Do you consider clones as siblings or children of their genetic donor?

It all depends on how the original calls them.

Attached: 1547162559667.jpg (1280x1810, 656K)

Depends on the context of their relationship.
Similar ages and a peer-like report with one another I tend to see as siblings.
Massive Age Gap and guidance role, I tend to see as more parental.
Though sometimes clones are just clones.
Don't you mean Parker Brothers?
I'm afraid that I'll try to make up for my failures and insecurities by desperately trying to guide my child away from them despite it might not being an issue for them, with my own clone there's ZERO chance I won't do exactly that.

Attached: 2070633-asm_09.jpg (1029x565, 234K)

Conner is literally Luthor and Clark magical gay son.

Sounds like a good plot for a comic. Wonder if there's been a story like that.

What does that make Spider-Otto? His body is created with the DNA of his original body and that of Peter. Half-brother? Cousin? Son?

Doc Ock in a new clone body
Though he was almost his Uncle once.

Apparently some of Ock's original DNA plus Jackal's extra Parker material.

Clones are stupid, but a man with spider powers or a super alien that looks like a human is fine for you?

Depends on if they share memories or not.

Kon is for Cass. And Tim.

I consider them to be good soldiers.

Attached: Battle of Geonosis.jpg (1000x625, 69K)

Souless abominations

Clones are property of the people who they are clones of.

I always felt that Kon and Power Girl would make a great duo.

>They bond over their convoluted origins and being weird quasi-relatives of Superman
"You Clark's son...nephew...cousin?"
"I'm a composite clone of his and Luthor's dna."
"Oh, I think I had one of those too."

There's a half decent Black Widow fapfic involving clones here
hentai-foundry.com/stories/user/HighHeeledJill/34411/Black-Widows---Book-One---The-Clone-Crisis

WARNING: Unbirthing

Depends. For example X-23 was made by placing Wolverine's DNA into the womb of a woman who then gave birth to her, so I think it's fair to say she's his biological daughter. If it's a test tube kinda scenario then that's a lot different.

I'm not sure if she's been retconed to literally his biological daughter since I never followed up on that rumor, but originally she was his genetic sister since the whole being a female expression of his genetic sequence, but relationship wise she was more like his daughter though I think he introduced her as a sister but then later adopted her as a daughter.

>Do you consider clones as siblings or children of their genetic donor?
Children. When you have a kid you're a genetic donor to what is largely a partial clone of yourself. Why would a test tube clone be different?

Attached: Seriously, what if Superman and Luthor fucked.png (430x322, 81K)

X-23 is a special case because a) she's not, strictly speaking, a clone b) they have a defined, legal relationship

Can't expect comic book writers to have common sense. Especially not a X-men writer.

for clark and conner it's both. clark treats conner like a kid brother until something serious happens to him than the papa wolf comes out in him

>Don't you mean Parker Brothers?

Shh user, you are giving away their secret identity!

Peter still sees him the usual Doc Ock