I don't get it, what was the problem?
I don't get it, what was the problem?
The problem was that there was no problem
and when there isnt a problem then you make one
I don’t get it.
Oh fuck me
Are you not going to be allowed to cosplay Ariel as a white woman without it being "Whitewashing" now??
That's the ONLY thing I can gather was the problem with this unless someone flat out called another dude a nigger on their twitter in between these two tweets.
No, if you check the tweets they're offended because they're using a woman to advertise... I think.
Ariel isn't holding/using the lens correctly from what I can gather. Which is stupid because Ariel is suppose to be a fucking idiot when it came to human objects anyways.
>manufactures a fictional scenario in his head
Rent Free.
No, it has nothing to do with that. Six random commentors complained about it being sexist, when the cosplayer is just being in-character.
But it just looks like an advertising attempt by pretending there was extreme backlash when it wasn't much of anything. Not sure why OP even decided to post about it.
Right now any white girl portrayal of Ariel is considered a protest against the new casting choice
>Not sure why OP even decided to post about it.
Don't kid yourself.
>WHY DOES THIS COSPLAYER NOT KNOW HOW TO HANDLE SPECIFIC CAMERA LENSES
Did they not watch the movie? I swear, Twitter has just become nu-Tumblr.
WHAT THE FUCK
this is either because of the fucking nigger ariel or because shes not actually using it when shes a fucking mermaid who collects peices of human stuff she finds and is obsessed to know what it is
i fucking hate this world more and more
We just need to stop using social media as a society. Humanity is just too fucking stupid to use it properly
Top comments seem to be random feminist ally men who are pissed at a company dare using a woman to sell a product n 2019.
>Manufactures a fictional scenario when the reality is just as absurd
You're a jackass, cunt.
All of these guy just seething at the core concept of a woman being photographed and talking about evil cavemen from the 50's. How do they work exactly? If they just hate the concept of a woman being seen that much, do they ever get laid? Do they even talk to a woman at all or would they also consider that to be evil 1950s misogyny too? what human interaction do they have outside of posting the word "Yikes" over and over again every day?
I still feel this was set-up. If they were that sorry they would've deleted the post after apologizing.
It's a Shit cosplay with some busted make up, an $8 shake and go wig, a half-assed "Disneybound" outfit, and a bored, unimaginative expression/pose.
Of course people are going to hate it!
It looks like shit.
>being a woman who doesn’t do photography in a photo reflects badly on female photographers
>random cosplayers must now look very professional and competent while being photographed for a little promo event at a con
Do these people just not read context?
Do these idiots think anyone but photographers ever looks at the twitter of Zeiss?
Does no one in this thread remember the days of black and white digital photos of random ass shit on every girls' Myspace page? Women who get into photography get patently fucking offended if you imply female photographers are anything but mystical geniuses capturing glimpses into a world inaccessible to most.
>Do these people just not read context?
No because it's about control. Claiming "I'm offended!" can get a major company to bend over backwards to appease you and do what you want, even if you do not buy their products is a huge high for a lot of people. They love it, being able to just repeat the words "misogyny, sexist" and all of a sudden a major fortune 500 company now has to do what you say.
Just like this thread stumbling over itself to get outraged over what exactly?
A couple of twitter comments?
Or just straight up imagining scenarios to get angru over
*angry
Most probably they have a problem with the model not wearing JUST the clams.
What does this have to do with Yea Forums?
The outrage in the comments was about people not liking the company using a woman as a model to sell cameras and comparing things to 1950s car ads. It's pretty clear you did not see it yourself.
Two of those were correct. The people replying did not like tits and ass being used to sell a lens
Well its a guy, there's nothing for them to rest on.
Well, they got a stock non-apology tossed their way.
Minimum fig leaf effort.
Notice how nobody here is demanding action from the company?
Key difference.
If the same people were outraged at Ariel being Ariel but just complained on their forum among each other there would be absolutely no issue.
Wait, they aren't mad because Ariel is white?
She's not an anime character.
nah, they mad because company is using sex to sell cameras
She's supposed to be like, 'Whoa cool, this crazy human gadget is neat, I am going to pretend i know how to treat it.' They even say she is just a guest,... so probably some random in cosplay and they thought it might be cool cuz of the movie buzz. Their response is acute for having to deal with todays pathetic issues.
Remember when you could shout down those types of (to use the term very loosely) men by calling them a faggot? Remember when it was a considered performing a public service to do so? This. This is the true slippery slope of allowing the gays to marry.
To all the faggots that said "why does anyone care that they race swapped Ariel, it's not that big a deal"
This is why. Your apathy is what allows for innocent people to be blatantly called racist just for dressing as a character who was originally black.
This has nothing to do with Ariel’s skin color, you dumb fucking faggot.
that Ariel's fingers are too long! NOT MUH ARIEL REEEEEEEEE