And into the trash it goes

>mcucks defending this

Video games died in 2015.

>single-player= BAD
This user is underage.

>implying that you'd play the game
you are the trash

>Dcrybaby saying online campaign is a giod thimg when Division and Fallout 76 prove otherwise

Wait, when people were asking for multiplayer they weren't talking about co-op?

...This is bad?

>mentions DC for no reason
For free or for a fee?

Oh sorry, sir. Here is your Avengers: Battle Royale you asked for.

Attached: doledippers.jpg (480x480, 20K)

>108249163
Sure user Your post dosent oust you as a DCrybaby.

Best news. Thanks OP, now I’m hyped for this game

Attached: image.jpg (1242x1540, 1.58M)

Have you never done a multiplayer campaign with a sibling or close friend? I remember when me and my older brother got an Xbox for Christmas and played splitscreen co-op Halo: CE.

You fool.

All this means is that the SP is an afterthought.
The multiplayer will be where all the effort goes to nickel and dime people.

Halo and a shit ton of military shooters have done it well for over a decade. It's not mandatory but an Avengers game which is a team and co-op is fundamental to how the group works makes a lot of sense to have multiplayer.

Good.

Fuck off

You dipshits are just looking for reasons to complain at this point

Careful Ladderbro or else you're going to get banned for picking on poor defenseless DC

It's his fetish.

That's a good thing though????

yes its shit because my older sister would punch or sit on me if she didnt get the power ups first

I love 100% single player games, user. I know at least a half dozen people who feel that way. I dunno why you feel you have to hate what you don't understand.

That sounds pretty hot.

Dcrybaby huh? Is that your new catchphrase, Ladderbro?

It's Ladderbro. Definitely free in his head

>Spider-Man 4
?

Based

Who cares, Ultimate Alliance 3 is coming out and that should have all the multiplayer story mode you’d need.

Attached: 5D97CB11-9812-4985-8DE8-702163EC3435.jpg (640x521, 68K)

Whi the fuck is ladderbro

that's unironically a good thing.

Attached: 1474343090659.png (873x623, 133K)

Imaginary bogeyman who is responsible for every post that hurts DC fans feelings

Kinda like Tommy for Marvel fans

Shut in player games are for losers and always bomb if not under an important brand

>OP wants multiplayer campaing
Wow, what an idiot.

LMAO, this is going to flop. Single player experiences don't sell anymore.

>if not under an important brand
you mean like Squeenix?

>KH3
>RE:Make 2
>RDR 2
all of those are the best selling games of 2019 so far, an they're all single player games

B A S E D

Glad I'm not the only one who noticed this

I'm saying this game is a waste of time and they should develop multiplayer games
The gaming community is better when we can actually be a community. No one otherwise would buy these games

>solo only cuck
>calling anyone else Yea Forums
Fuck off casual

look
>they should develop multiplayer games
why don't you go stick to Anthem then

Those are exceptions with a lot of hype
When it comes to RE2 Monster Hunter World still sold gangbusters compared to it
I wonder why.....
Red Dead 2 also has a multiplayer mode. The game would be reaching gta5 levels if the online was good

games that arent these exceptions 100% bomb
Look at the evil within 2, prey and Hitman 2

Shut in player games are for losers

You would have a point if you didn't used the exact same saved pictures for several years.

So what this is shaping up to be is a ADHD super hero fest where the player will constantly shift characters every 10 mins and each will have extremely shallow gameplay when they finally break from cutscenes.

Attached: 1553479497596.png (1176x850, 850K)

I'll stick to fifa, CoD, monster Hunter world and GTA online
You know, games that actually sell?
You losers need to stop holding the industry back

Even ninja theory a studio known for single player "experiences" knows where they should focus their resources towards

>RDR2
>ever reaching gta levels
No. It's not casual enough

>games that arent these exceptions 100% bomb
you mean like Automata, GoW, Witcher, Sekiro or Insomniac Spiderman, DmC or literally any other triple AAA single player game that has come out in the past 5 years?

Attached: Screenshot_2017-11-15-21-51-04.png (1080x1920, 554K)

It never will because it's online sucks but still sells more because it actually has online

>cant even get a proper image
you are fucking stupid and only play trash

Automa pandered to shut ins
GoW and Spider-Man had console seller marketing and is an important brand
Sekiro is going to be a dead game while dark souls rains king cause it has online,
DMC6 will sell much worse if it remains single player, change my mind
>literally any other triple AAA single player game that has come out in the past 5 years?
Do you mean the ones with online or the ones that bombed?

>Yea Forums is entirely full of faggots that have no friends to play video games with
I shouldn't be surprised, but it still managed to catch me off guard.

>Game about a team of heroes
>Can't play as a team

lol

Also the Witcher 3 and Fallout make up by just being super long games (perfect for shut ins!)
If they were any shorter no one would buy them
I mean what kind of retard spends $60 for a 15 hour game

No wonder Peter was heartbroken she died

Attached: 1560896481882.jpg (1024x744, 81K)

>Avengers, Assemble! jk lol
How is it possible that Star Wars has more effort and attention put into their games than one of the most profitable franchises in the world

Por que no los dos?

Attached: both.jpg (600x600, 38K)

I wonder what kind of bass Thor's chest-mounted sound system gets

Porque one steals dev time from the other and you end up with two shitty experiences

Spider-man and GoW sold like crazy, what're you talking about?

Would Spider-Man have sold as well of it wasn't marketed as a console seller?
No Spider-Man game before has

>It only did well because it was marketed as a console mover
What kind of fucking idiot are you? It was good, it sold very well. Not hard

man Yea Forums really does find whatever stupid bullshit it can latch onto to fight huh? this is like company wars inside company wars.

>Would Spider-Man have sold as well of it wasn't marketed as a console seller?
wouldn't that have has the OPPOSITE effect? no one wants to have to buy a console just to play game unless it's really good, the word of mouth saved that game because, surprise, it was really good.

You know what "really good" single player games bombed?
Prey, Hitman 2, and The Evil Within 2

This,
God of War is single player and literally the best PS4 game.

shut up EA salesman

people are lusting hard for the outer worlds

>people are lusting hard for the outer worlds
>epic games
into the trash it goes
you know whats funny too? most of those devs who take the epic bonus are mostly single player games
i wonder why....

>The Evil Within 2
you mean a game that was weighed down by the fact the first one was really shitty and it got virtually no advertisement?

What's your obsession with bringing it up? when it's not even a comparable situation to literally the other dozen single-player games that have been brought up so far?

God of War sucks ass m8.

>evil within
>good

Attached: 974158AE-090E-4E31-92E8-85FDEA0C1247.png (124x146, 19K)

>not playing the superior avengers game

Attached: H2x1_NSwitch_MarvelUltimateAlliance3TheBlackOrder_image1600w[1].jpg (1600x800, 239K)

>video games going the same way comics and animation did with how Japan is pretty much your only option.
Reminder that GRRM worked with Miyazaki and not Bethesda.

Attached: 56456456456456.jpg (592x442, 48K)

Fuck yes!

Go back to COD

I would kill for any Overwatch like competitive game with different Marvel heroes. If the roster was limited to just 21 at launch what characters would you pick to be in the game and which would be the first batch of DLC?

Attached: Overwatch-Characters-Reimagined-as-Marvel-Cast-in-Marvel-lous-Fan-Art-7.jpg (900x1160, 228K)

Good to hear, although I thought people were already aware of that when they announced that they hired an entirely new dev team to exclusively handle the multiplayer mode.

cool, i'm actually interested now.

I was playing Cho Aniki on PS1 when you were still in your dad's balls.

>playing shit 3rd installment with sub 30 frames
you shills are retarded

It took the thread this long for someone ti finally be right. Dissapoint.

Oh no. Does this mean I won't have to play this game with faggots like OP?

What's with the tryhard attempted tribalism of those pushing MUA3 anyways? Avengers isn't even coming out until fucking next year, just chill it out with the Yea Forums-tier retardation.

Ballsy move nowadays. as someone with no friends, I appreciate that.

OH NOOOOO, IT'S NOT ANOTHER FPS SHOOTER BATTLE ROYALE, CAN'T PLAY WITH MY 7 YEAR OLD NEIGHBORS NO MORE

Attached: 1560570429706.png (722x720, 580K)

None of what said detracted from those games selling well.

Seriously try rewriting what you said into valid base argument formats.

There are to many decent single player games that bomb while bad multiplayer games still are able to make money

How come there's no Fortnite event with Thor hunting down Noobmaster?

yeah, because of 7 year olds like you

Based

>citing ps1 for credibility
neck yourself 20 something faggot

And gacha games make even MORE fucking money and they're actually more singleplayer with faked multiplayer.

but imagine if you had the option of having boi co-op

Pathetic cocksucker

Anyone that's a Marvel / MCU shill.

I'm 30 faggot.

I know they're not doing the MCU or the comics but it just feels like Great Value Avengers.

Attached: norris mad.gif (512x384, 997K)

non-american can't understand this

I assume its some kind of generic brand.

So far it looked like shit. I cannot understand how single or multiplayer changes that at all.

Why would you want the campaign to not be single player?

OP was probably expecting Marvel Ultimate Alliance or War for Cybertron-tier multiplayer where it's completely optional but in single player you'll always be accompanied by two-three ai controlled bots.

based

>caring about multishit
This is good news, it means it won't be dumbed down to fit in multiplayer mechanics some faggots would only bother with for a month before moving onto the next multishit game.

So why does it need to be "live service" or whatever the fuck then

Money, characters can be free but you can charge for a lot when its a live service and people eat it up because they feel like its a good deal.

ZOOMERS BTFO

This isn't the first time they've made a single player live game.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is one.

Attached: 20190411220618_1.jpg (3840x2160, 723K)

lol fuck videogames

How so for TR?

Single player with dlc costumes and added tombs.

Dcrybaby huh? New catchphrase, faggot?

This. Amen.

now you have little to no effort put into boi ai

no.

story rich, if a game just has this its barely a game
multiplayer, if this is all a game has going for it its a co op game that is 100% dependant on who you play it with

what needs to be in a game first and foremost is solid mechanics, from there build off the rest of the game.
the main problem with games is they dont base games on solid mechanics, but instead try to give the illusion of solid mechanics and good luck with rng. I wish more games would focus on mechanics 100% before ever going forward with what they want to do.

That's the standard. A more accurate "Live Service" single player example would be the Shadow of Mordor and Assassin's Creed post Kenway trilogy where they use the gacha/sports system for armor, gold, SP online communities, and other stuff you'd usually find in a mobile game.

Thank god. Fuck online shit

That's a really good thing

>what is Bloodborne

You assume correct.