Cartoon you where have see is not for the art styles?

What's so bad about the artstyle in this? I would say that the writing is more obnoxious.

Attached: 1486345050946.jpg (1280x1770, 496K)

what cartoons would you have really been far even as decided to use to go want to do look more like?

It don’t always be like that but it do.

>Cartoon you where have see is not for the art styles?
I rememeber the premier in heyardee man.

Attached: what am i looking at.png (256x273, 149K)

Attached: open-english.jpg (640x360, 42K)

Based retard

Cartoons you would have seen if it wasn't for the art styles?

Are you trying to make a sentence with those words, user?

Are you trying to say "Cartoons you would've seen, if not for the art style"?

>"Cartoons you would've seen, if not for the art style"?
YES.

The only people who cared about ‘Home’ was woke Black people because it featured a Black girl as the MC, and even then, DW only used that purple alien in the ads. hell, I remember a shitstorm becuase they didn’t even have the MC in the DVD cover so DW half-assed ‘shopped her in lol.

Home looks great and is hilarious

>Cartoon you where have see is not for the art styles?

Attached: 1399233874094.jpg (264x351, 30K)

>Cartoon you where have see is not ofr the art styles
D-d-did you have a stroke, OP?

Attached: chadd-generation-o-9.78.jpg (210x240, 13K)

The only thing that catch my attention was the episode that appealed to my fetish.

Attached: No age like the present.png (464x560, 533K)

>Cartoon you where have see is not for the art styles?

ダチ何?

Attached: 03WxlPQ.png (1280x960, 978K)

>Cartoon you where have see is not for the art styles?
More stroke posting!

Attached: get a load of this special extraordinary fellow.png (384x288, 178K)