Kek

Then why do most art websites ban it?

Cause it's underage loli porn.

I never said it was morally accepted, and if a private institute wants to ban something they find offensive that is their right.

>underage loli
That's redundant.

advertisers > law

Most places find that having it on their site has a chilling effect on their public perception.

Not true at all

Why would it illegal? CP is wrong because it harms and exploits actual children not because it's icky. If that were the case scat and other fetishes would also be a felony. I mean making drawings illegal is beyond stupid.

If anything Shad has done us illegal his site wouldn't even show up on Google, and people most likely have reported him to the FBI before.

OH GOD SOMEONE MENTIONED ME TIME TO RETWEET IT is how these people function.

Shad Man
Smash Mouth
S M
Oh shit

>Not even knowing what the post is about.
>Normies.
People young enough to don't even know who the Shreck band is should be autobanned.

I guarantee I’m the only person in my social circles who knows who he is.

It’s not, look up obscenity laws

They also ban adult porn, so

Lawmakers aren’t stupid. They know that drawings aren’t the same as exploiting actual children. But at least in the US, there’s a restriction on things that are considered obscene. Obscene art must meet theee criteria: sexually explicit, morally offensive to the majority, and lacking in serious artistic value. Simulated child porn meets those conditions, hence it’s illegality in America.

At the current time as far as I know there is no legal precedent until such a case on loli porn goes to the courts, until then it's legal.

Obscenity laws can hit almost anything, desu.

>expecting logic out of those types
If they truly believed what they preached movies and video games would be banned as well as they both project violence on a daily basis from small stuff like fights to more serious shit like rape and murder yet they're ok. If a picture of someone being murdered is ok then everything is ok.

>as far as I know there is no legal precedent
Then you know wrong. Many states even have explicit laws against it.
No not really.

he draws big black men fucking underage guys so it evens out.

I wish Anime and loli to get banned.

States =/= federal

Attached: DC9Gd61UQAAZzLI.jpg (979x1200, 281K)

Attached: IMG_20190518_093556.jpg (112x112, 2K)

The federal government has upheld it's legal, states are a varied nature so if Shad is in a state where it isn't banned he's in the green.

tfw a large chunk of his Instagram fanbase doesn't really know about Shads past and only find out through either his website or someone explaining it to them
Seriously. I've explained to multiple friends that used to love his parody art and they had NO idea. He's pretty good at hiding it on certain platforms.

how has he not been deported yet?

I just want to add that there is usually a certain artistic standard to what is considered simulated child porn. Nobody is going to arrest you for having anime-styled loli porn on your computer because it barely looks like a real human. Same thing for cartoony stuff like Loud House porn or Gravity Falls, whatever.

Cops aren't going to see you lewding a bean-faced character and say he's a danger to society. But you know, something more in the style of Loomis? Yeah, maybe.

>why don't we kill people that draw things I dislike? RightThinkers like me will not tolerate that nazism.

Right-wing edgelords are paedos, confirmed

news.avclub.com/man-faces-10-years-in-prison-for-downloading-simpsons-p-1798222065