When will Disney make a movie starring LGBT protagonists?

When will Disney make a movie starring LGBT protagonists?

Attached: 1EF7FCD9-2A4D-4ECB-9965-221CC5F8272F.jpg (900x675, 48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bwyL7v3Yths
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

2013

November of this year

Correct and based

You can expect the L but getting the G will be a nightmare. Gay men are the least represented minority in any medium. They're just not as marketable. Why use gay men when you can use gay women to get the same accolades but make twice as much money?

Probably never. Disney does business all over the world and care a lot about their image. They wouldn’t want to show an LGBT character in a country where being gay can get you in jail, and will get you literally executed.

Fujoshit is bigger than yuri.

Never. Being gay will be seen as evil again in usa soon.

five minutes before a thousand autists go berserk because they were portrayed in a problematic manner.

It wouldn’t be right for Disney to promote mental illness as a positive.

Never. Including faggots in anything means no money from China because China is based and does not include Faggot shit in films.

>Faggotry is a mental illness
I never seen an explanation as to why that is other than "ewww its unnatural", its not degenerate like furries or the guys from Deviantart

They will never make Elsa lesbian though because Koreans and Japs are the biggest market for her and they will wipe her from all known internet history at the slightest hint.

Most furries and Deviantartists ARE gay though.

> its not degenerate like furries or the guys from Deviantart
I mean AIDs proves that it is degenerate and the fact that the gay community has individuals in it that spread AIDs to each other and there is Anal prolapse which seems to be indicators that the mentally illness in prominent in that community.

>It's Current Year...Why There An LGBTQXFMRSTD Disney Movie Yet?
>Hey Disney, Give [Prince] A Boyfriend!
But then...
>The Very Problematic New Gay Disney Movie
>Disney Finally Has A Queer Lead....And Why That's A Bad Thing!
It's all so tiresome.

GEE, WHY IS THE THING THAT UNDERMINES THE WHOLE POINT OF EVOLUTION CONSIDERED A MENTAL ILLNESS
t. dick chick loving gay

Korea doesn't matter much and I don't think it would totally kill Japan
Now China, that's the market they wouldn't fuck with

when all boomers finally die

I got some bad news for you, buddy.

Attached: 30.jpg (633x640, 51K)

What's wrong with Aids? I like having assistants, they make work easier
The human population continuously grows despite 4.5% of the population being gay, if anything, being gay is a better solution to overpopulation than running over people with a car

If that's what it takes to finally end all this constant homo shit, then just do it and get it over with.

> being gay is a better solution to overpopulation than running over people with a car
Not really. Killing gay men is way better for the environment then letting them live. Faggot corpses can be used to make fertilizer because dead bodies make plants grow. With gay men dead then it makes more room straight people. Gays were put on this earth to die for straight people.That solves overpopulation.

> What's wrong with Aids?
No retard. HIV and AIDs is a faggot disease.

Disney sell to the Chinese market

China will censor the fuck out of that Including the middle east and Russia

When China is cool with it.

When China un-clenches.

Pretty sure trannies beat out gay men for least rep.

>The human population continuously grows despite 4.5% of the population being gay, if anything, being gay is a better solution to overpopulation than running over people with a car
THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT NOT A MENTAL ILLNESS

Attached: goal posts.jpg (1920x516, 768K)

I remember people bitching about The Princess and the Frog because the prince wasn't a dark enough shade of black.

>Gays were put on this earth to die for straight people.That solves overpopulation.
Gays are only a minority, kill all of them and you only take out a few million people. If you really want to solve overpopulation, then you should genocide both China and India since they're the majority and killing all of them results in the deaths of 2-3 billion people

>The king knew his son was gay so he forced to marry Cinderella to at least have someone inherit the kingdom
>The faggot marries Cinderella to please his dad but short after he goes away for "important matters of state" with a lot of his stuff, even a fuckin' chair without impregnate cinderella

>It's beggining to look a lot like /pol/bait
>Every fucking post
>Take a look at the bait around, you posted it once again
>You should fuck off at most

>Aids is a faggots disease
So I assume you work alone and do everything yourself? I respect that

If they keep the incest undertones Japs will love it, if anything it's more of a China problem.

>Implying they're not the biggest yurifags on the planet

so long as they care about China money, never

I am so beyond tired of SJWs ruining fairytales that are supposed to be family friendly.
They are truly depraved and disgusting people.

From a medical standpoint there is nothing different about HIV from any other STD. Straight sex can still transfer it from person to person, gays just got unlucky.

why do you want them to be Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transexual all in the same character?

Disney ruined fairy tales by sanitizing them first.

Soon enough, sadly.

> then you should genocide both China and India
That would risk fucking up the economy. Killing millions of faggots is enough because we can use the corpses to grow plants which would support more people.

Attached: Captain_EO_poster.jpg (250x381, 21K)

HIV's blood-borne transmission makes anal sex a more potent vector due to tearing. Female-to-male HIV transmission is the least likely way to transmit.
Gays are unlucky alright, but it's hardly 'like all the other STDs', like HPV for example

IS THIS THE ONE WHERE ERIC GETS CANCER AT THE END

IT IS! IT IS YOU BASTARD, YOU THOUGHT NOBODY WOULD KNOW
youtube.com/watch?v=bwyL7v3Yths

This

When they decide they want to make less money.

According to them, they have - the non-gay portrayal in Beauty in the Beast, the Russo "volunteering" to be the Token 'Mo in Avengers 5.5 - Thanos Get Fucked, and now that they've absorbed Fox, AND have agreed to continue in the same continuity, Deadpool, not just for Negasonic Teenage Warhead but the likely implication that DP himself in pansexual.

Of course, this is bullshit, the only one of those films that has this in an unequivocal (requiring censorship for China, Russia and certain bumfucked areas in the Deep South and elsewhere) fashion is last year's DP sequel - and given that they could easily write it out for the Disney released (irrespective of it being R rated), it is currently a meaningless claim.

>starring
Not for a decade or longer, at best.

Not in your wildest wet dreams

Beautiful

I hope never because I love it how the only good gay couple is in South Park which is hated by SJWs

>Censorship is based now.

Glad you're finally showing your true colors user.

Forgot how easy it is to lose braincells here on 4channel.org

Attached: ad6addc6-6e4b-4655-90d4-8a625c82fd17.png (750x613, 299K)

Gay men where everywhere in media a decade ago, only recently was there a shift to lesbians. What happened?

Disney has been hard pushing homosex in their media for years.
Recently they've been basically going hard on the single masculine don't need no man misandrist twat who can do anything thing.

And if you discount the fake popularity of frozen it's bombing across the board. But the lie that that kind of woman is awesome and great and everyone likes her except mean old strawmen and gamer gate trolls has been pushed hard as fuck.

Hopefully never if Disney has any good business sense. Not accounting for certain places in the rest of the world, where being gay is either looked down upon at best, can get your jailed or executed at worst, only about 5% of the US identifies as LGBT. Why would a multi-billion/trillion dollar company spend many many millions of dollars to pander to 5% of the US alone expecting to make more back? You got problems if you think tokenism disguised as "Representation" would make much money at all.