Yes you are, and no it does not.

>One is not at fault for using a common interpretation of a word. Especially in this case has he make clear of the meaning he is making of it.
Except it's NOT a meaning of the word, and he's still an idiot, just like you.

Your lack of response to my last question also confirms that you're a dimwitted ESL.

rember
youtu.be/MZKiRRYNn1s

>That's not how social constructs work.
To an extend. When you are accused of being something a certain modicatum of proof is required. that' sthe curren societal world.

Being a priest or a fireman require to have certificated created by society, but what truly matter is the training and formation. You can be something, regardless of sicial construct, but not be regarded as such.

being something is not a social construct, being considered as such is.

>an incel is what society says is one and society calls me one.
for this to hold, it is required that you fit in the definition society define incel as. If the definition they have does not fit what you are, then the word doesn't apply to you. coherency is part of the equation.

This.

>They do have entirely different meanings.
They don't.

>that doesn't mean it's part of the definition.
It has become as such.

>lawyers,
a lawyer is someone who plead in court (if you simplify the defintion), you are talking about how lawyer are cosndiered to behave.

For incel, on the other hand, an hate for woman (or for man, if you are a female incel) is part of the definition.

>Yes you are, and no it does not.
It is how emerging words get defined.

>Except it's NOT a meaning of the word, and he's still an idiot, just like you.
It is the widspread meanign of the word. And he is not an idiot for using that meaning. at worst, he would be ignorant, but here is the thing, even then he actually make the distinction between the one who blames the love-interest and the one who doesn't.

what you are doing is attacking the form of his video while ignoring the actual content.

>Your lack of response to my last question also confirms that you're a dimwitted ESL.
No it means I consider the question irrelevant.

Incel is not a word from the dictionary you learn from school.

>At worst, you have caught me not expressing myself properly and that's it.
Why should I give any regard to your perspective on emerging vocabulary when you don't even have a grasp of established vocabulary?

>They don't.
They do.

>It has become as such.
It hasn't

>a lawyer is someone who plead in court (if you simplify the defintion), you are talking about how lawyer are cosndiered to behave.
And here you are, conflating the expected behavior of Incels with the definityion of Incel. Thank you for proving my point.

>For incel, on the other hand, an hate for woman (or for man, if you are a female incel) is part of the definition.
No it's not.

>It is how emerging words get defined.
Except it already has an explicit definition, not your made up bullshit.

>It is the widspread meanign of the word. And he is not an idiot for using that meaning.
No it's not, and yes he is.

>what you are doing is attacking the form of his video while ignoring the actual content.
No, I'm explicitly attacking the content, because the content is retarded,and so is he, and so are you.

>No it means I consider the question irrelevant.
Its very much relevant because your grasp on the English language is tenuous at best. If you're going to argue in English, you should know English.

>Incel is not a word from the dictionary you learn from school.
Yeah, but you do learn vocabulary and grammar in school, both of which you are severely deficient in.

Technically he's an incel with oneitis.

>Boo hoo I hate how I was more talented than my POC and feminist friends and got a part in a college play
Fuck this guy he's a fucking faggot.

>Expected Mega Mind thread
>INCEL INCEL INCEL INCEL INCEL
youtube.com/watch?v=3nGT4dV4s1w

Essentially what happens when you give the oppressed power, they become even bigger assholes

So you're saying civil rights was a mistake?

Shit now that I think about it the movie pretty much shows the different types of males. Metro Man is the Chad who became self actualized and went MGTOW. Mega Mind is the blue pilled beta, whose been taught they're a toxic male even though they aren't, and has his validation given to him externally by women and society. Lastly Hal is the Incel who believes they are entitled to pussy, instead of becoming self actualized like metro man he simply takes the black pill and becomes a nihilistic villain after being rejected.

All wrong. There is a whole website for 40+ incels (Wizards). People don't turn gay, some people are gay. Becoming MGTOW is the better option for incels. Also, we're going to have fembots soon.

Is he what happens if you give r9k super powers?

Why a was megamind never given a sequel despite doing well in theaters?

It didn't even get a tv show like all the other shittier movies like monsters vs aliens kung pow panda.

Yes, actually.

Dubs confirm

He's clearly a faggot and a furry so we know he's mentally ill

Even though Hal only cared about that one women, he's definitely not going to treat any others better now that he got superpowers and an ego problem.

*volcel

I wasn't talking about malcom x i was talking about the leaders of the black panthers and how he was a rapist who no one wanted to tell the cops. We create our own hell.

....i thought this thread was about megamind.
Why do you gotta do this to me bros. baiting me like this for an incel thread.

Attached: 5w4tehB.png (331x342, 47K)

It's specifically his neck that is horrible. It should either be shorter or supported by a pair of decent traps.

He wasn't oppressed.

Why are people like this? I'm a virgin but I don't consider myself a bad person or entitled to rape women or anything, yet it's like I'm a monster now. You could say "incel" just refers to a certain type of person, but imagine saying "nigger" and then something like "it's not about being black, it's about your personality!". Normies wouldn't like that at all and would still agree that it's offensive and mean.

Attached: image.jpg (500x500, 101K)

I don’t think I’ve met a single incel before. Even the ugliest autistic dudes I know have pounded at some point.

The trouble with the term is that it wasn't normies that coined it- it was a certain population of "incels" who adopted the term for themselves. Their views eventually came to light while they wore that identity so it's unfortunately why innocent anons like you are cuaght in this fuckery