Why do all Batman properties have to ape Nolan?
Why do all Batman properties have to ape Nolan?
Carter Green
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Ayden Green
last popular live action Batman
Easton Campbell
>Why do all Batman properties have to RAPE Nolan?
FTFY
Anthony Bailey
Hot desu
Liam James
Same reason everyone tries to one-up Miller in the comics. It's popular, and popular media tend to set trends for what comes after.
Jaxson Reyes
The basic holywood formula:
-Look at what made a lot of money recently
-Copy it shamelessly
Colton Green
(((Jewwood))) in a nutshell
Eli Gray
any business
this really shows how stupid and incompetent Yea Forums is
>someones trying to do something that's profitable? its a conspiracy!
Christian Diaz
the bigger problem is that abysmal production values and the very little money CW has to spend on things so they all end up looking cheap cheesy and bad
Hudson Richardson
People actually liked Nolanverse Batman.
Jaxon Bennett
>Meet being with literally limitless power so long as he is sufficiently angry
>Learn the only thing in life he has left to care for is his daughter
>Kidnap his daughter
What the FUCK did spider-kun think would happen
Nicholas Campbell
Because live action Batman was ruined for the general population until Nolan came in with Batman Begins. Batman was once again cool thanks to him, whether you like the movies or not.
Ryan Wilson
even then that's a pretty mediocre film lets be honest
>awful dialogue
>Nolan is an elitist so he has to change Mark of Zorro to the fucking Opera
>silly truncated origin, hanging out with crooks in Asia and then trained by Ra's lolno
>only 5 minutes spent on Gotham crime
>depowering Ra's al Ghul
>lame villain plan
>Rachel Dawes and Katie Holmes
Jonathan Bell
Because they had a huge cultural impact. Like it or not, they're still considered peak superhero movies, and The Dark Knight is considered a pretty great film in its own merit even if you're not into capeshit. A lot of people like his vision of Batman, so it's normal to go for something similar to try to lure the same people into watching your stuff.
Brandon Wilson
>is considered a pretty great film in its own merit even if you're not into capeshit
By idiots. Only capeshitters pretend it's a great film to quiet their insecurities about liking capeshit.
Joseph Wright
en.wikipedia.org
Cope harder faggot
Jackson Edwards
>awards
Oh wow, you really convinced me this mediocre at best flick is some masterpiece.
Jaxson Morris
For Dark Knight? Because it was the Fight Club of capefilms.
>entry level philosophizing
>neat fighting
>charismatic antagonist
>tight script
Carter Gutierrez
>neat fighting
Nigger, fight scenes in Nolan's movies are absolutely awful.
Isaiah White
>Fight Club of capefilms
Yeah, both are overrated entry-level shit idiots think are the best films ever. Hit the nail on the head.
Juan King
>entry level philosophizing
For dummies. The movie literally had The Joker call himself an Agent of Chaos and split out his relationship with Batman instead of play with it in an inteligent or visual way, like 89' Batman did (Nicholson Joker or Hamill Joker don't call themselfs Agent of Chaos, they just do it and the creatives behind it show us them doing wacky chaotic stuff to proof it).
>near fighting
Which fight scenes? Seriously. The Joker Vs Batman one? Batman Vs Copycats? Are you serious? Anyone can film that. Burton did it, Schumacher did it, Snyder did it. The 60's Batman did it too.
>charistmatic antagonist.
You mean Anarky dressed as The Joker? Or basically Alex from "Clockwork Orange" meets Batman Universe? Sure thing bro.
>tight script
Again, the script explained everything to the viewer to make them feel inteligent, but it never plays with visual stuff (It's not like were talking about a VISUAL media called a MOVIE that SHOWS stuff instead of EXPLAINING it).
The only reason TDK is not having shit thrown into it it's because of Ledger acting and because he literally died before the premiere, so if anyone dares to criticise the movie for what it is, he or she gets mocked or insulted because of that.
Juan Anderson
Don't get me wrong, I agree the Joker is generic in that movue but
>Anarky
Modern versions of Anarky, maybe. Real Anarky is more complex than that Joker.
Cameron Carter
Exactly m8. If Nolan had the balls to play with him instead of The Joker (In a comercial sense it makes sense: Joker sells more than Anarky), Anarky (or even Real Anarky, as you say), would've become as popular as The Riddler or Catwoman.
Instead, he chose to transform The Joker into another character, who is literally a downgraded version of Anarky (Some people compare him to The Riddler, but Anarky it's a more accurate comparation to me).
Dominic Phillips
Begins is arguably better than TDK. You simultaneously know nothing about Batman AND filmmaking if you think it's bad.
The only shitty film in that trilogy is rises.
Jacob Sullivan
Definitely the same angry faggot
Isaac Jones
>awful dialogue
That's consistent throughout the entire trilogy.
Nathan Thomas
>had the balls
You seem to think budgets wouldn't have been significantly different. Studios make those decisions kid. Grow up.
Kayden Jenkins
>entry-level shit
Oh look at this turbofaggot with no proper arguments.
Jace Nelson
Cry harder, faggot.
Anthony Ramirez
Thanks to Bale's delivery too. You know what I'm talking about here.
>WHERE ARE THE OTHER DRUGS GOING?!
>WHERE ARE THEY?!
>WHERE IS THE TRIGGER?!!
Sebastian Peterson
I already know, you imbecile: In the same comment I say that Joker sells more than Anarky, so it's logical to asume that both a Director or the Studios would decline more in Joker than Anarky, since the clown means more money for both.
Liam Butler
Nah, you just have shit taste.
Jackson Jenkins
Do all comic properties habe to be turned into anti white male feminist propaganda by liberals?
Ryan Reed
Hubris is a hell of a drug
Carter Parker
>Why DON'T all Batman properties have batman RAPED in prison?
FTFY