Am I the only one who strongly prefers how the majority of silver age comics were drawn and colored compared to the...

Am I the only one who strongly prefers how the majority of silver age comics were drawn and colored compared to the mishmash of styles out there today?

Attached: silverage.jpg (1280x720, 373K)

silver age has the best covers for sure

Darn right

Attached: 20327.jpg (400x594, 56K)

Id say the art was better at telling a story back then at the very least.

Depends on the comic. I like how colourful and simple and flat the colours are back then, and sometimes that the digital colouring today I really dislike . But when you exam in the medium is a whole colour and has gotten a lot better. There were no colourists or colours back then it looked as good as the stuff by Francesca Francavilla, or Matt Hollinsworth for example. Now this has to do with technology, if they have the technology to do more complex colours back then you’re damn right they would’ve. It wasn’t a stylistic choice it was because of the limits of the technology of the time.

But yes OP I like old comics coloring, I would just never say something as silly as they were the best of all time I read way too many comics to think that

The paper was matte back then. the colors looked so much nicer because there wasnt a sheen to the pages.

The art was honestly terrible back then and the lack of diversity in art styles is painful. But by god was stuff like batman and superman better then. I wonder were other heroes the same back then, anyone got recs?

Most of DC's interiors have been matte for a while.

Flat colors in a limited palette is the shit
Fuck modern colorists for making everything in gradients

>Fuck modern colorists for making everything in gradients
God I hate modern coloring