The New Face Of Horror

Who else is sick of the trend of “Past generation’s nostalgia = New generation’s horror”? Like Chuck E. Cheese/ Showbiz Pizza has FNAF now, Furby has Tattletail, and now there’s this. What’s next, Rugrats becomes a horror series where the Rugrats theory is true? Blegh. Modern horror is so stale.

Attached: 116970C7-AD86-475F-BFCA-ACE097C3F9DE.jpg (825x464, 58K)

no need, Csupo's artsyle has always been horrifying, the Rugrats has always had the same sway over its viewers as a Hôpital Brut film

Horror has always been stale. And I say that as an avid horror fan,

Just come up with your own fucking monsters or slashers for once in your life. When the closest thing to original horror this decade was either Jordan Peele's overrated trash, the Conjuring series and fucking Paranormal Activity...things are bad.

Pretty much this. When you base your monster off another monster people will be able to see it. guillermo del toro complain about this, saying to go back to nature use real animals or real experience for your monster or story don't just try and copy somebody else's.

Original ideas have too much potential risk for companies to invest in them though

Wait, what? Banana Splits are coming back as horror?
For what purpose?

A Quiet Place made a lot of money and won an Oscar.

Well, Rugrats was creepy AF

Wait, nominated.

Was A Quiet Place horror though?
Felt more like a shoddy drama with aliens thrown in haphazardly.

Made for Syfy movie in August that’s believed to be made out of the Warner Bros unused FNAF script when that jumped ship to Blumhouse. They are robots and kill people. Look up the trailer on YouTube.

As a 'fuck you' to the creator of Five Nights at Freddy's for not selling the film rights. No, seriously.

and was a mess of plotholes and shit writing that was only given a chance because of a name attached to it

Why are they robots? Wouldn't it be scarier if they were just human serial killers in costumes?

adult men in creepy suits targeting children carry unfortunate implications that robots don't

Wouldn't you want a horror movie to be creepy? Freddy was a child murderer, Leatherface tried raping women in some timelines, Michael Myers tried killing his young niece...

That was in the past century, user.

Because fnaf was robots, that is the reason here.

Character costumes in general are pretty spooky

2010 Freddy was an actual Pedophile.

>Unemotional logic should be more important than emotional character work.

Attached: image.jpg (555x480, 48K)

>A group of America’s top herpetologists are tasked by the government to tag along with two dozen marines to travel to an island off the coasts of South Carolina
>There have been reports of a 6 foot tall amphibian-like creature with yellow skin
> Locals in the area have nicknamed the beast “Binyah Binyah”
> The discovery of human remains on past expeditions has led the government to fear that the creature is dangerous
> Due to amphibians being aquatics creatures, it is feared that the beast was capable of swimming to mainland and causing chaos
> Their goal is to confirm the beast’s existence and, if so, kill it for examination
> Little did they know. The creature knew of the team’s arrival. And he was very excited

Gullah Gullah Island. Coming soon

You stupid millenials forced your awful nostalgia on Zoomers, like how boomers forced clowns and circus on you, and you didn't expect it to turn out like this?
Goddamn you really are the stupidest generation.

Why not go the tulpa route and bullshit some explanation about how the characters came to life off the animation cels? Or would that only work if they combined live action with 2D like in Roger Rabbit?

The best character work in the world means nothing when the characters are acting like retards so the script can move forward.

We see the suit of the lion dude hanged in a room so chances are that the "original" Banana Splits will show up to gun down those robots.

Rugrats theory? Indulge me please

That'd be great