No songs

>No songs
>No muushu
Why even call it mulan

Attached: IMG_20190630_143441.jpg (1788x1041, 148K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YigM-F4oSIE
youtu.be/rINj6MyEjmY?t=168
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

They did Dumbo without the crows, they don't give a shit about anything.

>this beautiful man is also being cut
what's the point

Attached: shang.jpg (600x500, 36K)

are you fucking serious

>dude Disney is just printing money by just making the exact same film again but with live-action and worse than the original
>WTF HOW DARE THEY TRY TO MAKE AN ACTUAL NEW MOVIE REEEEEE

Attached: really activates the almonds.png (680x680, 59K)

>No songs
Wait what? They did that shit with alladdin though.

youtube.com/watch?v=YigM-F4oSIE

If they want to make a new movie, then make a new movie. Don't try to cash in on the sentimentality of people who like the original when all you're really doing is butchering it so you can keep a copyright.

I have never watched any of these live action remakes out of principle, and have no plans to anytime soon. Just the same as I haven't seen any of the ghostbusters reboots, horror character reboots (Rob Zombie's Halloween, Nightmare on Elm St w/o Englund, etc.), or the new Twilight Zone. All of these are only supported by the IP they hold in front of them, none of them would have any merits if they were released without the recognizable assets.

Name recognition

>the villains are europeans instead of the huns
literal kek

This was the only remake I was excited for. Please be good.

Disney's live action remakes are for people who aren't Disney fans, it's why everything "Disney" about them is sucked out.

You know that Mulan is based on a folk tale, right?

I came to post this

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 52K)

>gong li
>jason scott lee
>european

Because the main character is still Mulan
He's being cut be a character that's going to have the exact same role

>if the movie stinks just don't go
I take issues with that statment, seeing how the thing and shawshank redemption were movies that were considered "stinkers" when they came out

I think the movie is based on the ORIGINAL FOLK TALE

They were cowards with the crows, why didn't they just make them a generic street gang and have them all have different accents.

Didn't the original folk tale end with Mulan sold into slavery and committing suicide?

No
It's just like the movie, but without magic
youtu.be/rINj6MyEjmY?t=168

Word of mouth makes stinker movies into classics. If the movie stinks wait for someone to tell you otherwise.

I'm honestly more upset people are actually paying to see these movies.

The songs in Mulan would never fly on 2019

>No Mushu
Why even live
That dragon is based af
Lemme guess, they even removed the cricket, didn't they?

GODDAMMIT

>No Muushu
Good; he didn't add shit that you couldn't have done with the cricket.

>no songs
Bummer if true.

Stop supporting Disney. They're so fucking lazy.

Last I heard they put songs back in due to backlash.

I'm honestly interested in this because they're changing shit otherwise. At least it won't be that predictable I guess. Also I want to see how Disney does war and mixed sex bathing in live action.

I thought she lived as a general and even married a woman to look more like a man

There's multiple versions, what with it being a very very old story

There's a bunchg of different versions, varying depending on the customs and values of their time period.
The most common is that she served in the army, retired and started afamily.

Isn't the Shang character gonna be replaced with a white guy? Makes no sense if true, Huns were at their height at a time when Rome was in near collapse.

Huns are several hundred years off any plausible point in time for Mulan.

They only chose "Huns" because it's the most recognizable term for steppe nomads for a western audience.