Logan is better than all of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man Films. Prove Me wrong

Logan is better than all of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man Films. Prove Me wrong

Attached: 1530002419687.jpg (800x613, 186K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/SjKXTiv4tp8
youtube.com/watch?v=to29LvuColU
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Okay:
youtu.be/SjKXTiv4tp8

Keep trying

They cant be compared one to one. Logan is a western, while spoderman is action.

Spider-Man! This is why only chinks are paid. Because you never know when some lunatic will come along with a sadistic choice
>Let die the whore you love?
>Or suffer the little niggers? Make your choice, Spider-Man... and see how the white man is rewarded.

Attached: ww2incolor.jpg (753x407, 27K)

Apples and Oranges as hell. Not even comparable. 5/10 made me reply.

Attached: 1547936454479.png (500x500, 170K)

Maybe. Still sucks though.

The Sam Raimi Spider-Man movies aren't really that good. Like the first 2 X-men movies, they primarily benefited from the fandom's goodwill after finally getting SOMETHING from their favorite franchises. Logan IS better, but mostly because comic movies had something of a groove by that point and weren't figuring it out as they went along. It's still not that great on it's own.

youtube.com/watch?v=to29LvuColU

Completely different kind of movie. Logan isn't a superhero flick. You can replace Logan with a retired marine who's really good with knives and nothing would change.