Why am I so bad at art?
Why am I so bad at art?
you are not bad, it's your style. just look at picasso
Picasso made it, so can you user. Art is a layman's word, all that matters is you have fun with it.
Because you are a fucking plane.
That's why.
Picasso also knew his anatomy and can paint like a renaissance master. Apply yourselves.
You haven't practiced and studied enough.
You have to research anatomy, color theory, shit like that.
Drawing from life always helps.
yeah when he was a teenager, then he went full cubism and never again painted with realism.
>and can paint like a renaissance master.
he's fucking dead
Let me be real with you mate, it's an incremental study, you draw and draw again, and never really find a place of comfort because once you do, then you suck. It's all about experiment and learning, if you get into a cookie cutter mass production mindset, then you officially suck and are no better than a Brazilian Animation Studio, or worse, an Indian one.
Always be learning, improving, and never settle for your current status.
It's why Adolf Hitler failed to be a painter, not because he was a bad painter, but rather he decided what his final level was, and presented it as his best work. If he had just said "I'm an amateur who is learning and wants to learn more" he would've gotten into Art Academy.
It's likely a problem in your logic. For example: How would we know why you're bad at art?
Well that, and the art reviewer was Jewish, and Jews in Art are very elitist/circle jerky. If you claim to be their equal or superior, they will decredit you because "You're not part of the circle." You could literally Paint a new Sistine Chapel, and they'd discredit you because you aren't a member of the super secret dick sucking circle.
This is why you must present yourself as a journeyman, even if you have the skills of a master; for it is not the art that speaks volumes of the artist, but rather social culture, audience, and galleries that speak for them.
Which admittingly, is a flawed system, but Arts along with other Social Humanities, has always been like this since the first homosexual caveman decided to use feces to paint a big tiddy cow woman on the cave wall.
Picasso also didn't give two shits if people liked or disliked his work, yet he still did it. There's people today that draw better than Da Vinci and Michelangelo, yet can't draw a fucking anatomical skull. Art became nothing but a skill to help you understand, not a lifestyle.
...
>first homosexual caveman decided to use feces to paint a big tiddy cow woman on the cave wall
What a pioneer.
you'll NEVER think you are good at it no matter how hard you try, it's natural to be self critical
otherwise it might be lack of passion or/and practice
Especially in portrait art the concept of talent is literally nonexistant. It's all practice paired with passion/motivation, and that goes to most forms of art too. The rest is aesthetic understanding which is , aside from portrait art, subjective.
I fucking love you anons
What was Van Gogh's excuse? That fucker could never paint realistically and was hated in his time for good reason. He only became famous because society's standards dropped.
>What was Van Gogh's excuse?
he didn't have any excuse, he was completely insane
He lent an ear to someone and they never returned it.
Is that the one who ate paint cause he was depressed?
I get artists mixed up.
nah, he cut his ear and dick
As you do
>Picasso also didn't give two shits if people liked or disliked his work, yet he still did it.
Wasn't he a slick business man who was a master at selling art? I feel no one ever mentions this despite it being a big reason why he's THE abstract guy when ever someone talks about abstract art.
>suck at art
>no idea where to start in my quest to improve
It's all so daunting.
nope, I still have two ears and two penis like a normal human bean
because you believe you are bad
look at Liefeld, he's bad, but he believes otherwise, and his shit's everywhere
you are thinking of John K, Liefeld does nothing anymore.
how come there's no porn of that plane? rule 34 my ass!
>suck at art
>draw a lot
>see mini improvements here and there, most of all have fun
It's all so undaunting
At least if you always think you're bad you know there's at least room to improve.
If you think you're good then you'll be comfortable with where you are and start to stagnate.
You should always be striving to improve your work.
Just have fun fella.
I whipped this piss of shit up with a mouse.
It was fun.
Don't be mean to plane-user, he can't help that. But he should at least try to better himself, be proud of what he has accomplished so far and not think too negatively of himself.
>be me
>draw
>people tell me it's really good
>I'm happy and think I could keep improving
>one year later I go back and watch my old drawings
>they are absolute shit, holy fuck! I can't believe I made such fucking horrible shit stains.
it's more surprising that most people consider those shitty pictures as good, that's why I don't really take compliments serious anymore or just assume they are pitty complimenting