I got some words, Cap. How about "shall not be infringed."

I got some words, Cap. How about "shall not be infringed."

Attached: file.png (389x344, 272K)

Other urls found in this thread:

edition.cnn.com/2019/06/05/australia/australia-darwin-gun-attack-intl/index.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>its a “cap watches the force awakens and last jedi back to back” episode

has freedom man forgotten freedom?

What's Cap even crying about in this panel?

I notice that conservatives never seem to quote the "Well regulated militia" part of the 2nd Amendment, wonder why?

Too much freedom is a curse

Pic very much related

Attached: 27239336-FBE7-4D10-AA2B-35754914A1B0.jpg (1125x1180, 408K)

He was raped.

An army of cyborgs shot up a mall with scary looking guns.
Because militias are made of citizens, and since militias are necessary to the security of a free state, it is therefore the right of a citizen to be able to own the arms necessary of a militia.
I know reading is hard but you'll learn.

Attached: file.png (986x780, 1.41M)

I mean, there's more the government could have done to prevent an army of cyborgs from shooting up a place than just gun control

fpbp

>Because militias are made of citizens, and since militias are necessary to the security of a free state, it is therefore the right of a citizen to be able to own the arms necessary of a militia.
Therefore, you need to be sure that the militia is in fighting shape and understands responsible gun use

I guarantee you that gun owners know more about firearms than any faggot who's ever tried to ban them.

Haha yeah I love comics & cartoons too

>understands responsible gun use
I agree. I think federal standards need to be improved, especially regarding background checks and responsible usage, and it needs to be done federally so there are no more loopholes (actual loopholes not "loopholes" like gun shows)of going to a less strict state.
This is also true, God knows it, but knowledge doesn't equal responsible use.
>complaining about a captain america comic being political

>I guarantee you that gun owners know more about firearms than any faggot who's ever tried to ban them.
Well yeah, I'm sure you know every thread of your safety blanket too

Yeah I loved the part where Cap makes a thread to discuss gun control on the wrong board.

Yeah, comics have always been political, thats why Yea Forums is the /pol/ board.

You don't, you send them to Australia.

Because gun owners never want to put up gun control laws? Bullshit. They're the ones who'd understand their importance the most. Then again you're probably brainwashed by the NRA.

Fuck's sake even free speech has more limits than guns at this point. You're full of shit.

>Fuck's sake even free speech has more limits than guns at this point
I know it's fun to exaggerate but don't be retarded

>Fuck's sake even free speech has more limits than guns at this point.
Hysterical.

We already have excessive gun grabbing laws.
All you're advocating at this point is creeping fascism.

again, you completely ignore the phrase "well regulated"

cars are well regulated, healthcare is well regulated, etc.

although really, if you go even deeper, the constitution makes it pretty clear that a standing army is unconstitutional (The Congress shall have Power To ...raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.)

so really, you already live in an unconstitutional military hegemony, so tell, me, how are those guns helping you change that? oh, that's right, they're not. ya fuckin sheep.

>you already live in an unconstitutional military hegemony
>so just let them take more of your rights

Go ahead and talk about the Holocaust, liberals, you'll know I'm right. (((They'll))) stop you.
>We already have excessive gun grabbing laws.
Yet niggers are still able to shoot each other. Clearly it's not enough. Then again that's probably what the (((NRA))) are going for, isn't it? With the guns and the abortions. You stupid bastards. How can they be slaves if they're dead?

it's like the words well regulated don't even enter your brain.

>implying that Cap’s wrong
>implying that the constitution wasn’t supposed to be updated over time, so it was left openly vague

he's right tho. free speech is under much more attack than guns ever have been.

conservative gun hysteria is about as much of a threat as the war on christmas.

>cheeserburgers being necessary for a healthy american diet, the right to bear cheese shall not be infringed.
What's being protected here and why?

Sounds like the problem is niggers, not guns.

I'll never understand how americans are so eager to make themselves defenseless.
The reason you have violent crime is inequality, same as my country.
And same as my country, the government disarming you will only be the first step for further breaches of your rights and increased violence.
If you want gun control, defend reasonable measures that won't lead to defacto disarming the populace.
Stupid fucking americans shitting on their own rights.

Because then they would have to start playing semantics games about what a well regulated (remember how that's a curse word for conservatives) militia means in practice and most people don't have the mental capacity for that.

that's the thing tho. the right in this country sees EVERY reasonable measure as a plot by the (((jews))) to take their guns.

there is no reasonable debate because it's impossible to find reasonable solutions with conspiracy theorists who just completely make shit up.

Caused by inequality, as every serious study on the subject has shown.

What do you consider a reasonable measure?

Blame the 98' AW ban

Then user. What is your country?

>Because gun owners never want to put up gun control laws?

Normal gun owners actually are mostly in favor of more regulations, it's the NRA and their lobbyist who don't want any new gun control legislation, because the NRA only cares about the money Russians and gun manufacturers give them. And who do politicians listen to in this issue? Their donors, i.e. in this case, the NRA.

In general, yet you regularly hear about gun owners being complete fucking retards with their guns, accidentally dropping them when they're loaded and the gun fires (like that FBI guy when he was dancing) or doing other dumb shit with them like showing of their gun or leaving them around for their kids to find them.

Because all you dumb fuckers do is erode gun rights, and there aren't any number of rights for you to take away where you'll finally go "Okay, that's far enough."

This is exactly what the right says about debates with libs about guns, truth is you're both wrong.

A well regulated militia in 2019 would have drones, anti-air defense and automatic weapons, your point?

Hey did you know, since Australia has cracked down with incredibly strict gun control laws, there has been literall 0 mass shootings in the entire country? And what's more, there are MORE guns in Australia since the crackdown 20 years ago than before it! Wow, it's like you can both enforce gun control, and also not impact legitimate gun owners! And that works! Incredible!

And if you get robbed or killed nobody will care.

And if a school shooting ever happen, we know it would be in the good old US of A.

>MUH HOLY CONSTITUTION
Every fucking time.

Most of those shitbags were the instigators and deserved it anyways

Zoomers are scum

>since militias are necessary to the security of a free state
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

>having this little of an argument
Yikes!

much like healthcare, I say model a new system based off of one that is proven to work. like australia or switzerland

edition.cnn.com/2019/06/05/australia/australia-darwin-gun-attack-intl/index.html

How embarrasing

>Let's compromise on gun control
>Again?
>Yes. Give up more of your rights.
>What do I get in return?
>Less rights LOL

I'm pretty sure the right just calls people stupid and screams 2nd amendment over and over.