Post objectively terrible shows that you enjoyed because of the waifus

post objectively terrible shows that you enjoyed because of the waifus.

Attached: Johnny-Test_Susan-and-Mary.jpg (640x360, 40K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/1LbWWx80ZPA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 18920346.png (584x370, 335K)

Korra's a good choice, but you'd have a very tough fight convincing people that Avatar is 'objectively terrible.

>objectively

Attached: 1424351174958.gif (250x376, 897K)

Are you trying to claim that Johnny Test was good?

why did the ugly twin get so much more screentime than the other

>Ugly twin
user, they're both very pretty and you should be ashamed of yourself.

Attached: 1559821494666.gif (287x498, 379K)

I'm claiming that some people actually like it, and that you don't know what "objectively" means.

Fighting Foodons.

Attached: clawdialrg.jpg (889x3000, 468K)

Apparently you don't know what good means compared to "liked it." A show can be terrible and you can still enjoy it and you can personally dislike a high quality show. Learn how to separate your personal opinion from objective qualifiers, you mouth breathing retard.

Attached: MV5BZGY3NGYyZDAtMmVmNy00Mjk1LThjMzMtMzFhM2NmZTE2NWU4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTM0NjIxMzA@._V1_.jpg (1200x679, 159K)

Attached: 1559667259513.png (657x580, 347K)

Sabrina the animated series

Good is subjective.
>you mouth breathing retard
Don't get triggered just because someone called out your ignorance of basic English.

No. Good is objective. "I liked it" is the subjective version, you idiot. You're the kind of faggot ruining this board because you can't separate your own opinions from fact. Like jesus fucking christ, how retarded do you have to be to believe that how much you enjoyed a show is all that matters when discussing things?

>you can't separate your own opinions from fact
>this show is objectively bad because I don't like it
You must be shitposting. There's no way you actually lack this much of self-awareness, unless you're genuinely autistic. Which, considering how angry you are over the prospect of someone disagreeing with you, is very likely.

Attached: Ironic.jpg (1160x499, 64K)

Well, after this i'm definitely sure that there is no better place for a foreigner to master English, than Yea Forums.

Criticism is a good motivator for improvement, and criticism is the only thing Yea Forums is capable of.

Alright, it's a bit too obvious now. Try actually making an argument next time, it'll bait your target along longer as they try to refute your points, however retarded they might be.

>n-no YOUR the shitposter
I guess we're done here. Enjoy what's left of your lonely existence before the inevitable junk-food-induced heart attack puts you out of your misery.

>implying this is objectively bad

youtu.be/1LbWWx80ZPA

As appealing as they were it was still impossible to watch jonny jonny test even with your brain completely turned off.

Attached: 1552930317516.jpg (768x432, 38K)

Some people like having STDs as a fetish but that doesn't mean they aren't objectively bad.

>there are "people" that get off one not only catching STDs, but intentionally spreading them to other people
Very few things in life make me this angry.

I think that early Johnny Test was okay. It’s just so shamelessly stupid and had some memorable characters. I feel like there was missed potential though.

>Good is objective

Attached: 1559542028711.jpg (540x427, 18K)

Here's your daily reminder that Yea Forums isn't a hivemind, user.

Yeah, same here.

Attached: 9e53cf1bb6333f95f7efaf2fafc3b286f33ea7d6.png (800x800, 148K)

What episode of SU does she appear in?

>Kick Buttowski
>"""Objectively""" terrible

haha remember the episode about their feet
asking for a friend

Maybe not terrible, but definitely not my immediate preference.

Attached: C6EE6548-9BEE-446D-AB80-9D0C4A5F2584.jpg (710x615, 340K)

That contest to add a new foodon was pretty rad
I liked cherry bomber more than what ever they picked

The show would've been MUCH better without the title character. Just focus on the twins and the dog while Johnny doesn't exist.

What about show you watch expecting a waifu to return?

Attached: AdvancedVillainousCockatiel-poster[1].jpg (320x240, 11K)

>Good is objective.

Attached: 1492142164548.gif (500x375, 2M)

I made one called 'Ghoul Lash', but I never submitted it.

Was it actually good?
I remember some episodes were fun, usually the ones where he was hopped up on Cheetah Juice.

BUT, I was in it for the Brianna.

I felt it was pretty good. I liked that the best friend character actually helped instead of always made things worse.

Well first of all, I find the idea of something being "objectively" bad to be completely fucking retarded. Different folks, different strokes if I boil it down.

I found Kick Buttowski to be reasonably funny. Kick and Gunther were a great pairing and a lot of the Episodes were pretty funny (especially with Wade). It's not great, but it sure as hell isn't bad.

Yeah it was actually good, sure there are some instances of heavy Gary Stu wanking in the beggining (like the carbox race episode) but overall it was a fun cartoon, with a good sidekick dynamic

We can all agree Gunther is the best fat friend in any cartoon.

None, because I'm not a faggot who watches a full episode of a cartoon to get a glimpse of meh cartoon waifu

>hurr durr everything is subjective
Fuck modern critical theory. It’s excused pretty much every shit piece of art that’s coming out. Nothing can be truly objective, but that isn’t to say that certain aspects on the “subjective/objective” spectrum aren’t almost completely objective. There are conventional standards for writing quality, character writing, sound design, animation principles. They all exist. Throwing that away because of the grain of sand of wiggle room that someone CAN like it anyway invalidating all of these criticisms is a great cancer to art.

i never actually watched it. is it worth it?