>character created with the purpose of showing how ridiculous and crazy characters that follow black and white moral are
>readers champion him as some golden bastion of morality
What went wrong?
>character created with the purpose of showing how ridiculous and crazy characters that follow black and white moral are
>readers champion him as some golden bastion of morality
What went wrong?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
dictionary.cambridge.org
merriam-webster.com
merriam-webster.com
en.oxforddictionaries.com
law.cornell.edu
twitter.com
People are stupid.
People look up to characters like that, the kind that don’t stop, those who don’t really give up
The problem with filling a story with hyperbolic strawmen and then setting those strawmen against each other is readers will tend to side with whoever's least wrong simply by virtue of hating the rest.
If you don't want to promote stupid bullshit, write at least one character that isn't stupid fucking bullshit.
The answer is Watchmen wasn't actually good and there's a reason the guy who wrote it regrets it.
Fuck off contrariantard
readers need to save hex
>there's a reason the guy who wrote it regrets it.
he doesn't, tho
hi
Being fair the actual plot of Watchmen can be covered effectively in like three issues. it's bloated as fuck for what it is.