Endgame to get "additional footage"

Attached: YOUR fucking Job.jpg (223x218, 61K)

Brilliant strategy. I kind of wanted to see it again but now I definitely will

A re-release that has no new footage except for a few post credit scenes.

That's not going to draw people in, especially with Toy Story 4 out this weekend.

POO story 4 will flop.

Same

>paying to see a few extra scenes that will be on youtube in a week
Fuck no. I'd go see if it included the original 2 hour long fight scene.

They're that desperate to beat Avatar? Well can't blame em, I'd be pissed if 10 years of build up and 22 films still failed to break Avatar's box office numbers.

Brilliantly pathetic, in fact.

DCek in suicide watch.

And if they don't manage to oversell Avatar, will they re-release it once again?

Nobody said anything about DC. Eager much?

This is exactly who it will grab.
I'll see it again too.

user, let me introduce you to Ladderbro. DC lives in his head rent free since he was born.

>That's not going to draw people in, especially with Toy Story 4 out this weekend.
I dunno man, aside from Avengers and John Wick, none of the other blockbusters released this year really set the summer on fire. No one seems to care about Aladdin, MIB, Godzilla, etc.

Probably, in all honesty I can see them re-releasing Avatar just to help the general public remember what that movie was about after a 10 year hiatus.

They'll add in the sales from the inevitable multi-film marathons.

I hope they rerun it on imax in my location.

They own both, so they cant lose.

What? Aladdin is doing monstrously well. Look at it's numbers right now

Aladdin made a 700 million dollars user

Milking so hard the cow is dehydrated.

>No one seems to care about Aladdin
And this is why Yea Forums needs to be removed from the site

Attached: Screenshot_20190619-101507_Chrome.jpg (757x1293, 353K)

What's it like having access to the internet, yet being so disconnected from actual information?

If they have an extra scene for Dr. Strance and some Widow and GOTG teasers, im in, I don't need more Spidey shit, they already sold FFH to me

If they show captain America meeting the red skull that would be cool

>Yea Forums references a board outside its own
I'd make a drinking game out of this but then I'd be fucking dead.

No theater will show a five and a half hour movie.

>Had to re-release it just to beat avatar.
People wanted avatar to stay in theaters people got bored of Endgame quick

Attached: e7a.jpg (1916x945, 238K)

I meant home media shit.

>Posting that image somehow ignoring Avatar is about to have it's own consume product/get hype for next product

They're owned by the same company.

Its like thinking Coke and Sprite are in competition, like Sprite gaining popularity is detrimental to Coca Cola's mark on culture.

Too many unpopular decisions. they should’ve kept tony alive. Who wants to see their fave die over and over again?

>they should’ve kept tony alive
No

I mean, since they’re so desperate for money they’re doing reruns. Killing Cap would have been less box office risk. They might have seen 3 billion.

>Who wants to see their fave die over and over again?
As someone who likes the character, I wanted him to die.

>they’re so desperate for money
More like they're taking an easy opportunity in a dead theater season

And in the end, it's all Disney

Norms found it too depressing and I saw people trying to cancel their second tickets.

Looking at it's box office, that clearly worked

You're an embarrassment

It didn’t beat Avatar.

Well clearly it didn't hurt the box office too much. Second highest grossing movie of all time and all.

And its not like depressing=low sales. Titanic was number 1 til Avatar lest we forget

And nothing beat Gone with the Wind

That's right

Who could forget that MASSIVE second weekend drop

Par the course for blockbusters.

>paying for 4 min of new scenes and a FFH trailer after the credits
The absolute state of mousefags

Uh, it had a normal second weekend drop. "MASSIVE" second weekend drop describes Dark Phoenix or BvS

>People acting like Disney don't have a history of re-releasing their movies

John Wick didn't do that well

They really are that petty about trying to claim the record, aren't they?

Also it's three hours long and in no way worthy of that runtime, had they made a shorter more concise movie they would have surpassed Avatar weeks ago.

It's sarcasm genius

>They're getting very desperate to beat Avatar it seems.

Understandable. It would suck to get so close and be denied.

I think so. If there's new footage I am going, partly for that and partly to help it get to the top position.

Kinda childish, but let's face it, this is capeshit after all.

>This is exactly who it will grab.
Retards?

They'd need to pay me to sit through that shit in the theater again. Why would you do this to yourself?
>inb4 ADHD zoomer
Fuck off, I can watch the extended edition of Return of the King any day. This is no Return of the King.

Attached: 1559407520061.jpg (493x352, 60K)

Don’t you have AMC stubs. Literally every Tuesday is 5$ movie day. Unless you’re a poor faggot who doesn’t live in the USA or the better states in the nation.

For me everything before Thanos was beheaded was a stand out moment. The immediate aftermath, Tony sperging out, having Infinity War's general pace, etc. was great. I still enjoy the movie but I know it could have been better and felt much more epic. I think killing off Thanos was what robbed it of that epic feel. Had he beaten the Avengers when they came for him but shown them mercy and then later finds out they're working to undo the snap, he's fucking furious and begins rebuilding his army to invade, which is the b plot running concurrent to the time heist and means we don't have to have that Gamora, past Nebula, etc. bullshit. EG Thanos is fine but not as good as the one that had an actual character arc, pathos, etc. And the big three fighting him should have been extended.

Kek, in Mexico only the nicest theaters have $4 tickets for normal showings, most normal showings in regular theaters are under $3.

also if you have stubs just...use it for your 3 movies a week thing.

The only new US release next week is Yesterday (dude wakes up to discover the beatles don't exist, so he begins to cover all their songs and gets rich). But it also sounds like this is all on the home release so you know do whatever.

Avatar had a re-release. It’s only fair Endgame gets one, sweetie.

You can have 2014 Thanos and do it more organically. Have regular Thanos destroy the gems when the Avengers arrive at his planet, and the impact of the snap shatters his body into nothingness. But unbeknownst to the Avengers he becomes ethereal and resides inside the gems (a reference to him becoming omnipotent in Infinity Gauntlet), when he learns the Avengers are going to undo the snap, he uses the last of his strength to inform 2014 Thanos and he arrives from the past into the future without that retarded Nebula subplot.

Uh, every John Wick film has increased from the previous

>new footage
What will it be, Yea Forums?

Attached: 1559758651780.jpg (496x594, 98K)

Stark's daughter from the future. I'd bet $100 over it.

It doesn't matter. You will consume it mindlessly no matter what it is. Just give Disney all your money now.

I never said Avatar was good. Just this is an obvious desperate move to beat it

black widow scenes probably. And the cut off post credit scene in captain marvel

>I never said Avatar was good
Neither did I, I was posting that because posting that image when not only are they both under the same company now, but James has been trying to get Avatar as a cinematic franchise off the ground for a while now is very hypocritical

I'll believe it when I see it. Comparing that to the MCU isn't the same at all. Also just because Disney owns it now doesn't mean a thing, they want their win

>I'll believe it when I see it.
Believe what exactly? There's 4 sequels planned to release every other year

The 2014 Thanos was Steppenwolf tier. IW Thanos wasn't written very well either, but like you said, the pathos and the tragedy behind his character worked regardless. What is the point of the Russos trying to make him """understandable""" if they don't do anything with the character further? Where's the self-sabotage? Where's him wrestling with the realization of the futility of his actions?

Hell, they could have done that with the 2014 Thanos too, arguably even better. since this is him before Gamora and Nebula turned on him, so they could write in something about him becoming increasingly fatalistic in their absence and so when the 2014 Thanos has to confront the grim reality of the future he was about to create, the character could make all kinds of interesting decisions. But nope, time to genocide harder.

The Russos are hacks.

Attached: 1542318227133.jpg (482x609, 47K)

Avatar is better than any given Avengers movie

Attached: DeiUcuGXUAQCzLd.jpg_large.jpg (579x850, 100K)

Oh, wait until they re-release Endgame for the 100th time.

You're just ignoring my point

Bts stuff maybe a blooper reel

The writers aren't amazing either. It took a fucking producer to come up with the "And I am Iron Man" line after the initial shooting wrapped.

And if Thanos in EG was still IW one I'd be find it he broadly behaved the same but adding in a few extra lines would have made the world of difference and made us felt that he does have a history with the heroes he's fighting. Maybe when the three confront him him he laments over sacrificing his daughter and losing it all for something that didn't work (people not moving on and thriving as he intended them to).

Avatar was in theaters for 8 months, in 2 months avengers is 40 million away.

Literally, it came out in january and was still being shown in august.

Thanos talking to his past self could be cool but I think the best route is simply have him still be the guy from IW. It would also make his defeat more satisfying. The better version of Thanos already got killed off unceremoniously and the one from 2014 who never went on his own little journey, doesn't have as deep a history with the heroes, etc. is the one that gets the big dramatic death

He's been saying that for a decade, more Terminator movies have been made in the meantime. Development hell exist and it looks like it's stuck there

Oh sure, Gone with the Wind re-released like 10 times back in the day and Titanic/Avatar can re-release like twice and it's fine but Endgame rerelease? How DARE they!

Avatar was an original property. Endgame has ten years worth of hype
>inb4 "but the story wasn't original"

Avatar 2 was literally delayed again recently. They are not delaying it past 2021, it will throw their Avatar->Star Wars->Avatar->Star Wars schedule out of wack

I think he's overestimating how many people are going to see Avatar sequels

Movies are different now. Before it took years to come to home video, even when Avatar was out it'd be at least a year for the DVD. Not to mention that it was hyped up as "you HAVE to see this in the theater. Now all marvel movies go directly to Netflix as soon as they leave the theater. It's clearly just to try and pass Avatar

Damn, my local theater is putting recliner seats in this week, and my job just gave me a $25 gift card to them.
Looks like Endgame is back on the menu.

Again, I'll believe it when I see it. Disney may push it out just because of the park but no one really cares about it anymore

>not going to see John Wick 3 or Godzilla
Shit taste m8

Nobody is gonna watch Avatar 2, man.

Betting against James Cameron's directing seems like a pretty risky proposition.

BASEDD

Seen em.
Wick 3 was pretty good. KotM was sitting through a monumental amount of stupid shit to see 20 minutes of neat monster footage.

His direction on Avatar wasn't special. I'd be surprised if they went a head and made a 3. Unless they are required to

Watch Wick again. Endgame is sitting through 3 hours for like 20min of good scenes

Yeah, it's so dumb that, with the theme of inability to move on, Thanos didn't get to chime in in any way. They had him rack up losses all throughout IW, culminating in the Soul World scene with kid Gamora, which should have been the breaking point and yet in EG, not even Farmer Thanos shows any self-reflection whatsoever. It's like they flushed his psychological make-up down the drain.

It's like they really don't understand the characters they are writing and that's not the first time, even with the characters they shepherded for a long time. I can somewhat understand mischaracterizing Nebula, but Thanos is theirs and yet they are making the mistakes of a screenwriter who got a characters handed down without any notes from the previous creator and only a shallow understanding of what made them tick and appealing to the audience in the original material.

I'd rather watch paint dry

I'd understand Wick 3 but you fanboys need to stop pretending KOTM is this underrated piece of art because there's a reason its box office is tanking.

>I can somewhat understand mischaracterizing Nebula,
You mean making her great?

Who said it was art. The human sub plot is shit, I just enjoyed seeing Ghidora and Mothra. Keep watching your capeshit and thinking it's deep

>partly to help it get to the top position
Why?

Attached: 1512071707352.png (366x337, 101K)

>too dumb to teleport back when she realized Thanos knew
>great

Her getting all sentimental with him at the beginning is out of character for her. She shouldn't have beaten his face to mush or anything, but even the little drop of sympathy she showed for him was too much.

user she acted far too emotionally stunted while the Guardians movies had her act normal. And she isn't stupid, hot-blooded, yes, but not stupid. (And she wasn't hot-blooded here).

Why are people so obsessed with Box office numbers?

Attached: 1510181460838.jpg (312x448, 67K)

"This is Avatar. He's the toughest there is."

"Well, he's never fought me."

"Yeah, he has."

"Well, he's never fought me twice."

Critics were bought by Disney. Test screenings leaked over a year ago and they were very favorable. This movie isn't much worse than your average MCU film.
Disney can't risk losing revenue or letting another franchise grow and compete against their franchise of movies.

>The human sub plot is shit,
And thats what is bringing the movies down. People like the monster action but there's like only 30 minutes of it in total compared to the 90 minutes the humans get

Because it decides on whether you will get more of thing or less of thing when it comes to cinematic universes.

Good box offices-MCU, leads to more MCU
Questionable box office-DCEU, leads to railroaded movie plans, actors leaving, cohesion lost, movies greenlit and cancelled on a dime
Bad box office-Dark Universe, SHUT IT DOWN

>Critics were bought by Disney.
Of course

>This movie isn't much worse than your average MCU film.
There is a strong difference. There are no focal characters to latch on to and they keep killing off the ones that people actually do like. They don't even do something like Bumblebee where there's an interesting story going along with the CGI product

>people

I was more talking about the whole this movie beat that movie shit, i understand caring about whether something makes enough money for a sequel, but the whole thing about "beating" Avatar seems really stupid.

>They don't even do something like Bumblebee where there's an interesting story going along with the CGI product
Well, Bumblebee is something special. We just don't see that kind of movies any more outside of a select few.

>I was more talking about the whole this movie beat that movie shit
Tribalism

Also Cameron said something or other about superhero films a few years ago so it's like "this is gonna stick it to him"

Movie making is basically all a con job on dumb boomer investors who need something shiny waved in front of them to give their money away so hollywood accounting can steal it.

>missing the entire point that that's what Thanos embodies, an inability to move on (what happened to his home planet)

Have sex incel

You stole that from some reddit thread, didn't you

Did you have any doubts he did? A quick search and reddit.com/r/dankmemes/comments/blqchc/

>We have plebbit posting
Damn. MCU rots the brain.

Hahahaha!

No.

I like the MCU.

Highest grossing movie
Gone with the Wind

What is this talk about Avatars and Avengers?

They're competing for the highest grossing film not counting inflation

Kys drone

They are reports from a cultural battleground.

Last 2 good MCU movies were Civil War and Doctor Anticlimactic Ending. Infinity War was serviceable by virtue of being a better Star Wars movie than the actual new Star Wars movies.

You have to count inflation though because in like 10-20 years, with the cost of tickets and everything around it going up, something else will pass it, since the money given for 1 ticket will have doubled-tripled etc.

>He thinks humanity will exist in 10 years
Lol

Seethe

That's what people in 1939 believed and we had so many stuff, but here we are, talking about comicbooks in a japanese imageboard user.

They probably don't due to the fact that it's harder to count the inflation in every country that had showings

TS4 has like 4 post credit scenes already too

>all of these people willing to see it again for a fucking end-credits scene
Where were all of you assholes when Godzilla was tanking? Were there not enough quips to your liking?

I must see Gojira-san again. Thankfully I only saw Memegame once and I have no intention of doing it again. Thanks user.

Most likely nothing special. Longer scenes of people hanging out in a room together, or longer shots of Start looking at math stuff figuring out time travel.

I'll take the ones they have already, if they go into it even harder and manage to analyze and find a movie that has earned more than that, I'll say that. Till then Highest Grossing should be adjusted for inflation.

This mediocre movie doesn't deserve a re-release. Gods I hate capeshit.
I hope Spielberg is right when he predicted that these capecrap movies will go he way of westerns; simply a fad that produced an overabundance of mediocre movies to cash in on some stupid obsession.
Not saying there are no good superhero movies just saying that they're few and far between, and coincidentally most of the good ones were made either before or unrelated to Kevin Fiege's MCU.

All of you faggy spandex soap opera fanboys may scream at me now, if you like.

>lets release the same movie TWICE
only in america
your country is doomed

Aquaman was surprisingly good because it was true to the source material, didn't limit itself in scale.
Spider-Verse finally got Spider-Man right and was even better than the comics it was based on.
You are right.

cringe, man. pure cringe

>Aquaman
>Good
Really nigga? Was it really?

>Spiderverse
>Good
I'll agree with you on this tho. I loved how beautiful the animation was especially. Also Hailee Steinfield is my love and im going to marry her.

>hope Spielberg is right when he predicted that these capecrap

You’re over 40, right?

Gone with the Wind was re-released many times. It was during an era where people had no choice but to see a movie in theaters. Reminds me of the Itchy and Scratchy the movie episode

As an spectacle? Yes, I think I got more than my money's worth with Aquaman. Didn't shy away from the comics absurdity either. What were your issues with it?
And yes, it's impressive how she could turn Spider-Gwen into a compelling character.

No u

No, 23 as of a few months ago. There's so many good shows and movies but they're all over shadowed by these loud and stupid fucking movies.

>no u
grow the fuck up

No u

>back in the day and Titanic/Avatar can re-release like twice and it's fine but Endgame rerelease? How DARE they!

Movies back pre-1970’s were re released because there was no home media or Tv airings. Going to the movies was a big event for everybody because if you missed it, you either had to go to another city or wait many years for another re release. Heck, there’s a vintage picture from my country (Puerto Rico) about the streets filled with people for the premiere of “Gone with the Wind” in theaters.

Oh shit! Here we go again.jpg

Last good one was probably Ant-Man.

Sounds like your Thanos fanboyism cloud your judgement a bit.

>Where were all of you assholes when Godzilla was tanking
I saw it once. I liked the monster stuff, but everything else was awful. I'll stick with Shin Godzilla and anything else Toho puts out.

Cope

>I'll stick with Shin Godzilla and anything else Toho puts out.
I getcha. Minimal monster stuff and even worse human interactions. You fucking weeaboo trash.

They probably didn't even need the rerelease considering where they're standing now, but this rerelease just cements it and then some.

Shin Godzilla is going back to the roots of the series and focusing on how humanity deals with disaster. Watch your capeshit if you want to see shit explode

>You fucking weeaboo trash.
Godzilla is Japanese. There are only 3 American Godzilla movies, bitch are you stupid?

You're not seriously trying to say the American Godzilla movies are better than the Japanese ones are you? Because it almost looks like that's what you're saying, but that would be retarded

And a 1998 cartoon series that does circles around Weebzilla.

i think there was only one extended version re-release, but still.

I don't know what you two are arguing about, but the American version of Godzilla was despised by Japan so they made it an impostor that Godzilla kills. Just a tun fact.

The 1998 one is called 'Zilla', so he's a different kaiju in his own right. Yes, he is killed in 'Final Wars', but he gives the big G a fight, despite being hideously outclassed.

>Puerto Rico
>country

Attached: E89ABCF35F184EA4AE0A4EE7431051D7.jpg (820x1206, 233K)

Wait, do you actually think they hate the 2014 version?

>but he gives the big G a fight
Doesn't he die in like 10 seconds?

He means the 90s version that was despised and killed.

could they maybe do highest returns in proportion to budget? you could argue that a movie that makes half as much as avengers but took 10% of its budget to make, then its a much more successful film commercially.

Pathetically predictable

He was the best in Endgame by a mile.

That's usually considered already a phenomenal success but at the same token, how many movies do you know that made $750M off a 22 million budget

Phase 3 movies are Marvel's most consistently well-liked and successful movies.

And an earlier Hannah-Barbera cartoon series.

I don't think they care to be considered burgers.

the motivation is much easier than some meaningless title. they want more money. its always about money. and if they can get fans to pay more money for a product they've already sold, why wouldn't they do it?

Objectively wrong. Most everyone keeps Iron Man 1 in high regard. Phase 3 always get mixed reactions.

No, that was Phase 1. Iron Man 1 was the only unanimously liked one, the rest did okay until Avengers 1 blew up. Phase 3 was when they started consistently getting bigger and bigger heights, notably with villains

Coproduced by Toho and well regarded over there.
Only when it's important.

I think they have much bigger problems at the moment.

Why is there so much argument over 45 million dollars?

Like, wow! These two movies (of the 7 disney owned in the top ten) both owned by disney made 2.7 billion dollars! Maybe there's something about monopolies we should talk about instead?

Attached: 45.png (564x369, 26K)

>notably with villains
Did they have any good ones on Phase 3 btw? Didn't watch Spider-Man, Thor 3 or Ant-Man 2.

Except for Strange and CM, all the villains were considered improvements from the previous phases. Zemo was different, Ego was great, Vulture was the best part of Spidey, Hela chewed the stagewas whenever she was on screen, don't need to say anything for Killmonger and Thanos. Ghost is middling but as her own character she wasn't too bad. That movie had multiple antagonists

Vulture and Hela were pretty good villains
Ghost...well not so much

Disagree, Ego sucked. He was daddy issues the character played by Kurt Russel on autopilot.

Thanos?

>Zemo lol
>Shrekos
>bitch KIllmonger
Seriously? I mean, at least Klaw was fun but he was from like, Phase 2 or something. Not much to match Stane or Red Skull overall.

Most of the kaijus in that movie don't even last 5 seconds against Godzilla

IW!Thanos was fucking kino, EG!Thanos was awful. I only mentioned those villains because those were from the movies didn't watch

>EG!Thanos was awful
That's not what most people thought.

Lol ladderfag, cope harder.

I did get the vibe from the trailer that Hela might be top tier, but a lot of other stuff turned me off from watching it... specially since they were catching up with current comics Thor.

Give it sometime.

Jesus tapdancing Christ...

Fuck off Disney. Buncha fucking sore losers...can't let anyone have anything, can ya?

avatar had a re-release so it could beat titanic. comparing the two without endgame also having one isn't a fair comparison.

Yeah they can, I won't be part of it though. I'll just sit back and see what leaks.

>conversations between Bruce & Natasha and Tony & Natasha during their respective snaps

Literally all that is needed to turn this movie into a 10/10

Doesn't Disney own avatar? If anything they will use this to have people give them nore money and when Avatar 2 releases they'll do the same shit to tryvto beat Endgame and get as much money as possible.

In the end they still win.

You forgot to remove your name and you outed yourself as a shitposter who actually does try to rile people up with your fake militant Briefaggotry.
From an actual Captain Marvel fan, go fuck yourself.

Avatar was being made for like 15 years before it came out.

Or Star Wars, at this point.

My nigga.

probably something about the Eternals

something teasing the Eternals

It's more like they want to beat it even including inflation.
They're never beating Gone With the Wind, though.

Avatar beated titanic in its first run though.

fair point, but if it had only had one run, Endgame would have already overtaken it.

that's retarded

Endgame already beated Avatar tho

Only retards that can't count think otherwise

Why?

15-minute footage of Cap smashing Peggy through the decades

not him but i like it too. because honestly they've put out more good movies than bad and that's a much better record than most movie franchises. i go to an MCU movie expecting a mostly lighthearted superhero story with a few (or shitloads) of jokes thrown in. they aren't action or comedy masterpieces, but they're usually entertaining.

that's what i expect and it's what i get, more often than not. even the worst MCU movies are still pretty average, and i never feel like i've wasted my money.

user...

>counting is hard

I went to see it, I liked the fights but frankly it doesn't feel like a movie I'd see twice. I also saw Men In Black and Captive State, neither were worth watching twice either (specially MIB).
I don't know, man... When people talk about "superhero fatigue" at this point, it feels more wishful thinking than anything, because there's absolutely NO good blockbusters right now, and I don't feel like watching live action remakes of Disney movies. Meanwhile, yeah, I'd see Endgame again. Hell, I'd see Captain Marvel again too, and I already went three times.

The story, the world design, everything was just regurgitation.

>We are getting movie equivalent of dlc now.

Lord almighty, where did we go wrong?

>Maybe there's something about monopolies we should talk about instead?
Ok, but first go read up on monopolies, so you understand the term and we can have an intelligent conversation. We'll probably have to take it elsewhere, too.

Avatar was a glorified 3D tech demo barely strung together by Dancing with Wolves and a coat of blue paint.

a classic example of a product nowhere near living up to the hype. Avatar was utterly forgettable, and i've never felt the slightest urge to watch it a second time.

I just want Endgame to beat Avatar so that I can drink Avatarcuck tears on Yea Forums.
They’ve been crying about muh inflashunz for weeks. Imagine their reaction when Avatar ends up being second in both gross and inflated gross categories while Endgame and Gone With The Chad naenaes over their sniveling corpses

>Avatar comes out December 2009
>Gets an extended edition re-release with 10 minutes of new footage in August 2010. This way people who might have missed seeing it in theaters in 3D or IMAX have the opportunity to see it
>Endgame comes out at the end of April
>"re-release" it just 2 months later even though it's still playing in most theaters
>Feige is hesitant to call it an extended version or say it has new footage because he doesn't want to get in trouble for false advertising. Will probably just have a photo of the cast and crew at the end of the credits.

yes these are clearly the same

Attached: 1559046475.jpg (626x625, 111K)

>In July 2010, Cameron confirmed that there would be an extended theatrical re-release of the film on August 27, 2010, exclusively in 3D theaters and IMAX 3D.[278] Avatar: Special Edition includes an additional nine minutes of footage, all of which is CG,[279] including an extension of the sex scene[280] and various other scenes that were cut from the original theatrical film.[279] This extended re-release resulted in the film's run time approaching the current IMAX platter maximum of 170 minutes, thereby leaving less time for the end credits. Cameron stated that the nine minutes of added scenes cost more than $1 million a minute to produce and finish.[4] During its 12-week re-release, Avatar: Special Edition grossed an additional $10.74 million in North America and $22.46 million overseas for a worldwide total of $33.2 million.[5]

so even if it didn't get re-released, Endgame wouldn't have passed it yet. They probably would've passed that point before the end of its run (even if they couldn't beat Avatar's total) but because they're re-releasing Endgame before it can pass Avatar's original theatrical gross ($2.755 billion) then the argument of "well it made more than Avatar did before it got re-released!" is null and void.

Attached: stage 5 - acceptance.jpg (1252x1082, 187K)

>because they're re-releasing Endgame before it can pass Avatar's original theatrical gross ($2.755 billion)
When is it releasing? Because I don't think Endgame is out of theaters yet.

Regular Endgame has like another 6 weeks in theaters. 14 week runs are pretty typical for MCU blockbusters. (which is still half of Avatar's regular release).
And they won't want to impugn on Far From Home's performance. So it will probably pass Avatar's normal release, then challenge its re-release.

next week according to Feige

>“We are doing that,” Feige said of an Endgame re-release with new footage. “I don’t know if it’s been announced. And I don’t know how much… Yeah, we’re doing it next weekend.”

so no, "regular Endgame" doesn't have another 6 weeks in theaters. It has this weekend.

oh I forgot to add, this weekend's box office is now definitely gonna be much less than it's been in the past couple of weeks since now people are just going to wait until the re-release with whatever new post-credit scene that they don't want to call a scene attached at the end next week

the funny thing is that it still won't be enough. if it was an international rerelease then maybe.

yeah they should have waited. wait until its out of theaters for a few months, knock together some extra footage or a damn blooper real and re-release it then. they're getting too hasty.

Hype. Hope my theater puts it back in so I can get free tickets.

>Thunderbird Ross is in his office and gets a call from the president
>tells him that dr. Banner is on his way and to "send him the bill"
>hulk walks into his office ala fist of the north star, destroying everything on the way.
>discusses that he and everyone is retired and happily ever after, but someone needs to continue Hawkeye's work when he was Ronin (killing yakuza, cartel, ect.) and appoints Ross.
>Banner Hulk's human but unhinged behavior sets can be seen as a foreshadow for maestro hulk
>As soon as Ross talks about his distrust in himself due to his age, he gets handed a big ol vial of banner's blood
>tells ross to assemble his on fucking team
Everything is set for a Thunderbolts movie, and a possible Maestro Hulk vs. Cosmic Ghost Rider foreshadow

You say that like it hasn't happened before. Also, if it's a Marvel movie, they most certainly would. Tons of theaters sold themselves out by playing Endgame over other scheduled showings for days on end. You think they wouldn't toss in an IWEG supercut?

I am on vocation from work next week, I will definitely go see it again.

People saw Godzilla, it isn't worth going to see a second time, hell it isn't worth seeing a first time. The human shit is god awful and it made me want to walk out of the film when the retarded as fuck mother thought radiation was going to save the planet. The movie was 80% boring bullshit, 15% decent shit and 5% actual good content. Godzilla was doomed because their isn't shit it could do to be a good movie viewing experience. They could have done a more monster fight focus movie but then it would have been shallow shit with no substance.

Attached: 5941661-mind-control.jpg (1988x2060, 1.18M)

BUTTFUCKING THE PUSSY

Smurfcucks are SEETHING

Not the user you replied to, but honestly I just want to see James Cameron get knocked off the top. Fite me.

Attached: People_are_being_mean_by_making_mashups_of_sad_Ben_Affleck_s_reaction_to_Batman_v_Superman_reviews.j (800x450, 22K)

I worked at a movie theater that marathoned all three Hobbit films when the last one came out. People absolutely would pay to watch a 5-1/2 hour cut of Infinity War/Endgame.

pls go back

Man, after reading some posts in this thread I gotta say Feige and Disney have really created the perfect shameless consumer who will watch an extended version of an already 3 hour movie they've already seen (possibly multiple times beforehand). A child's movie at that (Yes, I know where I am. Point still stands.) Slavishly attempting to get the mouse a pointless BO record with hard earned money. And what do you get in return? The exact same fucking movie with a couple deleted scenes that you're likely going to get when you buy the bluray. And the madness won't end there you're going to have to buy multiple copies of that bluray to break whatever bluray record is standing. Holy shit, how fucking weak are you guys.

Can't wait till they make a animated remake out of this, ya know after the whole extended Aladdin universe finally wraps up. Wow, what great times we're living in. People of today have such fantastic taste.

If the product's good, who are you to judge? In fact, even if you say this
>(Yes, I know where I am. Point still stands.)
it still is ridiculous for you to say because it goes to show you love to lambast people over their choices simply because you don't like it, with zero arguments to back it even. Calling it a "child's movie" derisively as if children in particular weren't one of the most obvious targets demographics, on top of that. How is it that no other "child's movie" recently has achieved these numbers, then? Because even stuff like Aladdin are throwbacks to movies most millennials relate to, not something kids can get much from.
So yeah, shove your derision up your ass and get back to Yea Forums. Your RLM-branded cynicism is pretty transparent because I bet you're bitter about your favorite franchises not being as successful, and that's the truth.

Because a child's movie doesn't need to be seen an umpteenth time in theaters and definitely not superficially to break a box office record that has more to do with inflated ticket prices than actual ticket sales. No deep kernel has been missed or needed to be savored unless you're a complete mouthbreather. But hey, parade around in your slavedom. Be as pathetic as you wish. Watch it for little more than a few after credits scenes that amount to nothing. They're banking on it.

>Because a child's movie doesn't need to be seen an umpteenth time
Tell that to the parents with kids who like Frozen.
Either way you're a fucking imbecile who doesn't belong to this board and I'm already wasting time replying to you. If you think this is all beneath you, leave.

>They're getting very desperate to beat Avatar it seems.
or they are taking advantage of merchandising

Goodness you are mad. Must be hitting home then. Hey, feel free to stop replying at any time. I'm sure you got the same 3 hour long plus movie to catch again anyway.

>yfw the post credits scene is something related to mutation or the F4

Attached: dance off bro.gif (429x343, 1.1M)

Aladdin was good. The others were shit.

Oh boy, can't wait to see another resurgence of faggots clamoring for the Snyder cut for Justice League after this...

Attached: 1436209872635.jpg (600x600, 333K)

Cringe.

>Test screenings leaked over a year ago and they were very favorable
that's what they also said on BvS and JL and we saw how those two turned out. there was also whispers that WW had bad test screenings and its considered one of the rare good ones the DCEU has

Kinda likely

Why does someone like chocolate? Or boobs? Or rollercoasters?

It makes me happy.

The 28th is my dad's birthday and we saw a lot of the MCU movies together, but he missed Endgame, so I guess I'm going again.

The invention of money.

May God grant it.

Well, except Cosmic Ghost Rider because he is utter shit.

Has anyone ever told you that you are an imbecile?

MCU thingy aside, that's pretty nice.

Where are these images from?
I need all of them.