Here's the official word. Everything below is the absolute truth:
It was okay, but the worst of the 4 movies.
It only kind of justified its existence by having more finality in the end than the rest of them.
Most of Andy's toys had nothing to do.
The biggest problem was that it seemed to have about 6 subplots and no main plot.
People who claim that they "ruined" Bo's character are retarded because she didn't have a character in the first 2 movies to be ruined.
Other urls found in this thread:
insidethemagic.net
twitter.com
This franchise is exhausted, I hope this is the end.
Did I hear you want more?
On an unrelated note. Abigail Disney is a pretty decent class traitor and I hope she joins us, when us poor folk eat the rich.
my only issue with is with Bo's outfit, I always got the impression that she wasn't an opposable doll with removable clothing, so how did her outfit change
R-r-r-RETCONNNED!
Literally the worst in the franchise, so I don’t know why the RT score is that high.
I think you already know why.
$$$$$
RT is more retarded with animated movies than anything else.
I think it works best out of the pixar sequels. The rest of them fall into a weird category of Okay, but not great. Mediocre watchable. This one was at least a little better than that.
so they retconned her from being 100% porceline to being a plastic barbie doll?
She's still porcelain. Just that her clothes are removable.
I BELONG IN THE
>It only kind of justified its existence by having more finality in the end than the rest of them.
In what way?
Have you seen it?
I mean Woody and Bo having more adventures seems like a possibility. They could even have a Toy Story movie about Bonnie's remaining toys, if they wanted to go that route.
>eat the rich
Silence commie
I liked it. Was it me or did Bo have a panty line?
Is there porn of Gabby yet?
They ruined Toy Story and they didn't even have to. It was done. We were all happy. The fucking core of this entire series was mortality and coming to terms with your existence and they pulled that off THREE TIMES almost flawlessly. They caught lightning in a bottle three separate times with the added bonus of making perhaps the only sequel over a decade later that actually used the time gap to its advantage and making it more immersive and relatable to the teenagers who grew up on the first two movies. The Toy Story franchise was a fucking achievement, and now they came back to fuck it all up. With just one cashgrab it all comes crashing down forever tarnishing its legacy and they didn't need to do it. Greed is such an ugly thing. I wouldn't mind at all if this movie got cancelled, I was actually really hoping for that to happen. This is just sad; they made this movie to promote the toy story attraction parks - this movie takes place at a carnival for fuck's sake. I know how it ends, I've seen all the webms of the ending so it's fair for me to make this judgement. The ending to this basically downplays and dishonors the ending of the third movie and that's bullshit. This movie is a tragedy, for me anyway.
Jesus, calm down. It's not THAT bad. It's just a movie, son.
even in movie 1 where everything looked plasticy (slinky's ears), her dress was still obviously not proceline.
>RETCONNNNNNN
She was never made of porcelain. What the fuck is wrong with you people?
I always thought she was one of those PVC figures. I had one of Bella from beauty and the beast that had a long skirt but no legs.
Now I unironically want this shithead to order a TS5 to retcon this terrible ending.
i loved it, wasn't expecting to cry
Fact: The only reason the Toy Story franchise is so critically acclaimed is because animation has a lower bar for standards.
Anyone feel more emotional when Gabby was tossed aside and when she was accepted by that lost girl than by anything else in the movie?
i don't get the hate for the ending
2 was about Woody becoming scared of "dying"
4 is about Woody not caring anymore about death if it means helping other toys and children
Of course she’s made pf porcelain you fucking muppet
Think he’s bad? Wait until the next guy.
insidethemagic.net
Fuck those parasitic, tax-evading inheritance queens
So did anything come from how Forky was made? Like do they try to explain what makes a toy come to life or do they just joke about it?
No, Forky ends up being just another subplot.
>her clothes are removable.
N-no please i beg you!
Officer Giggles McDimples is cute! CUTE!
Does she really have that much detail? You never see her that close-up in the movie.
She did nothing the entire movie. Just more useless filler in an already crowded movie.
Forky had so much potential to be explored but all we get is him hanging out with Gabby for like 3 minutes a pop. The other new characters were fucking shit. Duke Caboom is cringe for being Canadian based (And the motorcycle leaping thing stretches suspension of disbelief incredibly hard), the 2 carnival plushies are just nigger comedians for the normie laffs and are not essential to the plot, and Bo is just there because she is a leftover from the first Lassetter rom com script that the SJW NuPixar crew took and mutated into generic action girl. Toy Story 3 looks like a motherfucking MASTERPIECE compared to this unfocused, crowded schlock.
um...
giggle is cute
I can't wait for TS7 buddy!
>TS3 is higher than TS2
Fucking what. TS2 is the best in the franchise.
Why are you wording this like it was left dangling in 2? The final lines of dialogue in that film between Buzz and Woody are them discussing exactly that, with Woody content that when his time with Andy is over, at least he'll still always have Buzz (and the others) afterwards.
Considering how beloved the second one is, it's easy to see why fans of that movie wouldn't like this direction for their characters here.
If you even watched the movie, you'll see that they touch up on her being porcelain after her arm gets cut off.
lmao delusion
Didn't realize 3 was so wholeheartedly embraced. It had great gags, but the villain's motivation was surprisingly bland, the movie was much too long, and the entire scene with the incinerator was not necessary at all.
It also suffers a little from "Up" syndrome... the very end and very beginning of the movie are 10/10, but the stuff that comes in the middle was clearly not thought out.
I don't mind Woody becoming a country-traveling toy that helps other toys find their Andys. You could argue his motivation defies the last two movies, but he took his new purpose on the chin better than Lotso. And being stuck in a glass museum case would still have been a shitty alternative to seeing Andy to adulthood, getting Jessie a new child etc.
Woody leaving Buzz's side in the end sucks though. It's not what was prophesied at the end of the first movie.
6 subplots? written by commission ... I agree Bo never had a character, but how is she now? generic strok wamen or something noteworthy
She didn't bother me personally.
The Holy Trinity of fuck having friends endings (3rd one is a placeholder for Frozen 2)
Porcelain dolls tend to have separate clothing. My aunt collected them briefly so I got to see how they work. She should be making porcelain crunch noises when moving and have a different skin texture though.
>People who claim that they "ruined" Bo's character are retarded because she didn't have a character in the first 2 movies to be ruined.
She was pretty firmly established as not being an active participant in adventures.
>the entire scene with the incinerator was not necessary at all.
Ultimate tasteless retard.
>Woody leaving Buzz's side
This happens? I'm actually buttmad about this.
>eat the rich
If you can post on Yea Forums, you literally are the rich
Have sex
Neither Elsa nor Anna really have friends though?
Definitely