What's your favorite xkcd comic?
What's your favorite xkcd comic?
And because I know it's going to happen even if I don't post this because you people are like predictable robots, inb4 some retard posts the Hillary one.
>you people are like predictable robots
More like a group of close friends with their inside jokes and everything, amirite, guys?
The one about the inconsistencies of the Holocaust narrative. The numbers just don't add up!
Probably the one where everyone on a train thinks everyone else is mindless sheep, changed my perspective on things back in the day.
The one about the ISS traveling 500 miles in the time it takes to play "500 Miles (I'm Gonna Be)" by The Proclaimers.
It's censorship.
I've seen this massive infographic that never fails to shut up Holocaust deniers but I have to go digging a bit to find it, hold on.
>or get banned from an internet community
M A R S H
V E R S U S
A L A B A M A
This reminded how much I don't like that trope, when a fish-out-of-water human explains to some fantasy creatures how the human world works and always comes to the conclusion that "all humans do is kill each other and laugh at pain" or some shit. This is a very good strip.
>people still think SC precedent means anything
That's cute. People will do what they want regardless of what a bunch of old people in black robes tell them.
>>people still think SC precedent means anything
>when trying to defend a comic about amendment rights
>the Supreme Court wrote the Constitution
...
>people still think the constitution means anything
That's cute. People will do what they want regardless of what a piece of old paper tells them.
And now I've tricked you into admitting you would burn the constitution. I win.
The one with mitt romney that say [citation needed]
It's so fun to use it against people on twitter
The one where he endorses Hillary Clinton.
Boom. Get predicted.
it's an edit you moron
BEER FUCKIN' SUCKS!
Hit and miss, I suppose.
The fact that he couldn't tell the difference must mean something here. Either his dumb or xkcd does this shit so much that it flew under his radar.
Remember that period of time when all this guy did was talk about his girlfriend. I don't know what my favorite strip is but it's none of those.
I liked the one where she died of cancer
The original comic is much worse
Prove it.
Holy fuck you two weren't kidding. This is slop.
It at least makes more sense than the edit which goes full slippery slope fallacy. "WOW SO YOU THINK MURDER IS OKAY I GUESS YOU ARE THE VIOLENT ONES MEANWHILE WE CONSTANTLY TALK ABOUT A DAY OF THE ROPE WHERE WE KILL EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH US"
>the edit which goes full slippery slope fallacy.
???
Was XKCD really any good? I thought their popularity was like a sort of meme, it just resonated with weird geeks and nerds and their "culture" and now it sort of exists on momentum.
It's like an alien with 5 minutes of human experience explaining humans to an alien with 0 experience.
Yes but it would take another whole minute of study for them to stop unironically saying the word "sportsball"
>was
It's still around. Frankly it's the only webcomic I still enjoy coming back to after all these years. Thing with webcomics is they don't need to be successful to stick around, as long as the writer has the motivation to continue and the money to host the website, he can keep them around in perpetuity.
Hell, it's fun to use it on Yea Forums. They get even more pissed because you're using xkcd.
Is effectively meaningless, with positive consequences.
>While the Marsh holding at first appears somewhat narrow and inapplicable to the present day due to the disappearance of company towns from the United States, it was raised in the somewhat high-profile 1996 cyberlaw case, Cyber Promotions v. America Online, 948 F. Supp. 436, 442 (E.D. Pa. 1996).[1] Cyber Promotions wished to send out "mass email advertisements" to AOL customers. AOL installed software to block those emails. Cyber Promotions sued on free speech grounds and cited the Marsh case as authority for the proposition that even though AOL's servers were private property, AOL had opened them to the public to a degree sufficient that constitutional free speech protections could be applied. The federal district court disagreed, thereby paving the way for spam filters at the Internet service provider level.
>In Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, the Supreme Court distinguished a private shopping mall from the company town in Marsh and held that the mall had not been sufficiently dedicated to public use for First Amendment free speech rights to apply within it.
Would it kill you to at least find a similar looking font?